I would have worn it on my shoulder and been all like #yaasss #bitch #werk
How do you throw hashtags in real life? Is it like gang signs? Now this purse holding is getting dangerous.
I would have worn it on my shoulder and been all like #yaasss #bitch #werk
For a moment? To adjust herself or something? Yes.
Walking with it if she's perfectly healthy? No! She's a big girl.
Only thing worse than this is a dude tying a woman's laces, and ive seen that. Foh with that.
Disrespectful? Lol! Sorry you think helping someone means getting disrespected. And I've done a version of the second thing, and so has she, and we didn't check it off as disrespect towards each other. Sometimes, a lot of times, after her 14 hour day, she'll say she's not getting up, that means I'm the one doing everything from dinner to dishes, but who gives a shit? She's tired I'm gonna help her.
I didn't say helping somebody is disrespectful. I said I would hold my wife's bag if she needed help doing so.
What I was saying is disrespectful is if she expected me to carry it for her for absolutely no reason other than she can't be bothered doing it herself.
If her arms are injured and she can't carry it? - Yes, give it here.
Just being lazy? - Disrespectful.
That's right! That way they can be smaller than a normal tampon. So you can fit more of them in your... purse. Right next to your man's balls.
She holds my dick, I hold her purse. Fair trade-off.
Is this really the only thing worse? Aside from tying her laces and holding her bag, a guy could really push it and pick up some tampons for her. Underwear is pretty bad too, especially pink ones!
How embarrassing would it be if your buddies saw that. Doing things for your girl.
Ive seen this first hand. My friend would do this shit while in front of us. Shed tell him to put on her boots and he would and hed tie that shit... We'd just look at him like.... "Have you no shame?" Fuk that. Im not doing that. So glad they broke up and hes no longer woop'd like that. Omg.Only thing worse than this is a dude tying a woman's laces, and ive seen that. Foh with that.
Doing something nice for someone simply because you want to is different than being expected to hold something.
I don't think it's selfish to not want to do something she is perfectly capable of doing herself. To me, going by the info in the OP she is largely being the unreasonable one.
Put the masculinity aside. Whoever is reading this, you are now my SO in this post. Since it keeps being brought up, we apparently have a great sex life. We are at the mall. I buy a bottle of water. I then ask you to hold my water for me even though I would be empty handed otherwise and I simply don't feel like holding this water bottle I chose to buy for myself. I'd prefer it if you held it for me. We're having sex, so apparently that means you now cannot say no to my request. Peachy?
To be honest, they would probably get the wrong kind even if they agreed to do it.
In my experience it has nothing to do with holding a purse and looking "feminine."
It's about her carrying her own shit and not using you as a mule. The girl I'm with now, if she doesn't want to carry her purse around she puts in the the trunk of my car. I'll gladly hold it for her when she's looking at things or trying on clothes when we go shopping, but once we're back on the move she carries it or puts it in a cart, end of story.
I've been with girls who will gladly whip you into doing everything for them and then some, just because they want to be special. Not doing it again.
No time for tests. No time for games. I'll hold ypher purse for a moment but if she don't take that shit back I'll drop it off in the car or whatever. Sorry I'm old school.
"Sorry love, I care too much about how I might be perceived by ignorant strangers to give you hand!"
With respect, if carrying a purse for someone makes you feel uncomfortable, you honestly would probably benefit from taking some time to evaluate your insecurities and priorities.
It's just a bag.
"Sorry love, I care too much about how I might be perceived by ignorant strangers to give you hand!"
With respect, if carrying a purse for someone makes you feel uncomfortable, you honestly would probably benefit from taking some time to evaluate your insecurities and priorities.
It's just a bag.
"Sorry love, I care too much about how I might be perceived by ignorant strangers to give you hand!"
With respect, if carrying a purse for someone makes you feel uncomfortable, you honestly would probably benefit from taking some time to evaluate your insecurities and priorities.
It's just a bag.
Who mentioned every time?You can be in a healthy relationship without carrying around someone else's belongings every time they feel like being lazy.
Where are you getting that from this thread?
That isn't the argument against it at all.
Is this really the only thing worse? Aside from tying her laces and holding her bag, a guy could really push it and pick up some tampons for her. Underwear is pretty bad too, especially pink ones!
How embarrassing would it be if your buddies saw that. Doing things for your girl.
Agree with you guys. I guess we are just old school. For lack of a better term, it is a really "beta" thing to do. Have I just crossed the line into MRA? :O
hey man maybe it's just the late hour or some kind of magic, but can you point out where the OP stated that he was worried about how he "might be perceived by ignorant strangers" in the original post? because all i'm seeing is his refusal to schlep his girlfriends stuff around for her when she brought it in the first place.
So my question is, what would or have most of you done when facing this situation, and was I really a jerk for not just holding my SO's purse? Also her purse really stands out this is what she has.
![]()
Sorry for asking, but how else can a wife be disrespectful?
In my experience it has nothing to do with holding a purse and looking "feminine."
It's about her carrying her own shit and not using you as a mule. The girl I'm with now, if she doesn't want to carry her purse around she puts in the the trunk of my car. I'll gladly hold it for her when she's looking at things or trying on clothes when we go shopping, but once we're back on the move she carries it or puts it in a cart, end of story.
I've been with girls who will gladly whip you into doing everything for them and then some, just because they want to be special. Not doing it again.
ugh disgusting
i would never do such vile things for the person that i love and cherish
thinking it's a 'beta' thing to do honestly makes you a beta lmao! y'all are crazy
Hm.. let's see..
By asking and expecting the husband to wear a dress out in public?
By asking and expecting him to wear make up when he goes out with his friends?
I'm sure there's plenty of other ways. Not that hard to think of some.
Edit -
This guy gets it.
Edit 2 -
I'll add a few more:
By leaving her dirty clothes and stuff all over the house and expecting the husband to clean up after her all the time.
By telling him not to hang out with other girls and then going to hang out with a bunch of guys.
I'm not saying that's all there is to the situation, but to deny that it's an element is a bit disingenuous.
This guy gets it.
No he doesn't. Not by a long shot.
Let's apply Occam's Razor to this:
A. "I want to groom a man into a state of subservience. So I will keep asking him to do things and reward him when he does. This way I hope I will condition him (despite mental conditioning not working like that) for my own ends. Whatever they may be."
B. "I'm tired. Maybe I can ask my SO for help."
I had a friend whose fiance used to ask him to do little things all the time. It was maddening. "Could you hand me the remote? Could you get me a sandwich? Could you get me a drink?" While she is just sitting there. That's the attitude that we're arguing against in this thread - not that it makes us look feminine. As I said, I have a tiny dog. It is not "masculine." I don't give a shit about being seen holding a purse. I have an issue with being asked and expected to hold that purse.
No way. Recognizing "beta" behavior does not make one beta. Not sure where you get that...
But they're giving us SEX! So we have to do everything they ask, I guess. /s
I had a friend whose fiance used to ask him to do little things all the time. It was maddening. "Could you hand me the remote? Could you get me a sandwich? Could you get me a drink?" While she is just sitting there. That's the attitude that we're arguing against in this thread - not that it makes us look feminine. As I said, I have a tiny dog. It is not "masculine." I don't give a shit about being seen holding a purse. I have an issue with being asked and expected to hold that purse.
B. "I'm tired. Maybe I can ask my SO for help."
It would take a very insecure person to consider it an element in their decision at all.
I mean, they're not exactly forced to wear pants with no/shitty pockets. I'm sure there are women's pants that have real pockets. If they choose not to get those pants for stylistic reasons, I get it, but they still chose pants with shitty pockets.I would for a bit, sure. Newspapers thing though, for real.
Also, you guys need to understand the whole "girls never have functional pockets" thing. They're always decorative. Guys are wearing glorified Tripp pants, and women have about 2cm to work with. That shitty little pocket inside of your real front pockets on jeans? They're like that.
They also have to carry more shit than us.
Are you playing a you smealt it, you dealt it card here, or are agreeing that being uncomfortable holding a bright orange women's purse is a sign of insecurities that would probably be best attended to?
If the latter, then yes, we're in agreement. If the former... good gravy.
I'm not playing whatever card you suggested.
I mean, they're not exactly forced to wear pants with no/shitty pockets. I'm sure there are women's pants that have real pockets. If they choose not to get those pants for stylistic reasons, I get it, but they still chose pants with shitty pockets.
I mean, they're not exactly forced to wear pants with no/shitty pockets. I'm sure there are women's pants that have real pockets. If they choose not to get those pants for stylistic reasons, I get it, but they still chose pants with shitty pockets.
No he doesn't. Not by a long shot.
Let's apply Occam's Razor to this:
A. "I want to groom a man into a state of subservience. So I will keep asking him to do things and reward him when he does. This way I hope I will condition him (despite mental conditioning not working like that) for my own ends. Whatever they may be."
B. "I'm tired. Maybe I can ask my SO for help."
Come on, what? They're free to choose to dismiss social expectations of genders. Wear what you want, but don't act like it wasn't a choice.Vaaast majority of them have pockets like that. "They're not forced to wear make up, I don't know why they even bring it." Like, sure. They could wear flannel and cargo pants. But come on.
No he doesn't. Not by a long shot.
Let's apply Occam's Razor to this:
A. "I want to groom a man into a state of subservience. So I will keep asking him to do things and reward him when he does. This way I hope I will condition him (despite mental conditioning not working like that) for my own ends. Whatever they may be."
B. "I'm tired. Maybe I can ask my SO for help."
Come on, what? They're free to choose to dismiss social expectations of genders. Wear what you want, but don't act like it wasn't a choice.
OK, then I have absolutely no idea what your point was. Oh well.
Today I asked a female co worker what she thought about that and she said she was most likely testing to see if I was willing to put aside masculinity for her.