You need to buy a separate license to activate it on another system
boy howdy I'm looking forward to 2014. Bayonetta 2 looks tight!
Temporary fix until they unify the Xbox and Windows Store.
You need to buy a separate license to activate it on another system
boy howdy I'm looking forward to 2014. Bayonetta 2 looks tight!
There's several of these advocates giving the spiel right now.You sound like you have attended one of MS's meetings where everything gets sugarcoated in busisness-speak.
And how many people you think own a capable gaming PC and and Xbox one?
And you seem like an angry fanboy with "concerns".
You don't have to! It's an option. I'm not saying that you should buy and get a system. I don't get money from selling you an Xbox (nor care to). You say others won't because they are uninformed...you know that population is the biggest population of gamers out there. I'm not here to tell anyone that if you want buy a PC to just get an Xbox. Why are you making it seem like I'm saying that. I don't care what people buy. I'm saying that if you had both there are advantages and disadvantages and are generally used differently so if someone had both it's advantageous because of the scenarios in which you can use them.
40 pages...yeez. Good thing is good for everyone, why is it so complicated to grasp.
Yeah but it's not. Literally every Xbox One game that I own now or want to buy is also on PC now and I have a capable PC. Microsoft has made it clear that I wasted $500.
Yeah but it's not. Literally every Xbox One game that I own now or want to buy is also on PC now and I have a capable PC. Microsoft has made it clear that I wasted $500.
We are talking in circles here and I don't even think that I#m really discussing against you..
Please, see where I'm coming from: yes, a console like the xbox still offers advantages for the casual market: 1. low price 2. convenience
Compared to the Iphone/Ipad, those advantages are not set in stone.
A tablet by definition will always be harder to carry around than a smart-phone.
BUT, a PC doesn't have to be less convenient/ more complex and far more expensive than a console. This is a innovation/business problem. Let me pull something out of my ass: Let's say someone like MS came up in 2005 with a custom PC with 2 power buttons running two Os versions - console mode + PC mode. Or it could automatically enter console mode when you use the controller to start the machine. Something like this is possible, but I'm not arguing that it is/was a lucrative idea.
All of you guys talking about the eco-system stuff don't get that for the consumer it would be best to have like 3 devices at best for all the possible applications (stationary, mobile and something in between). Look at the situation now and you will see that it doesn't work this way. Apps like Netflix run on phones, TVs, PCs, smartphones, consoles, tablets - they are the real winners of this fractualized market. I'm one of the few gamers who would welcome all of the big three going 3rd party, because I won't put 3 devices that by principle do the same fucking thing in my rack anymore. This is totally contrary to the unified ecosystem vision.
Markoman said:Thanks, this is the type of opinion that weighs way more than all of the posts celebrating the unified ecosystem jazz in this thread.
I'm not even stating an opinion here. I can afford a good PC and I don't see myself ever buying a MS console again under this circumstances. That's all. They will still get my money for their OS, so where's the problem?
Yeah but it's not. Literally every Xbox One game that I own now or want to buy is also on PC now and I have a capable PC. Microsoft has made it clear that I wasted $500. Please tell me how buying an Xbox One was good for me because I feel like it was a total ripoff.
Ok, take away iPhone and iPad and put a cheap android phone and cheap android tablet. My point still stands. It's not about those devices exactly and the stuff around them, it's showing a reason why people WOULD buy both devices.
Yes, a PC doesn't have to be more expensive or non-convenient. Someone could go buy a Steam Machine right now, play Steam games. Do people do it...yes, a small number, but it hasn't taken off. Xbox on the other hand has taken off, and they are just doing the opposite route of going to the PC. Some people will have both, majority will be in one or the other.
Ok, take away iPhone and iPad and put a cheap android phone and cheap android tablet. My point still stands. It's not about those devices exactly and the stuff around them, it's showing a reason why people WOULD buy both devices.
Yes, a PC doesn't have to be more expensive or non-convenient. Someone could go buy a Steam Machine right now, play Steam games. Do people do it...yes, a small number, but it hasn't taken off. Xbox on the other hand has taken off, and they are just doing the opposite route of going to the PC. Some people will have both, majority will be in one or the other.
Nobody stated that it was a problem. The unified ecosystem is good for people just like the guy above you. That's why it's a good thing. You have both, you can play both after buying it once. It's really just that simple. BOGO free. If it doesn't apply to you then there's nothing to argue as you are a non-factor.
An xbox and a windows pc area nothing like a phone and tablet. You obviously have a hard on for everything microsoft says but so far we are looking at a minuscule handful of games with this amazing buy once/play anywhere capability. If you have an android phone and tablet, you have 100% compatibility. With the xbox and windows 10, it's what... 2 or 3 games and the xbox app features? Wrong-way streaming?
That's why people don't "get it", Zedox. Cross platform is old news for everyone else and for microsoft it still isn't even there yet. They finally had to release office for ios. That's as far as they've got.
They are putting the xbox to bed and windows tablet apps will be cross-device not cross platform. This whole unification push is the emperor's new clothes.
Sorry pal, you still don't get my point.
Phones and tablets are like apples and oranges.
Consoles and PCs are like baby apples and adult apples.
Steam machines don't take off, because this is a fractualized market. To many manufactures = no focused marketing efforts. And...surprise, competition from consoles and mobile devices! The Steam machine idea was great, the execution is poor. Plain as that. Still, if PCs were easier to use why would I use my Xbox if it plays the same games and is connected to the same TV like my PC? Let's talk about options: Yes, I have several options to run Netflix, but I have never watched a movie on my phone nor using the built-in Netflix app in my TV. Please, tell me what box A does so differently from box B? I do get the NX concept if it works the way we all imagine: you can take your mobile device on vacation and play Ninti games where ever you are. What is Xbox' special trick???
Markoman said:Maybe he should reply to this. I was under the impression that he is not very satisfied with this situation. Let's do the math: He spend x amount of $ on a PC + 500$ on a Xbox One. I assume that 500$ is not worth it to have the option to play games on two stationary devices in his household. He could have bought a high-end GFX for 500$ + the amount he has spent on his current card ->
500$= having the option to play QB in his bedroom or his living room vs. GTX 970 or Titan.
Maybe he should reply to this. I was under the impression that he is not very satisfied with this situation. Let's do the math: He spend x amount of $ on a PC + 500$ on a Xbox One. I assume that 500$ is not worth it to have the option to play games on two stationary devices in his household. He could have bought a high-end GFX for 500$ + the amount he has spent on his current card ->
500$= having the option to play QB in his bedroom or his living room vs. GTX 970 or Titan.
Sorry pal, you still don't get my point.
Phones and tablets are like apples and oranges.
Consoles and PCs are like baby apples and adult apples.
Steam machines don't take off, because this is a fractualized market. To many manufactures = no focused marketing efforts. And...surprise, competition from consoles and mobile devices! The Steam machine idea was great, the execution is poor. Plain as that. Still, if PCs were easier to use why would I use my Xbox if it plays the same games and is connected to the same TV like my PC? Let's talk about options: Yes, I have several options to run Netflix, but I have never watched a movie on my phone nor using the built-in Netflix app in my TV. Please, tell me what box A does so differently from box B? I do get the NX concept if it works the way we all imagine: you can take your mobile device on vacation and play Ninti games where ever you are. What is Xbox' special trick???
Maybe because the topic is about how it's great for Xbox owners, specifically. There is a tremendous amount of circling the wagons here, trying to convince people how this is good for PC gamers, how this is good for the Xbox ecosystem, how this "changes nothing", over and over and over again.40 pages...yeez. Good thing is good for everyone, why is it so complicated to grasp.
Maybe because the topic is about how it's great for Xbox owners, specifically. There is a tremendous amount of circling the wagons here, trying to convince people how this is good for PC gamers, how this is good for the Xbox ecosystem, how this "changes nothing", over and over and over again.
Yet, no one has managed to put up a decent argument as to how this benefits Xbox owners other than with "what ifs" and "maybes" like "what if this means more PC games get ported to X1?" and so forth..
I think when the X1 was 1st released and it was 500 and you could get a PC for 600 or 700 that was a lot stronger then I can see a good point if we were in the situation that x1 had no exclusives . Right now its 300 with games constantly and it feel like MS has switched where they are targeting the Xbox .
Basically I feel there are two types of Xbox people right now. Ones that have a Pc but bought a 500 console for exclusives now feeling like they wasted money . My thinking on that is it still works and you got 2 years of exclusives . Now you have the option to sell it if you will not use it
Then we have guys saying no one will buy a Xbox or they will not make another xbox . To that I say at the price of 300 dollars a lot of parents and guys with not a lot of money that want to play games will. As well as people that just believe PC is to hard to deal with . Will MS make another Xbox I really believe so but it will likely be a 300 or 400 set top type that can play games and they can get that sub money.
I know I went way off OP topic but my only way I can see this really being great for Xbox owners is if I'm a console only gamer and these games on PC sell well then they will make a sequel and invest in new ips. more games are better for Xbox owners
These are Olympic-level mental gymnastics. I'm impressed.Xbox owners have won a ticket to travel to the future where they can buy the next xbox so they can play remasters of microsoft exclusives at better resolution/framerate without having to pay twice for those games.
In their hands is deciding whether to buy that "remaster" console from the future or stay the same. They have lost nothing.
Phones and tablets are apples and oranges? Add phone capability to a iPad mini with LTE and you have a iPhone 6S++. I wouldn't necessarily say they are hugely different. You could always add LTE to an Ipad and use Google Voice and you basically have a huge iPhone. Let's not kid ourselves. You can't just add something to an apple and it become an orange whilst you can with a tablet and it become your phone.
Why are you insistent on asking me what makes the Xbox One so different that you shouldn't have both when I clearly stated that you don't have to. Sheesh. I explained my analogy, that's all. You keep trying to make it seem that my analogy is wrong and honestly I don't care if you don't see it how I do.
And to answer your question about Xbox's special trick...if you bought a W10 store game that was cross buy with xbox, you left your xbox at home. You bring your gaming laptop on the road with you, you can play your same game exactly where you left it. Jesus, it this concept so hard to comprehend?
There will be people who like the situation and people who don't. No need to do math. People spend money on what they want. Some care more about PC and some care more about console, and some people like both for a number of different reasons.
Maybe because the topic is about how it's great for Xbox owners, specifically. There is a tremendous amount of circling the wagons here, trying to convince people how this is good for PC gamers, how this is good for the Xbox ecosystem, how this "changes nothing", over and over and over again.
Yet, no one has managed to put up a decent argument as to how this benefits Xbox owners other than with "what ifs" and "maybes" like "what if this means more PC games get ported to X1?" and so forth.
Meanwhile, 40 years of gaming history is knocking at the door. It's shouting "losing exclusives has never benefited the console that lost them".
Xbox owners have won a ticket to travel to the future where they can buy the next xbox so they can play remasters of microsoft exclusives at better resolution/framerate without having to pay twice for those games.
In their hands is deciding whether to buy that "remaster" console from the future or stay the same. They have lost nothing.
These are Olympic-level mental gymnastics. I'm impressed.
So, "We have a product for those who spent $500 on an Xbox One. It's called a PC"?
Xbox owners have won a ticket to travel to the future where they can buy the next xbox so they can play remasters of microsoft exclusives at better resolution/framerate without having to pay twice for those games.
In their hands is deciding whether to buy that "remaster" console from the future or stay the same. They have lost nothing.
Maybe because the topic is about how it's great for Xbox owners, specifically. There is a tremendous amount of circling the wagons here, trying to convince people how this is good for PC gamers, how this is good for the Xbox ecosystem, how this "changes nothing", over and over and over again.
Yet, no one has managed to put up a decent argument as to how this benefits Xbox owners other than with "what ifs" and "maybes" like "what if this means more PC games get ported to X1?" and so forth.
.
Maybe because the topic is about how it's great for Xbox owners, specifically. There is a tremendous amount of circling the wagons here, trying to convince people how this is good for PC gamers, how this is good for the Xbox ecosystem, how this "changes nothing", over and over and over again.
Yet, no one has managed to put up a decent argument as to how this benefits Xbox owners other than with "what ifs" and "maybes" like "what if this means more PC games get ported to X1?" and so forth.
Meanwhile, 40 years of gaming history is knocking at the door. It's shouting "losing exclusives has never benefited the console that lost them".
I can't say about anyone else but I really did not care at all. I take no joy in seeing games locked to PC.Its good for XB1 owners because they can get a PC copy of the game for free. While I don't have a "gaming" PC now. When do decide to get one I will already have a few AAA titles to play on it.
Hmm, I wonder how the PC community felt over the years when games that were once exclusive to it came to console? I don't think I have ever seen such a thread discussed.
Its good for XB1 owners because they can get a PC copy of the game for free. While I don't have a "gaming" PC now. When do decide to get one I will already have a few AAA titles to play on it.
Hmm, I wonder how the PC community felt over the years when games that were once exclusive to it came to console? I don't think I have ever seen such a thread discussed.
Yeah, it's a benefit. But it's an imaginary "what if" benefit.That's a pretty good benefit in my eyes, especially considering the current situation where some games are skipping Xbox One all together. If the platform audience grows then devs will no doubt want to put more games in front of them.
Correction: you can take your Microsoft games with you, at the cost of locking you into their ecosystem. This is something they already tried with GFWL and it didn't work. But hey, if you are pleased by the idea of yet another walled garden on PC instead of the openness and freedom that PC is known for, have fun.I think this is the other big benefit is that you have options now and in the future. You no longer have to leave your games behind if you started on a console and if your situation were to change at any point, where you were willing and able to get a good gaming desktop or laptop then you can take your games with you.
You need to buy a separate license to activate it on another system
boy howdy I'm looking forward to 2014. Bayonetta 2 looks tight!
Wow, bravo!!! Is MS PR team hiring new staff? You should apply...![]()
Please tell me how buying an Xbox One was good for me because I feel like it was a total ripoff.
Yeah, it's a benefit. But it's an imaginary "what if" benefit.
It would be an unprecedented benefit, because in the past, losing exclusives (a.k.a shifting development focus away from one platform and spreading it across multiple platforms) has never worked out well for the platform losing those exclusives. Ever.
Smearing a thick layer of peanut butter over that fact doesn't change the fact that this is a shit sandwich. Losing exclusives is losing exclusives. The end. Maybe it won't be so bad (losing exclusives is rarely as bad as some people make it out to be) and maybe the Xbox ecosystem compatibility will make it easier for some to transition over to PC, and maybe this is all apart of Microsoft's grand plan to unify consoles and PC (even though they've had the staunchest stance against cross-play and cross-buy so far), but the fact remains that Xbox One is losing exclusive games. This is a fact. No amount of hopeful thinking or excuses changes that fact.
And historically speaking, losing exclusives is never "great" for the owners of the platform that is losing those exclusives.
The whole premise of this thread is a big, fat corporate apologist circle-jerk for something that is extremely cut-and-dry: Xbox One on its own isn't cutting it, so Microsoft will be releasing their exclusives on PC as well in order to bolster their "ecosystem".
I don't read any posts of people saying 'Great, now I will buy a Xbox and a new PC with Windows 10'. Your argument is a 'nice' thing to have for customers, but it can go both ways for MS. Period.
Its good for XB1 owners because they can get a PC copy of the game for free. While I don't have a "gaming" PC now. When do decide to get one I will already have a few AAA titles to play on it.
Hmm, I wonder how the PC community felt over the years when games that were once exclusive to it came to console? I don't think I have ever seen such a thread discussed.
And that is perfectly fine. The reason why I think it's a good thing is for future endeavors of MS products, specifically for me, the Hololens. I think it will be awesome (once they get a better FOV but that's a whole other can of worms). Hololens has already shown (via videos on youtube) that it can play the Xbox app and Stream Xbox games through it and it runs Universal Windows Apps. Now when I purchase that device, the games on it (if the Hololens can run it...I do take this into consideration, and I know that it won't be high fidelity as a PC right NOW) will be the same ones that I already purchased on my Xbox or my Windows 10 PC.
You know what I see in threads for PSVR...things like "Hopefully at E3 sony shows me good games and not demos." Well in this scenario that I described, I AT LEAST know that the games I already purchased will be playable on there so I won't have to worry about there not being anything compelling on the system before I buy it.
That's why I am excited, because this is the step into that direction (which MS has layed out for a while now).
There's scenarios in which this is good for Xbox gamers but I just wanted to give you insight in which why I'm happy. Well one point, the other is when I do upgrade my PC I have some games on it...I'll still use my xbox as it will probably be in a different room on another TV by then (right now they are both hooked up to the same tv).
The whole ecosystem-talk is BS if you ask me and doesn't bother me at all. Simple question: if MS was able to swap their Xbox business with Steam, would they go for it? Hell, yeah! They clearly had the wrong vision in 2000 where things are going in the future. Let's look at the present scenario: business PCs all around the world are keeping their business afloat, not the consumer market. When it comes to everyday usage MS has lost the OS war. They are a like a one-hit wonder from the 90s - like a predator being distracted by to much prey nowadays.
You sound like you have attended one of MS's meetings where everything gets sugarcoated in busisness-speak. Once again, I'm speaking for myself here: if they keep up the PC support during next gen, I will be very thankful, because I don't have to choose between 2 consoles anymore. Sometimes less options are better, you know.
Smearing a thick layer of peanut butter over that fact doesn't change the fact that this is a shit sandwich. Losing exclusives is losing exclusives. The end.
Indeed. It could just as easily be stated that no harm comes to xbone users. Where is the definite harm? If they only have an xbone, they definitely still get the xbox game they wanted to buy. No loss. If they have a PC, they might get a free game if their rig is powerful enough. What is also definite is the game they want to buy will definitely have greater earning potential it's market has just expanded. What is also definite is that software developers prefer making more money than less and that having a platform holder that can now offer them multiple platforms whilst retaining an exclusivity deal will please them. They will definitely look at that positively when deciding whether or not to make games for said platform holder in future.
Of course it doesn't change anything for people not planning to play on PC.
But can you understand why someone with a good PC has bought the X1 for its exclusivities might feel a bit fooled, and feel he made an investment not worth its money?
And on why it is bad for Xbox owners I got a perfect example my brother own a good PC, a Wii U and a PS4.
He wanted to buy an X1 for some of the exclusives.But now he dosn't want to buy it anymore.
It may lead to a slight or even bigger loss of sales and less xboxs means less content and less exclusivities for xbox owners.
Right now xbox solaes are getting crushed by the ps4 sales and doing that weakens the impact the Xbox has on the market.
Yeah it's interesting for people who will buy a hololens but it's still irrelevant ine the case of the xbox owners since hololens is an independant device from the X1
Its good for XB1 owners because they can get a PC copy of the game for free. While I don't have a "gaming" PC now. When do decide to get one I will already have a few AAA titles to play on it.
Hmm, I wonder how the PC community felt over the years when games that were once exclusive to it came to console? I don't think I have ever seen such a thread discussed.