"I have...letters from dozens of women who've abandoned their dream" (Brianna Wu)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You misunderstand. That question plagues just about EVERY Zoe Quinn thread. I wouldn't have included it if it weren't repeated so often, obviously.

Gotcha. What you're saying matches with Mesoian's reply. Yes, I hardly visited her threads. Sorry about that, it wasn't intentional in a negative way.
 
Gotcha. What you're saying matches with Mesoian's reply. Yes, I hardly visited her threads. Sorry about that, it wasn't intentional in a negative way.

You responded well to the answers you got. If everyone reacted like you did, most of us wouldn't be so touchy about it. But for every person who genuinely is asking questions, another half dozen are just "asking questions"
 
You have to expect people to give you shit when you put so much stock stock in anecdotal evidence and dismiss anything that contradicts with your preconceived notions, to say nothing of constantly moving the goalposts.

I am wrong! I admit it. 40% of PS4 gamers are female. I am now going to put I play Killzone and Destiny on my Tinder profile so I can attract all the ladies. Thanks guys!

This is why gaming is stereotyped lol.
 
You responded well to the answers you got. If everyone reacted like you did, most of us wouldn't be so touchy about it. But for every person who genuinely is asking questions, another half dozen are just "asking questions"

#Justaskingquestions

Staying up to date with this stuff is bad for your health.

I am wrong! I admit it. 40% of PS4 gamers are female. I am now going to put I play Killzone and Destiny on my Tinder profile so I can attract all the ladies. Thanks guys!

This is why gaming is stereotyped lol.

It certainly is.
 
As mentioned, I follow many of the other female related threads where it was not brought up the way I did. If you're saying that was the case in the threads that I haven't visited, then I apologize for hitting a sensitive topic.
It's not that it's a "sensitive topic". It's that the question is IRRELEVANT and I would question the motives of anyone who comes in such a thread "just asking questions" when those questions are completely irrelevant.

Not to mention, you're lying; you actually posted in a thread specifically about Zoë Quinn before, repeatedly even. So why are you playing dumb now?
 
Not going to miss you at all.

Seems clear he feels she is doing more harm than good by keeping the story going for her own personal gain, but that does not automatically translate into supporting what people have done to her. Suggesting he should be banned here is trying to use intimidation to silence someone solely for not falling in line with your beliefs.

Isn't this board a place for discussion? People should not be banned simply for not agreeing with everyone else in a thread.
 
I am wrong! I admit it. 40% of PS4 gamers are female. I am now going to put I play Killzone and Destiny on my Tinder profile so I can attract all the ladies. Thanks guys!

This is why gaming is stereotyped lol.

What the hell are you even on about at this point? You were shown statistics that lots of women are playing on consoles. You rejected these statistics because you don't see women at the stores you go to buying the games you play
 
Unless this exact question has been asked in Zoe Quinn threads and those huge ass GG threads that I hardly followed, I hardly remember anyone specifically asking that question in many of the other threads I have followed. Only bringing Zoe Quinn in either a) a negative tone or b) how she was mistreated and how much she had to endure as an example of mistreatment.

But people did explain why you have no right to that information and why it doesn't matter. You just refuse to listen.

The following is presented without comment, with emphasis added by me:

I've stayed away from threads about Zoe Quinn up to this point. This whole ordeal is shitty and it's weird in certain ways. I think my opinion differs from both sides. You have the idiots who try to use anything against her to make it look like a gaming related problem and justify all the harassments directed at her. Then you have the defenders who try to minimize what kind of a shitty person Zoe herself is. Yes, it has nothing to do with gaming but it's sad to see what I perceive as a blind defence to her and make her sound like a saint. As if only people that dislike her would do that because of her gender. Maybe some of you don't care about cheaters, but I sure as hell highly dislike a person who cheated on a loved one with 5 guys, keeps lying and treating that loved one like shit. After knowing all of this, it's hard for me to not look negatively at her and only defend her. Speaking of this boyfriend, I had sympathies for him at first but it seems he was also in chat logs with that hateful group behind the whole campaign. It doesn't sound like he was just venting. So he seems just as shitty.

I think this way of thinking is a different perspective on the situation. You have people who don't give a shit about her personal affairs and are able to only focus on the unfair treatment she has received in an objective way. You also have people who can't look past that once they know what kind of a person she is in her personal life regardless of the situation at hand. It's unfair to label everyone as misoginistic if not everyone thinks the same way.

Basically what I'm saying, the defenders have every right to defend Zoe. Nobody deserves any of this. But they should understand opinions of others who have no stake at this and just dislike Zoe for a different reason.

Uhm...it is our business once the news is out. By that I mean we are free to have opinions of people once we have information about them spread across the internet in this case.

Secondly, I find it hard to not believe the boyfriend with all the evidence he has gathered. It's all very believable and she admitted some of his claims.

It's not about the indie game and I'm not saying all that has happened to her is okay because. You're taking an extreme position towards me when you don't need to. Regardless of what you have to say, people do get judged about the smallest things even. I'm talking about having an opinion of a person, not attack that person or make his/her life difficult.

But that is the thing! I don't care about Zoe's personal life or of all the designers. That doesn't mean I can't have an opinion about her based on what I've read and share that casually on this forum/thread. Why am I (and others with a similar opinion) (are) being treated like an extreme case? Who are you to tell me no sane person thinks like that and asking me how I feel about somebody else kicking a dog? Or that other member who tells me who cares about what I wrote? You make it sound like I'm part of this harassment campaign just because I said I don't like Zoe as a person from an outsider perspective.

I wasted more time explaining myself and sounding negative towards Zoe more than I should have. Because of this, I feel like I'm coming over as a 'hater' and I'm getting tired of this. Is there some miscommunication or are there too many emotional members on this thread? I don't feel like I sound unreasonable or having a lack of understanding with my position and I'm frankly puzzled by replies similar to yours.

You did also stop by a gamergate thread to enquire about her.

Stop obsessing about her personal life and move the fuck on.
 
I admit I was wrong. All the girls on my Facebook were FURIOUS when PSN and Xbox Live went down during Christmas, for example. I also remember the huge rush for GTAV by females during its launch. How could I think differently?
I am wrong! I admit it. 40% of PS4 gamers are female. I am now going to put I play Killzone and Destiny on my Tinder profile so I can attract all the ladies. Thanks guys!

This is why gaming is stereotyped lol.
tumblr_n50m82ZK1x1qlyfm1o4_400.gif
 
Seems clear he feels she is doing more harm than good by keeping the story going for her own personal gain, but that does not automatically translate into supporting what people have done to her. Suggesting he should be banned here is trying to use intimidation to silence someone solely for not falling in line with your beliefs.

Isn't this board a place for discussion? People should not be banned simply for not agreeing with everyone else in a thread.

That's...kind of the reason there's a general moratorium on GG discussion. This one has at least somewhat managed to remain "on topic" of female involvement in the medium on either an enthusiast or professional level, but I don't know how much more gas is in it
 
I am wrong! I admit it. 40% of PS4 gamers are female. I am now going to put I play Killzone and Destiny on my Tinder profile so I can attract all the ladies. Thanks guys!

This is why gaming is stereotyped lol.

Gaming is stereotyped because of idiot guys like you. If anything, you sound ashamed you play video games.
 
Gaming is stereotyped because of idiot guys like you. If anything, you sound ashamed you play video games.

What the hell are you even on about at this point? You were shown statistics that lots of women are playing on consoles. You rejected these statistics because you don't see women at the stores you go to buying the games you play

His logic: 80% of women between the age of 18-30 that I know play console games. Therefor, 80% of all girls play console games.

How can he be having such a hard time finding women that like video games when 80% of them do! Sounds like a problem with him!
 
His logic: 80% of women between the age of 18-30 that I know play console games. Therefor, 80% of all girls play console games.

How can he be having such a hard time finding women that like video games when 80% of them do! Sounds like a problem with him!

Alright, alright, let's be fair now.

Honestly, the blinders argument is pretty common and I don't fault most people for thinking that because they don't see it happening, girls don't play games. It's not an uncommon mindset to have. I'd be lying if I said that I, myself, never thought that way.

Ignoring actual quantified census data on sex demographics and data, however, is not a good look.
 
What the hell are you even on about at this point? You were shown statistics that lots of women are playing on consoles. You rejected these statistics because you don't see women at the stores you go to buying the games you play

So you're telling me 40% of people who play PSN and Live are female? Hahahahahahaha wow I am done.

Gamers are stereotyped for a reason.

Nintendo said in late 2009 that 2.34 million females played the 360 and PS3: http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/Wand...Next_Frontier__Female_Gaming_Demographics.php

So you are telling me this number grew to 18 million in 2 years? There is something clearly wrong with Newzoo's data, cause I trust Nintendo more because I saw the Wii's success with my own eyes.

If you think there was a 16 million increase tell me what did it. The failures that were Move and Kinect? Lol.
 
Brianna Wu is a narcissistic opportunist.

I don't consider her at all.

Just because she is exposing harassment in the Internet and has to walk around with security, she is an opportunist? So, by the same definition, if you had to protect your life the same way and wanted to expose all the attacks in hopes someone does something about it, would you also be an opportunist?
 
Alright, alright, let's be fair now.

Honestly, the blinders argument is pretty common and I don't fault most people for thinking that because they don't see it happening, girls don't play games. It's not an uncommon mindset to have.

Ignoring actual quantified census data on sex demographics and data, however, is not a good look.

Its darkly hilarious though, because the perception that women don't play games helps foster an environment in which, for various reasons, women feel uncomfortable being a part of.
 
Its darkly hilarious though, because the perception that women don't play games helps foster an environment in which, for various reasons, women feel uncomfortable being a part of.

Totes.

And if you actually have the conversation with a woman about playing video games, you tend to find that they either do in a very casual manner or they did, but it became "not the thing to do" due to perceived social normatives.

Best match in a fighting game I've ever had was to a woman at Otakon. I'll never forget it. Down to the fucking wire.
 
Really happy to see that this thread inevitably became a great discussion on how we can help women developers feel more accepted in this toxic community.

Good job everyone!
 
Why?

Being a mixed-raced, homosexual son of a single mother, I clearly hate women.

Please don't assume I have some sort of agenda. Hilarious.

Sure you are.

Let's assume you are, they are a lot of self-hating people out there. They are some women that believe the current traditional roles should not change, the point being just because you claim to be a woman doesn't make you any less bias or prejudice.
 
I admit I was wrong. All the girls on my Facebook were FURIOUS when PSN and Xbox Live went down during Christmas, for example. I also remember the huge rush for GTAV by females during its launch. How could I think differently?

You need to maybe .. stop trying too hard. You're sounding wheezy and desperate.

Some of the hardest core gamers I know are female, but it skews heavily into fantasy RPGs, I think. lol Some are very into FPSs too, but bleh. Definitely the fantasy RPGs are the way to go for me and many others.
It's such a shame this thing is an ongoing headache and source of anxiety for females in the industry. To the detriment of everyone, too.
I'm glad there are women who are still hanging in there despite the hostile environment, but I hope it hasn't caused them to internalize hate for other women who seem to be "rocking the boat", which I think unfortunately does happen (seeing as female GGers or shielders exist).
 
Never give up your dreams.

I just wish we weren't at a place where you have to fight so hard to attempt them though.

Try and fail, okay. Try it and get bored of it, sure. Try it and succeed, GREAT! But knowing we live in a place where even trying just seems like a waste of time and effort due to the fact that the people who would be your consumers are looking for reasons to actively hate you just....saddens me.

And I don't fault any woman for looking at all of this mess and walking past game development, because from a top down look, it really does look like the worst thing in the world.

Really happy to see that this thread inevitably became a great discussion on how we can help women developers feel more accepted in this toxic community.

Good job everyone!

Can't tell if sarcastic but if even if so, you're still right.
 
I think it's obvious at this point that forums and game stores are skeevy male oriented places for a lot of women, that isn't an excuse though. Women are playing games, that's fact. Let's now work on cleaning up the community around our hobby to make it more welcoming.

How about the toxicity Liana Kerzner experienced with Feminist Frequency?

Here is the audio of her piece on her experience with them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O0JvjKEuF4

There is plenty of "skeevy" in every community. There are extremes of any issue the overt misogynists and the hyper feminists and both can get lost imo.
 
Never give up your dreams.

The idealist in me wants to agree.

The realist in me understands why people give up when they're faced with nonstop harassment and hostility from those who devote themselves to making sure those dreams don't become reality. Some can push through it and that's great, but it's never something I'd expect from everyone.
 
What the hell are you even on about at this point? You were shown statistics that lots of women are playing on consoles. You rejected these statistics because you don't see women at the stores you go to buying the games you play

I think a problem when the stats are thrown about as pertains to percentages of console gamers being male / female, is that to date the big 3 have not broken down their players by gender to the best of my knowledge. That makes it really, really hard for someone to believe what they have seen for 20, 30 years, etc., is not representative of the real world. Just because someone says your eyes deceive you, does not mean they are right (or that you are). Studies can be flawed for countless reasons. I'm not saying these particular studies are or are not, cause heck I don't know. I'm just saying after countless midnight launches and trips to video game retailers, I can understand why someone thinks the ratio if no where near as equal as the studies suggest.

If Sony, MS and Nintendo have released stats I'd be interested to read them, and would consider those pretty authoritative. Would be cool if someone got them to release them by E3.
 
You need to maybe .. stop trying too hard. You're sounding wheezy and desperate.

Some of the hardest core gamers I know are female, but it skews heavily into fantasy RPGs, I think. lol Some are very into FPSs too, but bleh. Definitely the fantasy RPGs are the way to go for me and many others.
It's such a shame this thing is an ongoing headache and source of anxiety for females in the industry. To the detriment of everyone, too.
I'm glad there are women who are still hanging in there despite the hostile environment, but I hope it hasn't caused them to internalize hate for other women who seem to be "rocking the boat", which I think unfortunately does happen (seeing as female GGers or shielders exist).

I do know quite a few female Kingdom Hearts players because that appeals to them.

To expand demographics we have to expand and appeal to them rather than pretend The Order: 1886, Mass Effect, and Destiny do.
 
So you're telling me 40% of people who play PSN and Live are female? Hahahahahahaha wow I am done.

No, actually. We aren’t saying that. We are saying that 40% of people who play PS3/PS4 and Xbox 360/One are female. It doesn’t say anything about PSN or Live. You are making an intellectually dishonest point.

Gamers are stereotyped for a reason.

Nintendo said in late 2009 that 2.34 million females played the 360 and PS3: http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/Wand...Next_Frontier__Female_Gaming_Demographics.php

The statistics I’ve provided, from TWO different, independent sources, are for 2014. One of them even describes the massive growth between 2011 and 2014. You are using outdated statistics. Give me something a little more recent. Bonus points if you can provide one that isn’t based on some random websites internet survey.

So you are telling me this number grew to 18 million in 2 years? There is something clearly wrong with Newzoo's data, cause I trust Nintendo more because I saw the Wii's success with my own eyes.

If you think there was a 16 million increase tell me what did it. The failures that were Move and Kinect? Lol.

Your argument is a fallacy for two reason. Note: If your argument is fallacious, it means you aren’t actually proving anything.
1) It’s a type of ad hominem fallacy to discount data because you don’t like the source.
2) You are pigeonholing women as liking motion controls. How many facebook games do you know have motion controls?

Also, what does Nintendo’s success in 2009 have anything to do with demographic data from 2014? How does Nintendo’s make it more accurate than numbers from last year?
 
I do know quite a few female Kingdom Hearts players because that appeals to them.

To expand demographics we have to expand and appeal to them rather than pretend The Order: 1886, Mass Effect, and Destiny do.

And I think that's happening, in very small degrees, and almost never in the AAA scene. But I personally know more women than men who played through the KH games. In a way, it's really sad that japanese game development has gone the way it has because that inclusionary nature their AAA titles had has been swept away in favor of quick cash grabs on mobile devices, or worse, they've gone full otaku-culture and most AAA titles aren't things that anyone wants to touch, let alone women.
 
The idealist in me wants to agree.

The realist in me understands why people give up when they're faced with nonstop harassment and hostility from those who devote themselves to making sure those dreams don't become reality. Some can push through it and that's great, but it's never something I'd expect from everyone.

I hope this doesn't sound as promotion (which is why I won't even say the name of my company), but the first thing I said to the women who are working with us (and the ones who have worked with us in the past) was that they were free to point out where we could improve in terms of company's culture and/or game story (such as avoiding tropes). They have already said a lot of interesting stuff. One of them is an artist and she suggested something that could be better in the story, so we have changed it. I am doing everything I can and I also know there is a lot I can still learn. My point is: anything we can do to help this industry be more welcoming is something we should do. In my case, I have a company. But consumers, press... everyone can do something.
 
No, actually. We aren’t saying that. We are saying that 40% of people who play PS3/PS4 and Xbox 360/One are female. It doesn’t say anything about PSN or Live. You are making an intellectually dishonest point.



The statistics I’ve provided, from TWO different, independent sources, are for 2014. One of them even describes the massive growth between 2011 and 2014. You are using outdated statistics. Give me something a little more recent. Bonus points if you can provide one that isn’t based on some random websites internet survey.



Your argument is a fallacy for two reason. Note: If your argument is fallacious, it means you aren’t actually proving anything.
1) It’s a type of ad hominem fallacy to discount data because you don’t like the source.
2) You are pigeonholing women as liking motion controls. How many facebook games do you know have motion controls?

Also, what does Nintendo’s success in 2009 have anything to do with demographic data from 2014? How does Nintendo’s make it more accurate than numbers from last year?

I am done posting in this thread.
 
Nintendo said in late 2009 that 2.34 million females played the 360 and PS3: http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/Wand...Next_Frontier__Female_Gaming_Demographics.php

So you are telling me this number grew to 18 million in 2 years? There is something clearly wrong with Newzoo's data, cause I trust Nintendo more because I saw the Wii's success with my own eyes.
I totally trust Nintendo on the demographics of its competitors.

Anyway, there are a lot of reasons we're seeing more female console gamers. Gaming is becoming more mainstream and accepted, PC and Mobile have grown a lot since 2009 and can serve as gateways, the Wii's success retained some folks, people are more willing to identify themselves as women with how female gamers are seen as more normal, there is a larger diversity of games to play than there ever has been, etc.

Plus, more children are growing up with gaming. I wasn't even allowed near video games before a certain age. My nephew was playing since he was a toddler.
 
I hope this doesn't sound as promotion (which is why I won't even say the name of my company), but the first thing I said to the women who are working with us (and the ones who have worked with us in the past) was that they were free to point out where we could improve in terms of company's culture and/or game story (such as avoiding tropes). They have already said a lot of interesting stuff. One of them is an artist and she suggested something that could be better in the story, so we have changed it. I am doing everything I can and I also know there is a lot I can still learn. My point is: anything we can do to help this industry be more welcoming is something we should do. In my case, I have a company. But consumers, press... everyone can do something.

Small steps, right?

Totally.
 
Go onto just about any popular forum discussing the depiction of women in the media, fictional or nonfictional, the backlash against the mere existence of these conversations is immense.

That is not proof for "a greater cultural backlash". There is some who argue that gamergate is a new front in the "culture wars" but I don't really agree with that claim (hell I don't even agree with the term "culture wars"). Also people complained about women with short hair and masculine clothing back in the 20's , this isn't new ground.

Again: To the men who support this backlash, woman having short hair and dressing in gender-neutral or traditionally masculine is transgressive on a physical level. Redesigns that make characters less sexualized, such as Lara Croft's look in the reboot, are criticized by bigots as being conceits to feminists.

Appearance, behavior, occupation and sexuality are all intertwined. How is it incorrect to say that MRAs would prefer women that greatly concern themselves with exciting men sexually versus women who enjoy sex without compromising themselves for the sake of it?

Yet again what you posted was:

...

For guys, I think a lot of it boils down to whether you prefer women who look like this:

Or this:

Gamergaters seem to like women whose design and personality revolve around pleasing men. Any woman who isn't enthralled by a dude 100% of the time, or providing fanservice, is seen as threatening.

Anti-gamergaters seem to prefer women who are independent, have cool personalities and accomplish incredible things. And also sometimes like to bone a dude.

Which still remains the dumbest thing I've read in this thread, even if it is garnering some serious competition. You stated that the crux of the issue was down to a choice of what sort of woman you find aesthetically pleasing and you still haven't been able to prove that assertion. What you've written since that post is not what I'm arguing about, I even agree that a lot of it is intertwined. What I took umbrage with was the initial post, how it reduced women to objects, how it talked about women having sex with men as a quality of those women and how it reduced men to (straight) slobbering idiots who makes ideological decisions based on what their dick is thinking. Gamergate isn't about your sexual of aesthetical preferences with regards to women which is what your post asserted.
 
But people did explain why you have no right to that information and why it doesn't matter. You just refuse to listen.

The following is presented without comment, with emphasis added by me:


You did also stop by a gamergate thread to enquire about her.

Stop obsessing about her personal life and move the fuck on.

Did you like read what I typed in this thread and how that matches with my post history?

A) I followed the story around the time it happened and a couple of months after that.
B) I asked this question before and didn't get a reply forgetting which thread it was. Well it turns out my question was in a GG thread. Only once I visited one of the threads and didn't feel like reading hundred of pages to ask that question. Stop by a thread clearly means the same as following the thread and reading all the pages. Sue me!
C) I already said I was negative about her when I only had the information when it first happened and that I feel bad about that now.
D) I already mentioned I was curious, I dislike cheaters, and it is very important to me in private life. I will think negatively of anyone who cheates regardless of gender. At that time, I was extra negative because I believed everything the ex boyfriend mentioned.

I only had 1 discussion about her in one thread in my entire post history that you pulled off and I only asked about her once afterwards after I had a disccussion about her that one time.

So tell me this.

How does that make me obssessed with her exactly?

I can't believe the lengths you went to try and paint me in a negative light. To try and make me look like I'm pretending with everything that I have typed about her.

This is the third thread I mentioned something about Zoe because somebody mentioned her and I got reminded to ask about her.
 
There are people celebrating this. Just take a moment and let that sink in.

This is what I don't understand. If hundreds of "woman" games get made, all the big blockbusters are still going to be there. Nobody is taking anything away. It's like getting mad that women exist.
 
This is what I don't understand. If hundreds of "woman" games get made, all the big blockbusters are still going to be there. Nobody is taking anything away. It's like getting mad that women exist.

No girls allowed. For real.

Like, the call that thinks like FemFreq will make people censor games and stop making the same products is asinine in a year where we have had more commercial game releases than ever before.
 
What I took umbrage with was the initial post, how it reduced women to objects

My initial post made the issue seem too simplistic, sure. But there was no objectification in my statements, I'm presenting the traditional side as accepting objectification and the progressive, modern side as rightfully rejecting it.

it reduced men to (straight) slobbering idiots who makes ideological decisions based on what their dick is thinking. Gamergate isn't about your sexual of aesthetical preferences with regards to women which is what your post asserted.

People who have well-thought out reasoning for getting involved with or sympathizing with GG are the minority. Most are, in fact, slobbering idiots who believe that all depictions of women should match their pornographic fantasies, and become enraged when confronted with something different.
 
How is that lying? I followed the story around the time it happened and a couple of months later. THIS IS THE ONE TIME I FOLLOWED AND CONTRIBUTED TO THE DISCUSSION which I already mentioned here. Look at the date when I replied for the love of god.

Can we cut out this witch-hunt now? RpgN seems to just be genuinely curious. This isn't something I'm proud of, but I love to hear my girlfriend gossip her co-workers. I assume her question comes from that same kind of curiosity I have.

No girls allowed. For real.

Like, the call that thinks like FemFreq will make people censor games and stop making the same products is asinine in a year where we have had more commercial game releases than ever before.

It's more than that. They are especially upset when games come out that may cater to different demographics. Check out the "Life is Strange" steam forums or, jesus, the Gone Home controversy.
 
How this ever went from a theory about Quinn & Grayson having a relationship, to a generalization to threatening to attack & rape women in the gaming industry simply boggles the mind.

The original Q&G issue as a singular event did need to be resolved from a journalistic point, but for it to then escalate to targeting a entire gender is well, what can you say.

I have chatted to Brianna on Twitter & we seem to get on, i have mentioned Gamergate things to her & she has gave her point of view, but this whole feminist movement is going to destroy the gaming industry is simply never going to happen, Tecmo are not going to stop making DoA games, R* are not going to stop making GTA games, i am not saying that female developers are just going to target female gamers, however there is a market for that, i think i read a few months ago that the gender divide is 50/50 male & female, some people love certain types of games & hate others, but people have a choice of what games they want to buy & play.

I once went to a event where they had The Frag Dolls & there were five or six of them all playing different games & there was a line of guys waiting to play them at whichever game & the girls won about 90% of the time, now i'm not saying this is sexist, but proves that women certain women as well as men are very good at games & also love playing them.

I have read that Nintendo have a lot of women at their first party studios making, building & designing games, how anyone can say they want to deny a whole gender from gaming is simply beyond me.

I would rather have one Brianna Wu then ten Peter Molyneux's, now have a played Brianna's game or Quinn's, no i haven't & the reason is i know from looking & reading about them that they are not the game i would enjoy playing, in the same way i wouldn't buy a JRPG or a Sports game, but do i think that women should not be allowed to create games, NO.

I wonder if somebody can interview Brianna Wu on behalf of NeoGaf?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom