Support NeoGAF

[ReBurn]

This is great. Very realistic.

 

[jason10mm]

I came across this (accidentally )

JFC, so much would!!!!

Easy BILLION at the Box Office, make it happen WB!

 

[Dr. Suchong]

I came across this (accidentally )

Hot as fuck...

 

[TheInfamousKira]

How much have I had to drink in this scenario???

Where do I stick my dick?

"Yes,"

 

[TronNerd82]

What have I brought upon this cursed realm?

 

[E-Cat]

I saw a headline that said faked voice recordings of politicians was a series risk to democracy, in a couple of years time there will be entirely undetectable audio and video of anyone saying and doing anything that someone wants to create for any reason.

I don't see how this won't be used nefariously by some at some point, if not already.

Think your conclusion through. By the time it gets so good that no one can tell the difference, no clip can be considered "reliable" by definition. In other words, no one will in principle be able to say or do anything on audio/video that will be incriminating.

 

[Mr Reasonable]

Think your conclusion through. By the time it gets so good that no one can tell the difference, no clip can be considered "reliable" by definition. In other words, no one will in principle be able to say or do anything on audio/video that will be incriminating.

Tbh, it's already that good.

 

[Jayjayhd34]

Think your conclusion through. By the time it gets so good that no one can tell the difference, no clip can be considered "reliable" by definition. In other words, no one will in principle be able to say or do anything on audio/video that will be incriminating.

I don't agree if we can create tech like this then they will create tech so we know what's real not real.

It could liturally start wars tech like this it's too dangerous

Its actually been covered in ncis la and this show called capture on bbc one and few more shows that can't remember the name of it they really show implications such tech.

 

[violence]

What have I brought upon this cursed realm?

Who say's you need to be ashamed of being short. Look at this sex symbol!

 

[E-Cat]

Tbh, it's already that good.

I would say we're entering the transition period now, which is the most dangerous time since it's a kind of gray area.

I don't agree if we can create tech like this then they will create tech so we know what's real not real.

So, then the tech will be the arbiter of truth? That opens up a whole other can of worms.

 

[Mr Reasonable]

I would say we're entering the transition period now,

This subject gained attention recently after Tom Hanks recently had to defend himself when a dental company used an AI-generated voice and image of him without his permission. Our survey results revealed that fewer than 2% of respondents were able to successfully identify the “real” voices in our experiment, with 98% being fooled by an AI-generated voice.

Can you tell the difference between real voice & fake one? | Ringover

Our survey of over 1,000 Americans reveals just how easily people could be scammed or have their security compromised by AI voice apps.

www.ringover.com

 

[E-Cat]

Can you tell the difference between real voice & fake one? | Ringover

Our survey of over 1,000 Americans reveals just how easily people could be scammed or have their security compromised by AI voice apps.

www.ringover.com

Voice is getting there, video not so much. But I expect extremely rapid advances there over the next couple of years.

Edit: This appears to be a frame from the video cited:



It looks instantly fake to me, even without motion. But I suspect I'm less susceptible than the average person.

 

[Hawking Radiation]

Where do I stick my dick?

 

[UnravelKatharsis]

Just waiting for my AI generated Paula Dean x Martha Stewart pictorial.

 

[TheInfamousKira]

I distinctly see a pair of knockers with a box beneath it.

Goodenoughforme/10