TheBaronOfNA
Banned
Why is a kid there in the first place?
No place for children, IMO. Far too dangerous.
And again, poor kid.
Why is a kid there in the first place?
No place for children, IMO. Far too dangerous.
Let him dream.Dude, he died 35 feet away from the car and the autopsy report stated that the lack of gun residue is sufficient to conclude that all of the shots were from at least mid range.
Why is a kid there in the first place?
I'd like to think that cops are trained to shoot low to immobilize aggressors without killing them. I guess when a black kid's charging you all bets are off?
I'd like to think that cops are trained to shoot low to immobilize aggressors without killing them. I guess when a black kid's charging you all bets are off?
6 shots. No biggie.
I'd like to think that cops are trained to shoot low to immobilize aggressors without killing them. I guess when a black kid's charging you all bets are off?
double tap. cop watched too many movies.
You shoot for center mass, AKA chest. If you're a cop and you shoot someone in the head, you're not following that rule.
Because he's most likely near his house on a residential street? He has every right to be there.
Is there video of these somewhere?
3hrs before curfew. You should ask yourself why police are firing on a kid.Why is a kid there in the first place?
Why is a kid there in the first place?
I got no sound on tim's stream.
No, there is no such thing as an immobilizing shot.
It's not a double tap if its from 35 feet away - more likely the cop squeezed off a bunch of rounds and they hit the guy at different points of his fall/stumble
I'd like to think that cops are trained to shoot low to immobilize aggressors without killing them. I guess when a black kid's charging you all bets are off?
Tasers and Pepper spray neutralize a threat.
You only shoot someone in the upper body if you're trying to kill them.
You shoot for center mass, AKA chest. If you're a cop and you shoot someone in the head, you're not following that rule.
Psh, I'm sure some MMO has that skill.
Or he's a bad shot or he was falling.
Doh, nvm, my headphones were half plugged in.
3hrs before curfew. You should ask yourself why police are firing on a kid.
So does going for the head classify this as an execution?You shoot for center mass, AKA chest. If you're a cop and you shoot someone in the head, you're not following that rule.
No place for children, IMO. Far too dangerous.
I'm not sure if I understand the implications of these autopsy results in terms of what they prove. Now, the lack of residue proves once and for all that he obviously wasn't killed over a struggle for the firearm. Not that either narrative right now was still suggesting that, but it seems we can put that to bed. Now, the lack of bullet wounds to the back obviously proves he wasn't shot in the back, but doesn't prove that he wasn't shot at while fleeing. However, as I understand it, neither prevailing narrative disagrees that Brown did run away at some point. As for where the accounts go next, we have one story that Brown surrendered and one that argued that Brown proceeded to rush at the police officer.
My gut instinct is that it's hard to believe that an unarmed individual would rush at a police officer from a distance. So, as I have from the beginning, I'm inclined to think that multiple gunshot wounds doesn't bode well for Wilson. However -- and I'm not playing devil's advocate here -- I can't help but shake the feeling that the autopsy results don't really clear anything up, and that what you take away from it probably hinges on what you believed beforehand. Does it tell the story of someone with his hands in the air mercilessly gunned down by police, or the story of someone rushing at a scared officer? Again, I'm not playing devil's advocate here. I don't believe the Wilson defense at all. I'm just trying to understand how this autopsy proves the former (Brown gunned down after surrendering) and not the latter (shot at multiple times while running at officer).
Autopsy said:Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front.
If the #ferguson cops would just douse everybody with ice water, it would stop the riots and raise awareness for ALS.
As a Neogaffer you should know better!
I thought curfew was in an hour? Aren't they central and curfew's at midnight?
(Not debating your point, just curious about when the curfew is supposed to be.)
I'd like to think that cops are trained to shoot low to immobilize aggressors without killing them. I guess when a black kid's charging you all bets are off?
Michael Ian Black ‏@michaelianblack 56s
So does going for the head classify this as an execution?
I thought curfew was in an hour? Aren't they central and curfew's at midnight?
(Not debating your point, just curious about when the curfew is supposed to be.)
Nope upper body chest area
Yup. However not all cops have tazers. Mace is used at short to midrange.
If he was 35 feet away then he wasnt a threat. So cop should be arrested.
So does going for the head classify this as an execution?
To me, the more likely scenario is that the cop shot at him as he ran, the kid stopped and turned around, and the cop just unloaded on him.
As a Neogaffer you should know better!
Exactly. Protesting during the day is one thing. They know that there is a good chance bad things are going to go down at night.
3hrs before curfew. You should ask yourself why police are firing on a kid.
They're trained to kill. Not maim.
I'd like to think that cops are trained to shoot low to immobilize aggressors without killing them. I guess when a black kid's charging you all bets are off?
I thought they were trained to kill in armed situations i.e. subject is armed.
They heard 7-9 shots.How many shots did the witnesses say they heard? I find it hard to believe the cop missed every shot in the back and even while Mike turned the cop missed and didn't land a side shot, then lands the last front facing 6.