Why would i?
seems fine tho i'm not sure who this is for in 2020
aight i take it back
Because some people like the original.
But whatever, it's Disney, it's woke, it's blah blah blah
EXACTLY. What's wrong with the Peter Pan we got?!fuck this movie, we already have a live action peter pan...
Can't believe they'd made a black woman the sidekick, and a silent woman with anger issues, too!
The problem isn't that she's black, it's the thought process behind taking a character that's a European mythical creature, from a British fairytale, who is one of the most iconic character designs in the entire history of cinema, appearing as that design in Disney's marketing and logo for decades, and ignoring all that completely in a remake.
It is very, very hard to see that this casting was done purely because she was the best actress for the role, and not just more of the same woke racism that we know infects the media, who see all minorities, but particularly black people, as perpetual victims that need to be given special treatment out of pity, because they can't succeed on merit.
Meanwhile, I expect Tigerlily and the American Indians, whom are not the right kind of diversity, to be given a smaller role (if any) and have their song removed.
Edit: actually after having a look they apparently are having an Tigerlily, and in an extended role, so I will give them credit for that if true. That doesn't make this casting any less suspect though, and if they wanted to virtue signalling, that's the casting they should be crowing about.
In this current political climate? Say it ain't so.Maybe they did have 2000 kids apply for the role and she was the best one?
Well at least this one doesn't look like someone who was made in a skyrim character creation menu with a totally fucked eyes distance slider...
Well at least they choose a girl who looks like a fish for the role of ariel
At this point either live with the changes, or stop watching Disney. They’re going all in on wokeness, and no amount of grumbling is going to change anything.
Maybe, but it's statistically improbable, which combined with the far lefts fetishisation of black people, leading to their vast over representation in modern media, natueally leads me to be highly suspicious of such a casting when it's such a departure from the established characters look.Maybe they did have 2000 kids apply for the role and she was the best one?
Meh, more stuff i wont take my kids to see.
I'm tired of media pushing minorities down my throat, i prefer that my kids watch movies who have people the same as them and the same as our country.
Your western media is completely fucked. Here is the stuff i let my kids watch
Yeah but just because a character has a certain eye/skin/hair colour in one adaptation of the book doesn't mean every adaptation has to do that. It's like how Peter Pan has had brown hair but he's also had blond hair. I don't think having a blond Peter Pan or a dark haired Tinkerbell is an issue.Because some people like the original.
But whatever, it's Disney, it's woke, it's blah blah blah
LatviaWhat country are you from, by chance?
Latvia
Are you kidding? Tiger Lilly is probably going to be the one that taught Peter to fly, sword fight, and will probably defeat captain hook. There will also be a scene where none of the boys can figure something out and all the girls will just be standing there rolling their eyes until they can't stand it any longer and they just push the boys out of the way and get'r done!The problem isn't that she's black, it's the thought process behind taking a character that's a European mythical creature, from a British fairytale, who is one of the most iconic character designs in the entire history of cinema, appearing as that design in Disney's marketing and logo for decades, and ignoring all that completely in a remake.
It is very, very hard to see that this casting was done purely because she was the best actress for the role, and not just more of the same woke racism that we know infects the media, who see all minorities, but particularly black people, as perpetual victims that need to be given special treatment out of pity, because they can't succeed on merit.
Meanwhile, I expect Tigerlily and the American Indians, whom are not the right kind of diversity, to be given a smaller role (if any) and have their song removed.
Edit: actually after having a look they apparently are having an Tigerlily, and in an extended role, so I will give them credit for that if true. That doesn't make this casting any less suspect though, and if they wanted to virtue signalling, that's the casting they should be crowing about.
Oh ok. Makes sense you don't like minorities since you're from an all white country.
Where is that image that shows Disney replacing all the white people in their shows with POC?Maybe they did have 2000 kids apply for the role and she was the best one?
Is this the part where we are supposed to be outraged and froth at the mouth that a company cast a black woman for a part in a children's movie and behave like there is some sort of concerted effort to wipe the white race off the face of the earth instead of using rational and logical thought processes to realize that the company is merely expanding the roles to reach audiences they didnt before and increase revenue?
I don't know, is this also going to be the part where the poeple that make this strawman argument provide any evidence at all that this kind of race switching has actually expanded the audience and increased revenue?Is this the part where we are supposed to be outraged and froth at the mouth that a company cast a black woman for a part in a children's movie and behave like there is some sort of concerted effort to wipe the white race off the face of the earth instead of using rational and logical thought processes to realize that the company is merely expanding the roles to reach audiences they didnt before and increase revenue?
I don't know, is this also going to be the point where the poeple that make this strawman argument provide any evidence at all that this kind of race switching has actually expanded the audience and increased revenue?
I dont know. I'm not Disney's bookkeeper. It is a much more logical argument than the typical one coming from middle aged men complaining about poc getting roles in children's films that were originally white though.
Well excuse me for not liking it when racists treat all black people like victims that need pity and special treatment to succeed, objectifying them to make themselves look good, while stoking the violent fires of racial tension we're currently suffering under, all at the expense of the quality of artistic work and the ability for people to suspend their disbelief in fantasy fiction that relies on that conceit.I dont know. I'm not Disney's bookkeeper. It is a much more logical argument than the typical one coming from middle aged men complaining about poc getting roles in children's films that were originally white.
Well excuse me for not liking it when racists treat all black people like victims that need pity and special treatment to succeed, objectifying them to make themselves look good, while stoking the violent fires of racial tension we're currently suffering under, all at the expense of the quality of artistic work and the ability for people to suspend their disbelief in fantasy fiction that relies on that conceit.
Next time I'll just ignore the obvious racism involved in this stuff, no worries!
Obviously not, but as a symptom of a wider problem amongst the far left that has become endemic amongst the news and media, and treat everything through the lens of intersectionalist critical race theory, yes, these people are the ones that are telling black people they are victims, that a persons race and the past defines them, are rioting at imagined injustices and actively trying to undermine society in order to impose regressive, racist, harmful changes while redefining words to make themselves look virtuous in doing so.You'd have to be an unhinged lunatic to think a poc being cast in a children's movie is "stoking the violent fires of racial tension". Like, you can't be serious with that comment can you? Let's ignore the generations of injustice, no sir, it is tinkerbell being played by a black woman that is stoking the fires of racial tension.
This movie is ruined for these children, how could they possibly suspend their disbelief in this fantasy fiction when a black woman is tinkerbell!?
Disney gotta rehash and ride out that soulless "live action remake" train. I can't wait until we get to Basil the Great Mouse Detective or Oliver & Companyseems fine tho i'm not sure who this is for in 2020
keep trying, i'm sure they will make all your favoritesDisney gotta rehash and ride out that soulless "live action remake" train. I can't wait until we get to Basil the Great Mouse Detective or Oliver & Company
the company is merely expanding the roles to reach audiences they didnt before and increase revenue?
Because people are sick of it. Make new characters instead of changing all these old characters to black. If we took a black character and made them white; the world would burn down. People dont have a problem with black characters, we have a problem with changing stories to fit this stupid culture we've created.Then why the snarky comment about black people? I posted who's playing Peter Pan and Wendy. I don't understand why everyone is up in arms.
Maybe, but it's statistically improbable, which combined with the far lefts fetishisation of black people, leading to their vast over representation in modern media, natueally leads me to be highly suspicious of such a casting when it's such a departure from the established characters look.
If we didn't have such a push for discriminatory and objectifying hiring policies becoming the norm now in the media, I wouldn't care about her race.
As it stands, the odds are that this was done out of the politically correct bigotry of low expectations, because that's the norm in the media today, sadly.
*Fades to Disney Studios*But making movies should be about more than just money, shouldn't it?
It wasn't about black people. It was about white liberals behind these decisions being condescending towards black people.Then why the snarky comment about black people? I posted who's playing Peter Pan and Wendy. I don't understand why everyone is up in arms.
Tinkerbell is a fictional character from an imaginary place. Why would anyone be upset about this?