cubanb said:if i saw him playing with dolls, id replace them with some Gi joes.
DSN2K said:my little bro has a handbag,
carrys his cars in it! so amusing.
Cyan said:Feminist propaganda. Prove it.
Loki said:Gotta agree with Cyan on this one; there is a substantial body of literature showing that the tendency to play with certain types of toys, or to engage in certain types of play, is pretty much innate. The studies were done with families who didn't object to allowing their children to play with anything they wanted to, action figure or doll, or in any way they wanted to, cooperatively or as a competition, aggressively or passively; they found that, even in the absence of the socializing forces that are usually believed to nudge a child towards this-or-that behavior, young boys were more likely to play with traditionally "male" toys, and vice-versa for females. This also extended to the type of play they engaged in with their peers, both its nature (cooperative/competitive) and level of "rowdiness". The results were statistically significant, and several such studies have been published in peer-reviewed journals. So to say that those seeming predispositions are all attributable to patterns of socialization and acculturation is a bit wrong. Certainly, in the typical development of a child, socialization plays a huge role-- but apparently there's something biological/innate about certain aspects of male/female recreation and socializing, be it genetic or hormonal or what have you.
Cimarron said:How ever if destro is going over to barbies house for tea and crumpets.... its time for a slap on the back of the head.
Teh Hamburglar said:So, would you let your kid play with dolls and "girly" things if they wanted? I know no parent wants their kid to have gender confusion but where does letting kid develop naturally end and a parent trying to shape who their kid is?
More interesting stuff...Loki said:Gotta agree with Cyan on this one; there is a substantial body of literature showing that the tendency to play with certain types of toys, or to engage in certain types of play, is pretty much innate. The studies were done with families who didn't object to allowing their children to play with anything they wanted to, action figure or doll, or in any way they wanted to, cooperatively or as a competition, aggressively or passively; they found that, even in the absence of the socializing forces that are usually believed to nudge a child towards this-or-that behavior, young boys were more likely to play with traditionally "male" toys, and vice-versa for females. This also extended to the type of play they engaged in with their peers, both its nature (cooperative/competitive) and level of "rowdiness". The results were statistically significant, and several such studies have been published in peer-reviewed journals. So to say that those seeming predispositions are all attributable to patterns of socialization and acculturation is a bit wrong. Certainly, in the typical development of a child, socialization plays a huge role-- but apparently there's something biological/innate about certain aspects of male/female recreation and socializing, be it genetic or hormonal or what have you.
*shakes head in disgust* It was all for naught!And besides, I'm a bit confused by the idea that playing with Barbie is considered gay, but the panty-wearing S&M freak He-man (and his friend "Ram-man") aren't
Jill Sandwich said:I'd let my son play with dolls AND wear princess outfits from the Disney store