GG is fighting a losing battle. At the end of the day, the rest of the world looks at this and sees women who feel hurt, and a group of people (GG) telling them to shut up. Whatever GG claims to be about, that's how it looks. Cyber bullying, plain and simple.
But they don't care how they look to the rest of the world and until their precious AAA developers actually start speaking out against them (not gonna happen) nothing will change.
I've had gamergate explained to me a thousand times an I still think i dont understand what its all about lol
Sociopathic manchildren hate women, specifically of the "game developer" variety.i feel the same way
Are 12 year olds using Twitter now? If not, how would someone that young even learn about GamerGate and/or comprehend what's happening?
Also, do people still actively tweet with the GamerGate hashtag? Or have they all just moved on to 8chan to fester amongst themselves?
Except it does. Most people don't side with GamerGate but just sit to the side quietly not doing anything. If there was a large group that was vocal that did things like raise awareness and protest I think it would help a lot more than a few articles on websites here and there. I'd join a group like that to help, but without a group like that there isn't really anything I can do but sit to the side, especially as a white-passing male who doesn't work in the game industry or media.
GamerGate claims to be about ethics in games journalism. I think the term stems from the "scandal" (read: completely fabricated allegations) that a female indie dev slept with a journalist or something. Hence the name "GamerGate" was formed, a portmanteau of "Gamer" and "Watergate" (reference to the Nixon scandal in the U.S. that led to the president's impeachment).i feel the same way
People younger than 12 use Twitter, and GamerGate isn't just a thing on Twitter.
I think I fell in love with you reading that just now.This is really intense.
I'm not going to lie, this whole ordeal has made me pretty depressed. I have to avoid this stuff because it honestly poisons the mind regardless of which side you stand on. It's an extremely important discussion to have, but not in this way. If it makes you angry or frustrated then I would advise to back down for at least a week. Barely anything gets accomplished through hatred. It just bores more hurt feelings and creates a cycle of blame and...suffering.
Any chance we can switch this into an act of love? How well you treat your enemies says a lot about who you are. Forgiveness is not an act of weakness but one of strength.
And well...I really feel like sexism is just a result of repressed emotional pain anyways. In fact, that's basically what all forms of hate are: repressed emotional pain. If you want to put an end to sexism or don't know why you've been called sexist, then remember that you can't skip the main step. When the plane is crashing you have to put on your own oxygen mask before helping the person next to you. With that in mind, is it ever really possible to love and accept someone else when you don't fully love and accept yourself?
And I think those are the questions everyone needs to step back and think about. All phobias and all forms of hatred start with the self. They are projected onto disadvantaged groups simply because quite frankly no one ever supports or gives a shit about disadvantaged groups. Both racism and sexism are the result of feeling the need to measure your own worth by stepping on others. Why do people do this? Because they can't find worth in themselves alone, so they need the certainty that prejudice provides.
Everyone carries a pit in their souls saying they were robbed of the love and belonging they deserve, everyone smacks others down to express that pain. I can shamelessly say it leads to nothing besides a short glimpse of satisfaction followed by a blinding addiction to hatred. And depression is nothing but hatred turned inward. :C
There's really not going to be a cure to sexism until you cure the hatred from each and every person's heart. And I'm pretty sure you can only do that by caring about each other. So regardless of where things go from here, I hope that everyone, regardless of how they feel, knows that they deserve love, belongingness and happiness in their lives.
Fighting sexism with sexism? That makes sense.I always say 'if you need something done right give it to a woman'
I didn't really know what to say other than "don't let that stop you" since it seems like a reality that I couldn't say was being exaggerated. Maybe I should've said that now is the turning point and times will change.
WHAT THE FUCK!?
I've had gamergate explained to me a thousand times an I still think i dont understand what its all about lol
What other people? And what is your problem with GG discussion being on "entirely negative terms" if, as you say here, there's nothing positive about it?
If you are defending Gamergate, or perpetuating the same arguments as Gamergate, or prioritizing your feelings or opinion over the terrorism of the female targets of Gamergate, or think it's important that you state your opinion without sitting down and educating yourself on this sensitive and toxic issue, then you are committing bigoted actions and contributing to sexism in video games, unwittingly or not.
Fuck Gamergate.
Imru al-Qays;151709318 said:It's not productive and it doesn't help us understand what's going on. I don't mean to suggest that we should talk about them in positive terms, but there has to be room for us to try to understand who these people are and what the larger social, economic, and cultural factors are that have driven them to these extremes of marginalization and anti-social behavior.
As for what do I mean when I say that Gamergate is used as a rhetorical cudgel to attack people who don't actually sympathize with it, read Lime's post directly before yours:
Sociopathic manchildren hate women, specifically of the "game developer" variety.
By the way... What would be wrong with being a hugbox? Hugs are great. You're banned now but if you're reading this, go get a hug from someone you like or care about. Maybe it'll make you feel better.Did Brianna back hers up?
Please ban me. You guys and your circle jerking are so idiotic. This place was never a good place to discuss games, but post-GamerGate it's become even more of a hugbox and far worse than it ever was.
Imru’ al-Qays;151709318 said:It's not productive and it doesn't help us understand what's going on. I don't mean to suggest that we should talk about them in positive terms, but there has to be room for us to try to understand who these people are and what the larger social, economic, and cultural factors are that have driven them to these extremes of marginalization and anti-social behavior.
As for what do I mean when I say that Gamergate is used as a rhetorical cudgel to attack people who don't actually sympathize with it, read Lime's post directly before yours:
Yeah there's nothing more to get, unfortunately. There's no deeper meaning, there's no value there. At some point early on there was actual debate about games journalism. I remember the discussions that eventually led to the jokes about Doritos pope and call backs to Gerstmann gate and how money and advertising was shaping the industry.
The minute feminism and that whole part got introduced is when the genuine discussion died and it became the cesspit of misogyny most are familiar with now and it blew up everywhere. The problem was that you couldn't tell who was still talking about ethics, and who was using the ethics discussion to further their screwed up agenda, effectively poisoning whatever merit that was ever there to begin with.
To see shit like those death threats and real life stalkers is disgusting. It's just so mindlessly appalling. Threatening people because they share your hobby, but like they different parts of it? Talk about the mentality of child.
But they don't care how they look to the rest of the world and until their precious AAA developers actually start speaking out against them (not gonna happen) nothing will change.
There is a deeper meaning though, for people into psychology anyways. I would absolutely love to know what happened to these people and why they are the way they are. I mean you can just say that they are sexist and end it there, and thats fair and most people would be content with that answer, but the human mind, how it deals with things and how it shapes who you are is super complex. There are probably many factors that contributed to forming these people into out-there sexists with violent tendencies and understanding what caused them to be this way on a psychological level would be beneficial to everyone.
This is what happens in a positive feedback loop. I've had that on my mind a lot lately, the application of systems analysis to social behavior. I guarantee that almost no-one (almost) starts off as a hateful misogynist: what we see here is an emergent effect. You don't need to be a naturally hateful person, you just need to be fed hate in small doses by a community which you're also feeding small doses of hate into until the entire thing saturates and you have....this
This is what happens in a positive feedback loop. I've had that on my mind a lot lately, the application of systems analysis to social behavior. I guarantee that almost no-one (almost) starts off as a hateful misogynist: what we see here is an emergent effect. You don't need to be a naturally hateful person, you just need to be fed hate in small doses by a community which you're also feeding small doses of hate into until the entire thing saturates and you have....this
Did you actually read what you quoted
Imru al-Qays;151711190 said:Of course I did. I think it's an excellent example of what I'm talking about: the evocation of a stigmatized group or ideology to undergird a rhetorical attack on ideas or arguments that may not in fact be aligned with that stigmatized group or ideology. It's the weaponization of the guilt by association fallacy in order to associate a broad and polyphyletic set of arguments with the hated group.
Imru al-Qays;151711190 said:Of course I did. I think it's an excellent example of what I'm talking about: the evocation of a stigmatized group or ideology to undergird a rhetorical attack on ideas or arguments that may not in fact be aligned with that stigmatized group or ideology. It's the weaponization of the guilt by association fallacy in order to associate a broad and polyphyletic set of arguments with the hated group.
Imru al-Qays;151711190 said:Of course I did. I think it's an excellent example of what I'm talking about: the evocation of a stigmatized group or ideology to undergird a rhetorical attack on ideas or arguments that may not in fact be aligned with that stigmatized group or ideology. It's the weaponization of the guilt by association fallacy in order to associate a broad and polyphyletic set of arguments with the hated group.
Imru al-Qays;151711190 said:Of course I did. I think it's an excellent example of what I'm talking about: the evocation of a stigmatized group or ideology to undergird a rhetorical attack on ideas or arguments that may not in fact be aligned with that stigmatized group or ideology. It's the weaponization of the guilt by association fallacy in order to associate a broad and polyphyletic set of arguments with the hated group.
See
When you willing associate with a consumerism-based harassment group that claims it's about ethics in games journalism when all they do is harass indie devs/freelancers/anyone who questions them while ignoring AAA completely
you're guilty
Imru’ al-Qays;151712507 said:But that's exactly my point: Lime's post was an explicit condemnation of people who don't associate with Gamergate at all.
or prioritizing your feelings or opinion over the terrorism of the female targets of Gamergate, or think it's important that you state your opinion without sitting down and educating yourself on this sensitive and toxic issue, then you are committing bigoted actions and contributing to sexism in video games, unwittingly or not.
I completely zoned out of the whole GamerGate thing.
Last thing I remember it was about biased reviews for a game because something with some chick.
Isn't this all a big overreaction? All I read about GG just sounds like the internet at work, nothing special. Giving your dream up because of this is the most silly thing there is, your dream should be something that you're close to willing to die for (IMO).
Isn't this all a big overreaction? All I read about GG just sounds like the internet at work, nothing special. Giving your dream up because of this is the most silly thing there is, your dream should be something that you're close to willing to die for (IMO).
In what sense?
If the who fiasco has made them fall out of love with the idea of being a game developer that is a much sadder thing. But "I won't pursue my dream because other people might not want me to" is no excuse.
LITERALLY die for. As in, death threats. As in, people over the internet finding out where you live and getting dangerously close to killing you.
No, I don't think a dream is worth dying for.
Why don't they get reported anyway? all i read in their feed is these death threats and how close to being harassed IRL but they never call the police for some reason.
Why don't they get reported anyway? all i read in their feed is these death threats and how close to being harassed IRL but they never call the police for some reason.
They did call the police.Why don't they get reported anyway? all i read in their feed is these death threats and how close to being harassed IRL but they never call the police for some reason.
Umm. Plenty of people have called the police and are working with them.Why don't they get reported anyway? all i read in their feed is these death threats and how close to being harassed IRL but they never call the police for some reason.