Fire Emblem Fates' localization doesn't have the petting minigame

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, I'm really impressed at some of the reactions in this thread.

I mean, I totally get people being glad it's gone, but it's honestly not that creepy at all, it's awkward at most. People are treating this as if it was Monster Monpiece (that's the game with the vita rubbing gif, right?), but it's just... dumb.

As I said, I get not wanting dumb shit in the game, so I don't mind people being glad it's removed, but "otaku pandering garbage" and "shit for people who like hentai and have no shame" seems like waaaaaaay too much.

Unless the gif is hiding some part of it that's actually creepy.
 
The idea that Nintendo is going to lose a significant amount of sales for getting rid of creepy shit is mostly parroted by the same 'hardcore' image board gaming weirdos

Well, thankfully I'm not parroting that. I just don't think that this will help gain significant sales either, and now western gamers have a definitively lesser game with no real upside.
 
Nintendo's attempts to cater to markets other than Japan are Code Name: S.T.E.A.M. What a success. Removing flavor from your game in some attempt to mass market it is absurd in this day and age. Considering the positive response in all markets to the character bonding in Awakening it seems pretty dumb to remove anything associated with that on the next FE release. If Nintendo has no respect for me as a consumer I'm not going to buy their games.

Fire Emblem Awakening sold 390K in the west

Nintendo pretty much doesn't care about you yeah.

300k is niche/hardcore. not mainstream.

I wish all of those other handheld RPGs could have sales as 'niche' as what Awakening did.

lmfao
 
Some of those gifs of petting dudes seems pretty light-hearted and funny. I would try it out but be annoyed if this was required to increase stats.

Anyone who is overjoyed or oversaddened by this news is weird to me.
 
Yeah, exactly. How is this change to affect that audience's perception of this game? It's still fairly not well written animu garbage where you can marry 1000 year old dragon girls. Removing goofy ass face petting isn't going to make or break this game's western acceptance in any significant way when it is japanese at its very core.
It's always weird to see people be happy about content getting removed from the game.
 
Woah why this thread is suddenly 26 pages long in just a couple hours? I'm actually glad this "minigame" was removed. So unnecesary and dumb.
 
She looks high as hell.

PuIaEAd.gif
 
Well, thankfully I'm not parroting that. I just don't think that this will help gain significant sales either, and now western gamers have a definitively lesser game with no real upside.


Basically my thoughts. Such a move isn't going to increase sales, nor is it going to decrease much. It's just, well, censorship. Weird seeing so many people in support of such, but I guess it's ok if it's something they don't like?
 
Can't say I disagree. Hopefully the people that care about that crap have bought a Japanese 3DS by now. I don't think that sort of thing is going to be missed stateside.

but the stateside version of the game will be filled with otaku pandering, just not this one minigame

i feel like i'm shouting into the void here
 
Some of those gifs of petting dudes seems pretty light-hearted and funny. I would try it out but be annoyed if this was required to increase stats.

Anyone who is overjoyed or oversaddened by this news is weird to me.

If it's required, then yeah, fuck that shit.
 
Wouldn't the inability to separate an entirely optional feature from the rest of the experience be on the individual, however? It's entirely a personal preference whether or not to engage that feature, and the game notably gives you the tools and capability to avoid it entirely. If someone chooses to act as if the feature is detrimental to their game when they can for all intents and purposes continue as if it was never implemented, then that is more their personal choice to make than wrongdoing on the part of the developers.

My problem is that I do feel like it's kind of disingenuous to say that content that is part of the game can or should just be ignored if it's not to your liking. If this was the a deleted scene that was tucked away on the extras disc, it would be silly of me to deride the inclusion of such bonus footage. But I feel like it's kind of akin to arguing that a scene in a film that's deemed not to work in editing shouldn't be cut from the Blu-Ray release seeing as how people can use the skip chapter feature if they really wanted to.

I realize this might seem a disingenuous comparison. However, I do think some care needs to be taken even in a medium like gaming to realize everything adds up to a whole. If -- and I realize this is a big if given the debate going on right now -- something is deemed to not work, I don't think you leave bad content in just because you can justify it as not necessary.
 
Great. Next, please cut all that horrible waifu stuff out of the game.
Would there be anything left?

I'm glad the gay conversion/date drugging and creepy face petting is gone, but it doesn't really make the game palatable to me. That tone and writing on display in that cut content isn't the outlier, it's indicative of what the series has become and what the rest of the game is.

It's fine for those who like it, but you can't cut the "anime" out of FE at this point.
 
Fucking dumb to remove it. I'm likely to stick with getting Awakening. I was already not terribly hot about 'buy two+ games to get the full story' thing.
 
It's a weird feature for Fire Emblem, but the exaggerated reaction to it is even weirder. You just poke your friend's faces, calm down.
 
Man, I need to play the SFC games since I started on GBA. There's pretty much no legal way to play them in English, right? :(
 
My problem is that I do feel like it's kind of disingenuous to say that content that is part of the game can or should just be ignored if it's not to your liking. If this was the a deleted scene that was tucked away on the extras disc, it would be silly of me to deride the inclusion of such bonus footage. But I feel like it's kind of akin to arguing that a scene in a film that's deemed not to work in editing shouldn't be cut from the Blu-Ray release seeing as how people can use the skip chapter feature if they really wanted to.

I realize this might seem a disingenuous comparison. However, I do think some care needs to be taken even in a medium like gaming to realize everything adds up to a whole. If -- and I realize this is a big if given the debate going on right now -- something is deemed to not work, I don't think you leave bad content in just because you can justify it as not necessary.
I see what you're trying to say, but I don't think your analogy is apt since a movie is designed to be viewed as a whole, and hitting "Chapter Skip" would fundamentally alter its flow. You would note the jump; it would be impossible -not- to note the jump. Unlike this game, where it sequesters the controversial stuff away in a separate area that you can easily ignore without impacting the flow of the main campaign.

To put it another way, never touching Smash Tour in Smash Bros. WiiU won't have the same impact on the overall experience as fast-forwarding through a scene in a movie.
 
I realize this might seem a disingenuous comparison. However, I do think some care needs to be taken even in a medium like gaming to realize everything adds up to a whole. If -- and I realize this is a big if given the debate going on right now -- something is deemed to not work, I don't think you leave bad content in just because you can justify it as not necessary.

Tangential, but what about games with very clear divides in content? A prominent example is single player and multiplayer. I couldn't care less about the fact that GTA5 had online multiplayer and I probably wouldn't have had much fun with it, but I loved the single player story very much.

I think there is value in being able to disassociate elements in a game from each other, letting players pick the content they want to interact with and ignore the ones they don't.
 
Its good that they cut this. I think it was right were it needed to be with awakening. My younger cousins (10-13yrs) all play fire emblem and don't need to see this.
 
On one hand it's not going to bother me since I wouldn't have used that feature anyway, on the other I'm getting a little tired of Nintendo's slow regression back to the mid-90s.

We get it Nintendo, you want a PEGI 3-7 rating for literally everything, can't possibly have a 10 year old seeing a girl in a swimsuit, my god won't somebody please think of the children. Problem is you're being fucking stupid, having a range of games aimed at different age groups and demographics is not a bad thing. Fire Emblem isn't going to sell better just by having a lower age rating on the box, constant censoring is going to drive away part of the existing target market instead.
 
I don't understand how some of you people can take the stance I'm offended/creeped out by thing X thing cut it.

I can not stand censorship I does not matter how I feel about the thing in question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom