Leyasu
Banned
I don't think so since apparently Marvel went to Microsoft first.
Ok, what did Insomniac release after Sunset Overdrive?
I don't think so since apparently Marvel went to Microsoft first.
As far as I understand, that game is what would become Spider-Man. It’s possible they had some sort of agreement but there’s no info on that afaik.Sunset overdrive came out in 2014, so that could have been a possibilty I suppose. But had they already been contracted by Sony to work on a game for them?
I agree. EA backed Xbox to win the last gen with Titanfall 1 and Xbone had good sales in the first year. To an outsider it would have made sense for an American Company doing very well (at that time) to be given first refusal by Marvel.MS given first refusal, I didn't wanna say it, but it sure does read that way.
As far as I understand, that game is what would become Spider-Man. It’s possible they had some sort of agreement but there’s no info on that afaik.
Edit: Ah, yeah they released the Ratchet & Clank Remake in between SSO and Spider-Man. And a few other, smaller games.
Microsoft picked up the publishing rights for the game after Sony passed on it because Insomniac wanted to own the IP. Microsoft didn't care back then which in hindsight is a mistake in regards to now owning the IP as I believe the publisher should always own the IP for the game(s) that they're publishing.
Also, Sunset Overdrive didn't do that well on Xbox and Insomniac went right back to Sony. I also believe that Insomniac was always a far better fit with Sony than Microsoft. Plus, with Sony owning the Spider Man movie rights, it just works out perfectly for them and Insomniac.
Ok, what did Insomniac release after Sunset Overdrive?
I follow zero "console warriors" on Twitter, from any system.Man, I never realized how many of you guys follow gutter tier console warriors on twitter. It's almost scary
They could’ve hired a studio for that, you know?Which studio does everyone think that Microsoft could have put on a marvel franchise in 2014? How many studios did they have then?
Literally what Sony did… given Insomniac was still independent at the timeThey could’ve hired a studio for that, you know?
Yeah they probably could have done. Like who though?They could’ve hired a studio for that, you know?
You like playing iterations of the same game over and over again?So I’m guessing the narrative being pushed here is Xbox could have had all these marvel games since 2014 rather than focus on Halo, gears and forza? As if to say Spider-Man etc?
Well I for one could not care. In the last year 8 years I have far more played and enjoyed those trio of games series faaaaarrrrr more than any one marvel game. So Phil chose right.
So you are not looking forward to "Spiderman with claws"?So I’m guessing the narrative being pushed here is Xbox could have had all these marvel games since 2014 rather than focus on Halo, gears and forza? As if to say Spider-Man etc?
Well I for one could not care. In the last year 8 years I have far more played and enjoyed those trio of games series faaaaarrrrr more than any one marvel game. So Phil chose right.
As usual the first page of a thread about a marvel property is more about people's grievances with Marvel itself rather than the property.
Why does it matter to you? Maybe they do.You like playing iterations of the same game over and over again?
I hate how platform tribalism has made people on an enthusiast gaming forum pretend that games in the pipeline don’t mean anything.
But I bet this talking point fades away soon enough.
Already closing in at 30% of the lifetime Xbox One sales, with demand not yet met and most of the heavy hitter AAA releases yet to come.
I think even a blind person can see the trajectory is definitely better this gen.
It’s not necessarily an ”either-or”-situation even if a lot of people seem to read it that way for some odd reason. As proven with how Sony used a then external studio in Insomniac.So I’m guessing the narrative being pushed here is Xbox could have had all these marvel games since 2014 rather than focus on Halo, gears and forza? As if to say Spider-Man etc?
Well I for one could not care. In the last year 8 years I have far more played and enjoyed those trio of games series faaaaarrrrr more than any one marvel game. So Phil chose right.
So I’m guessing the narrative being pushed here is Xbox could have had all these marvel games since 2014 rather than focus on Halo, gears and forza? As if to say Spider-Man etc?
Well I for one could not care. In the last year 8 years I have far more played and enjoyed those trio of games series faaaaarrrrr more than any one marvel game. So Phil chose right.
Yeah they probaby could have done. Like who though?
It’s a question. Can’t we ask question anymore? Lmao, don’t need to get defensive.Why does it matter to you? Maybe they do.
That’s not my cup of tea, but for others they really like that type of thing.
I enjoying playing good games and good sequels.You like playing iterations of the same game over and over again?
I simply disagree. At that time, they were basically two years away from shutting down Lionhead, cancelling Fable Legends and Scalebound and rumors had it that no funding was going into Xbox One so wouldn't have made any sense at that time. If anything, it probably would have back fired. As for finding an external studio, outside of Playground which are having their own issues with Fable, who else could they trust? Crytek, Remedy, etc. were external partners and both are long gone in regards to working with Microsoft exclusively.Perhaps, but it didn't even have to be Insomniac. Microsoft could have found a capable developer. They should have found a way to make it happen.
It’s narrative that’s being pushed as far as I can tell. I mean we have people here quoting Twitter fanboys.It’s not an ”either-or”-situation even if a lot of people seem to read it that way for some odd reason.
So you like playing iterations of the same game over and over, got it. Nothing against that if you enjoy repetition. You do you.I enjoying playing good games and good sequels.
I don’t enjoy superhero games. At all.
I simply disagree. At that time, they were basically two years away from shutting down Lionhead, cancelling Fable Legends and Scalebound and rumors had it that no funding was going into Xbox One so wouldn't have made any sense at that time. If anything, it probably would have back fired. As for finding an external studio, outside of Playground which are having their own issues with Fable, who else could they trust? Crytek, Remedy, etc. were external partners and both are long gone in regards to working with Microsoft exclusively.
Should Microsoft get Marvel/Disney/Lucas (and WB for that matter) now though? Absolutely.
Remedy? lolIf not Insomniac, then perhaps Remedy.
Remedy? lol
Nah man, I think that there's a reason why they stopped collaborating after Quantum Break. But, if we went with Remedy, which superhero do you think that they could have done?
Ambassadors probably. Did the same thing when MS, one of the richest companies in the world invests nothing into VR. Like having less games is good but having the same games coming, that were coming anyway, with Phil writting another company fat cheques is genius and great for them. I mean they rejected this to focus on their IPs and look at all the amazing games coming from their IPs...What is this narrative that Microsoft not making a Marvel game (not necessarily Spider-man) last gen was somehow a good thing? Xbox One's first party library was horrendous. A game like Spider-man would have been a huge boost.
But somehow, Sony getting not just that franchise, but the relationship with Marvel that created both the Miles Morales sequel and Wolverine was a good thing for Microsoft?
I've heard it all.
Hahahaha so salty. Iterations of the same game over and over…..do you really want to go down that road? As I said I don’t enjoy superhero games. I can’t think of one Iv enjoyed since 2014. Whereas I have had a ball with halo, gears and forza games. Sorry if that doesn’t fit your narrative preference.So you like playing iterations of the same game over and over, got it. Nothing against that if you enjoy repetition. You do you.
Ok, I have never heard of Dr strange (don't hate me).People genuinely associate the doctor strange ip with them.
I’m not defensive. I’m just genuinely curious why you would ask something like this considering you are clearly in the Sony camp and you know precisely what you are doing.It’s a question. Can’t we ask question anymore? Lmao, don’t need to get defensive.
Like I said, you do you.Hahahaha so salty. Iterations of the same game over and over…..do you really want to go down that road? As I said I don’t enjoy superhero games. I can’t think of one Iv enjoyed since 2014. Whereas I have had a ball with halo, gears and forza games. Sorry if that doesn’t fit your narrative preference.
Because I wanted to ask.I’m not defensive. I’m just genuinely curious why you would ask something like this considering you are clearly in the Sony camp and you know precisely what you are doing.
You can use words like “triggered” and “defensive” all you want but it’s pretty clear what your intentions are whenever you get into these types of threads.
Series is at around 14.5 million 18 months in. Xbox one was around 12million after 18 months. That’s about a 20% increase.I didnt say it doesnt mean anything. Its just everyone has games in the pipeline.
Blind or not, they are selling the same. Series X/S has sold the same as Xbox One in 16 months and the Series is cheaper.
Xbox One‘s trajectory was also looking to outsell 360. It just didnt happen. I doubt Xbox reaches 360 numbers again. The landscape was in there advantage and probably wont happen again like that.
Both Xone and Series S/X sold better than the 360 after 16 months. 30% of the lifetime sales, but they are selling the same, so that doesnt mean much.
2 of the biggest AAA dropped last year with Halo and Forza. Gears will be another big one. Forza Sport another one. Hellblade 2. The new ip we’ll have to see
We’ll just have to wait and see
Ok, I have never heard of Dr strange (don't hate me).
Remedy? lol
Nah man, I think that there's a reason why they stopped collaborating after Quantum Break. But, if we went with Remedy, which superhero do you think that they could have done?
Imo there is a wealth of opportunity or possibilities with this character. but if not remedy, there is insomniac due to the whole rifts and dimensions.
If they let Quantum Break burn that bridge then they were being foolish, imo. I agree with Cyber_hunter026 . Dr. Strange would have been a good choice.
When Microsoft passed on it? That's some spectacular mental gymnastics right there.You guys are really trying hard to spin the blame on Microsoft that Spiderman is exclusive. Sounds like more Marvels fault.
Series is at around 14.5 million 16 months in. Xbox one was around 12million after 26 months. That’s about a 20% increase.
Also they dropped the Kinect a half a year in or so, Making it $400. So their average sale price was the same.
You guys are really trying hard to spin the blame on Microsoft that Spiderman is exclusive. Sounds like more Marvels fault.
I’m not sure where you’re getting those numbers from. Since Xbox doesn’t release numbers it’s hard to know for sure.
This is off vgchartz. “The Xbox Series X|S has sold 14.43 million units in 18 months, while the Xbox One sold 11.81 million units.”
Also the series s is $100 cheaper and X is $100 more. Averages out to be the same. I have no idea what the split is.
Chances are they would have been bad Marvel games anayway. I would rather see them focus on their own IP. The fact that they dropped the ball last gen, doesn't mean this would have been a good deal.What is this narrative that Microsoft not making a Marvel game (not necessarily Spider-man) last gen was somehow a good thing? Xbox One's first party library was horrendous. A game like Spider-man would have been a huge boost.
But somehow, Sony getting not just that franchise, but the relationship with Marvel that created both the Miles Morales sequel and Wolverine was a good thing for Microsoft?
I've heard it all.
It is not easy to say with certainty that X studio could have worked on a marvel I.P
I see you are easily triggered.
Majority of Marvel games have been trash. Out sounds like ms made the right callWhat an utterly IDIOTIC move.
Just goes to show how poorly managed Xbox publishing is.
Insomniac literally used the engine MS paid to develop with Sunset Overdrive and made a huge exclusive with Sony.
If you want to brag about being an unpaid marketing shill, hey, more power to you.I see you are easily triggered.
Yeah cuz gotg and avengers did gangbusters. Lol
Incase you didn't know, both games did poorly.
Chances are they would have been bad Marvel games anayway. I would rather see them focus on their own IP. The fact that they dropped the ball last gen, doesn't mean this would have been a good deal.