MightyHedgehog said:Hmmm...red x action... Got a link?
eso76 said:I don't know, they look very early, there's a mix of good and "meh" in these pics, but i trust the developers; wreckless still is one of the most impressive-looking titles on xbox.
At this point the fate of this sequel seems uncertain...i thought the first did well saleswise, didn't it ? wasn't it one of activision best / fastest selling titles back then ?
dai said:
hmm, so maybe these were wreckless 2 shots, after all.
I'm not so sure they are. These shots are from the february 2004 GDC presentation of the developer, where he was documenting some of his stuff with these images. If you browse the whole ppt file the other shots look a lot like something from Wreckless 1.eso76 said:they definately are, nice find
Actually that's depth-of-fieldThe Bookerman said:the only thing that this game does is abuse of motion blur.
PhatSaqs said:whats up with the octagonal wheel wells :lol
You and I both, man.dark10x said:I'd love to see a new GTA title built around their graphics engine...
ok. Please tell me why no free-roam mode? not even with a cheat code! :\Spazbiohaz said:I worked on the first one.
Vark said:My Pudding Cup! They will pay!
Project Midway said:ok. Please tell me why no free-roam mode? not even with a cheat code! :\
shpankey said:what exactly did you work on?
Spazbiohaz said:QA and Balancing. I also made sure we met Microsoft's standards.
bitwise said:Did you do any programming
Lazy8s said:The Wreckless team contended with the problem of untranslated hardware documentation which early titles for systems can face, though from the opposite perspective of needing it translated out of English, the native language in this case.
:lol I read it twice and still was thinking "wtf?"DarienA said:^^^ = I try so hard to carry the appearance of a superior intellect.