Zoomers Coughing on Grocery Items and Posting it on Social Media
- Thread starter HeresJohnny
- Start date
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Cybrwzrd
Banned
You had to see it because I saw it.
infinitys_7th
Member
Last edited:
Batiman
Banned
Last edited:
Hideous Snake
Gold Member
Anything for the views and cheap fame. Eh, what a garbage generation.
DiscoJer
Member
At the Walmart where I work, we actually had kids cough on us (people working) last week.
But I don't see how it's really any worse than the typical behavior. People crowding you, people getting right up into your face asking questions or worse, making stupid jokes about the empty shelves.
You expect teenagers to be dumbasses. They're teenagers. They even know they are being dumbasses, they just think it's funny. It's the adults who are worse, because they their completely oblivious of their bad behavior.
But I don't see how it's really any worse than the typical behavior. People crowding you, people getting right up into your face asking questions or worse, making stupid jokes about the empty shelves.
You expect teenagers to be dumbasses. They're teenagers. They even know they are being dumbasses, they just think it's funny. It's the adults who are worse, because they their completely oblivious of their bad behavior.
Stiflers Mom
Banned
We'll talk again if they still think that shit is funny when the next outbreak is something like the spanish flu that kills young people predominantly.
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Watch this being spinned as some brave minority (presumably gay) man being bullied by right wing white cis male fascist. I can already hear that....
On a side note: Why this trash even exists???
Spukc
always chasing the next thrill
What the fucking fuck. I'd beat my kid until his brains leaked out of his ear holes if I saw him doing this kind of shit (if I had kids that is). I know everyone is piece of shit until they're about 20 or so (sometimes much longer), but these kids just keep lowering the bar. I just can't even imagine doing something like this.
Actually, the title should be changed to reflect that these are Generation Z fucktards, not the other fucktards.
nkarafo
Member
This type of "prank" always gets on my nerves. Spitting on food, licking products and now this.
In all other pranks the "victim" has the chance to see you and react. If you throw a cake on a person's face he is probably going to chase you. There's always some kind of risk the pranker takes in order to have his fun. There's always an interaction between the two parties, plus the victim always knows he was pranked at the end. And that's the point of pranks. That's the funny part for anyone watching them. And as much as i hate pranks that inconvenience the victims, i respect that.
These ones though... The victim will probably never know someone spitted on his food. There is no interaction between the two parties and the pranker receives no retaliation from his victim. So what's the point again? Literally doing something mean to someone for the sake of... doing something mean?
And i get how sometimes people who handle food may be angry with a customer and do this shit (i don't agree with it even then) but even then, the customer won't notice it (most of the time it's just gross, not harmful) so in his mind he didn't suffer any consequences. So basically you are the only one who knows you "got" him. So how is that getting him you coward?
But doing it in a scenario where the victim is going to be a random person you never met and never will? I don't get it.
In all other pranks the "victim" has the chance to see you and react. If you throw a cake on a person's face he is probably going to chase you. There's always some kind of risk the pranker takes in order to have his fun. There's always an interaction between the two parties, plus the victim always knows he was pranked at the end. And that's the point of pranks. That's the funny part for anyone watching them. And as much as i hate pranks that inconvenience the victims, i respect that.
These ones though... The victim will probably never know someone spitted on his food. There is no interaction between the two parties and the pranker receives no retaliation from his victim. So what's the point again? Literally doing something mean to someone for the sake of... doing something mean?
And i get how sometimes people who handle food may be angry with a customer and do this shit (i don't agree with it even then) but even then, the customer won't notice it (most of the time it's just gross, not harmful) so in his mind he didn't suffer any consequences. So basically you are the only one who knows you "got" him. So how is that getting him you coward?
But doing it in a scenario where the victim is going to be a random person you never met and never will? I don't get it.
Last edited:
Harold Lloyd
Neo Member
No idea what a zoomer is, in my day we just called them cunts.
StormCell
Member
No, that's bullshit when the little fuckers just go on sucking and the parents are given a free pass at failing society like this. There has to be some repercussions when you fail at your responsibilities and it directly leads to destruction of someone else's property (this case: the food).
I don't think fines are the first thing I would resort to. The state could threaten to remove the kids because obviously there's not enough parenting going on. Send a case worker to check on them once a week every week for the next year. THAT ought to result in some interesting family dynamics for a while...
Yoshi
Headmaster of Console Warrior Jugendstrafanstalt
How is that a murder attempt? If you do something with the intent of upsetting people and there is a miniscule chance it can lead to death (just think about it: What are the chances that the teenagers in question have a deadly disease transmittable by saliva, what are the chances of then the customer in question contracting that sickness and finally of that custimer dying?). I do not think it is reasonable to judge that as a murder attempt.
GymWolf
Member
i hope he catch the worst type of herpes...
Frito_Pendejo
Member
You're just insinuating the parents are to blame in all of these situations and that's probably not the case. It would be like blaming a serial killers parents. Just cause a person sucks doesn't mean their parents did.
StormCell
Member
I agree that the parents aren't always to blame. In every case. But Frito, this sort of thing is grasping at fringe cases just like on other highly political topics. Are you suggesting that because parents can't possibly be held responsible for the actions of their 17-year-old in a murder case, then parents can't be held responsible when their kids go out into public and cause panic?
I think we can do better than that. If you can't prevent your 17-and-under kid from walking out that door, then you have a bigger problem at hand. Call for back-up.
Cybrwzrd
Banned
Kid Who Licked Toilet for Social Media Challenge is Diagnosed with Chinese Coronavirus - Big League Politics
He has been diagnosed with the virus.
bigleaguepolitics.com
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Kid Who Licked Toilet for Social Media Challenge is Diagnosed with Chinese Coronavirus - Big League Politics
He has been diagnosed with the virus.
Shut up!
Seriously?!
Cybrwzrd
Banned
Apparently so.