AP: NFL finds it probable that Patriots deliberately deflated balls

Status
Not open for further replies.
The most important outcome of all of this is whether the NFL will change the rule regarding teams taking control of the balls after inspection. If the NFL wants to take the integrity of this game seriously then they need to change the rule, one approach is to have a league employee take responsibility of the balls rather than a team employee. They also need to measure and re-inflate/deflate balls at half-time to ensure they continue to meet the requirements.
 
That's really it though. I don't think this was a rule that was ever seriously enforced. If the ball felt good, they played with it. Since the ball would likely only be used by the team, rather than to screw with opposing players, i think the league just let people do whatever the hell they wanted.

I don't think the Patriots intentionally deflated the balls. I think they and likely the rest of the league just didn't care enough to check them beyond a "feel" check.

Nope, they deflated the balls AFTER the refs had checked them. Read the report.
 
It really isn't about that game or the Superbowl. It is about the fact the Patriots have now been implicated twice in severe cheating cases. I do firmly believe punishment is coming and it will be close but not as sever as the Saints in the Bounty Gate issue.

Severe?

The most important outcome of all of this is whether the NFL will change the rule regarding teams taking control of the balls after inspection. If the NFL wants to take the integrity of this game seriously then they need to change the rule, one approach is to have a league employee take responsibility of the balls rather than a team employee. They also need to measure and re-inflate/deflate balls at half-time to ensure they continue to meet the requirements.

Outside of this investigation or any of this, I don't think it particularly matters what the pressure of the ball is. NFL QB's are good enough to adjust to throwing a basketball if that's what they're given (or watermelons I suppose).
 
16LVLQzm.jpg
 
As a Colts fan, I will admit that I think we lose that game to the Pats. Cheating or not. They're just better than we are. Mathis not playing when we needed pressure the most didn't help, but you gotta be next man up. Our next man up just isn't Robert Mathis. You can't replace a guy like that. It's a team effort and we just didn't have it in that game. That said, we get one step closer since Luck has been a Colts. Year 1, bounced out first round...year 2, second round, and this year we lost in the AFC championship game. I got Colts and Packers in the Superbowl for this upcoming season.

Cheating is cheating, though. Someone needs to bring the hammer down on the Patriots. If Brady and Belichick had knowledge, they should have to sit it out this season.
 
Nope, they deflated the balls AFTER the refs had checked them. Read the report.

Again the NFL is only saying probable because they can't actually prove it as they don't know what went on in the bathroom. This whole thing is stupid as from the NFL's own report, the Colts had a ball that was under 12.5 which means that this rule of having all balls inflated to a minimum of 12.5 is not really mandated as the supposed clean balls are also under pressured in colder weather games if you assume the Pats cheat and the Colt's don't.
 
So the NFL did the same experiment on their own? I don't see that in the report.

Try Chapter VII. Scientific Evidence and Analysis.
Evaluated the effects that various usage, physical and environmental factors present on game day would have had on the measured pressure of a football.

That doesn't answer the question. The Colts balls all started at the exact same PSI (according to Anderson), yet at half time one Colts ball was 0.75 higher than another. How can this be?

According to Anderson, the Colts ball may have varied by as much as 0.4 psi (12.8 to 13.1). As evidenced by the differing measurements by the NFL officials, it's also not an exact science. It, however, is exact enough to clearly see that the drop for the Patriots balls is much larger than for the Colts balls.
 
It really isn't about that game or the Superbowl. It is about the fact the Patriots have now been implicated twice in severe cheating cases. I do firmly believe punishment is coming and it will be close but not as sever as the Saints in the Bounty Gate issue.

No way. A few things, the report claims Kraft and Belichick likely didn't know. It sort of unintentionally implicates the refs weren't testing the balls properly. And in regards to Brady all they have is "more probable than not" and there's no way the NFLPA lets any kind of punishment come down on Brady if all they got is "we think ya did it but can't really prove it."
 
Severe?



Outside of this investigation or any of this, I don't think it particularly matters what the pressure of the ball is. NFL QB's are good enough to adjust to throwing a basketball if that's what they're given (or watermelons I suppose).

This is where I get confused, if it doesn't matter, then why does the NFL go to such lengths to get investigate this issue if they don't plan on changing the rules to prevent this.
 
I love people saying this doesn't affect anything. Look at Patriots fumble numbers compared to other teams. Hmmmmmmmmm

That study has already been debunked for using bad data, where they didn't take into consideration dome teams, even though dome teams play half their games on the road, amongst other factors.
 
This is where I get confused, if it doesn't matter, then why does the NFL go to such lengths to get investigate this issue if they don't plan on changing the rules to prevent this.

Because information got leaked to a colts reporter. Colts reporter wrote a story. Mort wrote a national story.

The NFL wasn't going to investigate itself. Nobody gave a shit about football pressure until that leak.
 
No way. A few things, the report claims Kraft and Belichick likely didn't know. It sort of implicates the refs weren't testing the balls properly. And in regards to Brady all they have is "more probable than not" and there's no way the NFLPA lets any kind of punishment come down on Brady if all they got is "we think ya did it but can't really prove it."

Lots of strange things that happened there, with Brady at the very center, but I agree I don't find the report to be conclusive enough to punish Brady. If McNally or Jastremski were to open up however ...
 
The Patriots are always involved in some sort of underhanded rulebreaking and hijinx. Even when they aren't explicitly cheating, they seem to benefit from every missed or blown call. The refs and the league just look the other way and say fuck you give me money to the fans. Its rigged! RIGGED!

How can anyone ever root for a team that wins that way. I just don't get it.
 
Try Chapter VII. Scientific Evidence and Analysis.




According to Anderson, the Colts ball may have varied by as much as 0.4 psi (12.8 to 13.1). As evidenced by the differing measurements by the NFL officials, it's also not an exact science. It, however, is exact enough to clearly see that the drop for the Patriots balls is much larger than for the Colts balls.

It's impossible to conclude that since they only measured 4 of the Colts balls.

The science is anything but inexact. The Ideal Gas Law affects every football to the same extent. If the Colts footballs started at the same pressure but ended at different pressures, the only conclusion one can draw is that there are other factors at play which the report fails to account for, which makes its based-entirely-on-conjecture-with-zero-actual-evidence-to-back-it-up conclusion all the more ludicrous.
 
No way. A few things, the report claims Kraft and Belichick likely didn't know. It sort of unintentionally implicates the refs weren't testing the balls properly. And in regards to Brady all they have is "more probable than not" and there's no way the NFLPA lets any kind of punishment come down on Brady if all they got is "we think ya did it but can't really prove it."

Sean Payton did not have first hand knowledge of Bounty Gate and Goodell gave him a year suspension.

It happened, rules were broke and now someone will pay the price.
 
Let's all talk about the real repercussions of this:

Will Brady ever sniff the field again after he's suspended and Jimmy G throws 10 TD's in his debut?
 
The Patriots are always involved in some sort of underhanded rulebreaking and hijinx. Even when they aren't explicitly cheating, they seem to benefit from every missed or blown call. The refs and the league just look the other way and say fuck you give me money to the fans. Its rigged! RIGGED!

How can anyone ever root for a team that wins that way. I just don't get it.

#blessed
 
Sean Payton did not have first hand knowledge of Bounty Gate and Goodell gave him a year suspension.

It happened, rules were broke and now someone will pay the price.

No

According to the league, Payton ignored instructions from the NFL and Saints ownership to make sure bounties weren't being paid. The league also chastised him for choosing to "falsely deny that the program existed," and for trying to "encourage the false denials by instructing assistants to 'make sure our ducks are in a row.' "
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7718136/sean-payton-new-orleans-saints-banned-one-year-bounties
 
The Patriots are always involved in some sort of underhanded rulebreaking and hijinx. Even when they aren't explicitly cheating, they seem to benefit from every missed or blown call. The refs and the league just look the other way and say fuck you give me money to the fans. Its rigged! RIGGED!

How can anyone ever root for a team that wins that way. I just don't get it.

A lot of sports fans seem to enjoy stanning for bad guys who win.
 
Because information got leaked to a colts reporter. Colts reporter wrote a story. Mort wrote a national story.

The NFL wasn't going to investigate itself. Nobody gave a shit about football pressure until that leak.

I understand that, but with this sort of attention and detail, you would think a rule change is imminent.
 
The science is anything but inexact. The Ideal Gas Law affects every football to the same extent. If the Colts footballs started at the same pressure but ended at different pressures, the only conclusion one can draw is that there are other factors at play which the report fails to account for, which makes its based-entirely-on-conjecture-with-zero-actual-evidence-to-back-it-up conclusion all the more ludicrous.
On the gauges:
Exponent determined that when the Logo and Non-Logo Gauges measure an identical pressure, different readings are produced. According to Exponent, the Logo Gauge produced readings that were generally in the range of 0.3-0.4 psi higher than the Non- Logo Gauge. However, for a given set of measurements, the differential between the gauges generally remained consistent when compared to a calibrated gauge. In other words, in the short term, both the Logo Gauge and Non-Logo Gauge read consistently, though differently from each other. Exponent‟s experimental results were aligned with the measurements recorded at halftime, which indicated a consistent gauge-to-gauge differential of 0.3-0.45 psi. Exponent relied upon this information, as well as the fact that during the testing the Non-Logo Gauge never produced a reading higher than the Logo Gauge, to conclude that Walt Anderson most likely used the Non-Logo Gauge to inspect the game balls prior to the game, that Clete Blakeman most likely used the Non-Logo Gauge and Dyrol Prioleau most likely used the Logo Gauge to test the Patriots game balls at halftime, and that the game officials most likely switched gauges before measuring the Colts balls at halftime (with the one anomaly described above).

Also, the report did not fail to account for other factors.
Evaluated the effects that various usage, physical and environmental factors present on game day would have had on the measured pressure of a football.
All of their extensive tests are described in the Appendix.
 
I understand that, but with this sort of attention and detail, you would think a rule change is imminent.

Yeah I definitely think a new procedure will be put in place. Even if I, personally, think it's unneeded, the league has no choice now. Either the league takes over handling or outsources to an independent third party.

Either way, QB's should get used to ball at around 13 psi.
 
On the gauges:


Also, the report did not fail to account for other factors.

All of their extensive tests are described in the Appendix.

See the thing is Patriot fans don't like to read. So posting those if blocks of text is like garlic to Dracula. They would rather argue in circles and getting louder. The patriots are the Newt Gingrich of our generation.
 
On the gauges:


Also, the report did not fail to account for other factors.

All of their extensive tests are described in the Appendix.

The problem is they have no log of what the actual pre-game pressures were and are going on an assumption that they were at 12.5. It's an incomplete data set.

from the report said:
and assuming an initial pressure of 12.5 psi for the Patriots balls and 13.0 psi for the Colts balls
 
The problem is they have no log of what the actual pre-game pressures were and are going on an assumption that they were at 12.5. It's an incomplete data set.

They have no log but like they apparently always do, they did test them:

During the pre-game inspection, Anderson determined that all but two of the Patriots game balls delivered by McNally were properly inflated. Most of them measured 12.5 psi. Two tested below 12.5 psi and Anderson directed another game official to further inflate those two game balls, which Anderson then adjusted to 12.5 psi using a pressure gauge. Most of the Colts game balls tested by Anderson prior to the game measured 13.0 or 13.1 psi. Although one or two footballs may have registered 12.8 or 12.9 psi, it was evident to Anderson that the Colts‟ inflation target for the game balls was 13.0 psi. No air was added to or released from the Colts game balls pre-game because they were all within the permissible range.

Also read page 50 and up on the pre-game procedure.

See the thing is Patriot fans don't like to read. So posting those if blocks of text is like garlic to Dracula. They would rather argue in circles and getting louder. The patriots are the Newt Gingrich of our generation.

Oh so apt comparison.
 
So the referees measured 11 Patriot balls at half-time and 4 Colt balls, the measurements were taken by 2 referees and yet the measurements are widely inconsistent between the referees.

fer4768.jpg


Does this make sense to anyone? Is the equipment that inaccurate?
 
So the referees measured 11 Patriot balls at half-time and 4 Colt balls, the measurements were taken by 2 referees and yet the measurements are widely inconsistent between the referees.

fer4768.jpg


Does this make sense to anyone?

Different gauges along with air lost while testing.
 
So the referees measured 11 Patriot balls at half-time and 4 Colt balls, the measurements were taken by 2 referees and yet the measurements are widely inconsistent between the referees.

Does this make sense to anyone? Is the equipment that inaccurate?

It's all in the report, specifically Appendix 1, "Analysis of Gauge Measurement Error and Accuracy Effects".
 
I have to admit it is an extremely detailed report for essentially something that prior the incident i thought would be a non-issue. It is obviously important to the league and its fans.

I wonder if the 2 attendants will receive any fines - can the league fine them?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom