I think they probably need to sort out the contracting issue. I would also be interested to see average salaries and if that needs to be increased but ultimately hiring is a pain for everyone.
Not really considering a lot of those were announced pre-acquisition.Such a good post, and 0 upvotes.
It's not a very good post since it's just ridiculous cherry-picking:Such a good post, and 0 upvotes.
BUT, they still output more exclusives than PS and Xbox combined. They have a bunch of exclusive titles releasing this year including two major Pokemon titles, Kirby and the Forgotten Lands, Splatoon 3, Xenoblade Chronicles 3, Mario Strikers Battle League, Switch Sports, Fire Emblem Warriors, Mario and Rabbids Sparks of Hope, and Triangle Strategy. Bayonetta 3 is also possibly coming. That is ELEVEN exclusive titles in ONE year. And Games like Xenoblade, Splatoon, and Kirby aren't small releases either. We even had another full Metroid game (Dread), to bridge the gap for the awaited Metroid Prime 4. Also unlike most Microsoft upcoming games, Bayonetta and Zelda BotW2 already have gameplay footage.Some of Nintendo's reveals are just as bad
BOTW2, Bayonetta 3 and Metroid Prime 4 must be longer than any on the Xbox list
1. Those are not third-party deals the OP included. Sackboy and Destruction All Stars are first-party games. Medium and Ascent are not first-party games. They are both on PlayStation as well.It's not a very good post since it's just ridiculous cherry-picking:
- Some Sony 3rd party deals are added but somehow MS' ones are not included like The Medium or The Ascent. And don't tell me it's because they are not AAA when the Sony list has Sackboy and Destruction all-stars;
- Other Sony 3rd party deals are not mentioned, like Pragmata, Project Athia (which would become Forspoken), Little Devil Inside or Goodbye Volcano High (lol), since they wouldn't work with the argument. But they were presented in June 2020 so will have a 24 months delay or more;
- Some MS first party is somehow missing like Flight Sim or Gears Tactics.
It's bullshit made for warring idiots basically.
It was about the second part of my comment, the salary part.That has nothing to do with contractors.
no one is happy
Playstation fans don't get new announcements
Xbox have many games announced, but they're not coming
How are Sackboy and Destruction All Stars first party games when Sony doesn't own Sumo (which belongs to Tencent) and Lucid games (independent)?1. Those are not third-party deals the OP included. Sackboy and Destruction All Stars are first-party games. Medium and Ascent are not first-party games. They are both on PlayStation as well.
2. Pragmata, Forspoken, Little Devil Inside, Goodbye Volcano High are also not on this list for the same reason. They are not first-party games. These are third-party games. What does Sony have to do with the development and release schedule of any of these games?
3. Fair point, they should have included them all. In the comments, however, they mentioned that they wanted to stick with games released in this console generation, not the previous one.
The idea of the post is that XGS games have a longer time-to-release than PS Studios games. Therefore, they could only include first-party games.
I think you're confused about what constitutes a first-party games (which is fair, as I see a lot of discussion around this topic from time to time).How are Sackboy and Destruction All Stars first party games when Sony doesn't own Sumo (which belongs to Tencent) and Lucid games (independent)?
The problem is the criteria used is all over the place:
- if it's supposed to be a comparison of first party, then why does it include Contraband, Sackboy or Destruction All Stars?
- if it's supposed to be exclusives, why does it include MLB for Sony games?
- if it's supposed to be including moneyhatted exclusives then there are a lot missing.
It's just not very good data.
Play Ori 1 and 2 if you haven't, before your subscription ends. My most favorite XGS games. I'm sad they won't be making a third one, but I'm excited to see whatever Moon Studios does next.My GPU is ending later this year. I use it on the PC. I've played out several games, but overall I don't use it much. After I finished Halo Infinite SP (which was pretty bad in my opinion), I haven't touched any other games. Most of the games on the list are not interesting at all or I just don't want to invest time in them.
A game like Starfield (if it ends well) I would always buy on steam. After my subscription ends later this year, I won't be re-subscribing it for a long time. I have a lot of other games to play on PC and PS5.
Video game forum nerds came up with the term "second-party" for the scenario when a first party commisions a game from a third party, but in the real world that term is not a real thing so yeah, games like Flight Sim are first party.I think you're confused about what constitutes a first-party games (which is fair, as I see a lot of discussion around this topic from time to time).
It generally works like this: if the IP is owned by a publisher, it is a first-party game, regardless of who is developing it. And the external developer group may help a third-party studio create the game. Examples:
Similarly:
- Bloodborne is a PS first-party game because Sony owns the IP and contracted it out to FromSoftware. Japan Studio's xDev team helped FromSoftware build the game.
- Sackboy is a PS first-party game because Sony owns the IP and contracted it out to Digital Sumo. PS's xDev studio helped Digital Sumo develop the game.
- Destruction All Stars is a PS first-party game because Sony owns the IP and hired Lucid Games to make it. PS's xDev studio helped Lucid Games to develop the game.
On the other hand:
- Microsoft Flight Simulator is a first-party Xbox game because MS owns the IP. They hired Asobo (a third-party studio) to make the game. Xbox's Global Publishing (just like PS xDev) helped Asobo make the game.
- Contraband is a first-party Xbox game because MS owns the IP. They hired Avalanche to make the game. Xbox Global Publishing is helping them.
With this context, please see that list again. You'll notice that it's all about first-party games released this gen, and it is not as random as it may have initially appeared.
- Medium is a third-party game. Neither MS nor Sony owns the IP. Neither of them helped the studio develop the game. The game was just money-hatted to be timed exclusive.
- Ascent is a third-party game. Neither MS nor Sony owns the IP. Neither of them helped the studio develop the game. The game was just money-hatted to be timed exclusive.
The term "second party" has been around for like 20 years, and yes, it does mean something in the real world. Too many people act like it isn't a thing, and just claim everything is "first party", even when it isn't.Video game forum nerds came up with the term "second-party" for the scenario when a first party commisions a game from a third party, but in the real world that term is not a real thing so yeah, games like Flight Sim are first party.
Has Xbox, PlayStation, or Nintendo ever called one of their games second party?The term "second party" has been around for like 20 years, and yes, it does mean something in the real world. Too many people act like it isn't a thing, and just claim everything is "first party", even when it isn't.
If you look at the "phil spencer says steady flow of great games" thread from a few weeks ago xbox fans are not dreaming of one every 4-6 months they are in a coma thinking of one every 1 month.Xbox fans who expect to get AAA games day 1 on gamepass every 4-6 months are dreaming. But if Xbox achieves that, I think it will be some sort of miracle.
And that's fine.Assuming OP is being sincere, however, my immediate reaction is simple: it takes time to build chemistry & vision in each & every studio & it takes more time to get things in a groove to pump out quality product.
Yeah I'm so entitled with my Xbox and Game Pass subscription and pumping money in to MS and Xbox I really should just not expect anything at all from them and just be grateful for any shit they care to shovel in to my stupid big mouth.Gamers are in general an entitled lot who suffer others their 1st world problems view of reality far too often.
And that's fine.
But in order to give those studios time to form an identity and a cohesive way of working, it probably made little to no sense for MS to put pressure on them by releasing CGI trailers for games that are 5 years away.
Like Everwild. Despite it being just a world with no gameplay loop finalised, and later needing a reboot with Gregg Mayles taking charge as director.
Or Perfect Dark, with half the senior staff leaving and Crystal Dynamics taking charge.
Or The Outer Worlds 2 when we've still only seen a CGI trailer for Avowed.
It's not the fans having unrealistic expectations here, it's MS dick teasing but thinking they can dick tease for 4 or 5 years when their studios aren't ready to show.
Yeah I'm so entitled with my Xbox and Game Pass subscription and pumping money in to MS and Xbox I really should just not expect anything at all from them and just be grateful for any shit they care to shovel in to my stupid big mouth.
I'll keep it short for you; I'd rather be a spoilt brat than a corporate boot-licker, like you.You sound triggered. I'm not here for therapy or to read novels.
My overarching point stands: There is a lack of nuance in how many are responding to this issue, including many who insincerely mix console warring into every single discussion. People like yourself who apparently feel the need to make such a big deal out of delays are largely entitled, spoiled brats with a major case of 1st world goggles.
Fact: Games which are delayed are generally better for it.![]()
Weird misrepresentation of that thread.If you look at the "phil spencer says steady flow of great games" thread from a few weeks ago xbox fans are not dreaming of one every 4-6 months they are in a coma thinking of one every 1 month.
Why is it wierd? Did you read it?Weird misrepresentation of that thread.
Yeah. I didn't see anyone expecting one game a month, maybe I missed it.Why is it wierd? Did you read it?
I'll keep it short for you; I'd rather be a spoilt brat than a corporate boot-licker, like you.
You sound triggered. I'm not here for therapy or to read novels.
My overarching point stands: There is a lack of nuance in how many are responding to this issue, including many who insincerely mix console warring into every single discussion. People like yourself who apparently feel the need to make such a big deal out of delays are largely entitled, spoiled brats with a major case of 1st world goggles.
Fact: Games which are delayed are generally better for it.
That couldn't be further from the truth. Just because I'm pointing out that reality doesn't comport with your childish view of the world it doesn't mean I'm in any way inclined to favor multinationals over people. But, having said that, one would have to be able to hold down a job to be a "boot licker" so we know that rules you out.
![]()
There are in fact several people in that thread.Yeah. I didn't see anyone expecting one game a month, maybe I missed it.
That denial is setting in I see.
Hopefully you'll learn to just accept the day is coming when major titles will be released on a monthly basis on GP.
Unless dev times end up doubling again, I'll be impressed if they don't.
With the aforementioned 36 studios, several of which have multiple teams and projects, 12 AAA games per year is not far fetched at all.
I rest my case.
Ah, turns out I haven't read the thread, I just posted the gif and then left it because I assumed mods would close it anyway.There are in fact several people in that thread.
Here is one of them who replied to me
And another
You sound triggered. I'm not here to provide therapy or to read novels.
My overarching point stands: There is a lack of nuance in how many are responding to this issue, including many who insincerely mix console warring into every single discussion. People like yourself who apparently feel the need to make such a big deal out of delays are largely entitled, spoiled brats with a major case of 1st world goggles.
Fact: Games which are delayed are generally better for it.![]()
GOW 5 and halo infinite were great.
Some say Forza horizon 5 was great but I wasn't a fan .
Have they put out anything else ??
I disagree that people standing up to push back against Xbox Live Gold price increases is in any way analogous to people bitching about studio output. The first is a form of consumer pushback to guarantee fair pricing...while the second is a mixture of people who are entitled & generally clueless about production pipelines combined with some measure of people who just want to engage in console warring (many of the people dog piling on Xbox studios are generally not also looking at the rather lackluster output over at Sony over the past year with the same equally critical eye).Anyone can dismiss any issue facing gamers by referencing "1st world goggles", not just delayed games. If folks took that attitude then Xbox Live gold would still be double the price it is today because no one would have complained so loudly that MS backed down. They should have just stayed quiet rather than complain about first world problems? I get your point on delayed games, but the fact that some have a problem with Microsoft's game output are surely legit discussion points on a forum dedicated to video games. If someone brought this up in the thread in Off Topics discussing the war in the Ukraine then yeah.