Plasticine
Member
My new book, Extreme Haunt, comes out September 1st. The Kindle version is already available for pre-order. The physical edition should be available that week as well.
My new book, Extreme Haunt, comes out September 1st. The Kindle version is already available for pre-order. The physical edition should be available that week as well.
However, I do bring good news. Since my freakout, I've basically given myself the okay to write a shitty book, and that's apparently been what i needed to do. I gave myself permission to fail when I wrote my first novel, and knowing that that's an okay option really helped.
Yeah. It's back to being fun. I had a few specific things I was stressing about and kinda woke up one day and went, "Why bother writing them? They're stupid subplots anyways. I'll just cut em later." and yeah. Much better.Hooray! My advice wins again! haha but at the very least I hope writing a shitty book is more fun than you were having before. Your post makes it sound like you're a lot happier with it too. I recently had a similar experience with a short story, so know that this happens and you are doing what every good writer is supposed to. Also I wouldn't worry too much about writing rants. I once got drunk and wrote a long post about how I grew as a person.
No longer than a page, that's for sure.
Don't rush. I did that with my second book and I came to a point where I feel that the whole thing needs rewriting rather than editing.
It varies by person. Some people can rush and still come out with solid material. Some people rush and then feel like the end result just isn't salvageable, even if it has some strong points.
I'm still debating whether the story I finished for last year's NaNo is worth trying to salvage or not. I recently fixed a worldbuilding hole that had been bothering me, which makes me kind of want to go back to it... but I think a lot of the actual prose would have to be redone. I dunno. Maybe I'll report back in a few months.
I guess I'll try powering through the first chapter and if there's nothing of value in that I'll try again at a slower pace.
Prose is probably my biggest problem as well, especially since I'm writing in first person with a young protagonist.
Single is what I went with. When it comes to the "two page summaries" and the like, that gets iffy. I've seen some places specify "two pages double spaced" but most don't, and I figure it's fine to go with single-spaced pages for that. But I also have two different plot summaries written up just in case. Some people want a short one, others are cool with longer.I forgot to ask this, but is that no longer than a page single spaced or double spaced? Agent query says single spaced, but I want to be sure?
I'll let you know in five days I'm in the same boat right now. My gut says what I've done is salvageable, but I won't know until I look at it from the beginning.Shokifer said:I've been wondering recently if finishing the first draft is all that matters initially. But I'm worried that if I rush it too much i'll have to change so many things that I may as well not have bothered writing it. Is this likely to happen?
Arguably it's worth getting through the first draft quickly just so that the skeleton of the story is there. Maybe you have to fix the spine later, and maybe you have to reshape the muscle and flesh over the bone, but just having it there to look at and fiddle with is something.
Some people make up the actual skeleton first, and then start filling it in. Have an opening in mind, then an ending, maybe a climax, and a link between the opening and the climax, like keyframes in cel-shaded animation.
I am occasionally in a place where I read work by new writers. Sometimes this is at cons or conferences. Sometimes it’s in the sample of work that’s free online or a fragment from a self-published work. Sometimes I just roll over in my bed and there it is, a manuscript by a new writer, haunting me like a vengeful incubus.
I would very much like to yell at you.
GOING ON TOOOOOOO LOOOOOOOOOONG
Whatever it is you’re writing, it’s too long. Cut it by a third or more. Do it now. I don’t care if you think you should do it, just do it. Try it. You can go back to it if you don’t like it. Consider it an intellectual challenge — can you utterly obliterate 33% of your story? Can you do it mercilessly and yet still tell the story you want to tell? I bet you jolly well fucking can.
...
LET THEM TALK AND THEN SHUT THEM UP
You need to let your characters talk.
Dialogue is grease that slicks the wheels of your story.
And eventually it gets tiresome. You love the characters and you think they should be allowed to go on and on all day long because you think they’re just aces. They’re not. Shut them up. Keep the dialogue trim and vital. Concise and powerful. Let them have their say in the way they need to say it — in the way that best exemplifies who those characters are and what they want — and then close their mouths. Move onto the next thing. Let’s hear from someone else or something else.
I DON’T KNOW WHO YOUR CHARACTERS ARE OR WHAT THEY WANT
Each character needs to be a shining beam — each distinct from the next. Bright and demonstrative of its own color. Not archetypes, not stereotypes, but complex and easily distinguished people. And I want a reason to care about them. Right out of the gate, I want this. I need to know what they want, why they want it, and what they’re willing to do to get it. I need, in very short terms, their quest. Whether desired or a burden, I gotta know why they’re here on the page in front of me. That’s not true only of the protagonist, but of all the characters.
Who are they?
If you can’t tell me quickly, they become noise instead of operating as signal.
Chuck Wendig has a really great post addressing a lot of the issues that new/aspiring writers often deal with (pros, too). I found a lot of value in his advice, and I think everyone here will probably find at least one useful bit along the way.
And a few of the more salient snippets:
Very much worth reading: http://terribleminds.com/ramble/2015/08/26/i-smell-your-rookie-moves-new-writers/
Chuck Wendig has a really great post addressing a lot of the issues that new/aspiring writers often deal with (pros, too). I found a lot of value in his advice, and I think everyone here will probably find at least one useful bit along the way.
And a few of the more salient snippets:
Very much worth reading: http://terribleminds.com/ramble/2015/08/26/i-smell-your-rookie-moves-new-writers/
So, I can buy a copy of my book for $1.57 and received $2.18 in royalties on the sale. This seems, uhh...
Great advice, all of which I received from my tremendous writing group while working on Ahvarra. Went from 189k words to ~125k. So yeah, just about 1/3 got whacked. And it's a way better story. Crisper.
Really common advice (though usually it's "cut ten percent!!!!"), but not everyone writes the same way. Some of us write short and may actually need to add stuff to a first draft.
If I would always (or ever) follow that advise there's nothing left. Or so I feel. But it's one of those things that scare me in a sense that I feel I might be doing something wrong. It doesn't actively bother me, because I don't have an editor, beta readers or what have you. On the other hand it's probably a sign I should at least get someone with rudimentary experience look over some of my stuff at some point. Writing isolated from the rest of the world can be tough.Really common advice (though usually it's "cut ten percent!!!!"), but not everyone writes the same way. Some of us write short and may actually need to add stuff to a first draft.
That's what I do as well. With the current project, I kinda stayed away from that style of writing and that's probably why the experience was miserable for a little bit there. I stressed out too much about "is this really important, what i'm writing right now?" instead of just writing.I used to be this way, but I found myself spending too much time fretting about what was worth writing in there, and what wasn't. So, I just started writing everything, and, with a bit of distance, found it easier, and somewhat cathartic, to start carving away the fat on my subsequent drafts.
I used to be this way, but I found myself spending too much time fretting about what was worth writing in there, and what wasn't. So, I just started writing everything, and, with a bit of distance, found it easier, and somewhat cathartic, to start carving away the fat on my subsequent drafts.
This is exactly what I needed to read right now. I'm an extremely novice writer (my first attempt was NaNo last year, which I failed miserably) but I'm slowly working at it. I think at this point I'm really just learning how to even write a story in the first place. I've got a couple short stories I'm working on and while they're still within about 1,000-2,000 words, I find myself reading the entire thing and revising some before writing more. I know this is a bad strategy in the long run but through this I've realized I need to just write and get things down and not worry if it will be redundant or will get deleted later. I've definitely been spending too much time worrying about whether something is worth being there. So, thanks for that post.
When I write shorter pieces of fiction, I tend to do that too. I'll revise early and often before actually finishing the story itself. I really think that for novels, you should just GOGOGOGOGOGO until they're done, but that's mostly because novels are huge. If you lose your flow or start stressing too much about earlier stuff, you might not finish.
Personally, I couldn't jump between projects like that. I'd be apt to lose my characters and my train of thought too much. Its stressful enough working on one novel ._. i can't imagine writing more than one at once.Also, maybe I need to focus on one thing at a time? I've got two novels (maybe one or both will evolve into a series) and three short stories I'm jumping between depending on my mood. One of the short stories falls within the universe I've created for one of the novels though, so that's fun to work on and help flesh out the universe.
Same here, I might struggle this year, and it doesn't help that one of my most wanted games of the year comes out that month, lol.I'm getting kind of anxious for Nano this year. Like It's coming up so fast.
I'm getting kind of anxious for Nano this year. Like It's coming up so fast.
Aight, I decided to get a twitter, for promotional stuff/ also to find other writers. Anyway, all you other writers, anyone mind sharing their twitter information? Or suggestions of who to follow? Or how to even do twitter promotions and stuff?obviously hugo award winner Aiden Moher
edit: also mine is FlowersisBrit
My new book, Extreme Haunt, comes out September 1st. The Kindle version is already available for pre-order. The physical edition should be available that week as well.
Really need to get started using Goodreads. I signed up a month or two ago but have been so busy I haven't even looked around it yet. Publishing the first extract from my new book on my blog tomorrow, so need to start thinking about how to properly publicise it. Not my forte by a long shot.
I'm getting kind of anxious for Nano this year. Like It's coming up so fast.
So, I've got a 7k sword & sorcery short that's about ready for submission. Anyone up for a quick beta read before I send it off on Friday?
eh, I ain't doing anything for the week. I can give it a read.
So, I've got a 7k sword & sorcery short that's about ready for submission. Anyone up for a quick beta read before I send it off on Friday?
I'd be willing to take a look at it. Sounds interesting.
Do you have a crit group, aidan? Or is that not really your style?
Edit: totally fine to ask here, of course, I was just curious.
Going all in, huh? Beware the Twitter. It can be stupidly addictive (at first).
I'll add you to mine. I think I have pretty much everyone's Twitter here at this point now...?
I'm @HProtagonist.
I mean you dont follow me ;_; I did just follow you tho!
Hey guys. Since Nano is coming up soon, and I want to get my ideas ready early this year so I end up being less of a pantser this time, I decided to consult GAF about which book idea I should try doing for my Nano this year. I have two options, and wanted to know which one you guys think I should try.
The first is a rewrite of my Nano book from last year, a film-noir style detective mystery called A Code to Kill For. Though I managed to win at Nano last year, after I finished, I realized that what I had written was poorly paced, and frankly, to get to the point, was pretty much shit. I decided to change up the structure of the novel, with the original copy following the chronological order of events, which includes a time-skip. I've decided to change it up to have the novel start with the protagonist meeting the book's Femme Fatale (it's noir, of course it has one) after the timeskip, then place flashbacks throughout the story to the events that occurred pre-timeskip.
I was wondering if any of you guys have tried doing the same story in two different NaNoWriMo's, and how you found it. Is it a good idea? That sort of thing.
My second idea is a sort of spy/adventure novel set in an alternate 1960s where World War II is still ongoing after the Nazis managed to prolonged it by discovering dragons in the 1940s (I'm thinking the prologue will be the D-Day Normandy invasion, which fails because the Nazis have dragons). The plot stars a young SIS (a.k.a MI-6) analyst (think a male version of Ms. Moneypenny from Skyfall) who is forced to travel into occupied France in order to find something which may be able to end the decades-old stalemate.
These are my ideas. I was wondering what you guys think of them, and whether I should try something new for this year's NaNoWriMo, or if I should continue working on the idea I started last year?
Personally, I think you should do the new idea rather than rewrite or tweak the first NaNo book. Redoing the first one feels like the opposite of what NaNo is about (editing/fine-tuning, etc. vs. free writing). I know I'd get bogged down, and how much true new writing will you get vs. just rehashing ideas/lines you already tried? I say set the first one aside for editing or to tackle apart from NaNo and use the new book as your vehicle to try and implement better pacing and structure in a story.
I'm doing a similar thing for my NaNo this year and writing a sequel to my first book, so same vein, but new story and hopefully better execution. Lessons learned from last time and all that.
I agree with you. I also think the query needs a bit more personalized info at the bottom. Even an extra sentence or two about yourself will help, because damn, a lot of agents ask for it. "Tell me about you and why you're fit to write your book," kind of thing.First thought: genre is really unclear at first. Unless this agent only represents urban fantasy specifically, you might want to make that clearer.
Second thought: 150k words is really long, especially for urban fantasy, especially for a debut author. Like, even 100k might be a tough sell.
Third thought: the plot has some interesting points, but they're scattered and a little unclear. The interesting bit is in the first sentence, which is good. The rest is kinda messy. Witnessing an assassination, cool. Following a thief, not as interesting. The Red Terrorist, ok, cool. Lot of time spent on the decision of Andrew to help the new queen, which probably doesn't need that much. Why is this a suicide mission? That could be interesting.
First thought: genre is really unclear at first. Unless this agent only represents urban fantasy specifically, you might want to make that clearer.
Yeah, but unfortunately until I've finished writing my third book this is the only one I can try and publish right now.Second thought: 150k words is really long, especially for urban fantasy, especially for a debut author. Like, even 100k might be a tough sell.
I can see what you mean by the bio. I'll definitely consider it. It's hard putting one of these together. I don't know how many variations I've made over the past years.Third thought: the plot has some interesting points, but they're scattered and a little unclear. The interesting bit is in the first sentence, which is good. The rest is kinda messy. Witnessing an assassination, cool. Following a thief, not as interesting. The Red Terrorist, ok, cool. Lot of time spent on the decision of Andrew to help the new queen, which probably doesn't need that much. Why is this a suicide mission? That could be interesting.
I agree with you. I also think the query needs a bit more personalized info at the bottom. Even an extra sentence or two about yourself will help, because damn, a lot of agents ask for it. "Tell me about you and why you're fit to write your book," kind of thing.