alfredofroylan
Member
Well maybe this movie is cheap, but I think this's a good candidate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeGNcGVBE-0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeGNcGVBE-0
Are we going to use this metric then to measure whether a film is a bomb? If GOTG makes 175 million is it then a bomb?
Should we have a chart at this point?
If it makes less than 1.5-2x its budget worldwide, it's a bomb, yes. If GOTG makes 175M worldwide, it will be a colossal failure, up there with Green Lantern.
This is going to be Eating Crow OT if it's not already with all the Maleficent posts.
A Dreamworks movie released earlier this year---Mr. Peabody & Sherman---had a stated production budget of $145 million.
It made $267,336,699 at the worldwide box office. That's nearly twice its production budget.
And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.
Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.
Its definitely a Hollywood blockbuster-style flick, but its done well for the most part. I think its easily one of the more entertaining sci-fi movies I've seen in a while.Anyone who says Edge of Tomorrow can't be trusted to contribute here. I just want to see it for Emily Blunt musskulls wearing an Elysuim suit but it's got simple easy appeal. Explosions, robots, babes, Tom Cruise, and guns. The only hindrance to the trailers is the plot but that just gives it some egghead/P.Dick appeal.
This is going to be Eating Crow OT if it's not already with all the Maleficent posts.
the huge crowd waiting to see Seth McFarlane's follow up to Ted?
I want to like GOTG, but here's my problem....
It's a FUCKING RACOON! I just can't take it seriously, at all.
Yeah and Warner said every Harry Potter movie lost them money. I would take what the studios say about losses with a salt mine.A Dreamworks movie released earlier this year---Mr. Peabody & Sherman---had a stated production budget of $145 million.
It made $267,336,699 at the worldwide box office. That's nearly twice its production budget.
And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.
Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.
Yeah and Warner said every Harry Potter movie lost them money. I would take what the studios say about losses with a salt mine.
Yeah and Warner said every Harry Potter movie lost them money. I would take what the studios say about losses with a salt mine.
And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.
Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.
No the good artwork from the novel is from Yoshitoshi ABe.
![]()
The mediocre artwork that you provided is from the recent manga by Takeshi Obata, same guy drew the terrible artwork for Castlevania Judgement.
People also forget the studios never truthfully report the budgets of their films. Ever.
Probably a smart move. Opening in Feb gives them more breathing room.jupiter ascending is out of the competition!
Disney should snap up that July 18th opening for Guardians of the Galaxy. WB has hogged that weekend for several years now, but it's traditionally a pretty strong spot.
What's coming out that weekend?
What's coming out that weekend?
Sex Tape
Purge 2
Planes 2
Purge was a sleeper hit last year though but Cameron Diaz still draws in crowds and Planes is Planes.
The Tom Cruise movie. Big Budget may lead to big let down.
It worked for gi joe 2.Delaying a film for 7 months is not a good sign. Prepare your bomb, Wachowskis.
It worked for gi joe 2.
The purge was the opposite of a sleeper hit. It was a one weekend chump that made over half its domestic total in those 3 days.
Sleeper hits make consistent amounts of money over long periods of time. Black Swan was a sleeper hit.
That means it's literally the only thing to see. It will make more then opening in summer when it will be pushed out the next week.Edge of Tomorrow being reported as a $180M film is definitely going to hurt it. If it was $120M, I think it would do fine.
GI Joe opened in March. March is becoming a respectable month. February is mostly shit with a few exceptions.
EDIT: Especially if we are discounting date type movies for obvious reasons.
That means it's literally the only thing to see. It will make more then opening in summer when it will be pushed out the next week.
True, but this is a slightly bigger movie then normally opens that time of year.That logic hasn't worked out for a lot of films, especially since those Feb openings often come with a drastic cut in marketing budget.
Kswiston: You think Marvel can move Guardians back to July 18th this close to the date?
I know you're right. Even if North Americans woke up to the films being trash, the rest of the world that flocks to Hollywood's shiny things will happily give the film a billion or so dollars.Transformers chance of bombing is zero percent. It could make $0 in the US and still not bomb.
Hercules no doubt unless the budget is insanely small.
I know you're right. Even if North Americans woke up to the films being trash, the rest of the world that flocks to Hollywood's shiny things will happily give the film a billion or so dollars.
A Dreamworks movie released earlier this year---Mr. Peabody & Sherman---had a stated production budget of $145 million.
It made $267,336,699 at the worldwide box office. That's nearly twice its production budget.
And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.
Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.
Or how creative accounting allows studios to turn marginal success stories into nice tax right offs.