bonesmccoy
Banned
Boyega nailed that 'ohshitohshitohshitohshit' look.
The last shot of him as Driver attacks is fantastic. I haven't seen a believable reaction to someone is trying to burn me in half with a laser sword since Luke in ESB/RotJ.
Boyega nailed that 'ohshitohshitohshitohshit' look.
As did you. Your "And?" was a standoffish response to my post. You could have easily said something like "Yeah I suppose the main weapons of Star Wars cauterizing wounds would detract from the level of gore that would be otherwise present in a gunfight" or you could have said "Nah not always, remember when Luke cut the Wampa and it was bleeding all over? They could still have blood" or any number of things.
Instead you give me some sort of back-handed reply as if I said something completely worthless to you. So yes I responded dismissively to your dismissive post.
I'm trying to have a discussion with you about elements of the movie that would contribute to the rating of the movie instead you want to have an argument. Again is this a regular thing for you? Do you purposefully try to antagonize people out of habit?
So people who disagree with you should just shut up and not try and have a conversation? Why even have the thread then? I feel like you can't explain to me why this trailer is any good outside of saying "but it's Star Wars".
No not at all, i'm saying you take the same trailer, shot for shot. But instead of Star Wars it's called Star Battle, same actors, same dialog, no one would give a shit outside of people saying "Oh cool JJs next Sci fi" movie
Thinking it's more that Ren and co are simply twisting Vader's actions and ideals to their end. And no one really knows or believes that Vader killed the Emperor
Who was talking about the prequels 2 years ago? Also this movie will be good enough to not be remembered as bad. It will be bland and fit for mass consumption
III was amazing, I dont think this will be
I'm not going to get into an age debate with you, I was in my teens when the prequels came out and even then I knew they blew. And how is the director irrelevant? We are talking about a movie not an immaculate conception. God is not willing this movie to exist. It's being made by the same guy that turned Star Trek into an action movie
Read my original post about the trailer, all I said was Fords acting looks terrible (and it is) and the dialog is pretensions.. People acted like I shit on the original movies
I'm lost in the sauce over here, I'm asking what about that trailer makes it look like anything else but a big dumb action movie? Forget it's star wars for a second. What in that trailer makes you so hyped?
No that's Dando.
![]()
At last, the EU rises once again.
I'm lost in the sauce over here, I'm asking what about that trailer makes it look like anything else but a big dumb action movie? Forget it's star wars for a second. What in that trailer makes you so hyped?
Why is Spock in Star Wars?
You're saying that if you strip the movie of its identity it would be bland and generic? That's an original criticism, I'll give you that.
I feel like you are expecting something out of the franchise that was never there to begin with.
Why should I forget it's a Star Wars movie? It is a Star Wars movie. In fact, it's continuation of the best Star Wars movies (narratively, and aesthetically). If it weren't a Star Wars movie, I suppose I'd wonder why the trailer opted for such a self-important, bombastic tone, almost as if it were fixing to be a cultural event. But since it is Star Wars, those things feel earned. Familiarity with the universe and its characters is key to what makes the trailer work.
You're just trying to reduce it down to something that's not worthy of our attention. I understand the approach, but it doesn't serve your argument at all.
still best blockbuster of the year when dec. 31st hits brehs....
It's not about having an age "debate." It's that seeing the impact Star Wars movies have on the mass audience is believing. If you were old enough to see the previous Star Wars movies come out and don't see how a Star Wars release is a "sure thing" for being culturally relevant, then I'm just saying that I'm shocked.I'm not going to get into an age debate with you, I was in my teens when the prequels came out and even then I knew they blew. And how is the director irrelevant? We are talking about a movie not an immaculate conception. God is not willing this movie to exist. It's being made by the same guy that turned Star Trek into an action movie
I heard that Boyega was too street to play Spock thoughWhy is Spock in Star Wars?
At last, the EU rises once again.
For me A New Hope was a life changing movie. Doesn't bothering me they are re packaging it to make money. Just bums me out everyone is acting like it's gonna be A New Hope again when it's gonna be more Revenge of the Sith
still best blockbuster of the year when dec. 31st hits brehs....
so blessed in 2015
See, this is why people are taking issues with your postsFor me A New Hope was a life changing movie. Doesn't bothering me they are re packaging it to make money. Just bums me out everyone is acting like it's gonna be A New Hope again when it's gonna be more Revenge of the Sith
For me A New Hope was a life changing movie. Doesn't bothering me they are re packaging it to make money. Just bums me out everyone is acting like it's gonna be A New Hope again when it's gonna be more Revenge of the Sith
This is ridiculous if you want an argument seek it somewhere else, I refuse to engage anymore in your trolling. I hope you resolve whatever antagonist tendencies drive you to dismissively respond to people then get upset when they don't appreciate it. I'm sorry my comment about Blasters upset, confused, angered or whatever'd you so I shall endeavor to never dare quote you again out of fear you may be offended. I hope you have a good day.You quoted me, remember?
So people who disagree with you should just shut up and not try and have a conversation? Why even have the thread then? I feel like you can't explain to me why this trailer is any good outside of saying "but it's Star Wars".
The last shot of him as Driver attacks is fantastic. I haven't seen a believable reaction to someone is trying to burn me in half with a laser sword since Luke in ESB/RotJ.
You conveniently seem to have dropped your cynicism about mass marketing to complain that the mass market trailer doesn't seem to do enough to mass market the shit out of this movie. But, you know, you "hope" you're wrong. *winks*That's my whole point, this movie will not be remembered in 10-20 years. I hope i'm wrong but the trailer alone looks like every other movie trailer. Nothing about it stands out besides the name and the music.
still best blockbuster of the year when dec. 31st hits brehs....
so blessed in 2015
I was thinking the same thing lol.Did people see a different version of Revenge of the Sith?
One that had fantastic framing and good acting? Seems mine was defective.
Oh, Kylo Ren is normal Adam Driver? Was hoping he would be bald atr least - if Vader is his messiah.
All they need now is to all have met Han Solo at least twice.
Oh, Kylo Ren is normal Adam Driver? Was hoping he would be bald atr least - if Vader is his messiah.
Oh, Kylo Ren is normal Adam Driver? Was hoping he would be bald atr least - if Vader is his messiah.
It's not about having an age "debate." It's that seeing the impact Star Wars movies have on the mass audience is believing. If you were old enough to see the previous Star Wars movies come out and don't see how a Star Wars release is a "sure thing" for being culturally relevant, then I'm just saying that I'm shocked.
Here's the thing, even if TFA were the most maligned and boring film ever made, it would still be talked about for decades. That's the point. It is a foregone conclusion that it will be remembered! It's like electing a President. It doesn't matter how you do... You will be remembered. Just being a Star Wars film ensures cultural relevancy.
And no the director doesnt factor in to how this movie will be remembered at all. Most of the people who talk about Empire or Jedi have no understanding or care about Irvin Kirshner or Richard Marquand. Those names are infinitely smaller than Star Wars as a phenomenon, and so is JJ.
Have you seen the movie?
See, this is why people are taking issues with your posts
You're making definite concrete claims about a movie that you haven't seen yet. It's just ridiculous.
Then would you mind explaining what exactly in A New Hope that made it a life changing experience? I think that would greatly help in making sense of your posts.
No of course not, but that's not what people were arguing about, people were arguing about it not being culturally relevant. You moved the goalposts after people pointed out the prequels have continued relevancy/significance. Something can be culturally significant even when it's bad and many things are. The quality of this movie, predicted or actual, has little to do with whether it's going to be culturally relevant which was the original claim people were so up in arms about. I could not pick another film franchise with more cultural reach then Star Wars. By sheer inertia it will endure and we have a model (prequels) where it continued to do so despite negative critical appraisal.
Furthermore, most things that are culturally significant are culturally significant solely because they were extremely popular, that's how culture works. Low art/culture, high art/culture, whatever, we still say culture the end of it.
Deathbed conversion right here... Damn. It's like Richard Dawkins finding Christ.