supernormal
Member
YES! Now put that on gamersyde.
Ok, I've finished the ad for Evolution Studios.
Sony, you can send the money to my usual paypal account
WEBM, Enable audio!
http://a.pomf.se/qzutfi.webm
why do they keep doing that?
Amazing. Kinda feels like a 90's PlayStation ad with todays visuals.Ok, I've finished the ad for Evolution Studios.
Sony, you can send the money to my usual paypal account
WEBM, Enable audio!
http://a.pomf.se/qzutfi.webm
Doesn't matter if they release footage now or a week before it comes out. You can still only play on the day of release.
This is wonderfully made.
Wake up and one of the first things i do is watch that footage again.
![]()
Ok, I've finished the ad for Evolution Studios.
Sony, you can send the money to my usual paypal account
WEBM, Enable audio!
http://a.pomf.se/qzutfi.webm
For new page. Same track but different weather, cant find the exact location to make comparison.
Is he morphing into Steve Ballmer?
Ok, I've finished the ad for Evolution Studios.
Sony, you can send the money to my usual paypal account
WEBM, Enable audio!
http://a.pomf.se/qzutfi.webm
Is he morphing into Steve Ballmer?
Like someone said, if you take away the HUD and show this to someone, they would never think it was a game.
![]()
It's an arcade racing game, so it's easier to achieve that graphics than on an FPS or freeroaming title, but no doubt it looks great.
Not really... the lack of details in the car paint and cartoon-ish cars and bad trees give it away.
Still, really nice looking racer.![]()
Doesn't matter if they release footage now or a week before it comes out. You can still only play on the day of release.
Ok, I've finished the ad for Evolution Studios.
Sony, you can send the money to my usual paypal account
WEBM, Enable audio!
http://a.pomf.se/qzutfi.webm
Speedy Blue DudeNot really... the lack of details in the car paint and cartoon-ish cars and bad trees give it away.
Still, really nice looking racer.![]()
Not really... the lack of details in the car paint and cartoon-ish cars and bad trees give it away.
Still, really nice looking racer.![]()
Not really... the lack of details in the car paint and cartoon-ish cars and bad trees give it away.
Still, really nice looking racer.![]()
My wife is mainly a FPS/Fighting game person and I showed her the weather in Driveclub clips and I felt the moist drippin from the screen onto her body. Lol, and me being a racing fan I tried to slip in a, "Hey well maybe we could play GT7 too when it comes out" I was quickly dismissed like these 20 seconds clips =(
Not really... the lack of details in the car paint and cartoon-ish cars and bad trees give it away.
Still, really nice looking racer.![]()
I know people are just tag quoting you, but really? Bad trees? Cartoon-ish cars? Lack of details in car paint (how the hell do you even see this)?
I can't tell if you're purposefully trolling or not. Please tell me you are. Because out of all the criticisms you posted - I cannot see any of them in that clip. Opinions and all, yes. But its a damn strange opinion.
And how does that counter the fact that we should have gameplay footage?
Ok, I've finished the ad for Evolution Studios.
Sony, you can send the money to my usual paypal account
WEBM, Enable audio!
http://a.pomf.se/qzutfi.webm
The car and the paint itself have unrealistic detail in reaction to the rain.
They're attempt to show the wet paint is literally smearing and lightening portions of the car, which looks silly.
Also, you can hardly see any details on the rear-lights. It's just a red oval with a dark red blob in the middle, no details.
Also lots of Jaggies on the back windshield.
The trees don't even really matter because it's a racing game and they look amazing in motion.
I'm not sure why people are finding trouble with what I'm saying. I'm not saying the game is bad looking, I think the game looks incredible and is a really pretty racing game, I just don't think it looks "so realistic it could pass off as real life."![]()
And how does that counter the fact that we should have gameplay footage?
Mate, I think your picture is not grainy enough to make your point. /sThe car and the paint itself have unrealistic detail in reaction to the rain.
You're expecting to see details in a low quality webm/gif?Also, you can hardly see any details on the rear-lights. It's just a red oval with a dark red blob in the middle, no details.
The car and the paint itself have unrealistic detail in reaction to the rain.
They're attempt to show the wet paint is literally smearing and lightening portions of the car, which looks silly.
Also, you can hardly see any details on the rear-lights. It's just a red oval with a dark red blob in the middle, no details.
Has to be a joke post...so your telling me we're meant to see the details on the taillights from that grainy gif?Also, you can hardly see any details on the rear-lights. It's just a red oval with a dark red blob in the middle, no details.
The car and the paint itself have unrealistic detail in reaction to the rain.
They're attempt to show the wet paint is literally smearing and lightening portions of the car, which looks silly.
Also, you can hardly see any details on the rear-lights. It's just a red oval with a dark red blob in the middle, no details.
Also lots of Jaggies on the back windshield.
The trees don't even really matter because it's a racing game and they look amazing in motion.
I'm not sure why people are finding trouble with what I'm saying. I'm not saying the game is bad looking, I think the game looks incredible and is a really pretty racing game, I just don't think it looks "so realistic it could pass off as real life."![]()
And how does that counter the fact that we should have gameplay footage?
yesterday you commented on my post on the other thread that "its a really old joke" to make.
came out I was right. and you were wrong.
but you still do the same thing to others today.
do you think its bad that people ask for proper footage?
Isn't this game also using physically based shading? That's as close as you're ever going to get.
The car and the paint itself have unrealistic detail in reaction to the rain.
They're attempt to show the wet paint is literally smearing and lightening portions of the car, which looks silly.
Also, you can hardly see any details on the rear-lights. It's just a red oval with a dark red blob in the middle, no details.
Also lots of Jaggies on the back windshield.
The trees don't even really matter because it's a racing game and they look amazing in motion.
I'm not sure why people are finding trouble with what I'm saying. I'm not saying the game is bad looking, I think the game looks incredible and is a really pretty racing game, I just don't think it looks "so realistic it could pass off as real life."![]()
All the tracks are based off real locations iirc, so yes.Game looks amazing. Can't wait to play. I hope it lives up to my all time favourite non-sim racer, PGR4, which I also thought looked amazing for its time.
And sorry if this has already been answered but does anyone know if this track is based off a real location in Canada?
Son, you're treading on some mighty thin ice here. Claiming lack of details and jaggies in a heavily compressed footage is just moronic.
The car and the paint itself have unrealistic detail in reaction to the rain.
They're attempt to show the wet paint is literally smearing and lightening portions of the car, which looks silly.
Also, you can hardly see any details on the rear-lights. It's just a red oval with a dark red blob in the middle, no details.
Also lots of Jaggies on the back windshield.
I'm not sure why people are finding trouble with what I'm saying. I'm not saying the game is bad looking, I think the game looks incredible and is a really pretty racing game, I just don't think it looks "so realistic it could pass off as real life."![]()