Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am serious asking this: If there was an altercation in the officers vehicle, and a shot goes off and the suspect runs away. What is the officer supposed to do?
My assumption would be try and get out and run after them? What if the suspect is too far away to catch? Pulling out the gun and shooting someone because they are about to get away isn't good enough.
At what point do they let the suspect go?
 
Let's go back to what I initially replied to.

An exchange where people said, of the release of the information that Brown was involved in a robbery that might have provided context to why he might initiate an altercation with a police officer, that discussion of the possibility was so outrageous that it's an example of societal bias against black people.

A few pages later, now it's all like 'Well of course everyone believes there's a possibility he might have robbed the store, started the fight believing himself to be about to be arrested in which caused the officer to fear for his life. Duh.'

Uh OK.

Mission accomplished I guess, you all agree with me now and disagree with what I initially disagreed with.

Still disagree with the bolded part, because again, witness statement. On your speculation, you have... gut feeling?

And again, no justification for his murder. Do you agree?

I am serious asking this: If there was an altercation in the officers vehicle, and a shot goes off and the suspect runs away. What is the officer supposed to do?
My assumption would be try and get out and run after them? What if the suspect is too far away to catch? Pulling out the gun and shooting someone because they are about to get away isn't good enough.
At what point do they let the suspect go?

Chase the suspect, not shoot them. Like this.
 
I am serious asking this: If there was an altercation in the officers vehicle, and a shot goes off and the suspect runs away. What is the officer supposed to do?

I would assume try and get out and run after them? What if the suspect is too far away to catch? Pulling out the gun and shooting someone because they are about to get away isn't good enough.

At what point do they let the suspect go?

He shot the kid twice in the back. Mike then turned around AFTER BEING SHOT IN THE BACK/SHOT AT and put his hands up surrendering. It was at this point the officer dumped 4 more rounds into a person who surrendered AFTER BEING SHOT IN THE BACK/SHOT AT.
 
I am serious asking this: If there was an altercation in the officers vehicle, and a shot goes off and the suspect runs away. What is the officer supposed to do?
My assumption would be try and get out and run after them? What if the suspect is too far away to catch? Pulling out the gun and shooting someone because they are about to get away isn't good enough.
At what point do they let the suspect go?

Fugerson is also a small town of 10,000. Where the hell is Brown supposed to go?

Okay, say he does leave town and never comes back. Great, you chased him away, and he never darkens your town again with his presence, you just solved the issue of him causing any potential problem he may cause in the future.
 
He shot the kid twice in the back. Mike then turned around AFTER BEING SHOT IN THE BACK/SHOT AT and put his hands up surrendering. It was at this point the officer dumped 4 more rounds into a person who surrendered AFTER BEING SHOT IN THE BACK/SHOT AT.

Calm down. I was asking a serious question. I am not insinuating anything.
I don't know what the correct procedure is in this type of thing. I even agreed in the question what the officer did was wrong.

Reaction much?
 
Let's take it another step and say "looter" is a codeword for the n word! And criminal and felon! The purity of our politically correct language will be fierce! Think of how many people we can accuse of racism! Convenient!

Go back to stormfront. I swear if I'm banned before you because of this thread. I will have lost faith in GAF mods.
 
I am serious asking this: If there was an altercation in the officers vehicle, and a shot goes off and the suspect runs away. What is the officer supposed to do?
My assumption would be try and get out and run after them? What if the suspect is too far away to catch? Pulling out the gun and shooting someone because they are about to get away isn't good enough.
At what point do they let the suspect go?

APB on suspect. Immediate call for possibly dangerous but unarmed suspect fleeing down the road heading towards? I dunno its not rocket science, I'm thinking.
 
Calm down. I was asking a serious question. I am not insinuating anything.

I'm pretty calm, you're just asking a question that has been answered; and ultimately your question is pretty pointless. This is about a systematic execution of someone after they surrendered. It's already known he was shot at while running/shot in the back. People are royally pissed because even after Mike Brown surrendered he was executed. Every single thing else that gets introduced is obfuscation.
 
Will there also be a racist argument from the prosecution?

Why is it being called/considered a race crime just because the cop was white, is there any evidence that the cop was/is racist?

As i said in my original post would there be such a outrage if the cop who fired the shot was black?
First of all, I don't know if this cop was racist or what his reasoning was to shoot Mike Brown. All I do know is based on the information that's been released it seems like an excessive use of force. Notice that I said specifically "based on the information that's been released" because that leads to my second problem; why the trickle of information?

The reason you see people bringing up race in this case is not so much because of the race of the officer, although that does seem to always be the pattern, but more because of the race of the victim. Yet again it appears that the shooting of a black person is being treated like a non-event that's not worth the trouble of investigating without widespread protesting from the public. As I said in my original response to you having protests and vigils are generally not necessary for white Americans because there's very little chance that their murders would be treated so flippantly.

Perhaps if you could find some examples of black officers shooting unarmed white men (or even unarmed black men) we'd have some context to explore how these cases are treated differently. The closest thing I can think of is the OJ case where they were plenty of protests and vigils for the victims and OJ was basically hounded until he was put in jail for stealing back his own property. Justice always served for some but not all.

Edit: I didn't see that you got banned but hopefully you'll still read my response and get some level of understanding.
 
You should try to understand the world that you live in.

I remember this guy seriously arguing the 99.6% of poor people have a fridge stat is in fact proof the poor don't have it all that bad.
 
Except we aren't talking about any black man are we? The guy was a whole ten minutes off of aggressively shoving a shopkeeper around while brazenly robbing him in broad daylight. Is that also the act of any black man, or is it just possible that this one is openly aggressive and completely disrespectful of the law.

I don't want to interrupt the canonization of Saint Brown, patron of saint of any black man, but maybe he's kind of a thug?

I mean the guy didn't deserve to be shot, but holy shit, that leap from people publicly talking about how this guy just committed a felony not ten minutes before his confrontation with the police straight into rhetoric about people vilifying all black people.

Are they guys looting and burning the Quick Trip in protest innocent protester being unjustly smeared too in your world?

I was listening to a radio talk show host MO' Kelly, his producer also makes comments, Tawahlla Sharp is his name. He made a point of saying that this isn't a race issue but a prejudice issue. Meaning that police and people that have businesses in predominantly black communities, bring prejudices with them into these communities. Viewing every teenager and young adult as a thief or criminal, because of where they live and look. Which causes a similar situation like what happened to Latasha Harlinshttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Latasha_Harlins. Something happened between the clerk and Mike Brown before that video showing Mike Brown shoving the clerk. Either way, it doesn't make the cops actions justifiable or leads me to believe Mike Brown, all in one afternoon became a hardened criminal and chose to get into a altercation with a armed police officer. Try to take the officer weapon, in order to use it against him. If he had gained control of Darren Wilson's firearm, what he would have faced would have been a lot more worse than taking or stealing cigars.

You know what I was doing before two sheriff's deputies pulled me over and made me exit my vehicle, then sit in the back of one they're patrol cars for about an hour. I was on my way home from work, 3 a.m in the morning. What were the deputies doing. Sitting in the parking lot of a Winchells donuts. As I drove pass them preparing to stop at a red light, they put down they're donuts and got behind me. When they approached the car the deputy in front, unholstered his weapon. Now at this point my heart is pumping like a race horse and I'm scared, nervous, confused, overtly cautious, and angry. I'm being frisked now, they find my work badge and drivers license. No weapons, not even a pencil on me. One deputy walks me to a patrol and sits me in the back, and guess what I'm not Fucking handcuffed. I'm told to hold onto the grill seperating the arrested from law enforcement. Now for about an hour I have to be calm, compliant and humiliated in the back of this vehicle, while deputy Cunningham(Red Head) searches my vehicle for drugs, drug paraphernalia, and or weapons. Seconds before the deputy let's me out of the car, he say's it's good that I didn't argue with them. Get this, they give me a ticket. For what you may ask, the light over the rear license plate had gone out. That was there justification for bothering me in the first place.

Why all this, for someone who did no wrong. I lived in Compton, CA at the time. Area known for its gangs, drugs, and prostitution. But should also be known for having people that live there that own they're homes, have kids in college, work for the city, own businesses, and do everything that those who live outside they're communities does. Raise smart, respectful, humble, and with integrity adults who go on to become doctors, lawyers, law makers, police officers, actors, singers, writers, marines, soldiers, airmen and women.

Judging me by the color of my skin has morphed into a combination of what I look like, wear, and live. Oh snap, if I move to the burbs I'll be questioned anyway because I stick out like a sore thumb.

I'm more afraid of law enforcement than Crips or Bloods.
 
Let's take it another step and say "looter" is a codeword for the n word!

Keep fucking that chicken....
30957d1130004597-pepperpot-real-cool-stuff-image002.jpg



And criminal and felon! The purity of our politically correct language will be fierce! Think of how many people we can accuse of racism! Convenient!

If your argument is I'm just going out of my way to accuse people of racism you'd be wrong. The fact of the matter is that "thug" is almost always ONLY used against Black criminality. Gee, I wonder why.
 
Let's take it another step and say "looter" is a codeword for the n word! And criminal and felon! The purity of our politically correct language will be fierce! Think of how many people we can accuse of racism! Convenient!

I have rarely, if ever, heard white people or the media refer to white people who have committed any crime as a thug. Thug is reserved specifically for blacks for some reason.
 
First of all, I don't know if this cop was racist or what his reasoning was to shoot Mike Brown. All I do know is based on the information that's been released it seems like an excessive use of force. Notice that I said specifically "based on the information that's been released" because that leads to my second problem; why the trickle of information?

The reason you see people bringing up race in this case is not so much because of the race of the officer, although that does seem to always be the pattern, but more because of the race of the victim. Yet again it appears that the shooting of a black person is being treated like a non-event that's not worth the trouble of investigating without widespread protesting from the public. As I said in my original response to you having protests and vigils are generally not necessary for white Americans because there's very little chance that their murders would be treated so flippantly.

Perhaps if you could find some examples of black officers shooting unarmed white men (or even unarmed black men) we'd have some context to explore how these cases are treated differently. The closest thing I can think of is the OJ case where they were plenty of protests and vigils for the victims and OJ was basically hounded until he was put in jail for stealing back his own property. Justice always served for some but not all.
That's the problem, you never see cases of officers gunning down unarmed white or black people. It never happens.

Maybe the Sean Bell case. I think there was a black (or Latino) officer amongst the other officers.
 
There are plenty of cases where a black officer shoots a black man and they are treated the same. Sean Bell in NY being an example. This is about the alarming amount of unarmed black men that are murdered by the police with little to no repercussion, the race of the officer doesn't matter.
 
The dude probably is going back to stormfront though, and, in his mind, still has a leg to stand on. He'll only focus on the "unfairness" of his ban. I don't count that as a win.

I do. No matter what we said he wasn't going to change his mind or see things differently. Neogaf's better with his departure.
 
I was listening to a radio talk show host MO' Kelly, his producer also makes comments, Tawahlla Sharp is his name. He made a point of saying that this isn't a race issue but a prejudice issue. Meaning that police and people that have businesses in predominantly black communities, bring prejudices with them into these communities. Viewing every teenager and young adult as a thief or criminal, because of where they live and look. Which causes a similar situation like what happened to Latasha Harlinshttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Latasha_Harlins. Something happened between the clerk and Mike Brown before that video showing Mike Brown shoving the clerk. Either way, it doesn't make the cops actions justifiable or leads me to believe Mike Brown, all in one afternoon became a hardened criminal and chose to get into a altercation with a armed police officer. Try to take the officer weapon, in order to use it against him. If he had gained control of Darren Wilson's firearm, what he would have faced would have been a lot more worse than taking or stealing cigars.

You know what I was doing before two sheriff's deputies pulled me over and made me exit my vehicle, then sit in the back of one they're patrol cars for about an hour. I was on my way home from work, 3 a.m in the morning. What were the deputies doing. Sitting in the parking lot of a Winchells donuts. As I drove pass them preparing to stop at a red light, they put down they're donuts and got behind me. When they approached the car the deputy in front, unholstered his weapon. Now at this point my heart is pumping like a race horse and I'm scared, nervous, confused, overtly cautious, and angry. I'm being frisked now, they find my work badge and drivers license. No weapons, not even a pencil on me. One deputy walks me to a patrol and sits me in the back, and guess what I'm not Fucking handcuffed. I'm told to hold onto the grill seperating the arrested from law enforcement. Now for about an hour I have to be calm, compliant and humiliated in the back of this vehicle, while deputy Cunningham(Red Head) searches my vehicle for drugs, drug paraphernalia, and or weapons. Seconds before the deputy let's me out of the car, he say's it's good that I didn't argue with them. Get this, they give me a ticket. For what you may ask, the light over the rear license plate had gone out. That was there justification for bothering me in the first place.

Why all this, for someone who did no wrong. I lived in Compton, CA at the time. Area known for its gangs, drugs, and prostitution. But should also be known for having people that live there that own they're homes, have kids in college, work for the city, own businesses, and do everything that those who live outside they're communities does. Raise smart, respectful, humble, and with integrity adults who go on to become doctors, lawyers, law makers, police officers, actors, singers, writers, marines, soldiers, airmen and women.

Judging me by the color of my skin has morphed into a combination of what I look like, wear, and live. Oh snap, if I move to the burbs I'll be questioned anyway because I stick out like a sore thumb.

I'm more afraid of law enforcement than Crips or Bloods.

Dude, are you me? We even from the same hood.
 
I believe that any GAF member who uses "thug" in these discussions needs to be banned.
The Ferguson PD is a bunch of thugs and the community they are supposed to be serving and protecting deserve much better.

Speaking of which, how has no one had the authority and common sense to publicly take charge of this situation and fully answer the very justifiable questions about it?

Who in the hell does that PD actually report to directly?
Ultimately, the people of Ferguson. Directly, the mayor and city council of Ferguson. If people didn't care about city elections before, I bet they will now.
 
Can someone kindly point to the source of the information about the cop not notifying anyone for over an hour?

According to most sources, the next officer arrived three minutes after the shooting. The ambulance didn't arrive until later, according to video taken at the scene, despite Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson's statement on the matter.
 
That's the problem, you never see cases of black officers gunning down unarmed white or black people. It never happens.

Maybe the Sean Bell case. I think there was a black (or Latino) officer amongst the other officers.

Actually, now that I think about it we did have a case of unarmed black man being shot by a black police officer in the DC area back in 2000.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/19/AR2006011902346.html

I didn't know him but a bunch of my friends knew him at Howard University and rumors swirled that he shot because the cop's wife/girlfriend had been cheating with him. The case was one of the most shady that I can remember now that I think about it but much like every other case there wasn't much of an investigation into what happened.
 
Ultimately, the people of Ferguson. Directly, the mayor and city council of Ferguson. If people didn't care about city elections before, I bet they will now.
They were organizing GOTV/registration efforts a few days ago, hopefully they keep going with them.

I also hope this helps people better understand just why it's a problem when the GOP puts in restrictive voting laws and how it's designed to suppress the votes of the lower classes. (which of course, are much more minority-heavy than the general population in the US.)
 
That's the problem, you never see cases of officers gunning down unarmed white or black people. It never happens.

Maybe the Sean Bell case. I think there was a black (or Latino) officer amongst the other officers.

It's really amazing that people say it's not a race issue when 4 unarmed black men have been killed in 1 month, all by white officers, one of them choked to death on camera and the officer hasn't been arrested.

But you have to go back like a decade to find a case of black officers killing unarmed people.
 
Some journalists are using those camera drones and I think people are assuming its police. Not sure though.

From his hyperbole, I'm thinking they have the entire military complex coming down on these protesters.

So much FUD and confusion right now. It's too bad they have the governor they do...someone needs to come in and restore order.
 
And again... Bam. You're done. That's it. His initial use didn't kill Brown. The latter shots did.

The latter shots, the ones that killed Brown, are in question and anything else is smoke and mirrors.

I still won't to know where are these Damn stolen cigars. Then someone that's never been in trouble with law enforcement, then tries to attempt murder of a police officer. The clerk has been silent during this whole ordeal. No interview by press, no statement or testimony from investigating detectives. So Mike Brown on that day decides, he doesn't want to go college. He would rather go to jail for stealing, assaulting a police officer or worse die from several gunshot wounds. There's something missing in the story of the day this occurred, lies are being told, and the law is being used to circumvent the truth. Because in this cluster fuck the truth may not set someone free but put behind bars for 1st or 2nd degree murder.
 
Should any of the witnesses have spoken with the press while the investigation was ongoing?

Is that something that could get brought up in a trial and could their testimony be dismissed because of it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom