Nintentoast
Banned
WiiU numbers are egregious. Games like Mario would make Nintendo a lot more money if they came to tablets/mobile. Nintendo needs that money. Its best for business.
And the worst possible thing for gamers.
WiiU numbers are egregious. Games like Mario would make Nintendo a lot more money if they came to tablets/mobile. Nintendo needs that money. Its best for business.
Genuine question: do traditionally priced games do well on mobile these days? How well do $5 or $10 or $15 titles sell?
Maybe they do great, I honestly don't know. But if they don't, that means Nintendo would need to look seriously into creating a F2P, in-app purchasing model for their mobile titles and that's really, REALLY not something I'd like to see happen to Nintendo games.
It might be good for business but as a consumer, it would not be good for me.
not sure why you are comparing a console to handhelds, but ok.
1 billion smartphones, and 200 million tablets were sold in the last year alone. It is profoundly stupid to ignore that market.
And the worst possible thing for gamers.
Umm, what? Consumers are not, one a micro level, irrational they buy what is in demand, Nintendo console demand is not going to dry up by any indication, it may dissipate from time to time, but it isnt going to evaporate and most definitely not because of them releasing games on the smart phone(also Nintendo is already losing massive market share to smartphones and tablets because they refuse to enter). Also, no other non F2P games have the amount of notoriety of Nintendo, not to mention X-Com did very well on the tablet space and Beam Dog said Baldur's Gate did well, as well.
I mean, unless you can explain why games on handhelds/Tablets/Smartphones reduces demand in the console sector, your "logic" isn't actually logic but wild speculation. If anything them not releasing their titles on smartphone and tablet is actually hurting their marketshare.
![]()
That was in 2011, how bad do you think the pie chart looks now, in terms of Nintendo losing market share? They need to do something if they want to get back some dominance in the handheld arena, since less of the market is buying Nintendo products already.
And the worst possible thing for gamers.
And the worst possible thing for gamers.
Then tell Microsoft and Sony to start releasing Halo and Uncharted games on mobile, rather than just pushing an anti-Nintendo view. It goes both ways.
Besides, I'm sure he was comparing it in terms of validity and quality as a gaming device.
By the way, some of us may remember that Iwata has been looking at alternative options for the company's future. He's expressed consideration of mergers and acquistions, and he's already revealed the NFC Amiibo figurines, offering to license out its IPs via third party collberations, and teased us about the Quality of Life platform for release next year.
I'd rather Nintendo make good games and make less money than make complete shit on phones for more, I'm not a shareholder I don't care how much profit they make. The idea of playing smash bros. on a smartphone makes me sick.
Nor is it meaningful is everyone is growing.This pie chart is meaningless. The software ratio is completely skewed towards mobile. If more titles are released the more their share of revenue will increase. It does not necessarily represent whether it's a more profitable venture.
TFA said:The article claims that theres a shared recognition of Iwata being the culprit among management. While there is a strong desire to bring games/franchises like Mario to smartphones, Iwata is strongly vetoing the idea. Iwata reiterates that Nintendos strength is in unified development of game hardware and software, stubbornly rejects the net (seems to reference how smartphones dont use physical media since they download games), and fixates over game consoles perhaps in light of his pride as a former developer.
Umm why? X-Com on the tablet is awesome, along with a ton of other games I play on my tablet... Why would that be bad for me?
This pie chart is meaningless. The software ratio is completely skewed towards mobile. If more titles are released the more their share of revenue will increase. It does not necessarily represent whether it's a more profitable venture.
Doesn't it sound great to have 4 of your friends playing smash bros. on shitty little screens
*Nintendo gamers, who represent a extremely small fraction of the market. Most people aren't willing to pay for Nintendo hardware.
What does the 3DS has to do in all this ?!
...
Sorry, couldn't resist ( ^_^)
Source? I find it hard to believe that ~14.25% of the entire globe bought a new smartphone in 2013.
People that play mobile games aren't "gamers", didn't you know?
Nintendo wouldn't have to release anything fancy on mobile. They can do simple touch games, and even release old school games like Mario 1 and people would eat that up and Nintendo would make bank. It almost seems like an imagined fear on the part of some Nintendo fans that Nintendo will lose its soul by selling out to the devil.
That's why the solution is making competitive hardware and getting third party support. Not sacrificing the quality of some of the best games in the industry. Iwata understands this. (Well, maybe not the part about competitive hardware or third parties... But he understands they shouldn't go mobile!)
I've become a big supporter of Nintendo over the last few years, so I trust the decision and leadership of Iwata. Here's hoping this is bs, I like Mr. Iwata.
It's kind of shocking he's been propped up there for so long.
Not very many corporations tolerate a CEO who posts three straight years of losses.
That's why the solution is making competitive hardware and getting third party support. Not sacrificing the quality of some of the best games in the industry. Iwata understands this. (Well, maybe not the part about competitive hardware or third parties... But he understands they shouldn't go mobile!)
I've become a big supporter of Nintendo over the last few years, so I trust the decision and leadership of Iwata. Here's hoping this is bs, I like Mr. Iwata.
Sony investors supported that with worse losses, so I guess it isn't that bad...
What has Iwata done that makes you like him? I like Nintendo, but because they make awesome games... I dont see how Iwata gets credit for this though, anymore then Reggie(in fact I think he deserves more credit then Iwata by a lot).
I'm... stunned...
Has any product or medium, ever in history, pushed that many units in one year? Other than obviously food.
For me, it's Iwata's morals and ethics. He could have microtransacted the hell out of Animal Crossing New Leaf, because he knew people would spend money, but he chose not to. He is against screwing the consumer, something which is getting rarer and rarer of CEOs in this industry at the moment.
Condoms?
WiiU numbers are egregious. Games like Mario would make Nintendo a lot more money if they came to tablets/mobile. Nintendo needs that money. Its best for business.
“If I was only concerned about managing Nintendo for this year and next year—and not about what the company would be like in 10 or 20 years—then I’d probably say that my point of view is nonsense. But if we think 20 years down the line, we may look back at the decision not to supply Nintendo games to smartphones and think that is the reason why the company is still here.”
“I understand the reality that there are some in the market who are more supportive of doing things differently than the way we are doing it. If you want to make short-term profits from the stock price, then I am a very bad president. But I don’t think I’m so bad for maximizing the long-term value of Nintendo.”
“The capability of smart devices is growing and what a game machine can do uniquely is getting more narrow if we don’t do anything. So game machines need to expand into things that smart devices cannot do. Once we can no longer think of anything, that’s the point we can’t continue the game-machine business.”
It isnt meaningless at all, how the hell? You dont look at a chart like that simply from a profit perspective but a market-share one. Just because more content is released on the tablet/smartphone space in no way infers more revenue, it has more revenue because there are more consumers in it. The chart shows that Nintendo lost market share, that point isnt really debatable. And please explain how it doesn't show that Nintendo could earn more revenue and potentially increase their marketshare?
Making "competitive" hardware and trying to creep into MS/Sony's market is a deathwish. That's some fan pipe dream that the glory days of the SNES would return but it's just not realistic in 2014 and beyond. It's no coincidence that Nintendo's most successful home console of all time (and the one that bucked the downward trend of sales Nintendo experienced when they did try and 'compete') was when they went completely outside the box with the Wii.
The fact that he's actually a genius-level developer rather than a business-oriented suit is also great.
For me, it's Iwata's morals and ethics. He could have microtransacted the hell out of Animal Crossing New Leaf, because he knew people would spend money, but he chose not to. He is against screwing the consumer, something which is getting rarer and rarer of CEOs in this industry at the moment.
I think they should go mobile with the games that make sense, and Xbox/PS4/PC with games that made sense for those. A much more stable model that plays to Nintendo strengths (they are good at making games that have broad appeal).That's why the solution is making competitive hardware and getting third party support. Not sacrificing the quality of some of the best games in the industry. Iwata understands this. (Well, maybe not the part about competitive hardware or third parties... But he understands they shouldn't go mobile!)
More people bought a smart phone in 2013, then people who have watched Avatar in theatres LTD. Including people who re-watched it.
What the fuck. Why is this company ignoring that market???
What has Iwata done that makes you like him? I like Nintendo, but because they make awesome games... I dont see how Iwata gets credit for this though, anymore then Reggie(in fact I think he deserves more credit then Iwata by a lot).
Heh, it's sad when you see Nintendo get compared to Sony(A company in constant fear of having to sell its kidney).