As far as I know, Spain was conquered by people from north Africa, mainly arabs and berbers, not black men.
well then what you know is wrong my friend.
As far as I know, Spain was conquered by people from north Africa, mainly arabs and berbers, not black men.
He isIs this somewhat famous person a racist?
![]()
Yes or No?
This is scripted, by the way
It's fake.
Is this somewhat famous person a racist?
![]()
Yes or No?
well then what you know is wrong my friend.
Your history, culture and context. It doesn't work like that.
According to the logic shown here he is.No. The swastika is a sign of "good luck" (or something like that) in many cultures, the Nazis didn't create it.
I simply assumed he was talking about the black/ red/ white armband worn in the 3rd Reich specifically. But you're obviously totally correct, the symbol itself doesn't even have a single specific meaning in the first place. It's hilarious and a bit sad because it's banned in Germany as "anti-constitutional", which also affects buddhist temples and other completely unrelated uses of the symbol. Political correctness gone horribly wrong.Not only that but an swastika is such a bad example, seeing as for other cultures still means good things.
We even have swastikas carved in a Roman villa floor in Spain.
So im guessing that shows the point a lot of people is missing, different cultures dont see the same thing in things. For some are good, for some are bad and for same are nothing.
Someone posted examples of minstrel shows broadcasted on the BBC across Europe. Someone else posted a link detailing slave trades across Europe. That doesn't sound like the 'history, culture and context' of America.
Someone posted examples of minstrel shows broadcasted on the BBC across Europe. Someone else posted a link detailing slave trades across Europe. That doesn't sound like the 'history, culture and context' of America.
Without context, wearing a swastika means nothing, just like painting your face black means nothing. Do you wear the swastika because you are a nazi, because you want to mock nazis, or because you're an actor playing a role? In the first case, you are a nazi. In the second, you're not a nazi. In the third case, you might or might not be a nazi but the swastika won't tell us. Same thing with black face paint. Is the intention to mock black people, mock racism, or is it worn by an actor playing a role? That alone determines whether or not it's racist, not the symbol or face paint itself.
I know there were Zulu tribes involved (which are awesome in their traditional garbs on the moors and cristians festivities) but Im not sure of others.
Care to explain it further?
You're missing my point, it doesn't matter what I think, I could think a swastika is fine, popular, cool, trendy, or whatever. In the western world, if I were to wear a swastika, is is generally interpreted the same. The Consequences are going to be the same, regardless of my intentions. The fact that there is previous context with the swastika limits the interpretation.
Same theme reflects with "blackface", as that is a symbol of racism. Perhaps that is not how blackface is viewed in your country, but it is offensive to others, and ignorance of that fact does not justify the action.
You're missing my point, it doesn't matter what I think, I could think a swastika is fine, popular, cool, trendy, or whatever. In the western world, if I were to wear a swastika, is is generally interpreted the same. The Consequences are going to be the same, regardless of my intentions. The fact that there is previous context with the swastika limits the interpretation.
Same theme reflects with "blackface", as that is a symbol of racism. Perhaps that is not how blackface is viewed in your country, but it is offensive to others, and ignorance of that fact does not justify the action.
So Buddhist should stop using the swastika because it's highly offensive to us?You're missing my point, it doesn't matter what I think, I could think a swastika is fine, popular, cool, trendy, or whatever. In the western world, if I were to wear a swastika, is is generally interpreted the same. The Consequences are going to be the same, regardless of my intentions. The fact that there is previous context with the swastika limits the interpretation.
Same theme reflects with "blackface", as that is a symbol of racism. Perhaps that is not how blackface is viewed in your country, but it is offensive to others, and ignorance of that fact does not justify the action.
We should change our traditions because Americans, who don't understand or have experienced it, feel offended. Noted.
your right, i would hate to deprive you and your culture from putting black paint all over your face, coloring your lips bright red and wearing an afro wig.
So I shouldn't dress up as a ninja any more?hasn't the swastika symbol kind of decreased in use amongst the faithful post-ww2 tho?
also i think there's an easy rule to follow here: if it's making a mockery of an ethnicity/race then it probably shouldn't be done.
So I shouldn't dress up as a ninja any more?
how deep do you want to go? i could try and explain but i'm afraid a "timeout" would ensue lol.
but here......this guy will explain much better than I. When you find out where the root of racism stems from, it really is quite frightening but shockingly insightful.
So I shouldn't dress up as a ninja any more?
Does it matter if I do it regularly or not?Is it something you do regularly? More so you use it in a way that mocks Japanese?
Does it matter if I do it regularly?
well then what you know is wrong my friend.
If it's fake then who is the racist in this case? Obviously it can't be the man if he is just an actor.
What if he was a racist actor who said he would do the job for free as long as he could blackface.
So Buddhist should stop using the swastika because it's highly offensive to us?
edit
Beaten like a Nazi
From what I heard was the entire event pretty insane for Kim. Some guy she refused to dance with supposedly called her racist slurs and her host, who paid her 250.000 for showing up, groped Kim while also trying to lure her away from her bodyguards.White friends: do not do this. It's neither clever nor funny.
How the fuck does someone even gain access and get close enough to anyone to be seen before security boots them?
So by that interpretation you're saying Buddhists are are associated with nazis? Interesting...
Context people... The general symbol of the swastika was a confusing example, but everyone understands the point. The "equilateral cross" means different things and is besides the point. It was used as an extreme example but has specific meanings. If you have problems distinguishing the intent of Buddhists from nazis, then you should probably leave this thread, as you won't understand why blackface is offensive.
White friends: do not do this. It's neither clever nor funny.
Is this somewhat famous person a racist?
![]()
Yes or No?
Black men in the Muslim armies were slaves so I guess they were treated as grunts. Anyway, I've added the documentary you linked to my YouTube list, so thank you!
So whats the intention of Zwarte Piet? Or of this guys:
but they both look the same
He points a lump of coal in your shoe if you're naughty, otherwise he gives you treats.So whats the intention of Zwarte Piet? Or of this guys:
He points a lump of coal in your shoe if you're naughty, otherwise he gives you treats.
So whats the intention of Zwarte Piet? Or of this guys:
lol
the first man to ever call muslims to prayer was a black man (Bilal ibn Rabah). So if he was a mere "grunt" or slave, what kind of a mockery religion would that be my friend?
do more homework and be brave. the "indoctrinated bullshit" that you were taught in school was just that.
Ad hominem won't help you here, bud.So by that interpretation you're saying Buddhists are are associated with nazis? Interesting...
Context people... The general symbol of the swastika was a confusing example, but everyone understands the point. The "equilateral cross" means different things and is besides the point. It was used as an extreme example but has specific meanings. If you have problems distinguishing the intent of Buddhists from nazis, then you should probably leave this thread, as you won't understand why blackface is offensive.
isn't there a whole holiday based around black face in Sweden?
EDIT: it was the Netherlands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet
![]()
wtf a yall doing in the Netherlands with this shit? unreal.
OT: yeah it's pretty weird he was just allowed into the event like that. some people are just ass clowns.
lol
the first man to ever call muslims to prayer was a black man (Bilal ibn Rabah). So if he was a mere "grunt" or slave, what kind of a mockery religion would that be my friend?
do more homework and be brave. the "indoctrinated bullshit" that you were taught in school was just that.
Some Europeans argue that because they are not in American they can do black face as long as they like because of the different cultures, they say it has different meanings.
Then they throw Bananas at black people.
the startling thing about kim's night out is that not too long ago her people (armenians) were receiving the same treatment that the moors are now so.....that fact she got paid was definitely a bonus no?
Some Europeans argue that because they are not in American they can do black face as long as they like because of the different cultures, they say it has different meanings.
Then they throw Bananas at black people.
That's some jrpg boss right thereMay the stoner nazi pope be with whoever that is
![]()