swazzyswess
Member
now they bait-and-switch their loyal fan base without even a single word explaining this behavior?
That's not what bait and switch is.
now they bait-and-switch their loyal fan base without even a single word explaining this behavior?
I am only about an hour into the game, but the lighting is just sadness. I have probably passed 15 places I could have lit with a torch that are just useless to do so. Everything is well lit, I can see the enemies.
I can only imagine how much depth is now missing from this game due to the omission of the proper lighting. It's more than a graphical downgrade, it's missing a major gameplay mechanic. I think it is really frustrating when people say, "looks fine to me".
Last gen systems are terrible. PS3 has like what 512mbs of RAM?I just use that as an example that last gen systems are terrible and it's possible that From decided to work on gameplay and general mechanics over graphics, since there isn't all the much father you can push last gen systems anyway.never mind the fact that it's actually 256x2
If the PC version is proper, FROM will gain a hell of a rabid fanbase. This will be like the original version, but in reverse.
hilarious
I think that's so unfair though.
Last gen systems are terrible. PS3 has like what 512mbs of RAM?I just use that as an example that last gen systems are terrible and it's possible that From decided to work on gameplay and general mechanics over graphics, since there isn't all the much father you can push last gen systems anyway.never mind the fact that it's actually 256x2
I think they did a good job given the tools at their disposal. I'd wait to judge them until after we see a PS4bone Souls game.
That's not what bait and switch is.
They are shit, that's why the framerate is shit, why the resolution is shit, why there's no decent texture filtering and why there's low quality effects etc etc
but this ps2 style lighting on environments is beyond ps360 shittyness
Found footage of the mansion of the dragons. There's no way anybody anywhere can't claim this game hasn't been completely gutted. Just look at this shit, LOOK AT THIS SHIT:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This one looks similar, but without the dramatic chiaroscuro-style lighting, a simplified skybox and less dragons flying around:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndRpge6kHc8&t=5m13s
![]()
![]()
A beta isn't a finished product, a beta or an alpha is not a promise either, the whole point of beta testing is to see how things are working in an actual game scenario, and then make changes based on the data collected and feedback. From didn't promise to deliver the beta, the promised to deliver a sequel to Dark Souls, which they did, and with flying colors based on my 8 hours with it and the great reviews. To say reviewers, who are paid to review the product at hand, should do anything other than review the finished product is ludicrous, they should editorialize to a certain extent, but the ultimate goal is to review the product in front of you. If the game is worse than thw beta in some way it should be holistically reflected in the review as an overall indictment of the game in questions quality, not some weird diatribe about how they are a petulant child and From pissed in their cereal. The sense of entitlement, institutionalized bias, and catering to vocal minorities who act like spoiled adolescents (maybe some actually are) is why games journalism is a joke. Oh and the widely accepted bribing too.
Well, From weren't kidding when they said "current-gen still holds more possibilities for us."
If it's not, we all lose.
No doubt about it. Last gen gave us Tomb Raider, GTAV, DmC, Halo 4, the Uncharteds o course, GoWs, the LoS, Metro, Witcher 2 on 360, it could be achieved by a ood team. I know I'm in the minority but I've always thought Dark Souls looked like horrible crap, but this is somehow just as crap with worse artstyle.lol. Many more possibilities...
Serious question though. Do you guys think if this game were in the hands of more competent devs, would it be possible for the game to retain the original (intended?) look throughout the whole game, or is it really beyond the scope of current gen consoles?
lol. Many more possibilities...
Serious question though. Do you guys think if this game were in the hands of more competent devs, would it be possible for the game to retain the original (intended?) look throughout the whole game, or is it really beyond the scope of current gen consoles?
I suppose they have to decrease the quality so that the next gen versions look much better ...
I'm still getting this game though. I've seen a couple of let's plays and it looks great.
Let's put it this way: the original demo doesn't look better than Uncharted 3 (THE RETAIL VERSION. Apparently we have to make that distinction now...), which is obviously possible.
I really don't want to trash From for not delivering as good a graphical showcase as U3. I'm not a Souls fan for its graphical prowess, although a sublime art direction was definitely part of the appeal. But I'm saying these changes aren't inherently because of the currrent gen hardware.
Even so, if you feel you're entitled to an explanation then I will say good luck to you, because BN has probably covered their trail with fine-print or legal shenanigans at some point down the line.
If anyone cares, I continued the convo. I pressed Vaati a little on honesty and integrity.
He states again that the pics does look like a downgrade, but reserves judgement until completion....
https://twitter.com/VaatiVidya/status/443599211452305408
Hey, I actually made a video comparing the original demo to the final game. Sort of shot for shot.
Dark Souls 2 - April 2013 Vs Retail Lighting and Graphics Comparison
What is Vaati's involvement with Dark Souls again? Is he just a very famous youtuber, or does he have some bigger involved on the development/marketing side of it?
What is Vaati's involvement with Dark Souls again? Is he just a very famous youtuber, or does he have some bigger involved on the development/marketing side of it?
Hey, I actually made a video comparing the original demo to the final game. Sort of shot for shot.
Dark Souls 2 - April 2013 Vs Retail Lighting and Graphics Comparison
Like day and night. Great work.
Hey, I actually made a video comparing the original demo to the final game. Sort of shot for shot.
Dark Souls 2 - April 2013 Vs Retail Lighting and Graphics Comparison
Hey, I actually made a video comparing the original demo to the final game. Sort of shot for shot.
Dark Souls 2 - April 2013 Vs Retail Lighting and Graphics Comparison
![]()
Hey, I actually made a video comparing the original demo to the final game. Sort of shot for shot.
Dark Souls 2 - April 2013 Vs Retail Lighting and Graphics Comparison
At this point Vaati has access to as much information as anybody else and is really just a youtuber so people should stop hassling him.
Hey, I actually made a video comparing the original demo to the final game. Sort of shot for shot.
Dark Souls 2 - April 2013 Vs Retail Lighting and Graphics Comparison
What is Vaati's involvement with Dark Souls again? Is he just a very famous youtuber, or does he have some bigger involved on the development/marketing side of it?
At this point Vaati has access to as much information as anybody else and is really just a youtuber so people should stop hassling him.
As others have replied, he is a YouTube personality, has a lot of fans and has done a lot in the community to keep the fires/passion for Souls going with his vids and lore.
Although I personally liked his early stuff. He seems torn between being an apologist for From and being an objective pundit, but with his large subscriber base he has a pulpit.