You are very much in the minority on that view, thankfully.LunaticPuma said:PoA is the second worst HP film with only SS being the worst.
You are very much in the minority on that view, thankfully.LunaticPuma said:PoA is the second worst HP film with only SS being the worst.
LunaticPuma said:PoA is the second worst HP film with only SS being the worst.
I used to think it was one of the weaker ones as well, but I saw it for a seconde time this week and it's amazing how wrong I felt I was. It's definitely one of my favorties now. The only one that;s significantl weaker is Goblet of Fire imo. The rest I can watch time and time again.traveler said:As it stands now for me, the good HP films, in order of quality:
Prisoner of Azkaban
Half-Blood Prince
Goblet of Fire
and the merely mediocre:
Order of the Phoenix
Chamber of Secrets
Sorcerer's Stone
eXistor said:I used to think it was one of the weaker ones as well, but I saw it for a seconde time this week and it's amazing how wrong I felt I was. It's definitely one of my favorties now. The only one that;s significantl weaker is Goblet of Fire imo. The rest I can watch time and time again.
irfan said:FYI, movie opened HUGE. YUUUUUGE. Midnight screenings alone brought in an estimated 20M breaking TDK's record.![]()
irfan said:FYI, movie opened HUGE. YUUUUUGE. Midnight screenings alone brought in an estimated 20M breaking TDK's record.![]()
irfan said:FYI, movie opened HUGE. YUUUUUGE. Midnight screenings alone brought in an estimated 20M breaking TDK's record.![]()
Solo said:I love ya man, but come on. Hating on people for not liking a movie you loved and assuming they must be "book fanboys"?
Anyways, seeing this on Sunday.
the walrus said:no Harry Potter Film has even crossed 300 million besides the first one.
the walrus said:True, but from what I've heard, WB spent 250 million on the movie, and another 200 million on advertisments. I think HBP will pass 1 Billion WW and 300-350 million domestically, but the production budget increases are far outpacing the small increases in total revenue. I just think its ridiculous that they're budget was 250 million; there isn't even that many action sequences requiring a large budget. I guess the actors simply get paid more as time goes on; at least Hans is still employed after all these years.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:I really thought that this movie was great, and I say that as a person who has been relatively unimpressed by 3/5 Harry Potter movies so far. I think that it manages to be better than Order of the Phoenix, and it wrestles with PoA as my favorite; PoA flows and transitions much better and has a lot of good cinematography, but it also had the advantage of adapting a much shorter, less dense book. HBP manages to hit all of the important details from the book while still marking its own identity. I didn't mind all the teen romance stuff because that's a big point of the book: the world has a very real sense of impending doom, but in the world of a teenager, romance, love, and dating feels very much like a world-ending subject. I like it really well.
I don't know if this was an issue with the book or the movie. Maybe the movies to this point have put too much focus on the Voldemort story and made it seem more important than it was in the books. I can only speak to the movies, and at the end of OOTP it seemed like things were really about to boil over into an all out war.. and that continued for the first 15 minutes of this movie... then it turned into "lulz, things aren't that bad.. let's all fall in love"
Weapxn said:Azkaban was the best book, and the movie in comparison.. I just don't understand how people love it so much. The changes the director brought to the series were definitely great, but how the movie was adapted just pissed me off. So much was just...wrong. I thought Goblet was far superior, and OotP is probably the best so far.
I can't wait to see HBP.
StoOgE said:I don't know if this was an issue with the book or the movie. Maybe the movies to this point have put too much focus on the Voldemort story and made it seem more important than it was in the books. I can only speak to the movies, and at the end of OOTP it seemed like things were really about to boil over into an all out war.. and that continued for the first 15 minutes of this movie... then it turned into "lulz, things aren't that bad.. let's all fall in love"
I've read the 6'th book 4 times... due to a 2.5 hour constraint I thought the movie was amazing! having to condense all that info was impressive. Really only a few things that bugged me and they are very minor in the grand schemeBrandNew said:I had discussion with them about it. They were complaining about real trivial things, much like some of the complaints in this thread, about some parts straying from the book. They were hardly valid MOVIE complaints.
That, I leave up to you.
BrandNew said:Take your criticisms to the source material, then, because that's how the book presents the world. And I don't see how you couldn't see the impending sense of doom...Hogwarts with Aurors in the castle, various speeches by Dumbledore and the sorting hat, the protective charm around the castle that was trying to be broken, and Malfoy's constant state of unease. It's there, you're just not paying attention.
StoOgE said:That stuff was all in there, but like I said, it was relegated to the sidelines in this one. The sense of danger was much stronger in the last two movies. Even Hogwarts seemed like a dangerous place. In this one it was more like every 15 minutes or so they threw a short scene in to remind you it was dangerous.. but it lacked a pervasive feeling of danger or doom.
BrandNew said:I'll have to let things settle a bit, but for me it goes:
Half-Blood Prince
Prisoner of Azkaban
Order of the Phoenix
Goblet of Fire
Chamber of Secrets
Sorcerer's Stone
Just because you say that doesn't mean it's true. The book felt a lot more gloomy and dangerous than the film.BrandNew said:Aaaaaand that's pretty how much the book was.
well to be honest the 6th book is like this except the 6th book is primarily Harry a Dumbledore examining memories, though in rereading it, the impending doom you keep talking about is relegated to the beginning and the end of the book. So in that fashion the movie is fairly accurate, its just that the movie misses out on explanations because really... there is no time to. Oh and the potions book being hidden that way doesn't even matter, that was a change that doesn't even truly effect the outcome. To be honest I suggest you read the books.StoOgE said:I keep seeing this and cannot disagree more.
There was no impending sense of doom. OOTP and GoF had an impending sense of doom because the death eaters were wrecking shop in them. In this movie they burned down a few homes and no one shopped at Daigon alley anymore. Theybut it was done in such an anti-climactic way and their get away was so easy it had very little heft to it.killed Dumbledor
The whole "too teens love is life or death" bit is absolutely stupid. It's fine to have some of that in there as it develops the charachters. But most of the plot was focused on who likes who, and the end of the world plotline got pushed to the backburner as a result. For 5 movies, the impending return of Voldemort has been the driving theme of the story, and it was relegated to a subplot here. Whoever wrote the script should have put more focus on the end of the world stuff and less on the love stuff.
I don't know if this was an issue with the book or the movie. Maybe the movies to this point have put too much focus on the Voldemort story and made it seem more important than it was in the books. I can only speak to the movies, and at the end of OOTP it seemed like things were really about to boil over into an all out war.. and that continued for the first 15 minutes of this movie... then it turned into "lulz, things aren't that bad.. let's all fall in love"
Cheebs said:Just because you say that doesn't mean it's true. The book felt a lot more gloomy and dangerous than the film.
BrandNew said:Aaaaaand that's pretty how much the book was.
really, thats how the book was, I think your uneasyness will end with the 7th movies.... really that "sense of danger" you ask for is going through the friggen roof when those comeout. 7th book is a huge change from the rest of the books. HUGEStoOgE said:That stuff was all in there, but like I said, it was relegated to the sidelines in this one. The sense of danger was much stronger in the last two movies. Even Hogwarts seemed like a dangerous place. In this one it was more like every 15 minutes or so they threw a short scene in to remind you it was dangerous.. but it lacked a pervasive feeling of danger or doom.
Cheebs said:Just because you say that doesn't mean it's true. The book felt a lot more gloomy and dangerous than the film.
Jirotrom said:well to be honest the 6th book is like this except the 6th book is primarily Harry a Dumbledore examining memories, though in rereading it, the impending doom you keep talking about is relegated to the beginning and the end of the book. So in that fashion the movie is fairly accurate, its just that the movie misses out on explanations because really... there is no time to. Oh and the potions book being hidden that way doesn't even matter, that was a change that doesn't even truly effect the outcome. To be honest I suggest you read the books.
It's not that the source material is weak, its that the movie should have been 5 hours long... we're talking about a major condensing to the point where some scenes had to be acted like cliff notes. I absolutely loved how some lines were exactly word for word from th book.Chiggs said:I didn't read it, but maybe that's the problem...weak source material. Certainly, there was nothing wrong with it technically.
the walrus said:I haven't seen the film yet, but....
The book did feature a lot of teenage love stuff in it, but it was typically woven in with some of the stuff regarding the Half-Blood Prince, Dumbledore's lesson. However, I heard they only have 2 flashbacks in this film, which is dissapointing, considering they were the main driving factor of the books and they were definitely my favorite parts of the books. That said, the main source of "impending doom" comes from the fact that Voldemort is actually back this time, and everybody knows it. As a whole, Half Blood Prince is probably my favorite book, closely followed by Prisoner of Azkaban (and I loved the movie for PoA), so I hope the movie keeps a lot of the general feel of the book in there.
OOTP was more about being emo than there being a sense of danger like in HBP. At least imo. I didn't feel much of fear when reading OOTP for the first time compared to HPB.BrandNew said:I never thought it did, not nearly as much as the 5th book did.
I agree... the films aren't congruent enough but what can we do, its really the fault of the "medium" itself. There really is so much detail in those books that I'm amazed they haven't done 2 movies for each book since the 4th one.StoOgE said:They are on my (way too long) reading list. Right now I'm holding off on new series in hopes that a Dance of Dragons will come out soon (lulz).
Like I said, I'm not necessarily faulting the film here. My issue might be an issue that I have with the source material, or even with previous films getting something wrong. Either way the tone felt off from what I had seen before.
levious said:were there no constant "so anyone we know die today" comments when someone was reading the newspaper? Haven't seen the movie. That would certainly change the mood a bit.
They needed the funeral, not cause of lololol purisit but for a pure storytelling reason in the film. You needed it to let his death sink in. It comes and goes so quickly in the movie its like nothing happened.Chiggs said:Considering the amount of complaining by purists, you might be disappointed. I've heard the ending was changed considerably. Honestly, I was really surprised by how flat that scene was. It happened and I didn't care.
levious said:were there no constant "so anyone we know die today" comments when someone was reading the newspaper? Haven't seen the movie. That would certainly change the mood a bit.
Chiggs said:Considering the amount of complaining by purists, you might be disappointed. I've heard the ending was changed considerably. Honestly, I was really surprised by how flat that scene was. It happened and I didn't care.
I feel that way because while HPB is the best done of the non-PoA ones it suffers from the same flaw that the rest had in which it is a series of scenes adapted from the book squished into a 2 and half hour run time while PoA felt organic and flowed like a real film not a book adaption.BrandNew said:edit: There's not that great of a gap between PoA and this one, I don't think, considering I think this one is better![]()
WHICH IS huge in the 6th book but admittedly could have been a movie on its own.StoOgE said:I also don't want to sound like I am completely hating on the movie.
There were some parts that I really liked. The flashbacks were excellent, I wish I had seen more of that exploration of how Voldemort became who he is... they really grabbed my attention.
The opening of the film (right up until they get to Hogwarts) was just excellently handled. I really liked Malfoys struggle with taking up his fathers mantle and his uneasyness to become a death eater. The scene with the dead boddies dragging Harry down was pretty damn cool (wish the scene was longer). It gave you a real sense of just how much power Voldemort possessed to create something that intricate to protect his immortality.
On a repeat viewing I will probably like it better now that I know what I'm getting going in.
It's odd how little of it was focused on in the film when the first trailer for the movie was almost entirely about his backstory.Jirotrom said:WHICH IS huge in the 6th book but admittedly could have been a movie on its own.