Developers are soon going to be able to just take the code they made with Xbox game and do an easier port to PC. That makes it easy to port games over and more PC games. More games on MS ecosystem and their store (they can still make Steam games like RoTR but that requires more work). They have the option of making a game cross-buy/play if they want to. This just makes life easier for developers and for gamers. You know what, f it...
THIS IS PRO CONSUMER PEOPLE! IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE WITH IT, YOU ARE NUTS!
Anyone take a look at Phil Spencer's twitter today? I hate giving someone like Crapgamer attention, but this was too good.
![]()
Semantics. This strategy does nothing to maintain or improve the momentum for the Xbox One. It only devalues the Xbox One.
The Xbox Store and the Windows Store have yet to be combined. That's most likely happening this year (when they open up the Xbox store to "everyone" for development) with Windows 10 Redstone release. When that happens, you can expect clicking the button once and having it everywhere. Microsoft already has this with Windows 10 and Windows 10 Mobile. It's going to happen to Xbox, Hololens, etc...The future is bright and it is coming, slowly but surely.
I feel like I've been taking crazy pills on this forum saying that this stuff was going to happen and people downplaying me (and others). Thank god its happening. Quantum Break is the first to announce it, I'm sure Gears, Recore are next. This E3 is going to be exciting.
No more "Xbox and Windows 10 Exclusive"...now it'll be "Microsoft Exclusive"...
And that's why it hurts me. I'm an Xbox owner and I spend most of my time playing multiplayer.
Every exclusive game that the Xbox loses means there's fewer reasons for people like you to buy an Xbox, which means there's fewer people for me to play against.
Cross platform play isn't really an answer when I'm playing FPS titles and don't want to go up against KB+M users.
I don't know a single person in real life that owns a PC that could run that game.
I don't know a single person in real life that owns a PC that could run that game.
I'll reply to both since my response is the same.
You are operating under the assumption that Microsoft will "charity port" games over to X1 even if it's not a viable platform. You're assuming that the game will be developed to take full advantage of the X1 while at the same time also taking advantage of PC. You're assuming Microsoft is using this as a way to get more games on Xbox One instead of using it as a way to hedge the reduced financial outlook of their not-doing-nearly-as-well-as-they-hope (1 billion consoles ring a bell?) console.
Those are a lot of fair assumptions that have some facts behind them, but they're assumptions nonetheless. Microsoft does not have a good track record of supporting ailing platforms. I dunno, maybe they've turned over a new leaf and this will somehow fund games for the system. I doubt it, but anything is possible
Would you prefer to play on a system with more game support or less game support? That's the part you don't seem to be getting.
I'm glad "it doesn't affect you" in the sense that you weren't going to buy those games on PC. But it affects the health of your system in the long run, which means fewer games for you. In that regard, you'd have a hard time convincing me that doesn't affect you as a gamer.
I don't know a single person in real life that owns an Xbox One.
except i'm not gonna try and extrapolate anything meaningful from that personal anecdote of mine because I'd be a crazy person to try...
I guess it depends on if you view this as a move made from a position of strength or one of weakness.
If you think its MS attempt to prop up flagging W10 adoption by leveraging the strength of the Xbox brand, then sure, it ultimately hurts the Xbox hardware brand in the long run.
If you think its a tacit admission that they have failed to achieve whatever their goals with the Xbox hardware brand have been, and this is a move to consolidate and strengthen the gaming division as a whole, then ultimately it is more beneficial for X1 hardware owners to share these titles than the likely alternatives.
Anyone take a look at Phil Spencer's twitter today? I hate giving someone like Crapgamer attention, but this was too good.
![]()
Because people bought/will buy the hardware? Because those XBox fans may have had an option to ditch the X1 and save several hundred bucks and played it on a PC instead?Why are you so stuck on the hardware? Xbox gamers are fans of Xbox game franchises and they follow those franchises across hardware. Now they get more options on where to play their games and use Live.
I think your logic is sound. It could be either of the two things you mentioned but I don't really have a way of knowing. I'm sure X1 owners would be thrilled if this means X1 will get more games. However, that is still a hopeful assumption.I guess it depends on if you view this as a move made from a position of strength or one of weakness.
If you think its MS attempt to prop up flagging W10 adoption by leveraging the strength of the Xbox brand, then sure, it ultimately hurts the Xbox hardware brand in the long run.
If you think its a tacit admission that they have failed to achieve whatever their goals with the Xbox hardware brand have been, and this is a move to consolidate and strengthen the gaming division as a whole, then ultimately it is more beneficial for X1 hardware owners to share these titles than the likely alternatives.
This isn't even Xbox fanboyism.
This is Xbox extremism.
How fucking embarrassing is it that this guy is like a voice for the fanbase?
Anyone take a look at Phil Spencer's twitter today? I hate giving someone like Crapgamer attention, but this was too good.
![]()
I can see the logic behind the OP, make the game more successful.
Even better logic is to instead not skip PS4, that'll help success. Why are Remedy not making games on PS4 again? They aren't owned by MS are they?
This isn't even Xbox fanboyism.
This is Xbox extremism.
How fucking embarrassing is it that this guy is like a voice for the fanbase?
Because people bought/will buy the hardware? Because those XBox fans may have had an option to ditch the X1 and save several hundred bucks and played it on a PC instead?
On the one hand, you have GAFers preaching the value of platform flexibility on this very page. I agree. There's some value to it.
But denying this has any impact on the gamers who were denied that platform choice when they were given the choice to either buy an Xbox One or not play Xbox games at all seems really backwards.
Either platform choice is a good thing and this is a big bummer to X1 owners that were denied the choice, or it's a bad thing (i.e. exclusives rule the day) and X1 is losing some exclusives.
Anyone take a look at Phil Spencer's twitter today? I hate giving someone like Crapgamer attention, but this was too good.
![]()
wouldn't be that difficult to require controller only for cross platform play
What exactly is MS losing with this scenario though? PC gamers that get the XBO only for exclusives are worth exactly the same amount to MS if they buy those same exclusives on the W10 store. It's like saying the PS4 suffers because the Vita gets a port of a PS4 exclusive. The XBO is competeting with the PS4, not Windows 10.Because people bought/will buy the hardware? Because those XBox fans may have had an option to ditch the X1 and save several hundred bucks and played it on a PC instead?
On the one hand, you have GAFers preaching the value of platform flexibility on this very page. I agree. There's some value to it.
But denying this has any impact on the gamers who were denied that platform choice when they were given the choice to either buy an Xbox One or not play Xbox games at all seems really backwards.
Either platform choice is a good thing and this is a big bummer to X1 owners that were denied the choice, or it's a bad thing (i.e. exclusives rule the day) and X1 is losing some exclusives.
Because people bought/will buy the hardware? Because those XBox fans may have had an option to ditch the X1 and save several hundred bucks and played it on a PC instead?
On the one hand, you have GAFers preaching the value of platform flexibility on this very page. I agree. There's some value to it.
But denying this has any impact on the gamers who were denied that platform choice when they were given the choice to either buy an Xbox One or not play Xbox games at all seems really backwards.
Either platform choice is a good thing and this is a big bummer to X1 owners that were denied the choice, or it's a bad thing (i.e. exclusives rule the day) and X1 is losing some exclusives.
Anyone take a look at Phil Spencer's twitter today? I hate giving someone like Crapgamer attention, but this was too good.
![]()
People are upset over this??
What exactly is MS losing with this scenario though? PC gamers that get the XBO only for exclusives are worth exactly the same amount to MS if they buy those same exclusives on the W10 store. It's like saying the PS4 suffers because the Vita gets a port of a PS4 exclusive. The XBO is competeting with the PS4, not Windows 10.
And I dont know anyone that owns a Xbox One, so it clearly sold zero units and its a non-existent market!I don't know a single person in real life that owns a PC that could run that game.
The Xb1 is still going to be the lead platform for these games right? I have no problem with games like gears of war 4 or even halo 6 coming to the pc. And I could care less if the pc version has all the extra bells and whistles one would expect from a pc port.
But it would be dissapointing if these games start being developed first for PC, and then ported down as opposed to being developed for the Xbox and being ported up. I want these games to look and run as good as possible on my Xbox, because that's why I bought the system.
I'm not sure what MS would be losing, if anything. But this thread is about how this is so great for Xbox owners. So....What exactly is MS losing with this scenario though? PC gamers that get the XBO only for exclusives are worth exactly the same amount to MS if they buy those same exclusives on the W10 store. It's like saying the PS4 suffers because the Vita gets a port of a PS4 exclusive. The XBO is competeting with the PS4, not Windows 10.
Most people buy consoles -- hardware in general, actually -- under the assumption that they'll get use out of it. If you think Xbox fans bought the system for Ryse and Forza 5 with no thought about Halo or Gears and other future exclusives, you're crazy.Were there a lot of people who bought a X1 in advanced of the game they needed one to play it? I don't know anyone who did that. I can't even name anyone who knows about Quantum Break.
As for people who bought a X1 to play things like Killer Instinct, which is now going Windows 10 PC, they got to play it for the last 2 years. That was the price of admission for those 2 years.
You're grasping at straws.
There are morons like that all around, not just on Xbox. Anyway, it's funny to see him get stumped by basic logic.
Voice for a fanbase? He's a voice for himself and himself only. and these idiots exist on every console, not just xbox lol
Anyone take a look at Phil Spencer's twitter today? I hate giving someone like Crapgamer attention, but this was too good.
![]()
Did I say that they didn't??
Weird how you both felt the need to immediately jump in and deflect something I didn't even say.
Good god this crapgamer fella makes me cringe >_<
Nebraska doing work lol.Seems a handful of warriors are taking it pretty hard. Other than that we just have Disaster Nebraska trying to spin this so it seems like MS did something bad.