Already Torn
Banned
Because of the "DC movie" part?Internet person says bad thing about DC movie. Must be true then.
Because of the "DC movie" part?Internet person says bad thing about DC movie. Must be true then.
This movie has a different management team and is 80% Snyder free. This one should not suffer the same editing problems as the last 2, at the very least. And buzz has been good for the last months and by people with a face, so excuse me if I don't believe anonymous tipper #38234. There isn't even a final cut for the moment or anything resembling it.Because of the "DC movie" part?
Yeah no. I've watched Schmoes for a few years, Sasha genuinely wants this to be a great film and she'd be crushed if it was poor. A trusted friend/source saw it and told her it was bad. She has no logical reason to lie about this. Of course this is all hinging on the insiders movie tastes so it doesn't really matter. Sasha like Tom Dagnino before her are legit..
Of course Sasha has said that Cumberbatch is a complete dick from her encounters with him and I choose not to believe it.
Its amazing how these topics always show up on GAF. Like people always go out of their way to look for these things to feed their confirmation bias.
Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be true. I hope its not though. Don't know why many of you seem happy by this news.
Same here. Will give this movie a chance and form my own opinion regardless of reviews.I don't want to believe this. Really want Wonder Woman to do well.
It sounds like they're full of shit
Same here. Will give this movie a chance and form my own opinion regardless of reviews.
That would be a disaster. BvS was bad but Suicide Squad was bad on a whole other level.
Ben Affleck will never stop looking oddly overweight in that costume to me.
Idk, both are terrible terrible films but BvS is unwatchable, I will never finish that movie, ever.
I mean really, all we can do is wait and see what the reviews say when the movie actually comes out. You never really know what sort of edit these leakers watched, or how much of it they saw, etc.
Ben Affleck will never stop looking oddly overweight in that costume to me.
Whatever the heck Superman or Wonder Woman's suits are made of.Does DC universe have a metal that is the equivalent to vibranium?
Ben Affleck will never stop looking oddly overweight in that costume to me.
Ant man, iron man 2, age of ultron, and both thors were trash to super average movies. Man of Steel is better then those but for some reason critics prefer the marvel shtick and tone.I think Man of Steel got around 55% so it has to be higher than that.
For reference Thor 2 is 66% which is the lowest MCU film.
Internet person says bad thing about DC movie. Must be true then.
The Dark Knight Rises got higher than all of those. So it's definitely just Marvel bias.Ant man, iron man 2, age of ultron, and both thors were trash to super average movies. Man of Steel is better then those but for some reason critics prefer the marvel shtick and tone.
This movie has a different management team and is 80% Snyder free. This one should not suffer the same editing problems as the last 2, at the very least. And buzz has been good for the last months and by people with a face, so excuse me if I don't believe anonymous tipper #38234. There isn't even a final cut for the moment or anything resembling it.
Ant man, iron man 2, age of ultron, and both thors were trash to super average movies. Man of Steel is better then those but for some reason critics prefer the marvel shtick and tone.
I agree. I think BvS and Suicide Squad have issues that are unique to each film. It's difficult to understand a 'more of the same' argument other than just assuming that a viewer thought the film was bad. And this is someone else's opinion of course. Some people loved Suicide Squad whereas I thought it was a lot worse than even BvS.Their track record with their film universe isn't exactly stellar.
That doesn't mean we should automatically believe insider opinions, because saying "-DC film- is a disjointed mess" is probably the most broad assumption you could make about them.
Ant man, iron man 2, age of ultron, and both thors were trash to super average movies. Man of Steel is better then those but for some reason critics prefer the marvel shtick and tone.
and not the great movie the trailers have led fans to believe it might be.
Ant man, iron man 2, age of ultron, and both thors were trash to super average movies. Man of Steel is better then those but for some reason critics prefer the marvel shtick and tone.
Why do people continue to give Zack Snyder money?
Because he returns $20 for every $1 they give.
Quality and aclaim don't matter. Returns do. It ain't Marvel, but what else prints money like that.
I don't know about that. Maybe more like $3-$5 for every $1 they give.Because he returns $20 for every $1 they give.
Quality and aclaim don't matter. Returns do. It ain't Marvel, but what else prints money like that.
Because he returns $20 for every $1 they give.
Quality and aclaim don't matter. Returns do. It ain't Marvel, but what else prints money like that.
What makes Patty Jenkins a "mediocre director"? The one previous film she made was widely acclaimed and won major awards.that would mean that the mixture of a studio who completely botched the previous three films, an idiot producer, a mediocre director, bad writers and a terrible lead actress would result in a mess of a movie.
Because he returns $20 for every $1 they give.
Quality and aclaim don't matter. Returns do. It ain't Marvel, but what else prints money like that.
Jesus he's not Kevin Feige.
This movie has a different management team and is 80% Snyder free. This one should not suffer the same editing problems as the last 2, at the very least. And buzz has been good for the last months and by people with a face, so excuse me if I don't believe anonymous tipper #38234. There isn't even a final cut for the moment or anything resembling it.
Because he returns $20 for every $1 they give.
Quality and aclaim don't matter. Returns do. It ain't Marvel, but what else prints money like that.
Ant man, iron man 2, age of ultron, and both thors were trash to super average movies. Man of Steel is better then those but for some reason critics prefer the marvel shtick and tone.
Ant man, iron man 2, age of ultron, and both thors were trash to super average movies. Man of Steel is better then those but for some reason critics prefer the marvel shtick and tone.
Because he returns $20 for every $1 they give.
Quality and aclaim don't matter. Returns do. It ain't Marvel, but what else prints money like that.
What makes Patty Jenkins a "mediocre director"? The one previous film she made was widely acclaimed and won major awards.