Wut...Saudi Arabia to raze Prophet Mohammed’s tomb

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not at all. Their eagerness for the hadud (physical punishment) does not apply to their own monarchy. I only wish that the hadud be applied equally. Their first rebellion was put down in that manner (pikes, heads) by the Ottoman Sultan.

I pray that they swerve from this current path, but if they do not, it is only right that they be held to the standards they set for others.

My mother was invited to a party with one of their 'Emirs' where they shared a lovely glass of cognac. She left though, feeling uncomfortable when the strippers turned up.


did you know that there was a huge outcry in saudi arabia about that prince who murdered his gay lover? You know the one i am talking about. Saud Abdulaziz bin Nasser al Saud

Ever wondered why he was tried in britian and not in saudi? Because he would have been executed if he was handed to saudi arabian authorities. And britian being britian didnt want any capital punishment.

as for the emirs and strippers bit forgive me i would love to hear more before i can relax on this story. Oh save your prayers for other things that needs prayers.

The Haaram and medina are in fine hands. Safe from the latest sufi tariqas and the shia muharram flagellations

Wow. The hajj is deadly and needs more space..but razing the tomb...there has to be a better way

No tombs are going to be razed.
 
Ever wondered why he was tried in britian and not in saudi? Because he would have been executed if he was handed to saudi arabian authorities. And britian being britian didnt want any capital punishment.

as for the emirs and strippers bit forgive me i would love to hear more before i can relax on this story. Oh save your prayers for other things that needs prayers.
There tends to be a high level of corruption among royalty within many countries in the Middle East, the ones more known to be being the ones in Saudi and the sheikhs in the United Arab Emirates (the latter being where I've grown up; only spent a small amount of time in Saudi, which I found to be a scary place to live in).

They usually consider themselves above the law and the land (and in turn, sharia) and engage in all manners of vices. Drinking tends to be extremely common in general, but it also includes the use of prostitutes. Now, this would be all fine and dandy if they weren't hypocritical and let other people would suffer extreme punishments for the same "crimes". Money and power buys you exemption from the law, capitalism at its most extreme. I'm pretty sure that if Saud Abdulaziz bin Nasser al Saud had murdered his gay companion within Saudi Arabia, nothing would have happened and the story would have been buried. He was tried in Britain because he doesn't have wasta there.
 
People people people first of all the prophet's grave will not be razed. You have been reading the stories of western press> i find so amusing that westerners are telling muslims how to live their lives. Especially saudis. One of the best things about speaking arabic and having relatives in saudi arabia is that you get to hear the truth amidst the garbage of the slandering that goes on.


If you walked up to any saudi today and called him a wahabi you would get a slap or worse. You see no body in saudi arabia even visits the grave of muhamed ibn abdul wahab the so called originator of wahabism.

Wahabism is just a moniker. Used to troll saudis because they are so strict and zealous when it comes to islam. I mean which muslim country would you get where

the shops close when the azan springs to life
the shariah is fully enforced
alcohol is banned
statues, shrines and maseloums are completely wiped out
Capital punishment for murder and rape amongst other things

The saudis are going on an expansion spree. I dont know if you heard the news lately but 4 million people descended on to plains of arabic in a matter of days. Space does not magically come up. The saudis first concern is the safety ad well being of the pilgrims. Moreover people are tired of being in hotels which are miles away from the holy sites. Cheap affordable hotels are the goal here. If they demolish the house of the prophet's wife then what's the big freakin deal. Are you go the hajj on an archaelogical visit or to worship Allah?

The tombs of Prophet muhammed and abu bakr siddiq and umar bin al khattab will remain where they are. If a new bigger mosque swallows up the mosques of abu bakr and umar then what's the big deal.

I will tell you what the big deal is. Nothing unites the westerner, the shia and the sufi more than the hatred of the saudi. Any slandering or biasedness of oppurtunity will not be missed. But hate does not affect anyone. Least of all the saudis. For i doubt they really care what the haters think or say about them. the sufi and the shia will never in a million years control the holy sites and the westerner doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things

Get the fuck out
 
I will tell you what the big deal is. Nothing unites the westerner, the shia and the sufi more than the hatred of the saudi. Any slandering or biasedness of oppurtunity will not be missed. But hate does not affect anyone. Least of all the saudis. For i doubt they really care what the haters think or say about them. the sufi and the shia will never in a million years control the holy sites and the westerner doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things

Saudi arabia's bullish ways lives and dies by being an american protectorate through their use of the petrodollar. How quick you are to forget that saddam had tanks lined up along the saudi border ready to roll in during the gulf war.
 
I am atheist now, former Muslim. But Islamic art is absolutely amazing. It can only be appreciated when seen up close, all the handwork carving is unbelievable with symmetry. People don't realize that these are not paint jobs but extreme intricate carvings.

Muslims architecture did not have the luxury to use idols/ faces ets in there art/building. It's all carving and heavy use of water around or inside building.

I wish this threads turns into Islamic art appreciation with nice up close pics
 
Saddam's Mosque

Concept looked so good ; ;

Zwvok.jpg


This shit is so gorgeous to me:

J9VcY.jpg


fumrOm.jpg
 
Muslims can destroy a historically and religiously significant site, yet if I draw a picture of the guy whose tomb they're bulldozing, it's an offense some consider punishable by death? Makes perfect sense to me!
 
Muslims can destroy a historically and religiously significant site, yet if I draw a picture of the guy whose tomb they're bulldozing, it's an offense some consider punishable by death? Makes perfect sense to me!

Religion is all kinds of logical.
 
Not at all. Their eagerness for the hadud (physical punishment) does not apply to their own monarchy. I only wish that the hadud be applied equally. Their first rebellion was put down in that manner (pikes, heads) by the Ottoman Sultan.

I pray that they swerve from this current path, but if they do not, it is only right that they be held to the standards they set for others.

My mother was invited to a party with one of their 'Emirs' where they shared a lovely glass of cognac. She left though, feeling uncomfortable when the strippers turned up.

I'm sorry for that. I'm sure if she turned down it would have been even worse for her.

Thank you for your posts. I can't keep a cool head when talking about this. The arguments that the wahabis use are extremely slippery, and I thank you for rebutting them.
 
Muslims can destroy a historically and religiously significant site, yet if I draw a picture of the guy whose tomb they're bulldozing, it's an offense some consider punishable by death? Makes perfect sense to me!

nobodys tomb is being bulldozed. But the Saudis don't consider it essential to preserve some older mosques and structures.
 
The saudis are going on an expansion spree. I dont know if you heard the news lately but 4 million people descended on to plains of arabic in a matter of days. Space does not magically come up. The saudis first concern is the safety ad well being of the pilgrims. Moreover people are tired of being in hotels which are miles away from the holy sites. Cheap affordable hotels are the goal here. If they demolish the house of the prophet's wife then what's the big freakin deal. Are you go the hajj on an archaelogical visit or to worship Allah?
Aren't actually only Muslims allowed to enter mecca? So even if I wanted to do an archaeological trip there, I wouldn't be allowed to.
 
Allah mentions in the quran 'do not divide the religion and make sects' amongst many things.

where did this idea come from where you incorporate dancing amongst your dhikir? Where did this nonsense come from where you get these sufi saints and orders with their own school of thought interceding for you in qiyamah. have you seen folks like nazim al haqqani? One of my friends is an ardent folllower. Who believes haqqani will intercede for him. He also has the knowledge of the unseen.

Sufism is just biddah. Islam ended on the day of arafat. The deen is complete and finished. Anything after that is biddah

I think to begin my response I should emphasise something about this discussion. This issue is one of great gravity, the declaration of entire groups and practises as being deviant is an immense one indeed. Traditionally it was something done only in very dire circumstances... and confined to those with the rank of Qadi. In this respect, any generalisations need to be taken with the utmost caution. The act of declaring another Muslim a deviant has consequences not only for the accused, but also for the accuser.

With this in mind, the first point is the definition of terms. You use many, without distinction. The first is quoting the Qur'an regarding sects, yet you do not define what constitutes a 'sect'. Do all groupings within the Muslims become 'sects'? By being from the Ahlul-Sunnah wa Jamaat, am I a sectarian or schizmatic? What about following a madhab? Is that a sect... if so, then by your implication, all of us are in hot water! Even those who claim not to be of a madhab, still have that claim as their madhab!

Secondly, we have a range of assumptions that are not supported, they are as follows:

-All sufis dance while making dhikr
-Sufi 'saints' have their own school of thought.
-The idea of intercession is throughout Sufism
-Nazim Haqqani represents all Sufis
-The fact that the deen is complete means that anything that Muslims do after that is 'innovation' a term that you use as inherently negative.

These are problematic assumptions as you take an individual Sheikh or 'Sufi' group, and base your assumptions about all Sufis on that group. I will bold this for emphasis: this is not a valid assumption. This generalisation, invalid as it is, is sufficient to dismiss your claims.

Not all people who practice Tasawuf do any of the the things that you describe. Thus your assertion that they are all deviants is unfounded. This general condemnation is dangerous for you, and I warn you away from it, for the sake of God.

Additionally, your idea of 'bidaah' has many problematic ideas within it. Indeed by your definition, you condemn our Masters, the Caliphs Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali (radiAllahu anhu) to the rank of deviants. As they 'added' things.

They added tashkilat to the Qur'an, they compiled it in a single comprehensive volume. They used analogical reasoning to make rulings on things not ruled on directly by the Messenger of Allah (sullAllahu alayhi wasalaam). They moved Jumaah from the house of the Messenger of Allah (sullAllahu alayhi wasalaam) to the masjid, something they described as 'the best of innovations'.

Even then, you essentially condemn further those that followed them. Those that created the schools of law, those that compiled the hadith, and all the rest as innovators and deviants.

Do you not see this folly? Ibn Tamiyya spoke highly of the Sufis, Imam Nawawi was one, as was Ghazzali, indeed Islam would likely not remain in the subcontinent intact were it not for Sufis like the great reviver Ahmad Sirhindi. To dismiss all the above as deviants is a very grave affair, something that should be confined to people of knowledge, and done only under great consideration.

Be wary, for this is a path where feet slip.

And Allah knows best.
says the guy who believes a report by a western newspaper by where there is not even a comment from the other side.
I don't know what this refers to. The destruction of historical sites at the hands of the Saudis is something not really up for debate. It is occurring.
Common amongst your lot. am i right? another few years and a new word will appear. neo malikism. neo shafism. to be continued.....
Haha.. my lot? Sunni Muslims.

Interesting that you separate yourself from the Ahlul Sunnah Wa Jamaat. Each to their own I guess.
i am replying to you now in this thread. It is not slander if it's the truth.
You aren't replying so much as repeating protean, simplistic generalisations and ignoring responses.

Biggest purchaser of arms? so freakin what. they are the biggest spenders of money on charitable causes in the middle east. As for turning on their population bit i think you got al assad mixed up with al saud
When did that form an excuse for inaction when it comes to oppression? Charity doesn't make them good rulers, it just means that they are attempting to fulfil an obligation upon them. It doesn't form a shield against neglect in other areas.

Ever wondered why he was tried in britian and not in saudi? Because he would have been executed if he was handed to saudi arabian authorities. And britian being britian didnt want any capital punishment.
Sure he would have. Sure.
as for the emirs and strippers bit forgive me i would love to hear more before i can relax on this story. Oh save your prayers for other things that needs prayers.
I'm not down with gheeba, so I'll say it again, it is common practice for members of the Saudi Royal family, with all their exulted religious titles, to drink and sleep with prostitutes. It is widely accepted and there is little push back against it from within the royal family.
The Haaram and medina are in fine hands. Safe from the latest sufi tariqas and the shia muharram flagellations
lmao. I am not down with the Shia, and you mischaracterise all Sufis. I am a traditionalist. I am Ahlul Sunnah Wa Jamaat, and I object to the Saudi regime because they are the new khwarij. Fat dictators who get fat on the blood of the regimes that kill their brothers. Safe hands. Tfou!

Tfou.
 
Also read a fiqh text about the obligations of a Muslim ruler, then get back to me on which exactly the House of Saud fulfil, beyond arbitrarily applying the hadud, before you start presenting them as great defenders of Sunni Islam against the Shia barbarians at the gate.
 
CHEEZMO™;43888493 said:
Saudi destruction of historic Muslim sites is disgusting. Fuck them.

Turning Mecca into some Nights of Arabia Vegas knock-off is also pretty shitty.

Meh if they add alcohol, casinos and bitches then I might actually make the Hajj.
 
Sooooo.... how does a cartoon result in murder, but this results in nothing? I'm not sure I understand, or maybe I'm missing something.
 
I imagine only the ignorant muslims (the same ones who go batshit crazy over the smallest things) would take offence to this. It's not Islamic for them to have shrines/tombs in the first place. Having said that, the Saudi rulers are bloody crazy too, just not in this instance. Technically, there's nothing wrong with what they're about to do.

Somehow I get the impression that if a non-muslim bulldozed the grave then suddenly it would be the biggest deal in the world.
That would be the case, since we're not allowed in those cities in the first place. So, if we're there destroying stuff, whatever it may be, we'd be put to death.
 
Just an aside: It's amusing how much lunacy and superstitiousness in the world results from the simple fear of being dead.

I hope if there is an afterlife (logic would suggest it'll most likely be non-denominational), I hope we can look back and laugh at how bizarre and generally ruthlessly barbaric we all acted.

(Of course my agnosticism could engender my eternal downfall -- DAMN YOU, PSYCHOPATHIC DEITY OF CHOICE!! -- but I'm not too worried. I have a brain and when all's said and done I'm not gonna make excuses for having used it.)
 
There needs to be some balance here.

The Saudis are doing this for the sake of the pilgrims. They are NOT destroying the grave of the Prophet PBUH nor of his companions nor are they going to level Jannatul Baqee', the graveyard that is beside the mosque.

They will end up removing mosques that were initially built under the names of some caliphs but guess what? These mosques have already been renovated and completely changed...so what they're going to be removing are the modern shells of these mosques. The original mosque is nowhere to be seen. Muslims who have been to Madinah Munawwarah will attest to this fact. Even the first mosque of Islam, Masjid al-Quba outside of Madinah is of modern architecture. The mosque of the Prophet PBUH is also of modern architecture. Remember, at his time, the ceiling of the mosque was made of palm tree leaves and sticks. Now, marble has replaced it.

On the other hand, the Saudis have been acting crazy in Makkah Mukarramah. Some may make the argument that hotels are required to accommodate for the increasing number of pilgrims but how is this true when these hotels are 5+ star hotels that cost an arm and a leg a night? I remember when I went for Umrah in the mid-90s and stayed at a broken down, old hotel in Madinah Munawwarah where there was a shared bathroom for every floor and the entire thing was pretty run down. All of that did not matter since it was right beside the Masjid. You'd exit the hotel, walk 50 feet, and you'd be on Masjid grounds. None of those old hotels exist anymore. I am not saying that it is a bad idea to renovate and improve these hotels but when all this improvement does is create a high base cost for stay, who is going to be the one to have easy access to the haram? The rich and the wealthy. They're even selling off some rooms in these hotels, especially in Makkah, for exorbitant prices because they have an amazing view of the Ka'aba - there were even ads on TV in Saudi Arabia about this.

Expanding the actual masjid - I have few qualms about that. But as for using the excuse of housing the haajis and the mu'tamireen, that does ring hollow since the hotels that are built are extremely expensive for the average Muslim. Hajj prices have gone up severely in the past because of this issue of housing.

If, say, all the hotels were identical and cost the same price, many of us would have no issue since the excuse of providing for the pilgrims would be understandable, but when it looks no less than profiteering off of the rich pilgrims, that becomes an outright lie.

(It should be noted that many Wahhabis want to actually demolish the green dome above the grave of the Prophet PBUH - funnily enough, the House of Saud doesn't want to go to that extent to anger Muslims worldwide and it is this fear that is preventing its destruction at the hands of the Wahhabis. The Saudi monarchy has been known to go against their scholars whenever they felt like it, such as the opening of the co-ed university KAUST)
 
I imagine only the ignorant muslims (the same ones who go batshit crazy over the smallest things) would take offence to this. It's not Islamic for them to have shrines/tombs in the first place. Having said that, the Saudi rulers are bloody crazy too, just not in this instance. Technically, there's nothing wrong with what they're about to do.

You don't know what you're talking about.
 
So is Rihanna is a high priced hooker? Not surprised.
 
Meh, the only reason that might bother me would be that he won't suffer any punishment if he get's caught by authorities. Us Saudis actually do have dating, drugs, alcohol and all sorts of shit but it's mostly hidden.
Yeah Rihanna was even at my birthday party last week. We had a bang-up time.
 
Also read a fiqh text about the obligations of a Muslim ruler, then get back to me on which exactly the House of Saud fulfil, beyond arbitrarily applying the hadud, before you start presenting them as great defenders of Sunni Islam against the Shia barbarians at the gate.
Truth is, there have been very few 'Islamic' Muslim leaders, its why the myth of Islam being spread by the sword is so prevalent.

In reality the only times Muslims banded together was during catastrophes such as when the Crusaders started their campaign against the Muslim lands. Even if there was a righteous leader, he was surrounded by other nations who werent led by such people. Which is again why the whole myth annoys me so much, there has never been a so called Islamic empire.

But to get back to the topic, the Saudi government is NOT doing any of this for Islam. They preach a crude and simplistic form of the religion because it suits their needs which is all despite the West's strong support for the regime. Its the same way the Mutazila school was promoted and its opponents put to death, the leaders of the time simply found it convenient to stay in rule.

Edit: Dont bother, Salafis cant be reasoned with. Dealing with overzealous people, you have to put their own ignorant logic on them. Just see the responses on this thread, these Saudi bashing ones always tend to end up bashing something more...
 
The disturbing thing is that even if the estimate of the increase of the muslim population from 1.6 billion to 2.2 billion isn't bullshit pulled out of some real estate speculator's ass, this will increase the price of the pilgrimage, which in turn might actually reduce the amount of people that can afford to make it per year - in which case they'll have spent lots of money building hotels and structures that'll never be used to full capacity, and have demolished historically significant and irreplaceable structures to do so.

It's kinda depressing, especially for muslims hoping to somehow get a glimpse of how the city used to be during Muhammad's days, only to find gigantic hotels ruling the landscape.
 
The disturbing thing is that even if the estimate of the increase of the muslim population from 1.6 billion to 2.2 billion isn't bullshit pulled out of some real estate speculator's ass, this will increase the price of the pilgrimage, which in turn might actually reduce the amount of people that can afford to make it per year - in which case they'll have spent lots of money building hotels and structures that'll never be used to full capacity, and have demolished historically significant and irreplaceable structures to do so.

It's kinda depressing, especially for muslims hoping to somehow get a glimpse of how the city used to be during Muhammad's days, only to find gigantic hotels ruling the landscape.
Medina (the place where the mosque pictured in the OP is) however is actually a lovely city still.
 
Why is it that all these Muslim buildings and designs look pure evil to me? is it just because I've been raised an white american and the media has conditioned me to see middle eastern design as evil, or is there something wrong with me on a aesthetic level, or do Muslims share this view as well?

Erm, most Islamic architecture in the Middle East got its influences from Byzatine.

This tomb destruction will be done by muslims while the cartoons were done by infidels.

See the difference?

Yes. This is one of the problems with our people, not the religion, but the mentality of the people as perpetuated through their corrupt hypocritical and fucked up governments.

Somehow I get the impression that if a non-muslim bulldozed the grave then suddenly it would be the biggest deal in the world.

True again.

These buildings look beautiful.

I would like to visit some of these sites one day. It pisses me off that they wont let non-muslims visit. All religions should be open to letting people learn more about their religion.

You can visit normal mosques, or at least you should be able to, I know the stance on Mecca is no muslims allowed, but Im not so sure about Medina, I wonder how documentaries on the places were made? Be interesting to see if they allow non-muslims journalists in.

It is not immoral or religiously forbidden to be financially wealthy or try to make money legitimately (i.e., without violating the moral code or others' rights). One can still be modest while spending and making tons of money.

The purpose of these large expansions around the holy cities is to be able to accommodate more religious visitors. In the past, the infrastructure and capacity would not have held 4 million people; it did this year. The plan is to make it possible to hold 5 million religious visitors at once in the near future.

This requires construction and redesign. This requires great expenditure to build up the mass transportation, the prayer areas of the Masjids, and hotels.

I agree that the clock tower in Makkah is not fitting for the city, but the other projects have good intentions.

There are so many people in the world who would love to go for Hajj but can't due to the lack of capacity in these cities.

yeah, theres alot of people who can't go, and now with all this fancy construction and raising the prices of staying in these hotels, even more people won't be able to go. theres other ways of accomodating pilgrims than in such a vile materialistic manner, in a place where we are all supposed to be equal. fuck it, no ihram, no 2 pieces of simple cloth, lets do the hajj in full gucci. after all, thats what most saudi's love.


Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them. Fuck them.

I fucking want them off the face of this planet. I'd rather nuke the fuck out of them before they even get to touch his grave.

THANK YOU phospor. I really really wish the world would wake up to the fact that terrorists get their ideology from the House of Saud, Salafis and Wahabis, and then bomb the fuck out of Saudi (but of course leaving the 2 holy mosques alone)

The Saudis have destroyed almost all of historical Mecca and Medina. It's pretty sad as a Muslim. I wish Muslim countries would say something..

They can't. Well the people might, but the governments? Pfft. A bunch of fucking pussies.
Especially in the Gulf. Hypocritical bastards the lot of them. Even the mindset of the people their is grotesque.

Who is this architect and why is he so terrible

Most modern day architecture in the Middle East is appalling, an insult to architecture. Just look at Dubai, its like somebody designed a building, realised there was no place in the world where it would fit in, and just plonked it on a piece of land they could find available in Dubai.

They say architecture should reflect a cities character, well from most Gulf nations it does, they have no character and are completely soul less.

People people people first of all the prophet's grave will not be razed. You have been reading the stories of western press> i find so amusing that westerners are telling muslims how to live their lives. Especially saudis. One of the best things about speaking arabic and having relatives in saudi arabia is that you get to hear the truth amidst the garbage of the slandering that goes on.


If you walked up to any saudi today and called him a wahabi you would get a slap or worse. You see no body in saudi arabia even visits the grave of muhamed ibn abdul wahab the so called originator of wahabism.

Wahabism is just a moniker. Used to troll saudis because they are so strict and zealous when it comes to islam. I mean which muslim country would you get where

the shops close when the azan springs to life
the shariah is fully enforced
alcohol is banned
statues, shrines and maseloums are completely wiped out
Capital punishment for murder and rape amongst other things

The saudis are going on an expansion spree. I dont know if you heard the news lately but 4 million people descended on to plains of arabic in a matter of days. Space does not magically come up. The saudis first concern is the safety ad well being of the pilgrims. Moreover people are tired of being in hotels which are miles away from the holy sites. Cheap affordable hotels are the goal here. If they demolish the house of the prophet's wife then what's the big freakin deal. Are you go the hajj on an archaelogical visit or to worship Allah?

The tombs of Prophet muhammed and abu bakr siddiq and umar bin al khattab will remain where they are. If a new bigger mosque swallows up the mosques of abu bakr and umar then what's the big deal.

I will tell you what the big deal is. Nothing unites the westerner, the shia and the sufi more than the hatred of the saudi. Any slandering or biasedness of oppurtunity will not be missed. But hate does not affect anyone. Least of all the saudis. For i doubt they really care what the haters think or say about them. the sufi and the shia will never in a million years control the holy sites and the westerner doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things

I'm only quoting this bit of you, but ive seen the rest of your posts in this thread, and now its quite clear why i had an argument with you a while back.

First of all, in all your texts, and discourse with OttomanScribe, you have no respect, speak crudely, and think of yourself as some glorious figure.
You are actually, the reason why so many people in the world right now have a negative view of Islam. I mean look at your bolded last paragraph? What is that supposed to mean? In Islam we aren't meant to have these uneccessary quarrels with other sects of faiths but look at how you have twisted that. What, you think you are the enlightened one? Get the fuck out of here.

So what if the sufi and shia won't have control over the holy sites? They aren't begging for it. The house of Saud should have NEVER had control over them anyway, its pretty clear from various hadith that no private family like theirs should have one. I won't look or search for one but I know they are there. You should know yourself seeing as your one perfect muslim. How dare you defend the House of Saud, the biggest betrayer to our faith, and the reason we have a bad name globally. Seriously how fucking dare you.

Space doesn't magically pop up? Damn right it doesn't, building a huge ass clock that towers over the holiest site and takes the attention away from it doesnt help provide space either.

Saudi enforces sharia?? Yeah a screwed up and twisted version of it. Only the most learned and elected scholars can enforce the shariah, not some screwed up inbred family that promotes extremist ideologies with one of the most twisted versions of justice:

A few years ago there was a car parked on the side of the road, in a residential area, a baby was playing outside. A saudi man driving like a lunatic zooms down, clips the parked car which then kills the baby. Who is to blame? in a NORMAL place, the man driving the car would be blamed. IN SAUDI it was the guy whose car was parked on the road because he wasn't saudi.

not to mention their laws on rape and the way they treat our women. its shameful. the last sermon of the prophet (pbuh) was all about how we must take care and treat our women with kindness. In the worlds view today that was forgotten, and replaced with the House of Sauds lets oppress all women because they are worse than us.

As for your points on 'walking up to a saudi and calling him a wahabi' it proves how ignorant you are in matters you claim to have knowledge of. That being said I aint of the most knowledge myself in religion. But what you have said is just wrong. No one should be calling anyone else by what sect they adhere to. Just like you have insulted the shia and sufi, and anyone else who isnt like you.

You have intolerant extremist views of Islam, you are almost borderline Al - Qaida. You are part of the reason so many people in the world think we are a violent religion. You are part of the reason why our religion and ummah is so divided.

Don't go on talking like you some big ting. And don't even dare to defend the Saudis without thinking you'll get soem sort of backlash. Anyone who has had an experience with Saudis knows that they are arrogant, racist, supremacist, and most of all that they can't drive for shit. Yes that was a generalization, but I know it first hand.

Don't bother replying, I don't even wish to get into a conversation with you, after reading the rest of your posts in this thread and elsewhere. It's clear you have no skill in discourse.

Note to mods: I hope I didnt say anything bad in there.

Nothing new.

I pray that they see the error of their ways, or the sword sees an end to them. I've said it once and I'll say it again, the Uthmaniyya knew how to deal with such schismatics.

Heads, pikes, the walls of Istanbul.

If only...

What Shariah are you talking about? The one that is more driven by wahabi ideology and culture or the one that represents Muslims at large. I don't see a shariah that represents muslims in Saudi Arabia, but a shariah that represents the wahabi and salafi scholars/imams there.

If the Saudis are so pious and good why don't they help solve the Palestinian, Kashmir, Philippines, Chechnya, Myanmar, and Chinese Muslim issues...

Exactly. They have never lended a hand to anyone apart from themselves and the oil companies that invest in their land.

Also Hajj is now not a Pilgrimage, it's a fucking Commodity to be used and abused by the rich

There's a reason you wear 2 pieces of white cloth

The man right next to you can be the richest or the poorest man on the planet, but at that time you are equal

Now there are Hajj packages
$7500 per person get you an AC Tent, Buffet Food Line, Special Private Accommodations, VIP Driver, Faster Access, Top Tier Business Class Flight Seats
$5000 You lose some of the benefits
$3000 More benefits lost

THAT SHIT IS NOT EQUAL YOU STUPID FUCKS!, you are going against the same teaching you are fucking following

Now you are taking it up to stupid tier by forcing people to pay $500 to stay in these hotels, which most can't afford

Hajj is a pilgrimage of sacrifice, learning that the person next to you is your equal no matter what, that you are in God's house, worshiping god and nothing else
No consumerism

I can't wait till they start selling I<3 Mecca/Medina shirts
Buy 3 for $20 shirts, licensed out by Adidas


Thank you. Couldnt have put that better myself. Anyone trying to defend this lunacy has no idea what they are talking about. Thats directed at Muslim-GAF who are bigging up the Saudi regime.


Truth is, there have been very few 'Islamic' Muslim leaders, its why the myth of Islam being spread by the sword is so prevalent.

In reality the only times Muslims banded together was during catastrophes such as when the Crusaders started their campaign against the Muslim lands. Even if there was a righteous leader, he was surrounded by other nations who werent led by such people. Which is again why the whole myth annoys me so much, there has never been a so called Islamic empire.

But to get back to the topic, the Saudi government is NOT doing any of this for Islam. They preach a crude and simplistic form of the religion because it suits their needs which is all despite the West's strong support for the regime. Its the same way the Mutazila school was promoted and its opponents put to death, the leaders of the time simply found it convenient to stay in rule.

Edit: Dont bother, Salafis cant be reasoned with. Dealing with overzealous people, you have to put their own ignorant logic on them. Just see the responses on this thread, these Saudi bashing ones always tend to end up bashing something more...

Yeah, I'd dare say there is not one Islamic ruler in the world today. It was prophesized that such things would happen. Shame it turned out to be true but just gives me more faith : )

On your note though, I hope non-muslim and anti-muslim gaf read what you have written there.

I hope they realise that the reason they have acts of Islamic terrorism, stories relating to the oppression of women, harsh laws like stoning for adultery, is because of the House of Saud.
I hope they all realise that most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi.
I hope they all realise that the biggest traitors to our faith is the House of Saud.
And last and definetly not least, I hope they all realise that we hate the fucking House of Saud want to do what phophor said, nuke the fuck out of their palaces.
 
Dumb question. I realize that one of the super important things with Islam is not, under any circumstances, to promote idolatry. I'm a dumb American, so this is the thing I'm trying to grasp. For Mecca it's fine to make it all Las Vegas, but would the same hold true for the Dome of the Rock? Like, wouldn't there be riots in the streets if they tried to build skyscrapers around the dome?

Another dumb question. For starters I can hardly afford a vacation to Florida or the beach and I live in the states, how do people afford to make pilgrimage to Mecca? Has anyone on here on GAF made the Haji and come away disappointed? I think it'd be amazing to be able to experience something like that, but I fear I'd be disillusioned with what all I've heard about it. Also, say, I won the loterry and had a chance to visit Jerusalem, as a non-religious person, can you actually visit the Dome of the Rock? I realize there are rules about non-Muslims (I think?) about not going inside of it. Can you at least stand outside of it or something? What if I really like byzantine archictecture and history? I know the second intafada (sic?) started when that Israeli guy stepped inside, so it would kind of freak me out if I tried to even get close.
 
Dumb question. I realize that one of the super important things with Islam is not, under any circumstances, to promote idolatry. I'm a dumb American, so this is the thing I'm trying to grasp. For Mecca it's fine to make it all Las Vegas, but would the same hold true for the Dome of the Rock? Like, wouldn't there be riots in the streets if they tried to build skyscrapers around the dome?

Another dumb question. For starters I can hardly afford a vacation to Florida or the beach and I live in the states, how do people afford to make pilgrimage to Mecca? Has anyone on here on GAF made the Haji and come away disappointed? I think it'd be amazing to be able to experience something like that, but I fear I'd be disillusioned with what all I've heard about it. Also, say, I won the loterry and had a chance to visit Jerusalem, as a non-religious person, can you actually visit the Dome of the Rock? I realize there are rules about non-Muslims (I think?) about not going inside of it. Can you at least stand outside of it or something? What if I really like byzantine archictecture and history? I know the second intafada (sic?) started when that Israeli guy stepped inside, so it would kind of freak me out if I tried to even get close.

Yeah we aren't supposed to promote idolatry. True. But as for it being 'fine' to make Mecca in to Vegas, its really not fine. :)

A lot of people manage to save over years and then go to the Hajj, there also people who even walk there! A while ago some Indian couple did it and this year it was a Bosnian man. He even walked through Syria during the heat of conflict.
I haven't done the Hajj, i did the lesser pilgrimage when i was younger but imo it didnt count because i didn't do it out of choice. I would do it again though, I remember it being really soothing and just peaceful, well, Medina was more peaceful than Mecca. I know a lot of people who have done Hajj though and no one has come back with negative experiences as far as the pilgrimage itself is concerned.

I wasn't aware that non-muslims arent allowed in to the Dome of the Rock, its not a mosque btw, but the compound itself holds a mosque (Al - Aqsa, often confused with the Dome of Rock in terms of its importance, its also the place where Ariel Sharon went with a few hundred soldiers which is what sparked the second intifada). So unless your going there with a loaded semi-automatic or a a private troop you should be okay.
Well like I said im not sure if non-muslims are allowed there. I hope they are though.
 
Dumb question. I realize that one of the super important things with Islam is not, under any circumstances, to promote idolatry. I'm a dumb American, so this is the thing I'm trying to grasp. For Mecca it's fine to make it all Las Vegas, but would the same hold true for the Dome of the Rock? Like, wouldn't there be riots in the streets if they tried to build skyscrapers around the dome?

Another dumb question. For starters I can hardly afford a vacation to Florida or the beach and I live in the states, how do people afford to make pilgrimage to Mecca? Has anyone on here on GAF made the Haji and come away disappointed? I think it'd be amazing to be able to experience something like that, but I fear I'd be disillusioned with what all I've heard about it. Also, say, I won the loterry and had a chance to visit Jerusalem, as a non-religious person, can you actually visit the Dome of the Rock? I realize there are rules about non-Muslims (I think?) about not going inside of it. Can you at least stand outside of it or something? What if I really like byzantine archictecture and history? I know the second intafada (sic?) started when that Israeli guy stepped inside, so it would kind of freak me out if I tried to even get close.

There should not be an issue with non-Muslims entering the mosque called the Dome of the Rock. The requirements are the same as entering any mosque, which is that the person entering must be pure from any major impurity, easily remedied by taking a thorough shower/bath before entering the mosque. This is required of all people, Muslims or non-Muslims, by the way.

The reason why people were angered by Ariel Sharon's intrusion was because he and other like-minded Israelis and other Zionists want to tear down the two mosques in that compound (the Dome of the Rock mosque and the much more important al-Aqsa mosque) so that they can build the third Jewish temple atop it.

And as for the Hajj, people who go there do it for the sake of worship. It is not a tourist attraction. In fact, a lot of people hate how the Hajj and the Umrah (lesser pilgrimage) have been transforming into tourist trips ever since the popularization of the cell phone camera. Before this, all cameras were banned in the two holy mosques and people focused more on the religious aspect of the journey by engaging in supererogatory worship rather than going on pleasure trips and taking photos.
 
Man the clock tower is so ugly. I've been told god/allah is a real good designer...why didn't they ask him to whip up something nice looking? :/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom