2014 Israel-Gaza Conflict [UN: 1,525+ Palestinian dead, mostly civilian; 66 Israeli]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I read the article. I know Israel is killing Palestinians. There is no dignity in their deaths and so long as the defeated party insist on dictating terms they will keep dying. It's not fair but that's the reality. They're just going to have to accept there will never be a return to the '67 borders and look for a compromise.
The issue here is that "compromise" seems to involve the West Bank giving up land because people illegally settled there.
 
Publicly? I mean, disgusting either way, obviously.
Right here.
Op-Ed: My Outline for a Solution in Gaza

Clear and concise, the steps towards achieving quiet in Gaza.
Published: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:01 PM


MK Moshe Feiglin
Moshe Feiglin is head of the Manhigut Yehudit [Jewish Leadership] faction...
► More from this writer

Ultimatum – One warning from the Prime Minister of Israel to the enemy population, in which he announces that Israel is about to attack military targets in their area and urges those who are not involved and do not wish to be harmed to leave immediately. Sinai is not far from Gaza and they can leave. This will be the limit of Israel’s humanitarian efforts. Hamas may unconditionally surrender and prevent the attack.

Attack – Attack the entire ‘target bank’ throughout Gaza with the IDF’s maximum force (and not a tiny fraction of it) with all the conventional means at its disposal. All the military and infrastructural targets will be attacked with no consideration for ‘human shields’ or ‘environmental damage’. It is enough that we are hitting exact targets and that we gave them advance warning.

Siege – Parallel to the above, a total siege on Gaza. Nothing will enter the area. Israel, however, will allow exit from Gaza. (Civilians may go to Sinai, fighters may surrender to IDF forces).

Defense – Any place from which Israel or Israel’s forces were attacked will be immediately attacked with full force and no consideration for ‘human shields’ or ‘environmental damage’.

Conquer – After the IDF completes the "softening" of the targets with its fire-power, the IDF will conquer the entire Gaza, using all the means necessary to minimize any harm to our soldiers, with no other considerations.

Elimination- The GSS and IDF will thoroughly eliminate all armed enemies from Gaza. b[]The enemy population that is innocent of wrong-doing and separated itself from the armed terrorists will be treated in accordance with international law and will be allowed to leave. Israel will generously aid those who wish to leave.[/b]

Sovereignty – Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever. Liberation of parts of our land forever is the only thing that justifies endangering our soldiers in battle to capture land. Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel. The coastal train line will be extended, as soon as possible, to reach the entire length of Gaza.

According to polls, most of the Arabs in Gaza wish to leave. Those who were not involved in anti-Israel activity will be offered a generous international emigration package. Those who choose to remain will receive permanent resident status. After a number of years of living in Israel and becoming accustomed to it, contingent on appropriate legislation in the Knesset and the authorization of the Minister of Interior, those who personally accept upon themselves Israel’s rule, substance and way of life of the Jewish State in its Land, will be offered Israeli citizenship.
Moshe Zalman Feiglin (Hebrew: משה פייגלין‎, born 31 July 1962) is an Israeli politician and columnist. He is Deputy Speaker of the Knesset, Knesset Member, and head of the Manhigut Yehudit ("Jewish Leadership") faction of Israel's governing Likud party.
 
OMG. Anyone watching CNN right now? There was a bomb dropped about 500 yards from a live tv reporter. Crazy. Dude ducked down, obviuosly. Crazy.

In the midst of a bombing campaign. You can hear the drones overhead.
 
OMG. Anyone watching CNN right now? There was a bomb dropped about 500 yards from a live tv reporter. Crazy. Dude ducked down, obviuosly. Crazy.

In the midst of a bombing campaign. You can hear the drones overhead.
Honestly part of me just thinks the Israelis aren't nearly as coordinated as they claim to be.

Shit like that just screams to me that there are intelligence failures going on throughout the system. Likely with a mindset of let's be safe then sorry. We gave them a 5 minute warning and while we don't have great evidence of any munitions or tunnels let's be safe and just bomb it. If they didn't leave it's probably because they were human shields or they were forced to stay.

And with so many bombings and so many different people in charge and running it it just seems they aren't operating with any real restraint or proper coordination and the result is far too many innocents are dying. Plus given how little consequence there seems to be for soldiers that have committed atrocities there are no doubt some people in the system getting away with all out murder.
 
The mainstream media is doing their best to whitewash it. The Israeli army are employing every propaganda tool in the book, hiring people to go on social media and defend it. It's infuriating.
 
The mainstream media is doing their best to whitewash it. The Israeli army are employing every propaganda tool in the book, hiring people to go on social media and defend it. It's infuriating.

http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-universities-lend-support-gaza-massacre

Israeli universities lend support to Gaza massacre

Two leading Israeli academic institutions are offering strong support for Israel’s ongoing massacre in Gaza.

Tel Aviv University is giving students who serve in the attack on Gaza one year of free tuition.

“Tel Aviv University embraces and supports all the security forces who are working to restore quiet and security to Israel, including its students and employees called up to reserve duty,” the institution says in 24 July statement on its official website.

The context for the university’s declaration “is that there a witch hunt against Palestinian students [who are citizens of Israel] and others who are posting in social media against the Israeli occupation forces attack on Gaza,” Nadim Nashif, director of Baladna – the Association for Arab Youth, told The Electronic Intifada.

The university “wouldn’t say directly” that their statement is aimed at such dissenters, Nashif added, “but for people here it is clear.”

The university statement continues:


Tel Aviv University absolutely condemns and denounces the hurtful and extreme statements being circulated nowadays over social media – statements that have no place in the public discourse. The university will take action in accordance with its disciplinary regulations, which are applicable to students and employees, in the any event of any infraction.

It is signed “In hope for quieter days.”

Meanwhile, Tel Aviv University announced that it would be providing students called up to serve in Gaza one year’s free tuition and the scholarships would be funded by “private donors” and “friends of the university.”

Tel Aviv University president Joseph Klafter expressed his “appreciation” for students who went to serve in the army and said “Tel Aviv University has contributed and still contributes greatly to national security.”


tau.jpg


Tel Aviv University waves the flag for the massacre in Gaza.


Israeli attacks killed at least 26 Palestinians since midnight on Friday, including 45-year-old Salah Ahmad Abu Hasanin and his three sons Abd al-Aziz, 15, Hadi, 12, and nine-year-old Abd al-Hadi, Ma’an News Agency reported.

Israel’s latest killings brought to at least 825 the number of Palestinians killed in 18 consecutive days of Israeli bombardment.

At least 170 of the dead are children.

More than 5,240 people have been injured and nearly 150,000 are desperately seeking shelter.

On Thursday, at least seventeen people died when Israel shelled a UN-run school in Beit Hanoun in the north of the Gaza Strip where hundreds of displaced persons were sheltering.

http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-universities-lend-support-gaza-massacre
 
I got into a huge debate/argument with my girlfriends father over the issue, and one of the things he said was that the government does not necessarily reflect the will of the people. Now I know about the 86% poll I was wondering what kinds of splits there have been in the popular vote in Israel along the right wing left wing line, and how those parties positions to Gaza etc have changed over the years (including a modern day snapshot).

I have run into the point many times when discussing the issue with people, any good resources?
 
I don't understand why the supposedly civilized world still stands for stuff like this.

Well, the US backs Israel and will continue to do so. And the European countries don't even have enough balls to show up to a UN vote or piss off the US. So there you go. The US gets to continue to say "because terrorism" and the Euro countries get to say "because the US" while continuing to do nothing! So basically, because all western countries are assholes who only look after themselves ( a point most Europeans on this board conveniently forget)!
 
Questions I hope someone answers about today and in general

Today a refugee camp and hospital were attacked today Israel claimed it was Hamas own doing however news crews said it was in fact Israel. I Just saw and interview with wolf blitzer and he was interviewing a Israeli colonel and he DENIED that they shot those rockets, now if he WAS in fact lying why in the blue hell did wolf blitzer not challenge him on it and let it slide?

Also they always say hamas is a terrorist group. I believe the US and some allies sees them as terrorists however other countries do not. Are they terrorists or is it all about perspective and opinion? Also does the UN see them as terrorists? Thanks
 
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/493928657560145920
j9CBw6C.png
 
http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-universities-lend-support-gaza-massacre

Israeli universities lend support to Gaza massacre

Two leading Israeli academic institutions are offering strong support for Israel’s ongoing massacre in Gaza.

Tel Aviv University is giving students who serve in the attack on Gaza one year of free tuition.

“Tel Aviv University embraces and supports all the security forces who are working to restore quiet and security to Israel, including its students and employees called up to reserve duty,” the institution says in 24 July statement on its official website.

The context for the university’s declaration “is that there a witch hunt against Palestinian students [who are citizens of Israel] and others who are posting in social media against the Israeli occupation forces attack on Gaza,” Nadim Nashif, director of Baladna – the Association for Arab Youth, told The Electronic Intifada.

The university “wouldn’t say directly” that their statement is aimed at such dissenters, Nashif added, “but for people here it is clear.”

The university statement continues:


Tel Aviv University absolutely condemns and denounces the hurtful and extreme statements being circulated nowadays over social media – statements that have no place in the public discourse. The university will take action in accordance with its disciplinary regulations, which are applicable to students and employees, in the any event of any infraction.

It is signed “In hope for quieter days.”

Meanwhile, Tel Aviv University announced that it would be providing students called up to serve in Gaza one year’s free tuition and the scholarships would be funded by “private donors” and “friends of the university.”

Tel Aviv University president Joseph Klafter expressed his “appreciation” for students who went to serve in the army and said “Tel Aviv University has contributed and still contributes greatly to national security.”


tau.jpg


Tel Aviv University waves the flag for the massacre in Gaza.


Israeli attacks killed at least 26 Palestinians since midnight on Friday, including 45-year-old Salah Ahmad Abu Hasanin and his three sons Abd al-Aziz, 15, Hadi, 12, and nine-year-old Abd al-Hadi, Ma’an News Agency reported.

Israel’s latest killings brought to at least 825 the number of Palestinians killed in 18 consecutive days of Israeli bombardment.

At least 170 of the dead are children.

More than 5,240 people have been injured and nearly 150,000 are desperately seeking shelter.

On Thursday, at least seventeen people died when Israel shelled a UN-run school in Beit Hanoun in the north of the Gaza Strip where hundreds of displaced persons were sheltering.

http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-universities-lend-support-gaza-massacre

These vile creatures are sub human. The University is basically bribing and encouraging its students to kill the "dirty arabZZ".
 
If even MSNBC is seen as somehow pro-Israel or anti-gaza/hamas/palestine then I guess this makes sense.

http://www.people-press.org/2014/07...n-israel-for-current-violence/#the-weeks-news

Hamas Seen as More to Blame Than Israel for Current Violence

Deep Partisan Divide in Reactions to Mideast Fighting

As fighting continues to rage in Gaza amid calls for a cease-fire, about twice as many Americans say Hamas (40%) as Israel (19%) is responsible for the current violence.

Just a quarter (25%) believe that Israel has gone too far in responding to the conflict; far more think Israel’s response has been about right (35%) or that it has not gone far enough (15%).

dem-2014-07-28_04-17-54_PM.jpg
 
I hope people now realize that this new atheist movement is a faux cover to hate and no different than extremist religious folks. The old atheist is a much cleaner concept of how they really should live which is not believing but not hating either. Harris has forgotten one side is the clear aggressor, as per his argument its ok for Palestinian civilians go get it as long as Israel does its job because Palestinians are muslims so their loss is not really a loss
I was disillusioned with that whole movement long ago, once it became evident that it was a circle for old, chauvinistic white men. Nothing of value there to be had for women, people from Muslim/ex-Muslim backgrounds, or hell, anyone isn't an old, chauvinistic white man.
 
I got into a huge debate/argument with my girlfriends father over the issue, and one of the things he said was that the government does not necessarily reflect the will of the people. Now I know about the 86% poll I was wondering what kinds of splits there have been in the popular vote in Israel along the right wing left wing line, and how those parties positions to Gaza etc have changed over the years (including a modern day snapshot).

I have run into the point many times when discussing the issue with people, any good resources?
Israel leans right rather heavily, it's difficult to get an exact figure because you have large parties which are hard to pin on the left-right spectrum (or at the very least, it's hard to pin their voters on to such point).
And there is always massive support for pretty much any military action in Israel, at least at the start, because SUPPORT THE TROOPS IN A TIME OF WAR, WHAT ARE YOU A TRAITOR?
 
the missiles that hit a hospital and refugee camp is there sources that say it was Israel because they keep claiming ii wasnt them but they have been caught in how many lies now?
 
I was disillusioned with that whole movement long ago, once it became evident that it was a circle for old, chauvinistic white men. Nothing of value there to be had for women, people from Muslim/ex-Muslim backgrounds, or hell, anyone isn't an old, chauvinistic white man.
Sooo, you're saying that's Harris' point of view?
 
If even MSNBC is seen as somehow pro-Israel or anti-gaza/hamas/palestine then I guess this makes sense.

http://www.people-press.org/2014/07...n-israel-for-current-violence/#the-weeks-news



dem-2014-07-28_04-17-54_PM.jpg

ALL American mainstream media is pro-Israel. The AIPAC is not divided by party lines. There are pro-Israeli Democrats who are pro-Obamacare, etc.

MSNBC may be more liberal slanted (although that is still a joke considering the "left" on the American mainstream media would be considered right of centre in most of the Western world), but when it comes to Israel, it is united with the rest. It is only thanks to the internet that we have so much more dissent. The public is more divided than the media is.
 
Do you ever think there's a point where the US just says "you've gone too far"?

See Lebanon 1982. Menachem Begin and Ariel Sharon went so far that even Ronald fucking Reagan was livid about it. But there were thousands of dead civilians in that war and a death camp ran by an Israeli backed militia
 
The issue here is that "compromise" seems to involve the West Bank giving up land because people illegally settled there.

That's tough luck. They are going to have to suck it up. The land was occupied when the Arabs made the dumb mistake of attacking Israel. History is littered with precedents of people having to give up land they lost and never getting it back, the US, Canada, Australia etc. The alternative is the continued death and humiliation of the Palestinian people.
 
Didn't an NBC reporter say he saw a drone with his own eyes?

Ya i was wondering if there more sources saying they saw an Israeli drone, because if its just one person it becomes a he said she said game and well you know whos going to win that sadly
 
ALL American mainstream media is pro-Israel. The AIPAC is not divided by party lines. There are pro-Israeli Democrats who are pro-Obamacare, etc.

MSNBC may be more liberal slanted (although that is still a joke considering the "left" on the American mainstream media would be considered right of centre in most of the Western world), but when it comes to Israel, it is united with the rest. It is only thanks to the internet that we have so much more dissent. The public is more divided than the media is.
How is that?
 
That's tough luck. They are going to have to suck it up. The land was occupied when the Arabs made the dumb mistake of attacking Israel. History is littered with precedents of people having to give up land they lost and never getting it back, the US, Canada, Australia etc. The alternative is the continued death and humiliation of the Palestinian people.
I think it's a little more nuanced then that buddy.
 
Publicly? I mean, disgusting either way, obviously.



Sorry. Of course I don't have the answer. It just sounds insane to me that the prevailing thought is now Israel is doing it because they can. Basically another Russia. They guy above said it best, I think.

"at least systematic destruction of infrastructure, it's extreme negligence bordering on war-crimes."

Israel's leaders have espoused a policy of disproportionate force being reigned down upon areas from which rockets are fired. It's not speculation or hypothesis, the Israelis literally have a policy of collective punishment
 
That's tough luck. They are going to have to suck it up. The land was occupied when the Arabs made the dumb mistake of attacking Israel. History is littered with precedents of people having to give up land they lost and never getting it back, the US, Canada, Australia etc. The alternative is the continued death and humiliation of the Palestinian people.

Except Israel is still stealing land even in peace time. Israel is offering no alternative to continued death, just a choice between homelessness and a bullet.
 
That's tough luck. They are going to have to suck it up. The land was occupied when the Arabs made the dumb mistake of attacking Israel. History is littered with precedents of people having to give up land they lost and never getting it back, the US, Canada, Australia etc. The alternative is the continued death and humiliation of the Palestinian people.
You are saying it's "tough luck" and people should have to "suck it up" and leave their homes because the alternative is getting killed or humiliated. Do you not see an issue with that?
 
How is that?

A simple example would be not talking about universal healthcare. Is there any forum on the mainstream media that even has put up this possibility? Obamacare is not even close.

Most programs that would actually be left leaning end up being canned from so-called left-leaning MSNBC. The only reason that MSNBC is even called left-leaning is because it usually is in agreement with the Democratic party platform.

(and neither parties say a peep against Israel)
 

I don't know what the fuck is going on with the media and politicians in the US. Compare the narrative here to that in other countries, or how our politicians react vs theirs, or how the media reports things. Jon Snow vs our reporters, the size of the protests, the votes on the UNHRC.

And then when you look at our own media and politicians, you see the way things are selectively reported, you see the things John Kerry says when he thinks he's being recorded as opposed to when he isn't, and so on.

You see it in the outright fabricated Diane Sawyer report, wherein she claims footage of Gaza being decimated by the IDF was actually footage of Israel being decimated by Hamas rockets.

It's all so sickening.
 
That's tough luck. They are going to have to suck it up. The land was occupied when the Arabs made the dumb mistake of attacking Israel. History is littered with precedents of people having to give up land they lost and never getting it back, the US, Canada, Australia etc. The alternative is the continued death and humiliation of the Palestinian people.
But the people are still there. Does Israel get to be an apartheid state?
 
That's tough luck. They are going to have to suck it up. The land was occupied when the Arabs made the dumb mistake of attacking Israel. History is littered with precedents of people having to give up land they lost and never getting it back, the US, Canada, Australia etc. The alternative is the continued death and humiliation of the Palestinian people.

The Arabs attacking Israel was not a dumb mistake. Their mistake was not being well prepared to attack Israel. It is natural for any nation to attack some foreigner staking claim to their land.

And that is not how it works in the modern world. You're basically saying might makes right. In a world without international laws and courts, you would be right.
 
A simple example would be not talking about universal healthcare. Is there any forum on the mainstream media that even has put up this possibility? Obamacare is not even close.

Most programs that would actually be left leaning end up being canned from so-called left-leaning MSNBC. The only reason that MSNBC is even called left-leaning is because it usually is in agreement with the Democratic party platform.

(and neither parties say a peep against Israel)
I'm sure there have been people on programs that have propped up that model. Maybe the majority are realists, knowing Obamacare is a step in that direction, but that it indeed takes steps.

... no? Was it unclear that I was criticizing the movement as a whole?
No, I guess I just can't tell if you're throwing Harris in with that group. I mean, it's basically the opposite of everything the guy says and writes about.
 
The Arabs attacking Israel was not a dumb mistake. Their mistake was not being well prepared to attack Israel. It is natural for any nation to attack some foreigner staking claim to their land.

And that is not how it works in the modern world. You're basically saying might makes right. In a world without international laws and courts, you would be right.
Except nobody gives a damn about what international courts have to say.
 
It's pretty much certain that leaders in Israel believe they have to go all the way and have believed so for a long time, so to them whatever the methods may be the end is a necessity, and anyone who thought Israel wouldn't resolve their "Palestinian problem" by displacing everyone until there was a single state across the whole territory didn't understand why Israel exists in the first place. It's a small country, for a people who believe they have a unique privileged position in the world but of which the position is to remain undermined for as long as it has been if they cannot have a country, so any lost parcel of land to another people is in their eyes a 100 times larger than it is physically. There will never be an actual desire within Israel's leadership to give up on any of the territory it considers its own because it's more than territory, it is a base for an identity's existence.

As for Palestinians who leave, a generation or two later and they will have no interest in going back to Palestine if they manage to integrate economically within the neighboring countries and not stay in refuge camps or ghettos. With a non-existent Palestinian government by then, there will be no interest in going back, nor anyone asking for them to return.

I guess since Hamas is no longer supporting suicide bombings, or has been unable to command any (I'm guessing it's a bit of a chicken and egg thing), it becomes easier for them to gain support abroad, especially in Europe, whereas in the past it was quite a different story with the bombings of buses and restaurants. Now people see rockets as an appropriate response to Israel, so the whole "it's raining rockets" thing has little impact in influencing popular opinion in their favor. The tunnel angle will fall on deaf ears.

Israel's reputation will be impacted for a long time, not only because of the current conflict but because of what is left ahead of them that they believe they must commit themselves to still.

But if there is political resistance in Israel down the line and the situation drags on, Israel will change internally, as fascism inevitably leads to the same conclusions, where in order to keep social cohesion the opposition will be regrouped and marginalized. Things people take for granted today in Israel, such as equality among men and women, gay rights, etc., will all begin to erode as those who stand for such causes will be associated with the same who are a political thorn in the side of those who put priority on the current methods. Divide and conquer is what is done to enemies, regroup and silence is what is done internally to achieve cohesion. The future Israel is one where women are expected to stay home and families are expected to be religiously observant. There will be a desire to form a cohesive social structure out of fear of division erasing the gains made over the previous decades. People today won't believe this is the future of Israeli society, but it's not a question of who, it's simply a matter of cultural survival and it always plays out the same, whether it's Germans, Russians, Japanese, it doesn't matter who. The future of Israeli is one of social conformity, for patriotism, for survival.
 
That's tough luck. They are going to have to suck it up. The land was occupied when the Arabs made the dumb mistake of attacking Israel. History is littered with precedents of people having to give up land they lost and never getting it back, the US, Canada, Australia etc. The alternative is the continued death and humiliation of the Palestinian people.

Compared to the continued reality of the death and humiliation of the Palestinian people?

What a shitty world view.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom