There's no question about that. The real question is whether this will be worse than the 1994 one.
Our computer programmer people.
![]()
arent all programmers anti social?
whats slayvens opinion on this
whats slayvens opinion on this
If the rights won't return to Marvel, at least make himspank Apocalypse at the end of the next X-Men movie. Singer and co. could do him justice.
If the rights won't return to Marvel, at least make himspank Apocalypse at the end of the next X-Men movie. Singer and co. could do him justice.
Alright. Boycott this crap.
BuddhaBeam said:He wears a green fedora instead of a cloak and hood, I hear.
What is his GAF name?
Wow, what a dud.
It isn't really surprising. Look at what they did to Galactus.
Fox really taking a giant shit on the Fantastic Four license
He wears a green fedora instead of a cloak and hood, I hear. The face mask is to cover up his terrible neckbeard.
They need to focus on doing one of the xmen right maybe the 9th time will be a charm in the Apocalypse movie.
And people wonder why atheism is on the rise.
my money is on Samoa Joe beating doom here
I'm going to think about this next time I complain about Marvel Studios having underwhelming villains in order to keep things in perspective.
Batman Begins script leaked quite a bit earlier than the movie coming out and was well received so not really, this has only had random details that the cast members have said in interviews and one set leak pic of Doctor Doom, they were mad at this before any of those thing were revealed cause they want Marvel to own and make it instead.I dunno. The villains in The Dark Knight Trilogy were pretty different from their comic book selves, were people mad over that?
This is how they get back at Marvel for marginalizing X-Men.
I wanted to give this movie the benefit of the doubt because I loved Chronicle and I'm a big fan of Michael B. Jordan but this really just seems like they're making a shitty movie to spite Marvel.
I hate this infatuation with not naming him Victor Von Doom.
They did it in the Ultimate line too...they named him Victor Van Damme. Do they think that's any less dumb?
I dunno. The villains in The Dark Knight Trilogy were pretty different from their comic book selves, were people mad over that?
I guess I don't see a problem with this if it's a modern re-imagining. Is it really so bad?
I dunno. The villains in The Dark Knight Trilogy were pretty different from their comic book selves, were people mad over that?
Sounds good Toby, hope they are paying you well.