Short answer? No.
Long answer? It depends on how it's being used.
This is exactly where I'm at.
As someone that has worked in the industry for almost two decades and hopes to continue to do so, I'd only ever want AI to be used to the smallest tasks that don't replace an actual hire. Things that help improve workflows and output sound great, but I'd really prefer that AI stays away from anything creative.
For example, with the ARC Raiders situation, I didn't think the use of generative AI for their ping system is THAT big of a deal, especially since they bothered actually hiring actors/actresses for other lines in the first place. But I DO think it's kind of weird that they're going to AI their voice for future content, but hey, if the actors/actresses were paid well enough for it and they consented then it makes it easier to swallow. I can see why they did it, especially when considering future items, weapons, and maps. It essentially just cuts all of that out. But I also don't think that's a feature that people absolutely required. They could've easily recorded vague lines that could be reused and people wouldn't bat an eye I'm sure. Especially if the visuals are there to support it (new icons, text, etc.)
But things like COD related studios using generative AI art and then practically copying and pasting it is pretty damn gross. I mean, any situation where a studio copies and pastes art without even bothering to clean it up, make it more personal, etc. Is extremely gross to me. Especially when they surely have the money to hire or pay an artist to do so.
The more studios use it, the more other studios will use it. Especially bigger studios where all they wanna do is make money on the "next big thing" without passion or taking any risks.
