Counting votes is one thing. It's quite clear what votes mean. One vote for candidate A, one vote for candidate B etc.
"Being informed" however, the meaning changes based on who you ask. For example, it could become that only those who have read the bible can vote. Others might define that only those can vote who are familiar with everything Shakespeare has done. What would the disgruntled people do about it? Vote against them in next elections?
Restricting voting rights is not the right solution. Educating the population better is.
Trump won't win one primary or caucus.
Could the Donald happen
I'm afraid. I'm very afraid people will vote for him just for the laughs. 😨
How about a randomized test about the candidates and their political positions that selects from a large pool of questions that the voter has to correctly answer before voting. Maybe it could be bundled with the voting software at the booths. There are a lot of ways it could be done.
I believe in the Trump that believes in himself. His hair is the hair that will build the wall. Don't underestimate him. He doesn't care about time, or reason or... multi-dimensional whatevers! He doesn't give a damn about that. Force your way down a path YOU choose to take, and do it all yourself! That's the way Team Trump rolls! Go beyond the impossible and kick reason to the curb! Trump Trump, Fight the power!Nah. For non Americans out there: we're just fuckin' around because it's so early in the election. Trump isn't really going anywhere
Sure.
![]()
But what if none of that, the candidates' policies and beliefs, matters to the person? There are people out there whose vote will depend on whether the candidate is anti-abortion or not. For them knowing that the Republican nominee wants to get rid of abortion is being an educated voter.
I know at first we have been entertained by this man and his ridiculousness however the polls are clearly showing that people are on his side at first I thought there was no way he would get the Nom however I had memories today of Sarah Palin actually been on my television screen being entertained as the Feiss president of the United States of America
Could the Donald happen
I don't see why they couldn't just google that to begin with if it was such a gigantic issue for them?
I don't see why they couldn't just google that to begin with if it was such a gigantic issue for them?
What I'm saying is that your definition of being an educated voter clashes with what other people could consider being an educated voter. If someone's main issue which trumps all is abortion then knowing a candidate's budgetary policy or their foreign relation plans is meaningless information.
Consider this: I'm sure there are a non-negligible amount of voters who believe that knowing which denomination of Christianity each candidate practices is an important piece of information. I voted for Obama and have absolutely no idea what denomination he belongs to. There are no doubt millions of people out there who would consider me an ill-informed voter for lacking that knowledge, something I would never even think of as valuable information.
Pretty sure hes going to go farther than most gaf thinks. Trump is selling him self as a person and the idea of the results he can achieve. Details dont matter as much to the masses and in most cases just confuses them. Keeping things as simple and and as close to an 8th-11th grade level is smart and intentional. It's actually the best way to communicate when trying to appeal to the masses. Hes also not as stupid or awful of a candidate as some here make him out to be. Yes hes bugging the fuck out on some things and is far from perfect, but none of the candidates are perfect. I'm on the Sanders and Trump train.
He's also selling that he's not the typical politician. This is actually a different take on Obamas hope and change rhetoric. This time the change is that the U.S. Needs to stop electing people that get bullied by rich lobbyists and need someone with good business sense to get the U.S. out of debt and more jobs to Americans
Unemployment rate current around 5.9-6%
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
IF he's the answer for more jobs, I don't want it.
Some people dispute the validity of that number, and the rhetoric is more high wage jobs for Americans. This is stuff people like to here. Way more pleasing to the ear than literally any talking point I've heard any other GOP candidate say.
For republicans, it's a given all candidates are gonna be against abortion, want less taxes... Yeah yeah they all say the same thing. But trump has a slightly different spin which is giving him extra attention
Unemployment rate current around 5.9-6%
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
IF he's the answer for more jobs, I don't want it.
Some people dispute the validity of that number, and the rhetoric is more high wage jobs for Americans. This is stuff people like to here. Way more pleasing to the ear than literally any talking point I've heard any other GOP candidate say.
For republicans, it's a given all candidates are gonna be against abortion, want less taxes... Yeah yeah they all say the same thing. But trump has a slightly different spin which is giving him extra attention
Question: has any other candidate ever won the nomination, who was so clearly not a party-player? From what I heard on Dan Carlin's podcast, Trump said he would not pledge to support the party if he didn't win the nom.
I just can't see the GOP allowing him to take the nomination, which is quite the indictment of our political system.
He'll go indie.
Unless the GOP embraces him, and I don't see that happening. He'll take some fat with him though when he goes 3rd party.