PS4 performance on a ~£300 PC. Can it be done? (spoiler: yes)

Status
Not open for further replies.
My brother and two best friends have PCs specced similarly to the PS4, if not a bit weaker. They built them on a budget to play PC exclusives and multiplats.

The market for a budget PC is far bigger than you assume, not speaking solely out of my anecdotal evidence.
But it's a minority. Not sure what's the problem to admit PC passionate are interested to a good specs machine.
 
Its also not hard to see that articles like this have no place in gaming communities. On paper it looks fine, in real life its not what it says.

I can appreciate the goal of this article, but itspoint is still moot for gamers. Because pcs like this are not fit for gaming, regardless of what some tests that happen on a day old pc says. I know, I also own a weak pc (weak for a pc) like this. It can never match the performance of a console. It can never match a console experience. It is a pc small business gets for work. Its a pc a gamer buys before he learns what gaming pcs are really like.

These kinds of articles are never right, no matter how many times they are published.

Wow, I didn't know you were the ultimate arbiter of what articles should get written and published and posted about.

Time to pack it up folks, nothing to see here!

Good luck trying to get the Alienware PC in the UK for anything like the price of a PS4.

True that in UK the price sucks. In US Alpha is pretty fantastic purchase now.
 
But it's a minority. Not sure what's the problem to admit PC passionate are interested to a good specs machine.

You couldn't be more wrong, go and check average specs recorded by Valve on steam. The majority are on budget machines already.

And it's not PC passionates who buy expensive parts, it's GAMING enthusiasts! You know we all share the same hobby!
 
If you'd be willing to explain why it'd be in ANY sort of legal gray area, I'd love to hear. Sincerely, not being sarcastic.

DreamSpark Standard product keys may not be sold, distributed, traded or given to anyone outside the qualified department or organization.
 
You couldn't be more wrong, go and check average specs recorded by Valve on steam. The majority are on budget machines already.

And it's not PC passionates who buy expensive parts, it's GAMING enthusiasts! You know we all share the same hobby!
Well of course. PC machines in the world are a huge number and people doesn't stop to play on it just because are 'dated'. But how many people buy very low budget PC? The majority? Really?
 
If you'd be willing to explain why it'd be in ANY sort of legal gray area, I'd love to hear. Sincerely, not being sarcastic.

Because when MS sell those licenses they prevent you from doing so via their draconian license agreement. An OEM license for example cannot legally be used for a personal use build even though most people do it anyway. Those CoA licenses cannot legally be transferred.
 
Wow, I didn't know you were the ultimate arbiter of what articles should get written and published and posted about.

Time to pack it up folks, nothing to see

Not my goal, sorry if that is what you got. I'm just sharing my opinion, if thats ok.
 
If you'd be willing to explain why it'd be in ANY sort of legal gray area, I'd love to hear. Sincerely, not being sarcastic.

The program Microsoft runs is for university students to be able to get free software whilst studying their course.

The idea being that by using Microsoft software at Uni, the graduates will be more likely to use Microsoft products in the workplace.

When you gain a product key, the licence you accept states that they key is for you and that you cannot resell it.

So whilst the key that you buy is legit in that it activates, it is legally not licenced to you.
 
booting windows, even with a SSD, is still slower than booting a ps4. just because its windows and windows is slow.

latin is pro

yes in total, but what i oringally meant to say is there are fewer exclusives releasing than there are xbox exclusives (per year or per gen w/e). unless we count shovelware and indies but those never seem to count when looking at the ps4 and its library.....

yes ,unless you are a casual dota, lol or wow player :P

I still can't tell. So hats off to you, sir.
 
The program Microsoft runs is for university students to be able to get free software whilst studying their course.

The idea being that by using Microsoft software at Uni, the graduates will be more likely to use Microsoft products in the workplace.

When you gain a product key, the licence you accept states that they key is for you and that you cannot resell it.

So whilst the key that you buy is legit in that it activates, it is legally not licenced to you.

Because when MS sell those licenses they prevent you from doing so via their draconian license agreement. An OEM license for example cannot legally be used for a personal use build even though most people do it anyway. Those CoA licenses cannot legally be transferred.

most likely this or bizspark (dreamspark for business startups) or the windows 8 upgrade exploit

The more you know. I'll refrain from recommending those keys in the future. Thanks guys :)
 
pointless; graphics output might be similar but a ps4 will always be 5x faster in booting up, starting games, minimizing games etc. that alones makes it more useful for gaming than even an $800 pc imo.





yeah but there are even less (per year) than there are xbox exclusives. so negligible^2...

Sarcasm? If not, an $800 PC will be much faster than a PS4 thanks to the former's SSD. PC games also have the option of being modded to get rid of logo screens so you don't have to sit through them every time that you want to play a game. Believe me, it was a bad shock when I realised how much time I had to waste waiting for Bloodborne to start compared to Dark Souls on my PC which threw me into the game in seconds.
 
That or get a H series board with unlocked overclocking controls and take the G3258 to 4.5Ghz. i3 is more convenient for newcomers though.
Check out the video.

The OCed G3258 underperforms the i3 while some recent games flat-out refuse to run due to expecting 4 threads.
 
Unbelievable how insecure some of you are about your console.

Considering we have had articles trying to prove PC's can be as cost effective powerful gaming experiences since the day the current generation of consoles came out (so almost two years now), the general console shitting whenever people are talking about PS4 vs PS3 and PC had not even been mentioned in that thread before that, etc... seems a bit like the pot calling the kettle black ;).
 
Check out the video.

The OCed G3258 underperforms the i3 while some recent games flat-out refuse to run due to expecting 4 threads.


That is a valid point on the 4 thread situation, I have been recommending the i3 as the minimum since Far cry 4.

I didn't realise their chip was overclocked.

Didn't FC4 refuse to run without 4 threads, then a fan fix forced it to run on dual core just fine?

Indeed.
 
This thread has already been dragged into the age-old arguments of, "but what about the OS," "but what about PS4 exclusives," or "oh yeah, well in 2 years the PS4 will be running circles around this thing."

It is kind of tiresome to see this happen, again.

-------------------
@OP - The article was actually quite aweesome along with the attached video showing the framerate difference between the i3 and the Pentium. I would personally bite a bullet and grab and older socket CPU. Sure you spend a bit more, but your games will then youjr performance profile will be muc higher and offer you the chance to engage in some PC-only CPU-intensive games.
 
SCE and MS were definitely economical with the internal components of PS4 and XB1 respectively. Especially the CPU's.

It would have been more interesting to me if the PS4 was more like PS3-level of cutting-edge hardware for its time. The PS3 was way better value for what it offered with its top-of-the-line hardware, even if it was more expensive.

But yeah, I'm not totally blaming them either. Consoles need to have that mass-market appeal with relatively cheap price to be viable.
 
see my post


sure if you're buying a new PC. But with this kind of built you really expect it to last for 3-4 years?

Nobody knows for sure, but with dx 12 coming? Sure why not.
My pc is a 750ti and a crap dual core that i have yet to upgrade (i will soon hopefully, i dont rush it cause still runs the games i play anyway), i hope it will last, even if it runs games with worse graphics than a ps4 in 2 years i dont care as long as it runs them.
When the time comes i will sell my old gpu (maybe also the cpu and mobo) and buy a new.
In 4 years, with 100-150€ (which will be profit from price difference on games) i will probably get something a lot stronger than a ps4.

Thats the plan i have and the reasons i went pc, the upgradability. A similar specced pc with a ps4 is fine by me, but sure it might fail in the future.
 
But it's a minority. Not sure what's the problem to admit PC passionate are interested to a good specs machine.

This is completely and utterly untrue. There are plenty of people that enjoy PC gaming and stay at the mid - low end. Quite a few friends do this and enjoy PC gaming the way they want to, at prices they are happy with, playing all manner of games - both "console AAA" and PC centric games alike. This is one of the great things about the platform
 
Leadbetter mentioned the problem himself.

This PC will only cut it right now, in time devs will start pushing consoles more and/or PC ports will become less optimized for this sort of low-end hardware. I had a Core2Duo with an ATI 4670 during the PS360 generation, for the first few years I owned it it was running almost every port at 60fps on console-like settings, but by the end of the generation it was struggling to match console performance. :P
 
Didn't FC4 refuse to run without 4 threads, then a fan fix forced it to run on dual core just fine?

They even write this in the article. They tested it with the hack.

Definitely i3 should be used these days at least. I am glad my good 4 years old 2500K still handles everything like a champ though.
 
That's not "all you're saying". Everyone on an enthusiast forum knows that some systems have some games exclusive to that platform. All you did was put out the usual fanboy list wars crap to muddy the discussion, the same garbage that comes up every time someone feels threatened that so many multiplatform titles on PC are dispelling the 99% bullshit that is "coding to the metal" or "b-b-b-but optimisations!!!". So you circle the wagons around exclusive titles that will never appear on other platforms, which are therefore never going to be compared against a PC version. Easier to do that than face the reality of cheap PC parts in a box turning out to perform remarkably similar to...cheap PC parts in a different box.

And to all the rest of you who are trying to pull out "gotcha!!"'s like controller, OS costs etc, you're completely missing the point, which is that PC performance/$ is meeting that of the consoles already in this generation, despite the historical advantages that subsidised hardware were supposedly offering as a trade off of a closed system. With costs decreasing like this, the ability to release Steam Machines with console-beating specs at competitive prices becomes trivial by 2016 onwards. At that point you have systems with a controller, a free OS and a living-room friendly form factor that are matching or exceeding console specs within $100-$200 of a console's price range. We are starting to enter the sweet spot of price/performance/convenience Valve and co are aiming Steam Machines at.
dude what the fuck?
i own a ps4, aswell as an x1 and a capable laptop for gaming.
dont start this fanboy bullshit
 
This is completely and utterly untrue. There are plenty of people that enjoy PC gaming and stay at the mid - low end. Quite a few friends do this and enjoy PC gaming the way they want to, at prices they are happy with, playing all manner of games - both "console AAA" and PC centric games alike. This is one of the great things about the platform

I'd say another great thing about PC is that you have this entire, humongous backlog to fall back on when waiting for exclusives or other big AAA titles. Can't wait for Witcher 3? Play Deus Ex, Age of Empires, Morrowind, King's Quest, Day of the Tentacle, Crimzon Clover, Penumbra, etc. That's a benefit you don't get with a console until it's last years.
 
This is completely and utterly untrue. There are plenty of people that enjoy PC gaming and stay at the mid - low end. Quite a few friends do this and enjoy PC gaming the way they want to, at prices they are happy with, playing all manner of games - both "console AAA" and PC centric games alike. This is one of the great things about the platform
I never said doesn't exist people who buy low end PC.
 
I'd say another great thing about PC is that you have this entire, humongous backlog to fall back on when waiting for exclusives or other big AAA titles. Can't wait for Witcher 3? Play Deus Ex, Age of Empires, Morrowind, King's Quest, Day of the Tentacle, Crimzon Clover, Penumbra, etc. That's a benefit you don't get with a console until it's last years.

I've been playing GTA SA to kill the wait for GTA V lol
 
Depends if you already own Windows 7/8 or don't mind using the Windows 10 Technical Preview.

No, doesn't work like that. Most people buy single license versions of windows and windows 10 technical preview... REALLY? That wont be supported after a short while.

Also another key fact is if you're running windows that you paid for you probably most likely either only need to upgrade a couple parts in the system or have one that dances on the PS4
 
Leadbetter mentioned the problem himself.

This PC will only cut it right now, in time devs will start pushing consoles more and/or PC ports will become less optimized for this sort of low-end hardware. I had a Core2Duo with an ATI 4670 during the PS360 generation, for the first few years I owned it it was running almost every port at 60fps on console-like settings, but by the end of the generation it was struggling to match console performance. :P
This gen is completely different though and should not be compared to the last. The last gen had engine designers learning how to use pixel shaders for christ sake, or trying to get their engiens to use more than one thread.

Now these are basic priinciples and the consoles this time have less long term scaling due to their simplicity and relatively cheap comoponents. It isn't anywhere near like last gen.
 
This gen is completely different though and should not be compared to the last. The last gen had engine designers learning how to use pixel shaders for christ sake, or trying to get their engiens to use more than one thread.

Now these are basic priinciples and the consoles this time have less long term scaling due to their simplicity and relatively cheap comoponents. It isn't anywhere near like last gen.
I think gpgpu and ACE was a thing. I don't said will see miracle but space for optimization still exist.
 
Leadbetter mentioned the problem himself.

This PC will only cut it right now, in time devs will start pushing consoles more and/or PC ports will become less optimized for this sort of low-end hardware. I had a Core2Duo with an ATI 4670 during the PS360 generation, for the first few years I owned it it was running almost every port at 60fps on console-like settings, but by the end of the generation it was struggling to match console performance. :P

By the end of the generation, the PC ports had minimum settings that far surpassed the console variants - you couldn't match console performance if you tried

But for sure I agree such a system will become dated quickly - but that doesn't mean the end for the machine - it entirely depends on the user and what they play. There are hundreds of games that still support low end systems, and some people are happy play those far more frequently. For such a person, the need to move to better hardware is less of a necessity. As always PCs do more than just "console ports"
 
I think gpgpu and ACE was a thing. I don't said will see miracle but space for optimization still exist.

But PC GPUs also (for the most part considering the stuff being recommended is maxwell or GCN) have access to good compute and even async compute. The points are becoming moot because the consoles are basically using off the shelf technologies... just in very unique APU config.
 
They do? Let's find out. Watch Dogs face-off:



So the 750Ti offers PS4-like performance at a better resolution. Unity face-off:



Same performance as the PS4. What else you got?

Mstt2ed.gif
 
But PC GPUs also (for the most part considering the stuff being recommended is maxwell or GCN) have access to good compute and even async compute. The points are becoming moot because the consoles are basically using off the shelf technologies... just in very unique APU config.
I'm not sure to understand what's the point. Yes PC will overtake console even more but graphic will improve efficiently thanks to the ACE and the optmization.
 
They do? Let's find out. Watch Dogs face-off:



So the 750Ti offers PS4-like performance at a better resolution. Unity face-off:



Same performance as the PS4. What else you got?

I am legit curious about GTAIV
(Sure I could do the test myself but money problems come first)

I will say that PS2 on my PC>>>>>>>> PS2 on PS4 (Planetside 2)
i3-4130
750ti FTW
8GB DDR3 1600mhz
1TB WD Blue
 
I am legit curious about GTAIV
(Sure I could do the test myself but money problems come first)

I will say that PS2 on my PC>>>>>>>> PS2 on PS4 (Planetside 2)
i3-4130
750ti FTW
8GB DDR3 1600mhz
1TB WD Blue

How much was your build? I'm considering building my friend who's fallen on hard times a PC with a 750ti since he's always wanted one.
 
I'm not sure to understand what's the point. Yes PC will overtake console even more but graphic will improve efficiently thanks to the ACE and the optmization.
People are arguing that recommending the parts that Leadbetter is talking about is silly, because "console optimizations" will lead to the PC components scaling worse over time. A precedent which is from a previous hardware gen. I guess we will see higher utilization of ACE's over time on console... but this will not lead to a game not running well on a 750Ti or an R270x: they also have async compute.

I think people should hope that Sony and MS free up more RAM and processor time.
 
How much was your build? I'm considering building my friend who's fallen on hard times a PC with a 750ti since he's always wanted one.

WAYYYYY Too much
I spent more than needed since I was building for quality and efficiency and small form.
$60 HDD
$70 Case (Bitfenix Phenom)
$90 Asrock Motherboard
$35 Corsair 420w PSU
$60 RAM
$45 CPU Cooler (I live in AZ in the hottest room in the house)
Someone gave me a free key of Windows 7 Pro (Legit key)
$750 ti FTW was like $150

(Actually isn't that bad. Save on the case and CPU cooler and it's almost the price of a PS4)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom