the fuck... I can make these.....
Ill update my website after millions in sales, with my big, brown, dehumanizing, smile.
you're one of the good ones already. Just put the smile up on the front page and tell them you're a True American

the fuck... I can make these.....
Ill update my website after millions in sales, with my big, brown, dehumanizing, smile.
you're one of the good ones already. Just put the smile up on the front page and tell them you're a True American
![]()
Theft/battery is not 'normal teenage stuff' for many perfectly normal teenagers in America of all races.
This use of legal niceties to make mike brown something he's not has a long history in this country, you're following in the fine traditionTake it up with the dictionary/law? He is alleged to have made violent, non-consenting physical contact with a person.
Because they don't get arrested because they're white and told 'give it back'. Your use of statistics from racist justice system to confirm and further malign his name is infuriating, especially with the 'like it or not' . You know what? I don't like racism and its apologiasWell, I suppose we'll have to accept our differing opinions on normalcy. I certainly don't see the majority of young people in this country, coming of age without having committed any felonies (if done by adults) as freaks. Edit: Just to look at the numbers, in 2010, Juvenile arrest rates nationally for Burglary was just under 200/100000 and for 'simple assault' at ~550/100000 (http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/...asp?ID=qa05211) - you would have to assume arrest vs. occurrence rates under 1% to get these to approach anything close to median value.
Calling this poor young man troubled doesn't seem unfair given the evidence in the article, and given the nature of the incident, the character of those involved is a big factor in public opinion, like it or not.
Its curious how you change shoplifting and getting into a scuffle into legalistic terms that give off the air of more serious offences.
But shoplifting and petty theft is very common and part of the teenage years, getting into scuffles is too.
They can be called those things. Keep doing it. The label is accurate. Right wing leadership routinely displays bigoted behavior. If Conservatives don't want to be considered as generally bigoted they can either change leadership or change parties. The labels stay until they change their behavior and attitudes.
It stops being just shoplifting when you put your hands on someone. And I never shoplifted or committed petty theft as a teen. Nor did I commit assault/battery.
Sure do. Glad I'm not profiling or stereotyping. Once again, if conservatives don't want to be called racist, then stop supporting the Conservative party and movement because the leaders sure do support racist policy and ideologue.you do realize that this stereotyping and profiling is horribly wrong and is what caused these riots in the first place?
Exactly. You can justify being a member of the KKK by saying your a member because they have great picnics and barbecues. Anyone that continues to be affiliated with the GOP should be called out for throwing their hats in with a Racist, and homophobic group.
#notallteens
Is this really happening now? All cops are racist minority slayers and all republicans are members of the KKK? What next?
Oh my god, you're right, how could I have been so blind. #meaninglessoneliner
Oh my god, you're right, how could I have been so blind. #meaninglessoneliner
It stops being just shoplifting when you put your hands on someone. And I never shoplifted or committed petty theft as a teen. Nor did I commit assault/battery.
#meaninglessanecdotes
Kids do silly and stupid things. Most aren't criminalized and I doubt you're gonna find stats because most isn't serious and punished by their parents or friends
Kids and teens take things from other kids, from stores, they get into fights, the smoke and dabble in drugs, they write rap songs and curse. None of that reflects badly. Nothing in that story was anything abnormal.
It's been pointed out in the thread before that the shop owner never called the police and had no intention of pressing charges so Mike Brown would never have been a statistic either prior to becoming a statistic for police brutality.
The fact that the police appeared to spend more time investigating the shoplifting than the shooting infuriates me.
This relatively unimportant case of juvenile pilfering would never have taken on the significance which it later took on, had not a fortuitous combination of subsequent events made it the spark which set aflame the smouldering resentments of the city of Harlem against racial discrimination and poverty in the midst of plenty. The insecurity of the individual in Harlem against police aggression is one of the most potent causes for the existing hostility to authority.
Hey guys, I have a confession.
I shoplifted a lot of smokes when I was a teen. I got rather good at it until they installed cameras. Then I stopped.
Yes, goody two shoes, super nice Fiction stole smokes. I suppose by some people's standards I deserve to be gunned down.
(Just to be clear I am not talking about people in this thread having those standards, just the public in the general that is focusing on the shoplifting)
Its curious how you change shoplifting and getting into a scuffle into legalistic terms that give off the air of more serious offences.
But shoplifting and petty theft is very common and part of the teenage years, getting into scuffles is too.
This use of legal niceties to make mike brown something he's not has a long history in this country, you're following in the fine tradition
Because they don't get arrested because they're white and told 'give it back'. Your use of statistics from racist justice system to confirm and further malign his name is infuriating, especially with the 'like it or not' . You know what? I don't like racism and its apologias
So 16 cops shot the shit out of an unarmed white 18 year old in Ottawa, Kansasyesterdaylast Saturday.
http://www.kake.com/home/headlines/Kansas-teen-killed-in-officer-involved-shooting-272503211.html
http://www.kctv5.com/story/26355241/ottawa-police-involved-in-shooting
.
I'm sure the republican party, and cops everywhere are glad they have brolic jailer to defend them from being called all racists, especially when no one said that. They all have an issue with race though, via the actions of their party, the policies they have enacted, and the statements and rhetoric attributed to them, easily found in the historical record.
so yes brolic jailer, many republicans are racist. And the GOP has a racial history and an ongoing racial problem. do you wish to deny or address this?
It's been pointed out in the thread before that the shop owner never called the police and had no intention of pressing charges so Mike Brown would never have been a statistic either prior to becoming a statistic for police brutality.
The fact that the police appeared to spend more time investigating the shoplifting than the shooting infuriates me.
so your response is "many democrats are racist"?
This thread definitely runs contrary to what you're saying in this post. A plethora of "fuck the police" and how the police are all just waiting for the chance to oppress minorities. You should read some posts in his thread! The one I quoted equating republicans with the KKK would be a good start.
As for racist republicans as I said before, racists are everywhere and of very color. Many democrats are also racist. Making blanket statements about any group is exactly the kind of logic and mentality so many here are supposedly fighting against.
Just because a victim doesn't press charges doesn't mean charges won't be brought. The crime isn't only committed against a person, it's also committed against the state.
why..
bother...
We need to just say "yes you're right!" and move on the thread.
The difference is that the Democratic party encourages black people to vote as a matter of policy and philosophy and the Republican party nakedly and nationally tries to prevent black people from voting and in fact has several court cases happening concurrently because of it.
Do you deny this?
I would argue that there are republicans that don't agree with that policy either. I consider myself conservative, but don't agree with a lot of what the hard core right or left do.
This still does not mean republicans/conservatives or those that vote in part or in whole should be equated with the KKK.
I would argue that there are republicans that don't agree with that policy either. I consider myself conservative, but don't agree with a lot of what the hard core right or left do. Partly lines and politics aren't black/ white. There's a whole lot of gray.
This still does not mean republicans/conservatives or those that vote in part or in whole should be equated with the KKK.
This thread definitely runs contrary to what you're saying in this post. A plethora of "fuck the police" and how the police are all just waiting for the chance to oppress minorities. You should read some posts in his thread! The one I quoted equating republicans with the KKK would be a good start.
As for racist republicans as I said before, racists are everywhere and of very color. Many democrats are also racist. Making blanket statements about any group is exactly the kind of logic and mentality so many here are supposedly fighting against.
If being unfairly labeled as a racist is the worst thing that's happened to you then you should consider yourself lucky. There are far worse fates... like being shot dead in the street while surrending to police for instance.I would argue that there are republicans that don't agree with that policy either. I consider myself conservative, but don't agree with a lot of what the hard core right or left do.
This still does not mean republicans/conservatives or those that vote in part or in whole should be equated with the KKK.
one, maybe 2 posters said that. But you're not here because of two posters.
does the republican party and the greater conservative movement have a racism problem or not? via their members and their supporters? yes or no.
If being unfairly labeled as a racist is the worst thing that's happened to you then you should consider yourself lucky. There are far worse fates... like being shot dead in the street while surrending to police for instance.
You're literally defending what you just said, was not being said. And more than two posters have expressed the sentiments I've mentioned.
The entire reason for this post is to ask for a black and white answer to a gray question to justify a blanket statement about an entire group.
What's the statute of limitations?Unless you can point out multiple specific instances of the Democratic Party actively trying to dissuade people from voting based on race through laws and closing voting booths in minority areas, maybe drop the false equivalency.
I've been reading broly's posts while I was trapped in the Phantom Zone. He takes a breather, and seems to want to be the referee of the discussion instead of participating. Unfortunately he's not qualified to perform that duty since his opinions are clearly comprised. He needs to put on his jersey and step on the other side of the line instead of pretending that he's above the fray, because he's clearly in the midst of it, brolic jailer.
What's the statute of limitations?
Good thing you know what's happened in my life, my life experiences, and who I am.
Thanks for putting things in perspective!
The only thing that I was trying to put in perspective is how tacky it is to be in a thread about a dead teenager complaining that conservatives/republicans are being unfairly stereotyped as racists but please continue.
It's way closer than people say, but Republicans are pretty consistently more racist than Democrats.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/are-white-republicans-more-racist-than-white-democrats/
lol Nate there's only been two GSS's since Obama became PresidentIf theres a discouraging trend, its not so much that negative racial attitudes toward blacks have increased in these polls, but that theyve failed to decrease under Obama, as they did so clearly for most of the past three decades.
Then perhaps you should have said that instead of what you did say. You also should be posting telling others to keep the thread on topic and to only discuss the Michael Brown shooting, not just jump in when someone posts something you don't agree with. But you haven't don't that either. You don't seem to have a problem with people using a thread about a dead teenager as a launching pad for other race related topics, so long as they fit your perspective that is.
Or maybe I've read your posts wrong.
Then perhaps you should have said that instead of what you did say. You also should be posting telling others to keep the thread on topic and to only discuss the Michael Brown shooting, not just jump in when someone posts something you don't agree with. But you haven't don't that either. You don't seem to have a problem with people using a thread about a dead teenager as a launching pad for other race related topics, so long as they fit your perspective that is.
Or maybe I've read your posts wrong.