That's why you don't physically stop shoplifters.Any thoughts?
So, at least from watching the footage initially and that part a second time, I can understand why that group attacked the guy (to defend the woman). The one at fault here is, of course, that woman who also endangered her children.
Security was in the wrong when he tried to grab the girl and her mother.
Petty theft doesn't justify assault.
The person who was in the most wrong was the mother. First of all, resisting security. Secondly, child endangerment. And of course theft.
A very shameful display of how not to be a parent.
Security was in the wrong when he tried to grab the girl and her mother.
Petty theft doesn't justify assault.
I don't condone it and you're right they shouldn't have but I can see why it happened. Also, like some posters have said, he shouldn't have chased after her like that. The bad part she's going to get away regardless. Best thing just to call the cops but chances are she's long gone by that time. Although, would be nice if they did catch her, not only because she shoplifted, but her actions with children. Hopefully, that video going public will lead to her arrest.I can't stand when the person recording gets high and mighty with the situation when they clearly don't understand what's going on, as is this case if the summary is true.
He was cornered by 3 or 4 guys. They didn't have to hit him.
If I steal something small from your store, are you allowed to hit me? Shoot me? grab me? Where exactly does it end? What if what I take is only worth a dollar?Sorry, what? What exactly are you arguing? Are you arguing it was unwise of him? Are you arguing it was illegal of him? Are you arguing it was immoral of him? I can't see how you can argue his actions were immoral, if that is what you are saying.
So, the people that hit the security guy probably thought he was assaulting the woman. Misunderstanding, but then it can be argued they should have noticed he was wearing one of those neon green security uniform.
So, at least from watching the footage initially and that part a second time, I can understand why that group attacked the guy (to defend the woman). The one at fault here is, of course, that woman who also endangered her children.
If I steal something small from your store, are you allowed to hit me? Shoot me? grab me? Where exactly does it end? What if what I take is only worth a dollar?
No I think theft of any kind NEVER justifies escalation to physical assault. Take a photo, send it to the police, your job (as private security) is over.
He has hold of the bag, with the stolen goods in them. He doesn't have hold of her at all. She hits him. She escalates to physical assault. While holding her child.If I steal something small from your store, are you allowed to hit me? Shoot me? grab me? Where exactly does it end? What if what I take is only worth a dollar?
No I think theft of any kind NEVER justifies escalation to physical assault. Take a photo, send it to the police, your job (as private security) is over.
If I steal something small from your store, are you allowed to hit me? Shoot me? grab me? Where exactly does it end? What if what I take is only worth a dollar?
No I think theft of any kind NEVER justifies escalation to physical assault. Take a photo, send it to the police, your job (as private security) is over.
I don't condone it and you're right they shouldn't have but I can see why it happened. Also, like some posters have said, he shouldn't have chased after her like that. The bad part she's going to get away regardless. Best thing just to call the cops but chances are she's long gone by that time. Although, would be nice if they did catch her, not only because she shoplifted, but her actions with children. Hopefully, that video going public will lead to her arrest.
No I think theft of any kind NEVER justifies escalation to physical assault. Take a photo, send it to the police, your job (as private security) is over.
I agree, good solution.Why not just use security cameras then? Why even have security guards if you won't allow them to do anything?
Why not just use security cameras then? Why even have security guards if you won't allow them to do anything?
I believe the thought is security isn't necessarily hired to stop thefts in progress, but just to act as a physical presence kind of deterrent against people thinking about it. Human scarecrows, more or less.
Until they grab you and chase you out the store.
The person who was in the most wrong was the mother. First of all, resisting security. Secondly, child endangerment. And of course theft.
A very shameful display of how not to be a parent.
I don't condone what they did at all but in the heat of the moment, I can see how this happened. Nonetheless, they were wrong about hitting him. The security guy probably should not have gone after her, either.I can understand the men stopping the guy, as I don't think his work attire fully showed that he was security, but the men cornered him, he wasn't resisting at all, and one random dude throws the first punch. That part is not understandable and just reeks of idiots finding a reason to hit someone.
This is rich. Just let anyone take what they want. It's cool, just take a picture.If I steal something small from your store, are you allowed to hit me? Shoot me? grab me? Where exactly does it end? What if what I take is only worth a dollar?
No I think theft of any kind NEVER justifies escalation to physical assault. Take a photo, send it to the police, your job (as private security) is over.
Resisting private security is a crime now? I weep for humanity. People are more valuable than stuff.
You see though... this isn't a competition. No one is questioning if a crime was committed, this is a matter of escalation where things go from bad to worse when people's judgment begin to fail. As soon as the person who is supposed to be on the right side of the law fails, not only are they part of the circle of failure but they're action potentially makes a bad thing worse and as the video shows, it can get pretty terrible for all involved.
It's pretty obvious the security guard wasn't following procedures. If he was... then its the stores fault.
That said, why use your kids to shoplift? What kind of parent are you being?
If only the security guard had a gun...
Some people would totally argue it is okay to shoot people for petty theft.
If only the security guard had a gun...
If I steal something small from your store, are you allowed to hit me? Shoot me? grab me? Where exactly does it end? What if what I take is only worth a dollar?
No I think theft of any kind NEVER justifies escalation to physical assault. Take a photo, send it to the police, your job (as private security) is over.
Why not just use security cameras then?
So gloves and a mask and you can steal whatever you want?I agree, good solution.
Some people would totally argue it is okay to shoot people for petty theft.
So gloves and a mask and you can steal whatever you want?
He also got hit several times from the women and a sucker punch later on from the dudes. It's not okay to shoot people even in those circumstances, but it was more than just petty theft.
Exactly. This is why it isn't reasonable to expect security guards to be completely hands-off.
I can understand his actions more if it's his store, but either way once the thief is shown to be determined to get away and they are off your property it's time to stop pursuing. I mean you can follow them all day until you can get the cops involved, but is it worth it?
I can understand his actions more if it's his store, but either way once the thief is shown to be determined to get away and they are off your property it's time to stop pursuing. I mean you can follow them all day until you can get the cops involved, but is it worth it?
He really shouldn't be puting his hands on anyone, because of where it can lead. If the thief is determined to leave you really shouldn't be able to stop them.
Once he started chasing them onto the street it was the wrong thing to do. However the people arguing he had no right to physically detain them before that is wrong. It's called shopkeepers privilege depending how the local laws enact it.
The wording of the law tends to state it's okay if it's within a reasonable distance of the store as well so it's not as clear cut as being right outside the doors and you're clear.