Cops are always trained to use lethal force if necessary and are trusted to make those judgment calls on whether or not its needed or not. In this case lethal force was totally unnecessary and uncalled for. The teen was unarmed and at worst resisted arrest. Resisting arrest can call for being tazed or aggressively taken down but not shot execution style as you stand with your hands up surrendering. Even if the officer was aware that the victim committed a felony he still didn't have the right to shoot the kid down as he was surrendering.
Oh, I'm aware of that.
Just trying to figure out the direction they are trying to go to make this murder seem as justified as possible.
Earlier people were saying that by releasing the robbery video, it gave the cops a lawful reason to use lethal force from their story.
Now however they confirmed that the cop had no idea the victim was a felony suspect and still used lethal force?
Just seems like a bizarre thing to admit for them.