Microsoft Releasing Exclusive Games on PC Is Great for Xbox Owners

Bloodborne alone won't move 40+ million consoles. I think he meant BB might have moved those few it sold. While knowing Persona's coming might move a few more. Naughty Dog games more still, etc. 3rd party games might ultimately bring you to the dance, but exclusive games and features may lead you to dance with one partner over another.

Exclusive games and features help give each console, including PC, its own flavor or identity. Personally, I want each console to bring something different to the table games-wise. Don't know how realistic financially that'll continue to be though for all parties involved.

For sure, but it's not like MS is publishing games on PlayStation - they are still pushing hardware the same way I'm sure there are people out there who will pick up a PS4 when SF5 releases. I just don't see first party releases driving hardware the same way a Call of Duty or Battlefront does.

Surely a few of them will.

Of course some will. But I don't see Xbox drying up to the extent SimonM7 is suggesting because more people can buy MS titles on PC. Even if the Xbox Two is just a Windows PC with a streamlined OS (is that really that much different than what we have now?) that goes directly to the Windows 10 store Microsoft will still put an Xbox Console on store shelves.
 
I don't mind too much because I'll probably end up getting them on PC but at the same time it does make me wonder if it was worth buying an Xbox One for Sunset Overdrive and Halo 5.
 
I don't think it's good for Xbox at all.
It's still good for Microsoft hence why they're doing it. And of course it's good for consumers.
But there is no doubt that people with a good PC have little reason to buy a Xbox.

Posts like this one are so baffling to me. What exactly does MS lose if gamers with capable PCs don't buy their console? They would only be buying it for exclusives anyway since they can play the best version of every multiplat on PC. Allowing these gamers to play those exclusives without the need to buy a $300 box that MS makes zero money on is a win-win scenario for everyone involved. I don't understand how there are people who still don't see this.
 
What did Bloodborne sell? 2+ Million?

Halo 5 is around 3 million now?

I don't see exclusives moving systems like they used to. It's also not as if MS doesn't get anything from a PC sale of an Xbox game either. They have made a point about their driving force being to increase monthly active users and getting users into the Win10 store or using Xbox services does just that.

I don't think you quite understand what I'm saying. Third party games seem to be what are selling people on current gen systems. But which one do you choose when they both offer the same thing? The one that has more first party titles that appeal to you. That isn't to say every first party title will sell millions but its the main reason you pick one system over another. When most of Xbox One's exclusives are on PC that really deminishes the value of the system. There are few reasons to pick Xbox One over PS4 when its a weaker system and its library can be found elsewhere.
 
love how everyone thinks this is ms just giving up on xbox.

have you been paying attention to microsoft as a whole for the past few years?

the goal is to get you on windows, in any way possible. xbox one is one of those ways. id be shocked if the 360 isnt released as a 99 dollar windows 10 device soon that would function as a STB/steam-link like device.

getting you on windows and keeping you there is way more important than "beating sony". the console wars only exist on internet message boards.
 
The people who want an Xbox will buy an Xbox anyway. Those who only buy a console for its exclusives while their main gaming device is a PC aren't going to invest in the console ecosystem anyway so the only thing Microsoft misses out on is the (probably miniscule) amount of money it makes from every console sale. I bet the next Xbox will just be a Windows 10 PC with a Big Picture Mode-style interface.

Edit: damn, beaten. Basically, what this guy says:

Posts like this one are so baffling to me. What exactly does MS lose if gamers with capable PCs don't buy their console? They would only be buying it for exclusives anyway since they can play the best version of every multiplat on PC. Allowing these gamers to play those exclusives without the need to buy a $300 box that MS makes zero money on is a win-win scenario for everyone involved. I don't understand how there are people who still don't see this.
 
MS is basically saying "don't buy our console!" to tons of people. That's not good for Xbox.

It's always weird that the console warrior thing gets thrown around if someone is upset by this sort of thing. Spinning this into a positive is a thing PC gamers do because this is good for them and a thing console gamers do to kind of cope with it. There is no positive for the console only gamer. Budget and "more risks" are flimsy reasons that you'd never truly be able to prove occur.
 
I don't think you quite understand what I'm saying. Third party games seem to be what are selling people on current gen systems. But which one do you choose when they both offer the same thing? The one that has more first party titles that appeal to you. That isn't to say every first party title will sell millions but its the main reason you pick one system over another. When most of Xbox One's exclusives are on PC that really deminishes the value of the system. There are few reasons to pick Xbox One over PS4 when its a weaker system and its library can be found elsewhere.

I understand, titles like Bloodborne are great incentive for the many folk to get one system or the other I just don't see it as having as much pull as it used to (or appeared to). Either or like I said to DustyVonEric it's not like MS is publishing games on PlayStation. They are still "Xbox" games.
 
You make it sound like first party games are funded to make a profit. What if they are funded to help push their platform? In that case you could see MS taking fewer risks and only investing in 'safe bets' that make a profit,or scaling back on development
 
If they ever allow Xbox One users to play with PC users (very unlikely, but PS$ do it), then I would ditch my Xbox One and buy a mega-PC.

Though, the only thing that stops me from doing that currently is that all my friends play on Xbox One, and that's the most important thing for me.
 
Adding to this thread: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/qu...n-confirmed/1100-6434694/?ftag=GSS-05-10aaa0b

Gears of War 4, ReCore, Scalebound, and Fable Legends are all coming to PC.

What does this add to the thread's discussion?

Edit: Though the new Quantum Break trailer still says "Xbox Exclusive", it has Windows 10 logo at the end.

They already edited that line, it was a mistake by the writer. This is what it says now.

Quantum Break's PC edition is the latest in Microsoft's wider push to expand its games across console and PC. Games currently in development for both platforms includes ReCore, Sea of Thieves and Fable Legends.

And Quantum Break is confirmed PC, so there is no more speculation on that.
 
A gaming PC of almost any performance level/price today, with all the Xbox One exclusives on it, is simply a superior Xbox One. There's literally no reason to buy or play on an Xbox One if that was the case.

Sunset Overdrive would certainly sell better on PC, and before long it'd be a dubious proposition to even make it an Xbox One game in the first place.

You're in a position where you elect to play on Xbox One even when given better options - for whatever reason - but it doesn't change the fact that this would make the system infinitely less attractive. Simply count all the posts saying they would sell their Xbox One, or the ones breathing a sigh of relief having "dodged" buying one.

It's great for MS if they can just drop the Xbox system all together and still claim the benefits of owning the "platform" games are released on. It's great for gaming "overall", and the viability of every great game if everyone can play it, like I said in my reply. But better for the Xbox system itself, or better for fans of the platform expecting to be able to buy an "Xbox Two"? Just no. All of the no.

Putting some titles that make sense on PC on PC down the line, and making them cross-buy - that would be "good for Xbox". But day and date circumvents the Xbox One completely, and it'd be even more parenthetical than it already is.

Counting posts on GAF to prove or disprove anything is a waste of time. Its irrelevant.

I very much doubt most people who buy a console even consider a PC as an option. They are two different markets. The majority of games already come to both, and yet consoles still sell extremely well. Bloodborne is not the only reason people buy a PS4.

Microsoft are less concerned with the Xbox One as a device as they are with the Xbox platform. Ultimately, they will probably want to get to a point where Xbox games can be played across multiple devices, of which the console will be just one of a few options. This is what they have been working towards with Win 10. The traditional console model just isn't going to cut it in the future and they know this.

Sometimes I feel Microsoft actively wants to make me sell my xbox.

Sell it then. They won't care if you keep buying the Microsoft published games on your Win 10 PC.
 
I mean I can understand why for a new IP to release it on XB1 and PC. Especially after AW's sales, I can't blame Remedy. But man, MS is making it harder to justify me keeping my XB1. At least with PS4, its first party AAA games will never go to PC and it has a few Japanese third party exclusives as well to justify it.
 
I have no interest in owning an XB1 however if exclusives came to PC and had cross-platform multiplayer, I would buy two to gift one to each of my brothers so we had the ability to play together.
 
Not until we have Halo 1-3 on Steam.

Wont be on steam

Quick way of telling if it will show up on steam

Does it use xbox live for multiplayer? - not on steam

Those apis are only accessible to universal app compiled games...and they can't or wont be delivered on steam
 
I understand, titles like Bloodborne are great incentive for the many folk to get one system or the other I just don't see it as having as much pull as it used to (or appeared to). Either or like I said to DustyVonEric it's not like MS is publishing games on PlayStation. They are still "Xbox" games.

Xbox games that don't require you to buy an Xbox system. There is very little reason to own both a PC and an Xbox One with all these titles making their way to PC, people have shown they will wait for software rather than buy hardware for it with Rise of the Tomb Raider, this won't benefit the Xbox One in any way and will probably harm it greatly.

PS4 and Xbox One already don't compete in price and they hardly compete in hardware. Games are the only thing that can turn the Xbox One from a second place console to a first place one and they are deminishing its value with these announcements.
 
Errr this is no different to PS4 Console exclusive games.
If you like your console and enjoy playing on it, and the games on it run and perform well then you shouldn't worry about such a thing.
I mean if I had an X1 I'd double dip on Killer Instinct @_@

except 99% of all ps4 exclusives never go to pc... theres a rare occasion but i cant think of 1 exclusive for ps4 that ended up on pc
 
I think this gives us a hint at what the next xbox will be like.

One ecosystem.
Buy once.
Play anywhere.

Great news.

Pretty much confirmed that the next consoles wont be the traditional one.
 
You make it sound like first party games are funded to make a profit. What if they are funded to help push their platform? In that case you could see MS taking fewer risks and only investing in 'safe bets' that make a profit,or scaling back on development

Of course there is value in having something distinct from you competitor but I'm arguing that if games like Sunset Overdrive or Alan Wake are more successful out of the gate that we will see more of them and not have MS move onto something trying something else.
 
For me as a consumer, it is great!
For xbox as a console brand not at all!

Pretty much this. It also sets a thought within the mind of future consumers that exculsive games coming to the xbox may well come to the PC too. So unless MS can get their first party studios to be on equal footing with their competitors I feel it does hurt the xbox brand.

Regardless. This is really good for Remedy and their new IP as it allows them greater exposure. Hoping the best for them!
 
The people who want a Xbox will buy an Xbox anyway. Those who only buy a console for its exclusives while their main gaming device is a PC aren't going to invest in the console ecosystem anyway so the only thing Microsoft misses out on is the (probably miniscule) amount of money it makes from every console sale. I bet the next Xbox will just be a Windows 10 PC with a Big Picture Mode-style interface.

Edit: damn, beaten. Basically, what this guy says:

Thank you. There a ton of people in this thread who are living on the assumption everyone who doesn't have a Xbox is because they have a gaming PC and now they have no reason to. That's not even remotely the case. And I agree about the future of the console going forward.
 
So you're moving your PC around? Have multiple PCs?

Excuse me? :) Modern gpus allow multiple output devices to be connected at once. My PC is connected to my lounge TV and screen in my study(where the box is). I've got a wireless m&k + controller in my study and lounge.

I'm slightly confused...this isn't exactly a radical development in home computing, guys. HDMI cables?
 
MS is basically saying "don't buy our console!" to tons of people. That's not good for Xbox.

How when multiplatform games (many of which are on PC) are the top selling games on both the PS4 and Xbox One?

Exclusives really aren't doing much this gen. This past Holiday season showed that pretty clearly.

It's always weird that the console warrior thing gets thrown around if someone is upset by this sort of thing. Spinning this into a positive is a thing PC gamers do because this is good for them and a thing console gamers do to kind of cope with it. There is no positive for the console only gamer. Budget and "more risks" are flimsy reasons that you'd never truly be able to prove occur.

No positive for a console only gamer?

What about the fact that this push will help new IPs (that are good) to have a greater chance at success and thus become franchises with multiple sequels?

I loved Sunset Overdrive. If a PC version of the game would have caused a Sunset Overdrive 2 then how is that a bad thing? Most who care about consoles only will continue on caring about consoles only.

This move is setting the base for MS to merge Xbox and PC/Windows 10. This will cause the Xbox brand as a whole to better compete with the larg(er) worldwide userbase of PlayStation.
 
Xbox games that don't require you to buy an Xbox system. There is very little reason to own both a PC and an Xbox One with all these titles making their way to PC, people have shown they will wait for software rather than buy hardware for it with Rise of the Tomb Raider, this won't benefit the Xbox One in any way and will probably harm it greatly.

And how many people out there own a PC and Xbox that buy more than just exclusives on that console? If MS is just selling a handful of titles to that user what was the sense is subsidising them a console? Would it not be better to just sell them games on the platform they already own?
 
Xbox owner now :

Quantum Break, Recore ( maybe Scalebound ) is coming to PC!
Awesome news, MS! Thank you!

There is no reason to own Xbone now. I'm selling it!
MS, that's shitty. I regret my Xbone purchase!
 
Why buy a xbox and pay for xbox live gold if a can buy a PC and get better graphics, free online and cheaper games?

I enjoy sitting in front of my TV
I get 2/4 free games per month via Gold
I don't really want to drop £600+ for a competent gaming PC

Those are just a few. That being said LIVE functionality is on the PC too, the biggest thing it loses is the subscription.
 
And how many people out there own a PC and Xbox that buy more than just exclusives on that console? If MS is just selling a handful of titles to that user what was the sense is subsidising them a console? Would it not be better to just sell them games on the platform they already own?

I gave my Xbox One away to my brother in laws around Christmas as I already feel it has little value compared to PS4 but I was planning on picking another up when Scalebound launches, now I'll probably never get another Xbox One unless several more exclusive games remain on the platform. Why buy an Xbox One when the games I want are also on PC? Microsoft is deminishing everything that makes the console stand out, exclusives matter. Exclusives are the sole thing that make one console different to another, its the reason I own about 30 consoles but I have no intention of buying another Xbox One in its current state. Microsoft has given me no reason to.
 
Thank you. There a ton of people in this thread who are living on the assumption everyone who doesn't have a Xbox is because they have a gaming PC and now they have no reason to. That's not even remotely the case. And I agree about the future of the console going forward.

Yeah most of them are talking about 2 different people in the end really. Just because 3rd parties are on PC doesnt mean the console sales dropped. Consoles just have a wider appeal because they are easy to plug and play. This is a gaming enthusiast board so its a bit of a bubble.
 
It's a very sticky situation. On one hand it's great for gamers in general. On the other hand I definitely understand the frustration of xbox owners: they bought Xbox for the big exclusives, only to realize it's not exclusive anymore. It sucks for PC + Xbox owners but it shouldn't affect Xbox only owners.
 
And for the folk who own both a gaming PC and an Xbox One they can then play on the better platform for them. MS still gets the sale from the couple exclusives that said user would have bought on Xbox - not as if that user would likely buy multiplatform games on the system if all they got it for was exclusives.
Do you have the sales info to back that up? That a Microsoft game built on DX12, which they have said is the easiest it has ever been to port between PC and console, would somehow not justify being on Xbox One because the PC version sold better?
You're assuming that there is an Xbox One at all. A hardware platform called an Xbox which people have bought for Halo or whatever, as opposed to a PS4. How would an Xbox justify its existence if MS don't actually have to take a hit on production cost vs retail price? Do you expect there to be an Xbox out of the goodness of MS' hearts at that point?


Again, how many non-MS games are those users buying on their Xbox right now? Does it make a difference if user Y buys 5 MS exclusives on PC or on an Xbox they never user otherwise?
If they don't buy an Xbox One and buys the game for PC, perpetuating those sales blips you mention on the Xbox, I'm sure MS will be even happier to drop out of the hardware race, yeah.
Those millions of Xbox One owners aren't going to ditch their console and grab a PC. Games like GTA, Minecraft and the like (the biggest sellers on console) still do fantastic on the platform despite a better PC version existing.
Why do you think they have an Xbox One to begin with? Contra the PS4, what's the point of having an Xbox?

Again, PC releases doesn't stop users from picking up GTA5 (did gang-busters on consoles this year), CoD, Minecraft on Xbox. I don't see first party releases being that different.
All of your arguments are based on the assumption that a Xbox hardware platform exists, and yet all of those arguments are for things that would undermine that platform.

It's also a widely shared, bizarre notion that the cost of entry and the required know-how to play PC games is so dizzyingly substantial that it would single-handedly justify the Xbox hardware's existence. You can essentially click on a thing on the windows store, hook up an HDMI cable and an Xbox pad, and be off to the races. You can get a graphics card for a little over a hundred bucks to pump some adrenaline into your family/work PC - provided that it's not completely ancient - and it's pppppretty much an Xbox. Is this something "people won't do"? I dunno. Once word gets out that anything worthwhile for Xbox is available there, I can think of other things people will be less likely to do. Especially in the nearly insurmountable trending away from Xbox and toward PS4.

I'm not contesting that the games themselves would sell better if put on a platform that people are less antagonistic towards, nor that Microsoft themselves would do better business. I am, however, saying that for the Xbox as a hardware platform, and for its fans and the narrative that surrounds it, having it perpetually be the *worst* place for Xbox fans to play *the games they are fans of* is neither good for the image of the platform, nor something I expect those fans to just brush off and be cool with.

But you're echoing business decisions that make total sense. I don't think what you're saying is in any way unfeasible or wrong. It's the first move in phasing out Xbox as a flagship gaming platform though, and that's not a fun thing for fans at all. How very hollow all the commercials will sound when you're truly and utterly better off playing on PC than on the main competitor to the other consoles that the commercial is marketing.
 
I think this is great, as a PC and Xbox player. If we get more cross-buy options like with Quantum Break that's frigging awesome. I have different friend groups on different platforms.

The Xbox One was always meant to converge with the PC and other devices. The idea was always to have one 'app store' which carried purchases across devices. It just took MS far too long to get there.
 
I gave my Xbox One away to my brother in laws around Christmas as I already feel it has little value compared to PS4 but I was planning on picking another up when Scalebound launches, now I'll probably never get another Xbox One unless several more exclusive games remain on the platform. Why buy an Xbox One when the games I want are also on PC? Microsoft is deminishing everything that makes the console stand out, exclusives matter. Exclusives are the sole thing that make one console different to another, its the reason I own about 30 consoles but I have no intention of buying another Xbox One in its current state. Microsoft has given me no reason to.

You are a PC gamer. Many people who play on consoles aren't.

These Xbox games coming to PC aren't going to greatly hurt the Xbox brand in comparison to the state that it's currently in.

Same is true for PS4 games like Street Fighter V. Nothing about the PS4's sales state would really change if games like SFV stayed on PS4 only. Therefore, it's best to make these games be available to play for more users to bring in more money for the companies that make these games. More money = more games on consoles (and PC).
 
I think this is the beginning of the foundation for the next Xbox.

One ecosystem.
Buy once.
Play anywhere.

Great news.

Pretty much confirmed that the next consoles wont be the traditional one.

My thoughts exactly, I think the next platform will bring PC and console closer together, possibly with cross purchase.
 
Errr this is no different to PS4 Console exclusive games.
If you like your console and enjoy playing on it, and the games on it run and perform well then you shouldn't worry about such a thing.
I mean if I had an X1 I'd double dip on Killer Instinct @_@
Well the difference is ps4 has exclusives coming from more avenues since its market leader and more successful worldwide. The issue here is just about value. If you own a powerful PC, the value to getting an X1 lowers with every exclusive announced also coming to PC.

It's really a good move IMO, as I don't want to buy an X1 just to play Cuphead, Scalebound, etc..and I can just upgrade my PC instead.
 
I gave my Xbox One away to my brother in laws around Christmas as I already feel it has little value compared to PS4 but I was planning on picking another up when Scalebound launches, now I'll probably never get another Xbox One unless several more exclusive games remain on the platform. Why buy an Xbox One when the games I want are also on PC? Microsoft is deminishing everything that makes the console stand out, exclusives matter. Exclusives are the sole thing that make one console different to another, its the reason I own about 30 consoles but I have no intention of buying another Xbox One in its current state. Microsoft has given me no reason to.

Again,

If you are just buying exclusives on Xbox One why would MS care to sell you a console at a loss/tiny profit? Does it make that much of a difference to MS if you buy those handful of titles on an Xbox or PC?
 
The games are still console exclusive for my Xbox One, so I really don't give a shit if they go to PC as well. Being 'Microsoft' exclusive makes more sense from a business perspective and the increased sales will keep more franchises alive.
 
I think this gives us a hint at what the next xbox will be like.

One ecosystem.
Buy once.
Play anywhere.

Great news.

Pretty much confirmed that the next consoles wont be the traditional one.

I think with streaming tech becoming more and more viable it makes more sense to evolve the brand to gaming platform regardless of medium...

So yes buy from Xbox store and play anywhere is the direction
 
I have a feeling GAF is going to be a Fanboy filled Battlefield today. Probably best for my sanity if I avoid it for the rest of the day.
 
Yes, when I think of a console base being treated First Class, the first item that comes to mind is "I hope their exclusive games get ported to PC to hedge against poor sales".
 
This is a brilliant move if crossplay is allowed. Even though keyboard and mouse is superior for shooters it would be nice to have crossplay as an option when searching for games. it would greatly increase the longevity of certain brands.
 
Top Bottom