KINGofCRA5H
Member
ubisofts update was great.
"guys we never lowered the specs, we just didn't set high expectations in the first place"
wait, what? I must have missed this??
edit: nevermind just scrolled up
ubisofts update was great.
"guys we never lowered the specs, we just didn't set high expectations in the first place"
No other scenario? Surely everyone in this thread should understand that there is more to graphics than those two numbers.
This thread is a massive overreaction and I really don't want to be part of this thread, but I will point out the insanely obvious and then go find another thread to read because nothing good can potentially come out of something so negative..
1. We know the frame rate and resolution.
That's it.
What about texture quality? AA quality? Lighting, physics, shadows, draw distance etcetc, we don't even know how well each platform holds its performance to know whether the frame rate is actually comparable. Destiny reached "parity" between two magical numbers, but still cans out better on PS4.
There is just too many other factors that don't seem to be discussed here. People are literally infatuated with 1080p/60fps and seen to have developed tunnel vision.
Not if enough people are aware of the fact that Ubisoft is intentionally holding back ("gimping") the PS4 version in order to appease Xbox One owners.This game gonna sell gangbuster regardless of what people say here.
Did Microsoft kick your puppy or something. Stop assuming stuff. You know what that leads to.
And "M$?", seriously?
Well that's the whole deal with parity right? If the xb1 version was 720p there would be no parity anymore. Suddenly 900p would be fine.
I am suprised no one else from Ubi have come out to massage this quote to sound less shitty. Say the ps4 version was always 900 but thanks to the SDK update and extra help from MS they could boost it to 900p as well. Some BS like that.
Did Microsoft kick your puppy or something. Stop assuming stuff. You know what that leads to.
And "M$?", seriously?
You seem really upset about someone talking bad about MS. And M$ is a pretty common name for them. It has been since the 90s. Calm down.
AI really maybe they should have looked for cloud support.
Sure, but here we are still stuck with parity. Some reward.
No other scenario? Surely everyone in this thread should understand that there is more to graphics than those two numbers.
This thread is a massive overreaction and I really don't want to be part of this thread, but I will point out the insanely obvious and then go find another thread to read because nothing good can potentially come out of something so negative..
1. We know the frame rate and resolution.
That's it.
What about texture quality? AA quality? Lighting, physics, shadows, draw distance etcetc, we don't even know how well each platform holds its performance to know whether the frame rate is actually comparable. Destiny reached "parity" between two magical numbers, but still cans out better on PS4.
There is just too many other factors that don't seem to be discussed here. People are literally infatuated with 1080p/60fps and seen to have developed tunnel vision.
wait, what? I must have missed this??
Not if enough people are aware of the fact that Ubisoft is intentionally holding back ("gimping") the PS4 version in order to appease Xbox One owners.
Ahh...the blissfully ignorant.
Also let me be clear here. Im not on some anti MS campaign here. The Xbox One is pretty dope and I cant wait to play some Halo.
I just find whats happening here rediculous. If MS is in no way involved good for them. Then Ubi deserves 100% of the blame.
Not if enough people are aware of the fact that Ubisoft is intentionally holding back ("gimping") the PS4 version in order to appease Xbox One owners.
Do not buy this game, because if you do, you are supporting this awful practice.
Not if enough people are aware of the fact that Ubisoft is intentionally holding back ("gimping") the PS4 version in order to appease Xbox One owners.
This. PS4 owners everywhere are going to be notifying their friends &/or families that have a PS4 about it, especially now that this has been blown up on social media, thanks to the #PS4NoParity hashtag.
Again, why would Ubisoft nerf the PS4 version for no reason when Assassins Creed 4 and Watch Dogs PS4 beat out PS3, X360 and XB1 SKUs? It makes zero sense for Ubi to do that without some kind of MS incentive.
Has Ubi stated any extra effect in thr PS4 version? I've heard none. And to explain the same resolution they would have to be significant.
Lets use Mordor that came out 1 week ago. It was higher resolution, Better shadow quality, and denser foliage on PS4. If both versions are the same resolution and fps the PS4 should have some major advantages in textures, shadows, lighting, AA, etc.
Heh, this is definitely getting attention but it's not going to be that big. A lot of people couldn't care less and I'm sure the game will still sell very well on the PS4.
Heh, this is definitely getting attention but it's not going to be that big. A lot of people couldn't care less and I'm sure the game will still sell very well on the PS4.
Ok, this is bs. I don't know if its because of MS, probably is probably not, but this is no way to handle this situation. What would PC gamers say if this would apply in that version of the game as well?
I just canceled my preorder.
I'm so close to selling my PS4 and upgrading my PC right now. I wasn't even considering it yesterday.
"We wanted to avoid debates about facts, like the fact that one console is more capable than the other, so we made a decision that just makes us look bad instead!"
Never stop being stupid Ubisoft, I think it's hilarious.
Can you explain what the PS4's CPU has to do with the game being 1080p, please?No one said that, the PS4 can't handle this game in 1080p on PS4 with its weak laptop CPU is all...
Well that's the whole deal with parity right? If the xb1 version was 720p there would be no parity anymore. Suddenly 900p would be fine.
I laugh at anyone who gets upset at that. Tells you their allegiance right away. Is Soony banned too?It's not really acceptable on NeoGAF. I would refrain from using it.
Ubisoft, just sell Raymanso I can forget you exist.to Nintendo
Didn't really want to post again, but in short... yeah.
Except people's expectations are out of whack. Lose the "major" aspect. This isn't a first party game, it's not developed solely to maximize the PS4, they aren't going to add "extra" effects and things that aren't even available in the PC version just because it's PS4. Expecting anything more than what a comparable PC could output with the same exact game would come off as being entitled.
The PS4 version well likely be better, I'm not sure why people who have had an ear to any of this, would expect it to be otherwise.
That's all.
If you are tired of these sorts of things affecting multiplatform titles, yeah, go for it. Fair warning that PC ports can be crap from time to time, and Ubisoft is one of the biggest offenders. It makes attributing this uhh 'situation' to technical incompetence believable.
Again, why would Ubisoft nerf the PS4 version for no reason when Assassins Creed 4 and Watch Dogs PS4 beat out PS3, X360 and XB1 SKUs? It makes zero sense for Ubi to do that without some kind of MS incentive.
This whole thing is so nutty that the only thing that makes sense is a money hat happened. There is no way in hell that decision came down from brand development and marketing
Wait...They want to build an engine from the "ground up" that can only run 900/30 for the next 5-6 yrs?
I can't even believe they mentioned PC and optimization in their statement, smh.
LOL...Ubisoft, you can't even do PR correctly.