• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Giant Bomb #8 | It's a Hit!

Status
Not open for further replies.
To give some very relevant context, the position being hired for is Senior Editor and video producer at one of the most respected gaming sites out there, which is currently incredibly understaffed.

To be fair, the original job posting was actually for an Associate Editor.
 
Which is peculiar if you're talking about Giant Bomb; a personality driven site that is more about Cobra one-liners and lamenting caffeine being removed from Sparks than high brow talk of video games and their place in culture, etc.

Wouldn't quota-based hiring be a strange move in that regard? I understand why folks are upset, but then again I don't.

I need a Sparks.

This is a very valid point that I think isn't addressed enough. Giant Bomb isn't really a game site, throwing it in with IGN and Gamespot is wrong.

When you're an entertainment outlet, is it wrong to have one voice? A style/tone that doesn't change?

Do we criticise Top Gear for being Top Gear? People don't care about the cars, it's the presenters. Because, IMO, Giant Bomb is closer to that than Polygon or Kotaku.
 
Also just, LIKE JUST NOW.
Realized that next week like in 7 days it has been 1 year already.


That makes me very sad :(

Please some post an awesome GB gif to make me happy again :(

2599087-jeff_ryan_awesome.gif

And the all time best one:
aBykzk0.gif
 
I don't disagree with it, either. I do not pretend to know the intricacies of the hiring process at CBSi and Giant Bomb, or what their internal goals were for hiring. Ultimately, it was their decision to make, and while criticism is perfectly acceptable, and I too am interested in seeing more diverse views when it comes to video game coverage, I'm not going to demand that Giant Bomb not hire any more white men or they can go fuck themselves. That's what I call unreasonable.
The problem is that the bolded isn't communicated at all when you post this:
(because I guess hiring white males is unacceptable once you have met your arbitrary quota)

Wouldn't quota-based hiring be a strange move in that regard? I understand why folks are upset, but then again I don't.
Who's asking for this? Why does saying "more diversity would be awesome" always become asking to fulfill quotas or having to represent all permutations of people? Why does quota get tossed around in these discussions more than a football at a tailgate party? I don't mean to single you out, but it's literally in the post above this too, and others as well.

But why don't we see that kinda comments when ign and polygon hire yet another white guy? Thats the thing I dont get.
Because those other sites employ women, people of color, etc. They already have a more diverse group. It's not always great, but it's something.

i really need to understand how the fight for diversity in the workplace seems to have become " actively discriminate against cisgender white males" for some people. this shit is bananas.
I doubt that's what anyone is arguing for, unless you take wanting to include more minorities as coming at the expense of cisgender white males. If I argued for discrimination against that group I'd be fucking over myself.

Sure, "what if they were the most qualified people?" is a stock response, but it's perfectly legitimate. The advocates get made because they think it implies that non-white males are not qualified, but that is not the case at all.
Not when it's the often the only response to hiring practices. It absolutely carries an implication that there isn't a pool of qualified minorities. I work in IT, and see this all the time. It's a boys club that doesn't want to admit it's a boys club, so arguments like this get made often. To me, it's lost a lot of sincerity as an argument.

I really can't help but sit and laugh at all the people that actually care what gender/race/nationality/sexuality/whatever they hired. I absolutely could not possibly care less about any of these characteristics. Too bad for the GB crew to have to hear all this worthless criticism though.
Good for you.
 
Making comments like "I think in all of this I'm most angry with myself for once *honestly* believing that @giantbomb would hire someone who wasn't a white guy." is not going to spark any kind of rational or level-headed debate.

I get that that specific comment isn't helpful and doesn't really add to things, but you can't deny that when people make reasonable issues too they get so much shit. (See Zoe Quinn, Rami Ismail, etc.)
 
I think there's a broader point that really does need addressing though, which is why the industry is VASTLY overrepresented in terms of white men, and why talking about issues of gender representation causes such a vitriolic backlash. It's not enough to just say "It's the internet" and act like we should just be okay with the fact that people act like total pieces of shit to other human beings.

why is the onus of changing that on GB though? the thing that irks me is they're being played up as being some sort of "old boys club" even though they (especially Patrick) have been shedding light on these types of issues etc.
even though part of CBSi, they're still quite a small team focusing on very specific type of content - it seems counterproductive to me to try to put them on blast with this shit, especially when they have done more to provide a spotlight for the themes touched in this shitstorm than most others.

I know that's not exactly what you meant but it pisses me off that of all sites THIS is the one that gets the spotlight for supposedly unfair hiring practices.
 
I'm gonna go with Patrick's advice from his PAX panel on how to fight negativity on the Internet, by being more positive!

So here it goes: I'm excited to see what Dan does at Giant Bomb because I've been a big fan of him since his work on Replays at Game Informer.
 
To give some very relevant context, the position being hired for is Senior Editor and video producer at one of the most respected gaming sites out there, which is currently incredibly understaffed.

I think there's room for that argument, but I don't think GB is the place it should be argued for. They needed to pick the most qualified individuals and aren't in a proper position to make a risky higher, even if it could bring a very interesting and unique perspective to the discussions.

This is literally the qualification.
 
what I really want to know is... wheres my Sniper Elite 3 quicklook?
 
I don't even know how Giant Bomb likes this. I do web design, and every job I've had that's been male dominated (which is most of them, in this industry) was so exhausting and boring to deal with. Sausage parties are the worst.
 
Not only this, but for a small site like GB (especially after Vinny left SF) it is vital to get the right people. So hiring somebody who is good on camera, can present themselves and you know you can work with them is just important. They really can't afford hiring some newcomer and risk him being a second Brad Nicholsen.
What is the Brad Nicholson story? I wasn't around for that.
 
I just want to point out, this shit right here:


2k5hOvM.png

HDTAW08.png


Is why some people might become agitated and be a little harsh in their comments.
 
I'll never be disappointed when qualified people land a job. They're people. No matter what gender or race, they're people.

I hoped for something that didn't happen so naturally I'd be disappointed, but in no way am I looking down on Dan or Jason because of who they are. They're awesome guys and their appearances on the Bombcast solidified that.
 
For all its faults, Polygon is pretty diverse and they stand proud in front of a lot of hate that comes their way because of it (see: Gone Home review).

Not to derail, but they actually put interesting in deep articles about the industry, game development, and culture related to gaming.
 
Personally, I can understand one white guy getting added, but I see how this got so big after finding out two white guys were hired. It's a huge, huge missed opportunity to me.
No it's not. Not every job hiring should be a crusade. Giant Bomb were lucky to get these guys. Both of them could not have been more perfect for these positions, and I didn't know Jason was white until this news blew up, since he was never in front of the camera before.

This is like if you're casing for a new comedy show, and suddenly Dave Chappelle shows up, and wants the job. You throw the resumes of everyone else in the trash. You don't say, "Well, there are too many black comedians on TV already. We wouldn't want to miss the opportunity to be more diverse."
 
T
Who's asking for this? Why does saying "more diversity would be awesome" always become asking to fulfill quotas or having to represent all permutations of people? Why does quota get tossed around in these discussions more than a football at a tailgate party? I don't mean to single you out, but it's literally in the post above this too, and others as well.

I feel like this whole thing is like a game of "whisper down the lane" (I just google translated that cause I have no idea what it's called in english). Some person says something reasonable like "More diversity would be awesome". Then MRAs happen. And then everything get's out of control, and suddenly even the reasonable people react vile to posts not meant to be mean cause they were showered with idiotic tweets. And then everything explodes.

What is the Brad Nicholson story? I wasn't around for that.

Nothing special, he just didn't really fit in and left. And I don't think GB can afford that right now.
 
I'm gonna go with Patrick's advice from his PAX panel on how to fight negativity on the Internet, by being more positive!

So here it goes: I'm excited to see what Dan does at Giant Bomb because I've been a big fan of him since his work on Replays at Game Informer.

Same! Also I never watch wrestling but I super enjoy listening to other people talking about wrestling.
 
A lot of what can't be taken into account by those looking from the outside is with Ryan gone and Vinny and Patrick far away, Dan fits the SF crew like a puzzle piece. There are likely hundreds of folks who aren't white men who could fit that bill, but Dan wasn't hired because he was a white dude, he was hired because he's a sure thing.
I think Jeff was looking at stabilising their SF vibe, their business and their subscribers right now. Not later, right this second so they can take a shot on someone who brings something new to the table later.

I don't know if it was the right move, but I have faith in Patrick and while I'm sure he disappointed with another white guy, if he thought Jeff didn't have completely acceptable reasons he wouldn't be with the site still.

The Giant Bomb of today would not have hired Patrick right now either. He was hired to be a journalist and not to jump in with the rest of the crew.
It's a frustrating status quo, but I also genuinely feel it's a temporary one.

All of that is just speculation though.


As for Leigh, the shit she got from the community was over the top and beyond anything that happened in response to any Gearbox guy, 2013 Microsoft dudes in denial or Paul Barnett's defence of Dungeon Keeper Mobile. It was intense.

Garnett Lee did the drunk and obnoxious thing all the time to less shit, Patrick himself, the magnet for haters on the GB community, got less shit for his behavior during that one Rock Band night. Granted there's more than gender at play when considering the backlash she got, she did pick a direct fight with the community from the start of her second appearance, but I really think it'd be foolish to pretend her gender didn't play a large part in the scale of the backlash.

It and the subsequent word of mouth about Leigh's behavior on that E3 cast went beyond the bubble, and that really sucks for her. I remember a developer guest telling the story on Giant Bomb in which he recognised her name from the 775 thing and her dismay that she can't leave that behind as she gets it everywhere.
Whatever you think of her work, or even her tweets, she's still paying for that one night years later and that's because of the vehement reaction here and from the Giant Bomb community at the time.

Yes, she shouldn't be taking pot shots at Giant Bomb, but it's not like the GB community at large, anywhere they cluster, got over it either or let her live it down.
 
I can understand this, but can you understand how much harder it is for a woman or minority to achieve the same employment history in this industry? All of these white guys being friends and possibly giving each others jobs based on their networking is a frightening idea for a young woman hoping to break in.

It's a shitty situation but the whole premise of their site is it is personality based and their preferred medium is now video either live or Quick Looks. Dan has already proved he can deliver that content from his time at GI.

I'm all for a different voice in GB's coverage or any site's coverage but games journalism is a small industry and getting smaller; if someone wanting to break into the industry hasn't by now they probably aren't going to. And "Senior Editor" at Giant Bomb is not a position someone is going to "break into" the industry.
 
I feel like this whole thing is like a game of "whisper down the lane" (I just google translated that cause I have no idea what it's called in english). Some person says something reasonable like "More diversity would be awesome". Then MRAs happen. And then everything get's out of control, and suddenly even the reasonable people react vile to posts not meant to be mean cause they were showered with idiotic tweets. And then everything explodes.

Closest english equivalent would be "a game of telephone."
 
why is the onus of changing that on GB though?

The onus isn't on GB, it's on everyone. GB just has a very vocal, passionate community, many of whom (including myself) feel quite passionate about these issues. We need to call everyone out in terms of asking about this stuff. Reading Patrick's introspective on the issues with his list of contacts was super refreshing, because it looked at a lot of the issues that I feel are problematic and made good points, and I really hope we see some more diversity coming out of that thinking.
 
Even though Leigh Alexander said 'fuck' my beloved Boston, she doesn't deserve nearly as much shit as the Gearbox Guy does for Colonial Marines.
 
This is a very valid point that I think isn't addressed enough. Giant Bomb isn't really a game site, throwing it in with IGN and Gamespot is wrong.

When you're an entertainment outlet, is it wrong to have one voice? A style/tone that doesn't change?

Do we criticise Top Gear for being Top Gear? People don't care about the cars, it's the presenters. Because, IMO, Giant Bomb is closer to that than Polygon or Kotaku.

Hate to break it to ya but people criticize Top Gear all the time. Usually worse than Giantbomb with accusation ranging from racism, to misogyny, to general right wing stupidity. I don't think these personality driven shows require a white dude. Sitting around talking frankly, playing shit games and laughing about it is gender neutral. It's unfortunate what happened with Leigh. She has the personality for Giantbomb. At least the Giantbomb I idealize.
 
No it's not. Not every job hiring should be a crusade. Giant Bomb were lucky to get these guys. Both of them could not have been more perfect for these positions, and I didn't know Jason was white until this news blew up, since he was never in front of the camera before.

This is like if you're casing for a new comedy show, and suddenly Dave Chappelle shows up, and wants the job. You throw the resumes of everyone else in the trash. You don't say, "Well, there are too many black comedians on TV already. We wouldn't want to miss the opportunity to be more diverse."
There aren't too many black comedians on TV already, so this analogy doesn't work at all. Besides, Comedy Central just added two more women-lead comedies to their fall lineup to go with the returning Amy Schumer show and Broad City, so even Comedy Central is very aware of their bro-ing down in recent years.
 
For all its faults, Polygon is pretty diverse and they stand proud in front of a lot of hate that comes their way because of it (see: Gone Home review).

i think conventional game sites this is just easier in general to do. gb is a personality driven site generally people become friends with similar people and the friendships actually have to be legitimate (yes gender can play a role without being discriminatory). its one of gbs greatest strengths but now can be seen as a weakness as well.
 
The problem is that the bolded isn't communicated at all when you post this:

Do I have to communicate my feelings on the topic in every post? I feel that what I wrote in the post you quoted was perfectly legitimate in context. It was talking about a tweet from a woman who more-or-less stated that there is no scenario where Giant Bomb hiring more white men would be acceptable.
 
I think many people expected way too much out of this job opening thing. The open application really seems like it was just something they had to do since they're owned by CBSi. I'd be shocked if they didn't have a general idea of who they wanted to hire prior to the position being posted. Giant Bomb has always been a small-scale operation deeply invested in personality. These guys aren't just co-workers, they're friends, that's how they started the site. If this was one of the more cooperate game sites like Gamespot, IGN, or whoever, and they just went out and hired 10 white dudes, then okay, let's have a discussion. But because this is all happening around Giant Bomb, I have a hard time taking that discussion as seriously. I understand the issue, there's a lot of white dudes in video games and the games media and times are changing, so people are upset Giant Bomb didn't hire someone outside of the norm. But the fact is, Giant Bomb has always been the site that's about fun driven through the interactions of people who all know each other and their personalities well, above all else. Sure, Patrick brings a more intellectual element to the site with his articles, but the reason why many people flocked to Giant Bomb is because they enjoyed the dumb ridiculous shit that other sites were too "professional" to do. The site where they shake the Wii baby, shoot arrows in their office, and flush pies down the toilet is hardly the vehicle for all this stuff.

That said, though I don't agree with the shit Giant Bomb has been getting, the people who the staff has denounced through the day are scumfucks, that should go without saying.
 
I've alluded to this earlier today, but the GB community should use this as a time to change, mature, and excise its demons. It helps literally no one to go "No, no, this isn't our community, don't lump us in with them." For better or worse, yeah, this is totally your community, even if they're just lurkers or non-prolific or just fans. They're people that are rushing to the defense of people that don't need defending to attack people who do.

I feel like it's incredibly important that people understand that attacks on Giant Bomb are not things anyone needs to leap in front of like Kevin Costner in front of Whitney Houston. They don't need retaliation. They don't need posting screencaps of tweets with the implied "Hey, guys, agree with me that this person is terrible!" to be hashed out for pages.

There's toxic parts of the community that should be identified and excised, not ignored and hypothetically distanced until people forget. But more than that, people need to emotionally disinvest from the website if it's causing them to react like their family is under siege.
 
Not to defend her specifically, but I can understand how daunting it must be for a woman or minority to think about applying for a thing like this that hasn't shown any interest in including them.
Yes absolutely but if they are not applying than how can it change. If you don't apply for a job but than call foul when its not who they wanted to get the job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom