I'm nowhere as talented as the folks at Naughty Dog, so don't laugh. Here is a CG image, I rendered on my single PC using Maya's mentalray. It took 12 hours. I could have also render it using multiple PCs to render it faster.
Banned site
Makes sense...
The hair is the only think that looks clearly worse to me when you take out the fact that Nate is dirty and wet in the E3 video and even the hair looked considerably better during the Drake presentation. It was probably toned down a bit for framerate in the live demo. There are some other differences but they seem like slight design changes as opposed to downgrades.
Here is the ingame version of the teaser Drake(jungle Drake) vs Drake's brother in realtime. I think that Naughty Dog has the ability to scale the shaders and lighting just as before. To me, E3 Drake could almost pass for a real person and it has nothing to do with the time of the day. Drake's brother could not.
Here is an extreme closeup of the shader on E3 Drake's face.
Here is another
Also their game engine allows them to record a video as well as fix the framerate.
Yah it's not that great as I am not a serious artist. I do it for fun. It was rendered on my laptop that was 3 years old. It was also rendered at a much higher resolution. For Christmas, I am upgrading my laptop to the Asus Rog G751JY-DH72X.
I feel like E3 Drake picture is brighter than Drake's brother picture. ( maybe different lighting conditions?)Here is the ingame version of the teaser Drake(jungle Drake) vs Drake's brother in realtime. I think that Naughty Dog has the ability to scale the shaders and lighting just as before. To me, E3 Drake could almost pass for a real person and it has nothing to do with the time of the day. Drake's brother could not.
Watched the 1080p video on my TV and the hair looks fine, lots of details I just couldn't see on my phone or my laptop.
So you're comparing two different models in vastly different lighting conditions? Okay...Here is the ingame version of the teaser Drake(jungle Drake) vs Drake's brother in realtime. I think that Naughty Dog has the ability to scale the shaders and lighting just as before. To me, E3 Drake could almost pass for a real person and it has nothing to do with the time of the day. Drake's brother could not.
Here is an extreme closeup of the shader on E3 Drake's face.
Here is another
Also their game engine allows them to record a video as well as fix the framerate.
Yah it's not that great as I am not a serious artist. I do it for fun. It was rendered on my laptop that was 3 years old. It was also rendered at a much higher resolution. For Christmas, I am upgrading my laptop to the Asus Rog G751JY-DH72X.
Ok, now we know for sure you have no clue what you're talking about
The fact that you are comparing it on Youtube shows that you have no idea how bad compression can screw up details. Have you watched the Gamersyde color corrected video? That looks far better than the Youtube video. The textures and foliage look MUCH more detailed because of the high bitrate. The character models also look far better and the lighting looks less washed out. Watch it and come back to this thread before making ignorant statements like "Durr.... E3 looks better but I can't tell why aside from details". Most importantly, the extra details you claim you see is because Nate is wet in the E3 teaser.
My thoughts exactly.
Here I helped you. The best quality possible from the direct video feed. The E3 teaser looks overall still a little bit sharper to me, but that's probably just the Video quality.
Hair, eyes, mouth, scar, no crows feet, and he looks fatter
Thanks a lot, man! That Drake model looks just as good as the E3 model imo. And yeah, the bitrate of this video is only ~18000mb/s, which is only half of Gamersyde's usual bitrate.
Here I helped you. The best quality possible from the direct video feed. The E3 teaser looks overall still a little bit sharper to me, but that's probably just the Video quality.
Did Sony ever put video of the recent demo up on PS4? I'd love to watch it in direct-feed on my TV.
Ok, you seriously have no idea with comparisons at all it seems. The only valid point you made is the hair, but even then the E3 teaser was very dark, making it hard to analyse the hair in the video. With eyes, I see literally zero difference. It's not like Nate has lifeless eyes in the PSX demo. The rest are just cringe and face palm worthy. I mean, scar? Really? He could have gotten injured later depending on chronology. Your post just convinced me that you are nothing more than an ignorant troll or a fanboy seeking attention.Hair, eyes, mouth, scar, no crows feet, and he looks fatter
Seriously, man, just go for the HQ version on Gamersyde. I had enough of trolls screaming downgrade watching the low quality versions...Did Sony ever put video of the recent demo up on PS4? I'd love to watch it in direct-feed on my TV.
I... wasn't screaming downgrade. I think the game looks great. I watched it before and was just wondering if there's a version I can download to my PS4 so I can watch it on my TV whenever I want.
Sorry, dude. Not you. The guy a few posts above who has zero knowledge in graphics but decides to comment anyway. I didn't mean to offend you at all. I suppose I was a bit too aggressive but it just saddens me when awesome graphics are unappreciated.
No prob. My favorite part of the graphics is that opening shot of the water crashing on the beach far below. Game looks so atmospheric. Hope we'll get some rainy, windy sequences!
Oh, I didn't realize it was that simple. Nice!
I'm no fan of teasers at all. I know they have their purpose to some people, maybe a lot. Setting the mood, show what settings and characters to expect etc. But I don't need that. I need gameplay and a glint of story. Therefore never cared for teasers.
Thanks for quoting the links, haven't realised them. This looks so beautiful. The way it's meant to be watched.
