Digital-Hero
Member
My gun works on gays and straights. Bring on FarCry 4!
Just watched the Far Cry 4 intro on the Ubisoft conference.
Noticed the main villain looks a lot less Patrick Stewart and now looks somehow Asian.
Compare that to the initial revealed materials..
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think they changed his features after the controversy.
They made him younger looking, or just more Asian looking.
I like the twisted, power hungry Swede look, more than the whiny teen look.
Damn it, internet. You just had to go there.
For all you know, the protag is gay and the villain is a fashion obsessed psychopath with a wife and kids.
We need to stop looking for things to be upset about and reserve judgement until there is actually content to judge.
Yeah, and the trivialization of those fears is also concerning.
It's not necessarily about how one particular gay character in one game is played as a stereotype, but how that plays into the aggregate.
I would caution this thread to avoid the strawman of the PC police -- nothing in the OP would lead one to believe that he was offended. Instead, he was raising concerns about the portrayal of gay men in videogames, and how Far Cry 4 could play into that. That's a valid concern, and it's not wise to shrug off the fears that minorities have of their portrayal in media with a "get over it."
Personally, I'm sick of the effeminate, gay-coded villain in male-skewing media in contrast to the study hero. It was old in Skyfall and Tron 2, and it'd be old if that's how it played out here.
For my part, I see less trivialization and more warnings at caution in this particular thread. There is so little information to go on, we don't know this character's entire role in the story or even his orientation. It's just too early to be concerned, and indicates oversensitivity to my eyes. Even if he does turn out to be gay and a villain, is that really such a problem if he's a well-written and meaningful addition to the story? Far Cry 3 had great villains, and I expect Far Cry 4 will as well.
I would also like to mention that it is a little bit ironic that the OP assumes this character is gay because of stereotyping. I suppose it's only natural to be on your guard about such things when you see them and they're often harmful, but flamboyance in villains who are never indicated to be homosexual isn't new at all, and this guy isn't even playing it particularly flamboyant yet beyond his appearance.
Yep, totally making that up.I wouldn't take anything the OP says seriously.
everything she has said, is based on assumptions, ignorance and stereotypes. I wouldn't put it past this poster to make stuff up to fit her argument.
The discussion will go back to people assuming he's white.Can't wait for him to not be gay and for this whole fiasco to be forgotten.
We already had this thread. The consensus was it was a terrible idea to assume the guy is gay because he's dressed in purple.
Eh, I don't really see that in this thread -- I see less of a concern that this villain could join the pantheon of gay-coded villains and what that means and instead of telling the OP he's being ridiculous. And I don't think it really matters if he's gay or not -- like many Disney villains through the years, they're coded in an effeminate way to contrast with their studly hero. It's not a new phenomena.
No. Here's what I am concerned about though.
I posted it in the Ubisoft thread but it got buried, or people don't give a hoot about Ubisoft:
I am a member of the pachyderm community and I found this game's portrayal of my fellow pachyderms to be abhorrent! We are not all mindless beasts that aggro and rampage over the first NPC to fire at us, and we certainly aren't meant to be "weaponized"! Absolutely sickening!
Yeah, I haven't even consider in my deepest thoughts, that he might be a gay. This is just overreaction.
No. Here's what I am concerned about though.
I posted it in the Ubisoft thread but it got buried, or people don't give a hoot about Ubisoft:
He looked Asian to me even in the initial reveal.No. Here's what I am concerned about though.
I posted it in the Ubisoft thread but it got buried, or people don't give a hoot about Ubisoft:
Are you serious? What the fuck? People are sick.
No. Here's what I am concerned about though.
I posted it in the Ubisoft thread but it got buried, or people don't give a hoot about Ubisoft:
To be fair this kind of behavior goes back at least as long ago as GTAIII. I had a friend who liked to hunt down prostitutes and beat them to death with a baseball bat.Hell, even in Watch Dogs, where the NPCs are just mindless polygons that wander about, there were videos and reports of people seeking out and killing minorities just for the hell of it.
You can't have it both ways. If you want better LGBT representation in games, then that means having gay heroes and villians.
What
What made you think the villain was gay? I don't remember them specifically saying he was.
Dude, spoilers. Come on.
snip
Welcome to the real world. While you view it as sick, someone views the fact that we'll laugh as we mow down pedestrians with a car in GTA as sick. And someone else views the fact that kids discuss K/D spread in video games as sick. We are all racist, sexist, everything wrong with being human. Every single one of us. It's not a mindset, it's just part of how society is. That's not disgusting. Acting that out in games is not disgusting. Acting that out in real life is disgusting. You cannot hurt pixels. Don't imply you're somehow "better" than others because you're appalled by what they do for fun in video games. There are war vets that are disgusted by our love of Call of Duty, just like there are war vets that love it just like us.
Not that you implied that, I'm not saying that, this is more of a broad general statement of the "us vs. them" mindset that we see far too often in gaming. It's "us vs. us." Not "us vs. them."
It's a problem with stereotypes, not the fact that the villain is gay. It's cause the villain is a stereotypical gay guy (assumed).
While I have a hard time seeing someone's sexual preference as a spoiler, I've put a warning above it. Can't really make the post any different or it would be 60% hidden.
Also, if that is really a spoiler, as in knowing it know will affect your enjoyment of the DLC or that someone's sexual preference should be this shocking revelation rather than an interesting footnote, then it's sort of really just highlighting the real problem.
No. Here's what I am concerned about though.
I posted it in the Ubisoft thread but it got buried, or people don't give a hoot about Ubisoft:
Welcome to the real world. While you view it as sick, someone views the fact that we'll laugh as we mow down pedestrians with a car in GTA as sick. And someone else views the fact that kids discuss K/D spread in video games as sick. We are all racist, sexist, everything wrong with being human. Every single one of us. It's not a mindset, it's just part of how society is. That's not disgusting. Acting that out in games is not disgusting. Acting that out in real life is disgusting. You cannot hurt pixels. Don't imply you're somehow "better" than others because you're appalled by what they do for fun in video games. There are war vets that are disgusted by our love of Call of Duty, just like there are war vets that love it just like us.
Not that you implied that, I'm not saying that, this is more of a broad general statement of the "us vs. them" mindset that we see far too often in gaming. It's "us vs. us." Not "us vs. them."
No. Here's what I am concerned about though.
I posted it in the Ubisoft thread but it got buried, or people don't give a hoot about Ubisoft:
Yes. But too many people on GAF will claim that any attention paid to gross bias issues is POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD and that real equality means it's okay to shoot a gay dude in the head at the end of the game.
Yes. But too many people on GAF will claim that any attention paid to gross bias issues is POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD and that real equality means it's okay to shoot a gay dude in the head at the end of the game.
First it's like we want more gay characters. Now it's why is he gay? Just made your mind up LGTB community.
No. I think oddly enough by having the antagonist *possibly* be gay, it means that the character will be featured in a way that makes him a more well rounded, more fully developed character than just a one-off NPC or even a relatively bland main character (like in FC3). The solution to combatting homophobia isn't restricting the ways in which gay characters can be depicted, but rather in making sure that in whatever role they play (good, bad, hero, villain) they are defined by more than just their sexuality.
The villain in FC3 (not the final villain, but the one on the cover) was considered one of the more interesting, memorable and "cool" characters in the game. If they do the same thing with this character (again, who may or may not be gay), I think it could actually end up being a good thing. Idiots may confuse his evil goals with his sexuality, but those morons will have a bias anyway. If he's written well, the rest of us may easily end up seeing his homosexuality as just another one of the several characteristics that define this interesting character.
he looks exactly the same
No. Here's what I am concerned about though.
I posted it in the Ubisoft thread but it got buried, or people don't give a hoot about Ubisoft:
No, speak for yourself with this bullshit post. When I see the filth that some gamers type and say, there is a very clear "them" that I want and take no part in, and the people who are open and accepting of others are definitely a better bunch. Being offended by Call of Duty is nothing like having open animosity/hatred towards gays, women and and ethnic minorities. The latter actually has real world consequences toward how people get treated, the most obvious examples being the slurs some people have to hear in online games or the death threats received online or in the mail when being critical of any aspect of the gaming industry.
What I wanted to say is I think profiling people with the intention of murdering them in a video game sounds like if the person doing that is trying to relieve himself, as in "it's a real shame I can't do that in real life but thank god for this game".
Hear me out, I do agree with you that we're all animals and other people might feel offended as well by what I do in video games (killing people and other stuff), but it's just not the same as hunting down black people or gay people.
I'm just saying that if I ever feel like running down people in GTA, I'm not gonna target a specific group of them based on ethnicities or sexual orientation.