[1] US 8th Gen LTD
![]()
[2] US Handheld TTM HW
![]()
Not sure what exactly is baffling.
Probably because I'm not just looking to cherrypick numbers from the United States, thanks for sharing though.
[1] US 8th Gen LTD
![]()
[2] US Handheld TTM HW
![]()
Not sure what exactly is baffling.
You're right. They're not equivalent at all. The Sony drop off lost Sony more money in a year than they made in the previous four. Meanwhile, Nintendo hasn't even lost one year of Wii profits after three years of losses.
In terms of profit, Sony's drop off was worse. But I think he was referring to PS2 -> PS3 unit sales, for which PS3 sold ~50% of PS2's install base. For reference, Wii U will likely sell ~10% of Wii's install base when it's all said and done.
lolyou caught me.. im part of the Nintendo conspiracy...
and of course console publishers have peaks, but it's not realistic to expect either Nintendo or Sony to hit the Wii and PS2 type sales again any time soon. but to say that Sony's drop off is equivalent to the sort of decline Nintendo's seen is disingenuous. and while i think it's unlikely that PS4 will reach PS3 lifetime sales, it's not guaranteed Sony wont come very close.
Unless it isn't coming out for Wii U, which is a big possibility.
I disagree on the doomed part. You can't lose practically all of the money you made on the Wii in a few years and not be in line for major, major changes.
Unless it isn't coming out for Wii U, which is a big possibility.
How is he cherrypicking? lolProbably because I'm not just looking to cherrypick numbers from the United States, thanks for sharing though.
Well, less third party support like always. At least we'll have new Nintendo games....Right?
I can respect where you're coming fromI sure am enjoying mine. While I can only speak for myself, I don't want a third console doing the same thing as the other two that are available, while sharing most of the same games. Being the odd man out has ironically made Nintendo more than relevant to me again.
How is he cherrypicking? lol
I don't follow. Is this a thinly veiled "lol Nintendo is skipping E3" post? LolHas anyone pointed out that Nintendo skipping their E3 press conference this year may weigh in this decision? Even if Ubi has some stuff coming for the Wii U, Nintendo not making it a focus during their usual press conference may be an issue.
I'm sorry, are you asking how it's cherrypicking to show hardware sales results from only one country, or were you unclear on the fact those are U.S.-only numbers?
I don't follow. Is this a thinly veiled "lol Nintendo is skipping E3" post? Lol
Probably because I'm not just looking to cherrypick numbers from the United States, thanks for sharing though.
They're generally having better luck from this angle too.Not necessarily you, but some people do characterize it as something personal or irrational.
Just Dance was a project well-aligned to the audience on the Wii though, even if it was a low budget/risk affair. Skylanders is probably another example. EA tried to modify their titles in ways they thought would appeal to the audience, and I think that was roundly rejected. Mixed success.
With regard to indies, I'd say they typically want to be on as many platforms as is possible given limited resources. They're not really looking at opportunity cost in the multi-millions etc in terms of ROI. They don't really have to answer to investors for growth and profitability etc. A lot of the time they have a guaranteed market through the likes of Kickstarter to confirm their platform choices. Visibility is probably better on the eShop given limited competition.
Some larger publishers are exploring mobile as an avenue to reach those gamers. Square-Enix wants its own Puzzles and Dragons. EA spent a 3/4 of a billion acquiring PopCap and I doubt EA would be unhappy had it made Candy Crush. They want those dollars, but haven't had the best success in gaining them.
I think to a degree developers themselves don't want to make certain types of titles, even under publisher mandate. But I don't know if it's right to characterize it as seeing such gamers as "beneath them."
![]()
Feel free to provide these expansive numbers you're privy to showing the massive market for Western publishers' games on the 3DS/handhelds.
Bargain bin/catalog titles.DS software beating out the Vita, WiiU, and X1?
What the hell are those britbongs buying?
Ubisoft seem to be trying to do the same in terms of software like their CSI licensed games, assuming "other" refers to those revenues. But they've a long ways to go in terms of filling the void left by the decline of the NDS.They're generally having better luck from this angle too.
DQM:SL is doing well, and EA's mobile revenue has hit $500 million a year.
Rev (Euros) FY14 FY13 FY12 FY11 FY10
Handhelds 10.071 37.686 42.452 62.328 156.78
"Others" 30.213 25.124 42.452 31.164 17.42
How did you come to this conclusion?This doesn't bode well for Nintendo at E3.
Japan isn't relevant to Ubisoft's business model
Feel free to provide these expansive numbers you're privy to showing the massive market for Western publishers' games on the 3DS/handhelds or the runaway success of the Wii U relative to the PS4 and XBO.
In a world where Grand Theft Auto can chart in Japan, maybe the issue isn't Nintendo but "Ubisoft's business model," as you put it.
Probably because I'm not just looking to cherrypick numbers from the United States, thanks for sharing though.
Why are 3rd parties abandoning the Wii U?
Yes, clearly the time frame of sales has no bearing on how well a product is doing. Selling 2M units in 19 months is obviously the same thing as selling 2M units in 2 months.
This is an odd statement in a post complaining about cherrypicking and comparing apples and oranges
I'm just saying
Didn't you know Nintendo only expects to ship 3.6m units in a year now?
that's awful and doesn't bode well with third parties too.
Chicken or the egg.I know Wii U isnt selling gangbusters, but have ubisoft released any meaningful games for Nintendo systems that arent Ghost Recon 3DS, Zombi U and Rayman Legends?
Sales figures arent much to write home about, but theyre going to be skewed in platform comparison charts when they arent releasing anything else.
I know Wii U isnt selling gangbusters, but have ubisoft released any meaningful games for Nintendo systems that arent Ghost Recon 3DS, Zombi U and Rayman Legends?
Sales figures arent much to write home about, but theyre going to be skewed in platform comparison charts when they arent releasing anything else.
I thought Splintercell Blacklist Wii U version was well made, I own that version. It is a dam shame no one else on Wii U bought that or CoDGhost another excellent Wii U 3rd party title.I know Wii U isnt selling gangbusters, but have ubisoft released any meaningful games for Nintendo systems that arent Ghost Recon 3DS, Zombi U and Rayman Legends?
Sales figures arent much to write home about, but theyre going to be skewed in platform comparison charts when they arent releasing anything else.
What matters to Ubisoft is both how many units are sold and how much content they can sell on the hardware units of a platform.What matters to Ubisoft is how many hardware units are out in the six months following one of its releases
How many will they have sold? What exactly makes you think Ubisoft doesn't have internal projections? What exactly do your projections that are apparently superior to theirs say that make them "one of the most myopic publishers."And that's the contradiction I find baffling -- the idea that what these consoles will have sold in 2016 or 2017 is of any interest to one of the most myopic publishers out there.
What matters to Ubisoft is both how many units are sold and how much content they can sell on the hardware units of a platform.
You were already given an example in the last post, regarding the US market.
On an installed base of 1.4M Wii U units, ACIV sold 6K units at launch.
On an installed base of 1.1M PS4 units, ACIV sold 270K+ units at launch.
On an installed base of 900K XBO units, ACIV sold 115K+ units at launch.
I'm sorry, are you asking how it's cherrypicking to show hardware sales results from only one country, or were you unclear on the fact those are U.S.-only numbers?
It's irrational to suggest that Ubisoft did themselves no favors on the Wii U? And again, Ubisoft doesn't have to bother, but if they do, they may as well try in earnest to provide worthwhile content at a reasonable rate comparable to other platforms. Why bother at all if you're not going to try to maximize your profit potential and growth potential on the platform?
Give me a break. Ubisoft was the only third publisher who put a lot of efforts into the WiiU. They made a core exclusive game for it.
Are you really comparing an established franchise like Call of Duty to a new IP like Zombi U?
Activision will place their licensed shovelware on a banana if they could.Activision arguably have put more effort into Wii U as far as making multiplatform parity releases. Ubisoft have made one exclusive and a few multiplatform games have been given the shaft via delays (Rayman, Watchdogs).
not even watch dogs?
welp
Nintendo thought they could get core-targeted multiplatform titles to sell on Wii U without actually doing anything as a first party to cultivate an audience for that type of software. Sorry, that is both a bad strategy and extremely stupid.
Activision arguably have put more effort into Wii U as far as making multiplatform parity releases. Ubisoft have made one exclusive and a few multiplatform games have been given the shaft via delays (Rayman, Watchdogs).
You've got to be kidding me.
The NES, SNES, GB, and GBA were all exclusively aimed at kids. The Wii/DS was exclusively aimed at casual gamers, kids, and families. When ever Nintendo ignores the young male audience they tend to be pretty successful.
The N64, and NGC saw their largest loss in market share and it makes sense when you consider who Nintendo's key demographic is.
It really isn't
The PS3 was a pretty big drop off from the PS2, and you better believe the PS4 isn't gonna get anywhere near PS3's LTD. Plus, the Xbox one isn't looking like it's going to be reaching 360's LTD any time soon as well.
That argument ignores so many different factors just for the sake of getting across an agenda.