TheNamelessOne
Member
Man, Rockstar are really leaning on the 60 fps / 4K angle.
GTA V PC Trailer (60 FPS)
- Thread starter RadioactiveLobster
- Start date
brokenbeans
Banned
Man you pc guys are gonna love this.
Oh come on now.
To play the game at Xbone levels yes.
Oh come on now.
SniperHunter
Banned
Around $1200 - $1400 Canadian. That was probably running on an i7 with a GTX 980
Nice. I really like it.
Billy Big Bollocks
Banned
Are all the GTAV cutscenes in-engine? One of the worst things about modern games I have noticed recently on my PC is that it will suddenly switch from glorious 60fps to a blurry 30fps CGI cutscenes that actually looks worse then the game itself.
We don't know how max settings perform. But I'd say a mid range GPU + mid range CPU will get you 60 FPS mostly high settings, so double the frame rate and higher graphics settings than current gen consoles.
Cases, various mobo options, etc would determine the final price, but I'd say a mid range gaming PC today should run you about $700. You can go cheaper if you are willing to sacrfice graphics for performance, or performance for graphics though, or go for more machine and not compromise at all
Solid Samus
Banned
The more I watch this the more I wish this trailer were from a gameplay perspective. That's what matters.
idontknowwhatimdoing.gif
idontknowwhatimdoing.gif
SebastianM
Member
They've always been in-game ever since GTA 3.
I wasn't kidding. A 560ti should give you somewhere around Xbone performance levels (assuming your CPU is up to snuff). 30 FPS, and a mix of medium high and possibly a low setting or two.
Wait for it to release and we'll know more by then. If you want a really rough picture (not reliable but just to give you an idea if you're completely clueless) a current $700-$800 rig should get you 1080/60 at max or near-max settings. A $1000 rig might get you 4k/30. You will need even more for 4k/60. Keep in mind less than max settings doesn't mean the game looks bad. Lots of console games run at variable settings compared to their PC counterparts ranging anywhere from low to max so that "near-max" can still mean higher settings than on PS4 for example.
IV was a nightmare to everyone on PC.
Gen.Grievous
Member
Looked fine. Nothing revolutionary but a proper port. I have good hopes in terms of performance. Hopefully there will be some singleplayer dlc later this year. Something meaty like the Ballad of Gay Tony was for GTA4.
RadioactiveLobster
Member
Where characters tongues animated on the console versions?
Not everyone. I have fond memories of it running on my 8800gt / E8600.
Comparable to PS4/XBO? Around $500-$700. Sweet spot for PC has always been the $800-$1000 price point.
Well, the other day I saw someone say that a few teraflops of extra power is no big deal, even though we've had huge threads about half a teraflop of difference between the consoles.
btw
I am the only one who thinks that Trevor looks like he just came and is havinng an orgasm?
this!
I remember that many people had less problems with a Intel/Nvidia combo.
GavinUK86
Member
Yes, you are the only one who thinks that.
DapperSloth
Member
MY EYES! They bleed! Totally jarring. 30 FPS is fine for me. 60 FPS looks so speed-up it's ridonkulus. I have never seen the need for 60 FPS, what does it actually accomplish for you PC-people?
BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
I might as well comment on the trailer music. It's... alright. Compared to the Trailer that originally confirmed the PC version, which came out 10 months ago by the way, it's nothing special.
eternaLightness
Member
Looks great! I waited and skipped the PS3 version and glad it's almost here.
Not everyone, just almost everyone.
RadioactiveLobster
Member
I would but his post was at 31 FPS and I couldn't see it.
Thanks so much, really like it, couldn't find it on Google music/Spotify.
I'm noticing a correlation between the amount of juniors parallel to the amount of "60 FPS SUX TOO GAMEY" posts.
Other than me, of course...
60fps is like spicy food, apparently.
Makes everything better?
JudgmentJay
Member
The only problem with GTAV PC is that there's *too* many frames.
Solid Samus
Banned
I'm noticing a correlation between the amount of juniors parallel to the amount of "60 FPS SUX TOO GAMEY" posts.
Other than me, of course...
A larger sample would probably still support this observation.
There's definitely one between them popping up and the amount of posts not actually read
This observation doesn't even need extra support
I don't know. Why don't you boot up any given Metroid game and play it through an emulator set not to display every other frame? Bet you'll see the 'need' then ;p
but to actually address what you're saying - as BASICALLY ALL OF YOU should already know by now, 60fps doesn't look jarring when you're actually playing the damn thing (do you people even remember console games before xbox?), and 60fps can make a world of difference for open world games where there's already shitloads of visual information coming at you in any particular scene. I'm just imagining gunfights at 60fps in crowded city streets. Seeing every single bullet kick up dust on impact with my cover as particle effects flash by on the wind and having each character's unique animation quirks brought to life that much more. Not to mention smooth, satisfying movement while driving down city streets, or flying, or boating. I can't wait.
GavinUK86
Member
I'm noticing a correlation between the amount of juniors parallel to the amount of "60 FPS SUX TOO GAMEY" posts.
Other than me, of course...
And me. 
Was enjoying it until the rapping started.
nogoodnamesleft
Banned
Wow someone actually said 60fps is too gamey. People actually buy into that PR "cinematic 30fps" bullshit. Absolutely unbelievable.
jediyoshi
Member
I'm noticing a correlation between the amount of juniors parallel to the amount of "60 FPS SUX TOO GAMEY" posts.
Other than me, of course...
There's definitely one between them popping up and the amount of posts not actually read
nogoodnamesleft
Banned
So I assume that by stating "you PC people" that you're a console only gamer. And I'm guessing that this post is incredibly salty. You still have your 30fps version so why do you care what it does for the "PC people"? You don't need to understand. And if you can't understand I really do feel sorry for you.
GavinUK86
Member
I think it's more like console gamers are used to 30fps and because of that, 60fps looks sped up. They don't realise higher frame rate grants you better precision and more responsive controls.
thats the best part though
Solid Samus
Banned
until you have a controller in your hand and you're controlling it, that is.
60fps looks 'sped up' in samples and short clips. When you're in front of a screen looking at the game itself for more than a few moments at a time it's a pretty noticeable step up without appearing 'sped up' relative to anything.
nogoodnamesleft
Banned
On topic though, I hope my 780 can handle this at mostly high 1080/60 with clean AA. It looks really great.
GavinUK86
Member
You're preaching to the choir. I can see where some arguments are coming from though.
Windom Earle
Member
60fps video of game gets posted. People get salty. People fight. Ok GAF.