• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Predict the biggest B.O. bomb of summer 2014: Jupiter Ascending Delayed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are we going to use this metric then to measure whether a film is a bomb? If GOTG makes 175 million is it then a bomb?

Should we have a chart at this point?

If it makes less than 1.5-2x its budget worldwide, it's a bomb, yes. If GOTG makes 175M worldwide, it will be a colossal failure, up there with Green Lantern.


A Dreamworks movie released earlier this year---Mr. Peabody & Sherman---had a stated production budget of $145 million.

It made $267,336,699 at the worldwide box office. That's nearly twice its production budget.

And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.

Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.
 
For the purpose of this thread, the metric for bomb here is the lowest amount of profit percentage based on budget of the film, ie if movie A has a budget of $100 million and makes $100 million back, and movie B's budget was $200 million and made $150 million back, then movie B is the bigger bomb because it only made 75% of it's budget, as opposed to movie A making 100% of it's budget. Of course marketing factors in, but because that data is never really available, it wont be included.
 
Anyone who says Edge of Tomorrow can't be trusted to contribute here. I just want to see it for Emily Blunt musskulls wearing an Elysuim suit but it's got simple easy appeal. Explosions, robots, babes, Tom Cruise, and guns. The only hindrance to the trailers is the plot but that just gives it some egghead/P.Dick appeal.
 
A Dreamworks movie released earlier this year---Mr. Peabody & Sherman---had a stated production budget of $145 million.

It made $267,336,699 at the worldwide box office. That's nearly twice its production budget.

And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.

Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.


Then based on that, GOTG is going to be Watchmen II.
 
Anyone who says Edge of Tomorrow can't be trusted to contribute here. I just want to see it for Emily Blunt musskulls wearing an Elysuim suit but it's got simple easy appeal. Explosions, robots, babes, Tom Cruise, and guns. The only hindrance to the trailers is the plot but that just gives it some egghead/P.Dick appeal.
Its definitely a Hollywood blockbuster-style flick, but its done well for the most part. I think its easily one of the more entertaining sci-fi movies I've seen in a while.
 
I want to like GOTG, but here's my problem....

It's a FUCKING RACOON! I just can't take it seriously, at all.

That seems like such an arbitrary barrier of immersion to the Marvel universe. If Gary Shandling can be an elected Senator with deep ties to a secret fascist organization I don't see how imaging a raccoon with a jet pack gunning about universe could be that hard to swallow.
 
A Dreamworks movie released earlier this year---Mr. Peabody & Sherman---had a stated production budget of $145 million.

It made $267,336,699 at the worldwide box office. That's nearly twice its production budget.

And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.

Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.
Yeah and Warner said every Harry Potter movie lost them money. I would take what the studios say about losses with a salt mine.
 
Yeah and Warner said every Harry Potter movie lost them money. I would take what the studios say about losses with a salt mine.

Hollywood accounting 101: Flex the numbers so Net Profit is in the red.

International Gross versus budget should be the only metric this thread cares about in determining the biggest flop.
 
If I had to choose a potential 'bomb' right now for the summer it's starting to feel like Hercules. Though Dwayne Johnson is a very popular actor everything about the tone of this film seems off to me. I just don't see people turning up for this is huge numbers.

I also think that this new Ninja Turtles film is going to miss the mark and do middling business at best. Word is the film plays 'very young' so it's not like Paramount are trying some darker interpretation of the brand.

While Jupiter Ascending is the popular choice Im hoping that it manages to hold its own later in the summer. It's too early for tracking on the film but I have a feeling that weird elf ears or no the combination of Channing Tatum and huge sci-fi action (supposedly later trailers will concentrate on the action..., which is crazy) will bring people in and it won't become another Lone Ranger.

Yeah and Warner said every Harry Potter movie lost them money. I would take what the studios say about losses with a salt mine.

This. People also forget the studios never truthfully report the budgets of their films. Ever.

The amount of times I've seen people quote budget numbers religiously when there is no source for them beyond a rough 'guesstiamtion' in the trades is ludicrous.
 
And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.

Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.

See, I think the term "Bomb" needs to actually MEAN something. Something like the example you pointed out is a disappiontment - but just because Hollywood sucks at accounting doesn't mean a movie that cost 150 and made 270 worldwide is a "Bomb." It might have disappointed, but it's not a BOMB.

Transcendence is a bomb. That's what a bomb looks like. A film that only barely covers its budget is a disappointment. A film that just barely misses its budget is a disappointment.

A film that doesn't even get close? THAT'S a bomb.
 
No the good artwork from the novel is from Yoshitoshi ABe.

tE8xvMy.jpg



The mediocre artwork that you provided is from the recent manga by Takeshi Obata, same guy drew the terrible artwork for Castlevania Judgement.

thanks, I just bought the book cause of you!
 
People also forget the studios never truthfully report the budgets of their films. Ever.

Studios hold their budgets close to their chest, but they're close to the mark if numbers are released. It's Net Profits that are typically skewed beyond any semblance of being reliable.

Of the seven main films mentioned in this thread, 5 of them have reliable budget numbers. Only two; Guardians and Sin City, don't have reliable numbers out there.

mmJBJOk.png
 
Disney should snap up that July 18th opening for Guardians of the Galaxy. WB has hogged that weekend for several years now, but it's traditionally a pretty strong spot.
 
Sex Tape
Purge 2
Planes 2

Purge was a sleeper hit last year though but Cameron Diaz still draws in crowds and Planes is Planes.

The purge was the opposite of a sleeper hit. It was a one weekend chump that made over half its domestic total in those 3 days.

Sleeper hits make consistent amounts of money over long periods of time. Black Swan was a sleeper hit.
 
Edge of Tomorrow being reported as a $180M film is definitely going to hurt it. If it was $120M, I think it would do fine.

It worked for gi joe 2.

GI Joe opened in March. March is becoming a respectable month. February is mostly shit with a few exceptions.

EDIT: Especially if we are discounting date type movies for obvious reasons.
 
The purge was the opposite of a sleeper hit. It was a one weekend chump that made over half its domestic total in those 3 days.

Sleeper hits make consistent amounts of money over long periods of time. Black Swan was a sleeper hit.

Okay, you're right as Man of Steel came out the weekend after.
 
Edge of Tomorrow being reported as a $180M film is definitely going to hurt it. If it was $120M, I think it would do fine.



GI Joe opened in March. March is becoming a respectable month. February is mostly shit with a few exceptions.

EDIT: Especially if we are discounting date type movies for obvious reasons.
That means it's literally the only thing to see. It will make more then opening in summer when it will be pushed out the next week.
 
That means it's literally the only thing to see. It will make more then opening in summer when it will be pushed out the next week.

That logic hasn't worked out for a lot of films, especially since those Feb openings often come with a drastic cut in marketing budget.
 
Hercules might be a safe (ish) pick. The Rock has definitely disappointed at the box office before, and this trailer that just came out sure as hell didn't inspire any confidence.

Kswiston: You think Marvel can move Guardians back to July 18th this close to the date?

edit: Betting Warners is trying to see if they can do what they did with Lego Movie in February. It would necessitate shifting the marketing quite a bit - trying to highlight the "fun" nature of the movie instead of the OMG SERIOUS nature early trailers have been pushing.
 
Kswiston: You think Marvel can move Guardians back to July 18th this close to the date?

Hmm. I guess I forgot that we are only 6-7 weeks away from Jul 18th. Smaller movies have jumped foward and backward a week or two from release. After Earth was bumped forward a week about 5 weeks from release, so I know it isn't logistically impossible. I guess it would depend on things like IMAX deals.
 
Calling a bomba with Jupiter Ascending no longer in the mix is somewhat tricky.

I think Edge of Tomorrow could struggle despite the favorable reviews.

I would like to put forward an argument for Transformers: Age of Extinction without sounding like an insane madman.
Perhaps people will now realize these films are garbage just as they seemingly have for Adam Sandler films.
It's a tough case to make, however, with Michael Bay keeping the budget for this sequel BELOW that of Edge of Tomorrow.

So yeah, Edge of Tomorrow gets my vote for biggest bomba although it should bring in more at the box office domestically than Hercules.
 
Hmm, after my first guess is out, it looks like Edge of Tomorrow. I'm starting to look forward to it too from the word of mouth here. Sad 😢

Next guess is Hercules.
 
Transformers chance of bombing is zero percent. It could make $0 in the US and still not bomb.
I know you're right. Even if North Americans woke up to the films being trash, the rest of the world that flocks to Hollywood's shiny things will happily give the film a billion or so dollars.
 
I know you're right. Even if North Americans woke up to the films being trash, the rest of the world that flocks to Hollywood's shiny things will happily give the film a billion or so dollars.

bu.but i like explosions and shiny things and OPTIMUUUS.
sorry im foreign and im part of the problem
 
A Dreamworks movie released earlier this year---Mr. Peabody & Sherman---had a stated production budget of $145 million.

It made $267,336,699 at the worldwide box office. That's nearly twice its production budget.

And yet, despite this, Dreamworks took a $57.074 million impairment loss and called the movie a financial failure. The situation was so bad for them that they ended up owing their distributor (Fox) money, and the film only contributed $3 million to the company's quarterly revenue.

Just an example of how a film really requires quite a bit more than the stated budget to actually be a success.

Or how creative accounting allows studios to turn marginal success stories into nice tax right offs.
 
Or how creative accounting allows studios to turn marginal success stories into nice tax right offs.

Even if studios got 50% of the worldwide gross (they don't), $265M wouldn't make a $145M film money at the box office. The film wasn't a bomb, and will probably turn a profit eventually via home media, netflix, tv, etc. That's not really a success story though.
 
Well shit, with Jupiter being moved to the 2015 Feb graveyard, this just got a lot harder.

Hmmmm.

Hercules I guess?
 
I have no idea what some of the budgets of these movies are, but if I had to guess it'll either be Sex Tape, the new Planes movie, or the new Planet of the Apes movie.

I'd place chips on them if I was in Vegas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom