http://www.rsl.org.au/Portals/13/Ou...ation/Flying the Australian Flag Protocol.pdf
It's against protocol to have over-printed words on the flag.
I assume it just overrides the usage of customs? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Customs_Flag
http://www.rsl.org.au/Portals/13/Ou...ation/Flying the Australian Flag Protocol.pdf
It's against protocol to have over-printed words on the flag.
I assume it just overrides the usage of customs? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Customs_Flag
![]()
I bet that cost more than $5k.
Not to mention Abbott getting on board all those military hardware, choppers, planes, boats, and getting custom military uniforms just for photo opps to make him look like a fascist lord and master. $5k? Play money to compared to that.
With the re branding to Tony's Stormtroopers it's probably natural that they have updated the flags.
Ironically perpetuated by a bunch of right wing lunatics whipped into a frenzy by rampant islamophobia from the political classes.
Labor's Chair of Waste Watch Committee Pat Conroy writes to the Australian Federal Police asking them to investigate Speaker Bronwyn Bishop's alleged misuse of taxpayer funds.
Perhaps tragically rather than ironically. This is exactly what happens in the US. Since 9/11, terrorism from right wing extremists resulted in 254 deaths in the US vs 50 from Muslim terrorists. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html?referrer=
Abbott and co know exactly what they're doing too, they've been warned about it multiple times: http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/...ist-groups-terror-politics-warns-commissioner
Yet while Obama and tory David Cameron tend to use inclusive language when describing terror threats, Abbott is all fear all the time. He knows it leads to increased violence and energising white supremacists into action, but he does not care.
Forget that though, someone took a $5k chopper ride.
Does that actually have any base? Is the investigation just for the helicopter flight (which was allegedly government business but later revealed to be a Libs fundraiser) or the half a mil she went through last year?
Parliamentary records show Opposition MPs have been booted from the House of Representatives Chamber 394 times, compared with just eight members of the Government.
It's for the helicopter and if she lied when filling out the form she's fucked.Does that actually have any base? Is the investigation just for the helicopter flight (which was allegedly government business but later revealed to be a Libs fundraiser) or the half a mil she went through last year?
And I still don't know how there's no way this can't be brought to task, either:
From what I've seen floating around today the form she *might* have had to sign specifically says they aren't misleading parliament and that there's criminal repercussions if they do (ie. the Feds). The request went in today (from Fairfax, at Labor's prompting) to determine whether she signed such a form.Well...there's basically a parliamentary protocol that if you pay it back you're basically shielded from any liability for having gotten it wrong. So I think she's fine criminally....
Yes, re-branding from customs to something that sounds like a Saturday morning cartoon costs money, likely orders of magnitude more than a helicopter ride.
the daily telly had a small column dedicated to it yesterday which was barely 5 words wideI'll note that *nothing* about this has been mentioned in News Corp. papers today. They've been re-hashing MH17 of all things.
I take it back. They have an article up this afternoon. It has a funny interactive graphic and all![]()
Imagine that:
Coming this Saturday morning to ABC Kids (30mins,R for required), Borderforce.
John Howard, no the other one, and Asher Keddie, she's in everything else, star as new Borderforce agents tasked with holding back the invasion of brown people on the open ocean. Armed with billions of dollars of the latest technology, how will they fare against the invading forces armed with dysentery and fear of oppression?
In this weeks episode our brave agents match there wits against the evil and not so brave people smuggler Pirate Pete and bravely stare down hiswarshipfishing boat, dingy er... bravely. And don't forget to watch next week where out brave Minister, Mister Potato Head, denies the incident ever took place!
(Remember parents, the new State run ABC Kids is required viewing for children aged 4-12. We have your metadata.)
They've been flying the Customs Flag since the 80's. With the re branding to Tony's Stormtroopers it's probably natural that they have updated the flags.
My issue is that it looks backwards.
I don't know anything about [Reclaim Australia]. I certainly haven't been briefed on it. I've been briefed intensively and extensively on Islamic extremism and other threats to national security but I can certainly say that the security forces in Australia are keeping a very close eye on any form of extremism.
Ms Bishop revealed that none of the 400 extremists under government surveillance are right-wing, anti-Islam campaigners.
Right-wing extremism is emerging as an equal, if not greater, threat than Muslim radicalisation in Australia and multiculturalism is "close to death" at a federal level, academics have told a conference on social cohesion.
Violent extremism in Australia is beginning to mirror that of the US, counter-terrorism expert Anne Aly from Curtin University said.
Deputy Commissioner Nick Kaldas, the police force's spokesman on cultural diversity, listed far-right extremism and marches and rallies "which encourage divisive notions of us and them" as some of the biggest challenges facing his troops.
Race Discrimination Commissioner Tim Soutphommasane told the conference there had undoubtedly been a rise in far-right extremist organisations.
"What is concerning is that they are coming out in public and not confining their activities underground [as they once did]," he said.
Is that picture above proof enough, or do we need people with Nazi swastikas on their shirts and tattoos?
Any sightings of mainstream media with the balls to call them neo nazis yet? The caption of that guy was anti Islam protester, which is a bit specific when there is a reference to Hitler right there in the sign.
![]()
not racist but FUCK THOSE NON-WHITES 14/88
14 88 is the Hitler reference isn't it?
Disgusting to see we have openly proud neo nazis in this country
14 representing 14 words written by David Lane, "We must secure the existance of our people and a future for white children."
88 representing David Lane's 88 precepts, or sometimes the eighth letter in the alphabet (H), to represent Heil Hitler.
Stolen from da interwebz cause I had nfi myself.
I find Julie Bishop's comments to be interesting in terms of how much federal resources have been directed at Islamic extremists and how much to right wing extremists, despite both being a significant threat.
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...ans-to-attend-rightwing-rally-20150717-giebph
Meanwhile...
http://www.smh.com.au/national/righ...-radicalisation-say-academics-20150717-giduqp
Is that picture above proof enough, or do we need people with Nazi swastikas on their shirts and tattoos?
"I'm not racist, but fuck non-white people"
Amazing
If it's any consolation that racist cunt will probably choke on a chicko roll one day or drown in a pool of his own vomit
theres always a silver liningMike Holt, head of Restore Australia, told Fairfax Media he was disappointed by the turn out of "everyday" Australians: "I can't believe how small the crowd is. It's terrible."
and then the abbott government puts the price up for divorce2. There are so many barriers to leaving a violent relationship
Fears of being left homeless, not wanting to put children through upheaval, a lack of money, unemployment, and fears of being harmed or killed all prevented victims from leaving an abusive relationship.
This picture could literally be seen a million different ways, it's a single snap. He might just be being polite and not trying to escalate anything. If he's sitting there talking and nodding and whatever than fine but it's a lot to assume just from that picture. He's not even looking at the guy.
hmn yase its a great idea to give the benefit of the doubt to a buncha cops known for blatant racism
Exactly WTF?We're not talking about a bunch of cops. We're talking about one cop. None of those links at all link this one guy to any of the things mentioned above. Yes, the police have a racism problem, but going after one guy and making a shit-load of assumptions is exactly the kind of behaviour they're hypocritically railing against.