Yes that annualized creation kit engine. Ps your post makes zero sense.engine bruh :/
Yes that annualized creation kit engine. Ps your post makes zero sense.engine bruh :/
Wrong. That is a dog. A diamond dog.
I actually think that Bethesda's writing is absolute shit. But when has a Bethesda RPG not won GOTY?
Wrong. That is a dog. A diamond dog.
nope. thats not a dog lol
That's exactly my point. Its really funny. Heck even naughty dog would get hammered looking at this. Game will probably play wonderfully(minus the bugs it will have) but come on let's at least be honestIf those screenshots were from an Ubisoft game, this thread would be 300 pages long.
nope. thats not a dog lol
Play the game.
Who are you? Huey?
Jesus Christ are you 12 years old?I actually think that Bethesda's writing is absolute shit. But when has a Bethesda RPG not won GOTY?
Please tell me you also confuse the Half-Life 2 engine with the Quake engine.
Doesn't it not release until November?Play the game.
I feel like we're being trolled with these shots. How is the UI a step backwards, even?
Doesn't it not release until November?
He is, one of the characters brings it up.ok great advice. i havent play the game but DD looks like a wolf or at least a hybrid
You guys saw the game unveiling at e3, saw the footage that was released before that wasn't looking too hot but was "OK" cause it's Fallout.
And now we are seeing the first real screenshots coming from the retail version, it looks exactly the same as that footage shown before at e3, and now suddenly it's too ugly for words?
Just accept that it's going to look like a larger scaled Xbox 360 game in Full HD with some added effects, no more, no less.
Why? Because it's been 5 years in the making and was probably cross gen at one point and changing the engine at around 3 years of development probably wasn't the smartest choice. So deal with it.
If those screenshots were from an Ubisoft game, this thread would be 300 pages long.
Ohh, I couldn't tell which one was from the unreleased game. My bad!What? MGS5 came out already bro.
It's like some people don't understand you can admit the game looks like shit but still want to actually play the game.
It's okay to call an ugly game an ugly game.
It honestly looks like it was created in 30 seconds using MS Paint.
Everyone loves their rose tinted glasses. FO4 looks waaaay better than FO3 but people just can't see it.
I dearly hope not, because not everything seen here will be improved for the PC version, notably materials. Draw distance, LOD, AO, perhaps textures but not assets themselves.
I don't get it, at all the gameplay footage looks really good, not a graphical milestone sure but nicely detailed textures, good lighting, materials reacting plausibly to light, it looks like a game targetting modern systems.
Those shots are just horrible.
It's like some people don't understand you can admit the game looks like shit but still want to actually play the game.
It's okay to call an ugly game an ugly game.
Yeah totally, those people are the problem. Not the people who think a game can't be good if it doesn't look great.
It looks fine.
It was never going to be graphically impressive.
It's a massive improvement over the console versions of 3 and NV and I never had a problem with either of them.
As long as the frame rate is solid does it really mater what it looks like?
I'm not asking for top-tier graphics, but seriously where are the fucking SHADOWS???
Looks really plastic/rubbery.