malek4980 said:
Anecdotal evidence is always great, but I think the number of people who work minimum wage jobs simply to get out of the house is exceedingly small. And I'm sure your friend would prefer to get out of the house and earn a better wage, if she could.
You stated there were only two options, I simply stated another. She's not exactly my friend though, just a co-worker.
malek4980 said:
I thought we were strictly arguing about the minimum wage. As for tips, people go into the respective jobs with certain expectations. Maybe it's arbitrary that waiters gets tips and checkout staff don't, but base salaries in those professions are shaped by those expectations as are the available talent pools.
Why is it then that waiters are expected to get tips? What service is so special about taking orders and waiting tables when the person really doing the significant work is the cook?
malek4980 said:
These potential deductions aren't that impressive when they don't pay much tax in the first place--because they don't earn much. Being envious of minimum-wage earners because they don't pay much tax is like being envious of bald men because they don't have to buy shampoo. Who cares if they don't pay much tax when they can't afford rent or have to go to a food-bank?
I'm not envious because they pay much tax, I'm pointing out that I pay more tax that goes for the benefit of all eligible Canadians. I've already provided social assistance, which itself does not count (at least not much) the additional volunteer time or donations I put in.
Tipping as a form of social assistance to minimum wage earners is just absurd.
malek4980 said:
Again, education isn't for everyone, and some simply aren't attracted to it. But there will always be skilled and unskilled labor jobs. I don't see why the people working these jobs shouldn't at least receive fair, living minimum wages.
Not being attracted to education is to me, is indicative of laziness. Unless you're a genious, are on the coattails of another genious, or come from a background with a large social saftey net that allows you to screw up, then not getting an education is a good way to end up struggling to pay off your 40 year mortgage doing a job you hate, while your stay at home wife takes care of the kids you barely have time to spend with.
As I said, this is something I see all too often. Only the people who educate and retrain break the cycle.
malek4980 said:
Pull yourself up by your boot-straps, eh? I can't believe people are still tied to that kind of thinking during this economic shitstorm. Even at the best of times, people often face poor economic prospects because of factors entirely beyond their control.
It's only beyond their control because they didn't plan. What good is it to work like that steel mill or GM plant is going to be there forever? You have no time on the side to learn more marketable skills? Even if I lost both jobs now, I still have enough marketable skills to grab a rung on the economic ladder in a wide number of positions because I have marketable skills and have planned for the worst.
What is beyond a persons control is dependant on what they allow to be beyond their control.
malek4980 said:
Some people can; some can't. There are many things that could have prevented your parents from becoming millionaires: accidents, bad health, poor economic conditions. They probably benefited from other things also not within their control. Wealth often is conditional.
Poor economic conditions still affected my family but they still worked through it. We landed in Montreal expecting to get jobs to pay rent, but there were no jobs. We then moved to AB where my mother, who actually was too poor to finish high school got a job with the Royal Bank where the no tolerance for failure policy at the bank she previously worked at, made her exceptional in comparison.
My father continued his aircraft mechanic position with Air Canada until they downsized, and then Canadian Airlines until they downsized. He then worked in Saskatchewan installing signage. While doing that in another province, he spent his spare time learning computer records keeping. He lost that job when the term was over and went to work for Save on Foods for their computer records keeping. He was then downsized and spent a year without work during which he passed some course about security and records.
He then worked for City of Calgary transit records, then City of Calgary Police, and then went on to make his own business with another employee, only to be hired into the United Farmers Association for Records Management where he works from home, earns a six figure salary and teaches at SAIT as a professor.
This is the same boorish guy whose aircraft college had him chase cows out of the class every morning and who only holds a diploma.
My mother without the highschool diploma and poor english skills? Now speaks and types better than one of my team leaders born and bred in BC, Canada (thanks in part to my Peter and Jane books) and she works as a Senior Financial Analyst despite not having the degrees the junior financial analyst reporting to her does.
There's nothing magical about what they did, aside from not getting hurt too much. Although working as an Aircraft mechanic leaves longstanding injuries that he's now paying for.
Is wealth conditional? Certainly. It's conditional to exploiting available opportunities, and in nations that thrive on capitalistic venture, the opportunities are just about everywhere.
malek4980 said:
Even assuming everyone could in fact become as wealthy as they wanted eventually, why shouldn't they earn a fair, living wage while working during their climb up the ladder? Many students, for example, have to work--like in restaurants--while trying to pay for school.
Everyone can't become wealthy. The system is designed to advance the people seeking it, and keep those that don't at the bottom. Ever notice these people coming from other countries in droves and working harder because wherever they came from offered them little room to maneuver? That is how the world actually is without the comfort of economic superpower. As the world globalizes, they will compete with you and unless you compete, they will crush you. They already know the importance of education and drive, only because the gaps are much larger where they live and the effects are more prominant.