YesSo, maybe a silly question but if you decide to play a game at 1080p instead of 1440p on the monitor/any 1440p monitor really. Does it look worse(fuzzier) then on a native 1080p screen?
YesSo, maybe a silly question but if you decide to play a game at 1080p instead of 1440p on the monitor/any 1440p monitor really. Does it look worse(fuzzier) then on a native 1080p screen?
Of course. Non-native resolution is always comparatively garbage.So, maybe a silly question but if you decide to play a game at 1080p instead of 1440p on the monitor/any 1440p monitor really. Does it look worse(fuzzier) then on a native 1080p screen?
Of course. Non-native resolution is always comparatively garbage.
The benefits of Gsync aren't climbing in particular, you're just describing the benefits of being at a high framerate in general.The benefit of being able to take advantage of smooth and tear free image at any refresh rate (above at certain point), and because a higher frame rate is better than a lower one, the higher your frame rate the naturally better your image is. A higher frame rate is better, no? G-Sync making that tear free and smooth at those higher frame rates is a benefit of G-Sync + the higher refresh rate monitor. The benefit of the package (of a high refresh rate monitor + gsync) climbs with the frame rate.
In the 5 or 6 months I've been using G-Sync, I'd say the benefits below 60fps are quite overstated. It's an improvement, just an exaggerated one when it comes to the actual real world results, because it doesn't make 45fps (for example) a significantly better experience.
And this is the reason I wont be getting one for a while. I want the option of 1080p if I need it. Its naïve to think I'll be able to play everything at 1440p, good settings and a great framerate. Gsync can soften the blow some, but I know having the capabilities will just make me itch to buy more expensive components for my PC.Of course. Non-native resolution is always comparatively garbage.
Of course. Non-native resolution is always comparatively garbage.
That's exactly what I said i nthe previous page myself:And this is the reason I wont be getting one for a while. I want the option of 1080p if I need it. Its naïve to think I'll be able to play everything at 1440p, good settings and a great framerate. Gsync can soften the blow some, but I know having the capabilities will just make me itch to buy more expensive components for my PC.
Nothing ridiculous about what I said. Thank you for your concern.Calm it with the ridiculous statements.
Nothing ridiculous about what I said. Thank you for your concern.
Oh, and yes, "fuzzier" is exactly what I would describe as "comparatively garbage".
If I actually had any "impossible high standard" I would be talking about 4K panels and quad-SLI GPU setups.Your description is elitist preference.
If I actually had any "impossible high standard" I would be talking about 4K panels and quad-SLI GPU setups.
Instead I'm advocating fro sticking to 1080p and staying in the range manageable by a single mid tier GPU. Which reads as "being money-savy and reasonable" to me, if not even being a cheap ass by some people's standards.
Go to dismissively call elitist someone else who cares.
To me, yes, upscaling s the worst offence you can committing to image quality. There's hardly any option that I wouldn't be willing to drag to the lowest setting if it spared me the pain to watch at a monitor outputting an upscaled image.
But this isn't even about my opinion as it is about facts: a 1440p monitor outputting at 1080p would look far worse than a 1080p panel. Regardless of how much you can tolerate it.
out of curiousity. do you have a spreadsheet or blog or something like that which shows your current pc setup, past purchase, hardware "lying" around?
*throws RoG Swift out window*
Can I get a curved 34" 5K resolution G-SYNC IPS monitor please?
The low resolution on the g-syncs and the curved Dell are deal-breakers.
Hardware to keep stable 60 fps is cheaper than any variable rate display.
And this is the reason I wont be getting one for a while. I want the option of 1080p if I need it. Its naïve to think I'll be able to play everything at 1440p, good settings and a great framerate. Gsync can soften the blow some, but I know having the capabilities will just make me itch to buy more expensive components for my PC.
I don't see the point of buying a 1440p panel now just to be forced to stick to >60fps or, FAR WORSE, upscaling.
Says the man with plenty of GPU headroom!
TFTcentral speculated that this might be an error.
Ugh, I hope not.
I’d lay the pricing details on you, but Acer hasn't committed just yet. I suspect Acer wants to see what other monitor makers have coming and for how much. I can tell you what Yoda said: “There is another...”
haha i am ready to feel miserable about my laptopI just have a pics. I was actually thinking of doing something like you mentioned in 2015. A lot of people have asked about it.
I probably won't be able to resist buying this day 1, and then 2 days later a VA panel gets announced.
Says the man with plenty of GPU headroom!
Not regretting my AOC 1080p G-sync purchase.
I'll upgrade when I can get either a much, much better 1080p one, or a 4k 144hz that is somewhat better image wise.
Not regretting my AOC 1080p G-sync purchase.
I'll upgrade when I can get either a much, much better 1080p one, or a 4k 144hz that is somewhat better image wise.
omg lol ... what on earth could push that![]()
I too have the 1080p AOC G-Sync monitor, but I went for that over the ROG Swift primarily because I wasn't sure if I wanted to go to 1440p with the 3GB VRAM on my 780s. I'll upgrade my monitor again after my next GPU upgrades.
I await those fine super sampled shots of System Shock 2 at 4k 144hz.Depends on the game, lol. I'm not intending to run an insane SLI setup or anything. But there are older and less demanding titles that could look pretty stunning at 4k and 90+ FPSr
I await those fine super sampled shots of System Shock 2 at 4k 144hz.