I think what's impressive about the technique is having such significant manipulation to an egg cell lead to a healthy child, which has been a significant concern with procedures similar to this - ie, clone deterioration (although those issues have also largely been solved by improving technology).This really isn't such a special technique. It's basically a child from 2 parents, but in the cell of another. Yes, there's mitochondrial DNA there, but that's not part of the cell nucleus. This technique can't be used to give brown eyes to a child of 2 blue-eyed parents.
This really isn't such a special technique. It's basically a child from 2 parents, but in the cell of another. Yes, there's mitochondrial DNA there, but that's not part of the cell nucleus. This technique can't be used to give brown eyes to a child of 2 blue-eyed parents.
How much would this cost?yep, and once we really get going (when CRISPR techniques are close to 100% accurate) we should consider banning "natural" babies IMO. no one's health should be risked, every possible genetic disease should be edited out, and at least some positive traits should be edited in.
How much would this cost?
Not trying to be a smart ass or anything, but using science to have another women's mitochondrial DNA is more acceptable?
I mean couldnt you have just adopted.
I wonder if gay parents will ever get the possibility to get a child that consists out of their DNA.
No, its actually overIt begins.
Not trying to be a smart ass or anything, but using science to have another women's mitochondrial DNA is more acceptable?
So could this be used to let gay couples have children where both parents genes are present?
Yeah I do. Your free to spend your money however you want but if for example you've been trying to have children many many times and it doesn't work out, and you ask me or post about it on a forum if ask the question, why not adopt
I'm not saying your a bad person if you dont