It doesn't matter anymore, Microsoft are the new Nazi Party in most peoples eyes.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH and now they blame the media!
Zero humility.... so, again
![]()
I cant disagree but its also not difficult to see how they hit that conclusion.Something can be inaccurate and incomplete without being faulty reporting.
This article and thread title is the definition of click bait.
When you're detached from games and watching the press conference, it really IS wholly reasonable to go "this looks like it might be a good product!" because it really does within just the context of that, even if certain aspects don't appeal to me at all. It's when you start cutting deeper that you start to question its actual worth period, even with the game aspect disregarded.I have seen stuff on both sides, Rev3 coverage has been pretty decent, Marcus Beer, Patrick, and a few others, but obviously we still have a few who are waving the corporate flag in games journalisim.
The mainstream media imo probably just does not know better because videogames are not seen as major news from what I have seen when big things happen in games the mainstream media rarely reports on it in most cases.
You didn't money hat hard enough Microsoft.
Almost... Maybe next time.
This one is the parody account, for anyone who might actually take it seriously.
Photoshopped, right? He has a different picture on his (protected) page, and it's been there for awhile. Don't see him flipping back to throw that out then switch to the new one, and in his position I'd stay deathly quiet anyway.
I wouldn't be surprised if at this point they'd be notably insulted instead, before they were doing mostly fine and at worst Kinect just wasn't something appealing to them but not actively BAD, here this is a different story.Once they give every person in the audience an Xbone the articles will become significantly sunnier.
No fun allowed :/This one is the parody account, for anyone who might actually take it seriously.
I don't have a problem with you posting it, I just get annoyed by the inevitable 100 posts following asking if it's real or not. Figured I would get that out of the way at the beginning.No fun allowed :/
I don't pay any attention to Angry Joe. I think for myself, thanks.
No fun allowed :/
I actually got tired of his rant before very long, it was definitely just angry rambling after a night of no sleep, whereas Francis at least had a prepared act kept down to a short period of time.I don't pay any attention to Angry Joe. I think for myself, thanks.
I'd say that's up for debate, but I prefer having both as options. Even if this time I'd probably just be using that controller only on PC.MS jumped the shark in all aspects except for one: a killer gamepad that trumps the dualshock.
Since the details of those arrangements is clearly changing, the onus would be on Microsoft to make the coming changes abundantly transparent.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH and now they blame the media!
Zero humility.... so, again
![]()
It seemed to me like the media has been sticking up for MS, so... this probably won't make those media outlets feel very good, huh.
Isn't that what this is:
"The ability to trade in and resell games is important to gamers and to Xbox. Xbox One is designed to support the trade in and resale of games. Reports about our policies for trade in and resale are inaccurate and incomplete. We will disclose more information in the near future."
This is the worst version of this classic GIF I have ever seen. I want to find the person who slapped the hahahahahahah all over it and thought "Yup, that makes it better!".
No, this guy just took a mild implication at worst and extrapolated. I've seen someone else bring up Jim Sterling's story and that better encapsulates the problems here.Wait, i haven't seen MS release any statements apportioning blame to anybody. Did they actually?
There's definitely been some defending this, but "I wrote PR for dummies!" aside I don't think any are actual shills, they just really feel that way. And may be assholes too, it really doesn't help the tone some of those in defense of this have.So, the Xbox 1 reveal not only diffused the WiiU death squads, but the loljournalism crew as well.
The whole thing is a farce, alright, but it's unifying power is beyond denying.
It's all about E3 and release dates now.
Kind of. Still the overall point is valid though.I just read that article... but um... I don't see where microsoft is really blaming the media for (or even admitting there is) any public outcry of discontent.
Kind of taking a real leap there, the author, and doing some reading between the lines. MS' current activity is abhorrent, but the premise of this article seems quite a stretch.
That's a pretty silly article. All MS is saying, "We're not ready to talk about it.". They're not whining. They're not complaining. Just not announcing final details about how its all going to work. MS wasn't clear in it's communication, so they sorta have brought the speculation on this, but it's still gamers and some media that are stating facts like "you can't turn the camera off. Its always spying on you. Lol".
Kind of. Still the overall point is valid though.
The point is sorta because of hyperbole. "Reports are inaccurate because we haven't told the full story yet. We will reveal that information at a carefully chosen event/date" does not equal, "MS blames media". The article starts it, people spread it based on what they want to be true.
I wont post the whole thing because its a decent read, but here is abit of it.
http://m.cinemablend.com/games/Microsoft-Blames-Gaming-Media-Xbox-One-Consumer-Rage-56056.html
I searched around, but did not find this article but a few places are reporting on it, so if old I apologize.
As for the article, I fully agree with the sentiment. If Microsoft does not like the bad press the they need to start answering peoples questions about Kinect privacy, always online, and used games. I dont think this is an issue that is going to just blow over at this point because it just keeps building onto itself. Really it needs to be the first thing they talk about at E3.
Agree. At it's core it's just blaming Microsoft PR, but the way they did is sensationalist.The point is sorta because of hyperbole. "Reports are inaccurate because we haven't told the full story yet. We will reveal that information at a carefully chosen event/date" does not equal, "MS blames media". The article starts it, people spread it based on what they want to be true.