• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The South Carolina Primary & Nevada Caucuses |Feb 20, 23, 27| Continuing The Calm

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm just totally dumbfounded by Trump. After each fuck up or stupid comment I think well he's probably done now but nope this asshole just comes on stronger. It's insane. He really can not be stopped.

To beat trump deal with him as you would as an Internet Troll. He says things to get people talking. Had people ignored trumps insane comments he would of been done already.
 
So, the Nevada Republican caucus is this Tuesday, not next Saturday as I thought. Trump will get a bump in the polls from his SC win right as Nevada votes. That, and the recent polls from there where he is up by ~15 points, suggests he all but has Nevada in the bag.
Interesting question to me: if GOP runs a 3rd candidate (+ Hillary + Trump) in the GE, can they keep the max EC vote below 270?
 
It's just so fucking amazing in a scary way that the two Republican front runners are a neo-fascist that wants mass deportations and wants to ban Muslims from entering the U.S and the other is a religious zealot that wants to put the bible above the U.S Constitution.

What the fuck is happening here? And the political pundits on CNN and other various cable channels refuse to call them out on their bullshit?

I think by now we've become so fucking desensitized that we don't even question their crazy ass ideas anymore...
 
As a queer person myself, I dislike the shaming that comes from Democrats toward people who call out the similarities between the two parties.

Intersectionality is a pretty important concept in modern feminism and queer rights movements. A (too often) overlooked category of oppression and privilege is class. Considering that Democrats largely serve the interests of the ruling class, and the vast majority of queer and transgender people are not ruling class, the overall policies of the Democratic Party are harmful to most LGBTQ+ people. It cannot be understated that queer people are more severely affected by poverty and homelessness, or that the well-being of poor transgender people is largely dependent on medical procedures that they may never be able to afford. What hurts the poor and disadvantaged hurts queer people even more. The Democrats will continue to deny us proper healthcare and free access to the means of survival, while maintaining a rigid class structure that oppresses everyone and affects minorities more harshly than their straight/white/cis counterparts.

It's true that Republicans will do more damage to us in the short-term with hateful discriminatory laws; but it's important to realize that they only do this to gain favor among their reactionary voter base. Getting people to hate us and blame us for the moral degeneration of society distracts people from noticing those who are really screwing us over. The ruling class. Protecting the interests of this class at the expense of everyone else is precisely what Democrats and Republicans alike both do.

Thank you, I missed this post initially. For some reason we all love to talk about intersectionality but it's ok to disregard the class struggle because apparently that's less important than other kinds of struggles. That's the impression I get from a lot of Hillary supporters at least. That shouldn't really be a surprise - Hillary supporters are largely liberals (in the classical sense), so to them capitalism just needs to be modified, not overthrown, so that's where their blindspot may be. Bernie supporters often overlook race and gender issues, Hillary supporters often overlook class issues, and we need to take all of these into account.
 
What about 2 wars, countless drone strikes, PRISM, Guantanamo, voter ID laws, etc.?

Democrats may have move left, but not their nominees (i.e., Obama and Hillary).

Those are almost entirely policies implemented by Republicans, what point are you trying to make? The 2 wars were started under GWB, the Drone Program started under Bush but was expanded under Obama in exchange for pulling troops out of various regions, PRISM was a byproduct of the Bush administration as well as the PATRIOT Act, Obama wanted to shut down Guantanamo but has faced intense push back, and Voter ID laws are passed in almost exclusively red states. Democrats had very little to do with any of these things.
 
The part that will be most shocking to a lot of Clinton supporters is the moment they realize that young people will not be so quick to switch over from Sanders to her.

And if enough of them stay home and the GOP wins the election, it'll just confirm every negative thing folks think about young voters.
 
Huffpo is garbage:

gr2kARJ.png
 
It's just so fucking amazing in a scary way that the two Republican front runners are a neo-fascist that wants mass deportations and wants to ban Muslims from entering the U.S and the other is a religious zealot that wants to put the bible above the U.S Constitution.

What the fuck is happening here? And the political pundits on CNN and other various cable channels refuse to call them out on their bullshit?

I think by now we've become so fucking desensitized that we don't even question their crazy ass ideas anymore...

The media is to blame. All they do is pander. Nothing negative against Trump. "He is made of Teflon! Nothing hurts him, only gets stronger!" Fuck off with that media.
 
I agree with this and I also think if you really cared about what Bernie stands for you should have been doing your part during the mid-terms in your local elections where it would have made such a huge difference on a host of different issues locally. (and when I say you, I don't mean any of you peeps specifically, I just mean excited Bernie liberal voters in general ). We only get change if we actively participate.
Bingo.

For better or worse, the Tea Party changed the face of the GOP through sheer force of will - through consistent participation in local races, unyielding and swift punishment for those elected officials who didn't represent their interests, and frighteningly effective coalition building.

There's no reason the future that Sanders is envisioning for our country can't become the status quo. But things don't become status quo through one man, or even one administration.

Vote for city council. Vote for comptroller. Vote for attorney general. It doesn't matter, just vote bitch.
 
Why are you still friends with someone like that?
I don't have a lot of friends. And am bad at making them. Also, I rarely see them as we live on opposite sides of the country now. Just occasionally he messages me on Steam or whatever.

Trying not to fully shut people out for being wrong sometimes. Have had limited success in influencing them.

Ehh. Sorry if that's not good enough for you!
 
As a sanders supporter (my number one issue is trying to greatly reduce money interest in our politics) im just going to focus on where my biggest disagreements lie, the GOP. I don't like this in fighting between the two campaigns and a lot of it just comes out as minimizing Sander's main message and goal. I don't interact with other Sanders supporters outside of what I read from people posting during the nomination process. I just feel like there is a lot of disingenuous statements going around within the left.

But when it comes to Rubio, Cruz and Trump? Not really going to get in-fighting with that.

He's to hoping that the country doesn't screw up this fall.
 
Those are almost entirely policies implemented by Republicans, what point are you trying to make? The 2 wars were started under GWB, the Drone Program started under Bush but was expanded under Obama in exchange for pulling troops out of various regions, PRISM was a byproduct of the Bush administration as well as the PATRIOT Act, Obama wanted to shut down Guantanamo but has faced intense push back, and Voter ID laws are passed in almost exclusively red states. Democrats had very little to do with any of these things.
Voter ID is the GOP's baby, but foreign interventionism, drones, mass surveillance all continued or escalated under the Obama administration. Pretending the Democrats aren't culpable for these things is drinking some seriously strong kool-aid.

Guantanamo I'm not sure about, but I feel like we shouldn't let him off the hook there either?
 
Um, guys. You do know Cruz would be easier to beat in the GE right? Why are we so excited for Trump winning?

Because anyone can have a chance at winning a general. Terrorist attack, economic recession, huge scandal, etc... and then you would have to live with Ted motherfucking Cruz as President. I don't want to take that chance.
 
No. You would be pretentious for thinking you are better than someone else just because that someone else is voting or supporting Trump/GOP.

You can absolutely not want to be friends with people based on the kind of ideology they support without thinking you're better than those people. I don't know any personally, but I can say with fair certainty I don't want to be friends with any Neo-Nazi's or Clansman.

Voter ID is the GOP's baby, but foreign interventionism, drones, mass surveillance all continued or escalated under the Obama administration. Pretending the Democrats aren't culpable for these things is drinking some seriously strong kool-aid.

Guantanamo I'm not sure about, but I feel like we shouldn't let him off the hook there either?

Obama has tried his hardest NOT to intervene, and has been getting beaten over the head by Republican for it. If we had listened to the GOP we'd still be completely in Iraq, as well as have boots on the ground in Libya and Syria--possibly even Iran, Crimea, and Yeman for all we know. So increased Drone Strikes is hardly a bad thing compared to the alternative. It's also worth nothing Obama has scaled back in Afghanistan and Iraq a great deal compared to where we were in 2008, rather than what McCain and Romney wanted which was "another surge!". The mass surveillance programs were kept in place under Obama, but not really expanded.

How can we blame Guantanamo on Democrats? Obama has wanted it closed since he was a candidate in 2007--maybe even earlier. It's the GOP that keeps blocking it insisting it is necessary for national security or some other nonsense. If Democrats had their way it would have been shut down and the inmates would have faced trial on US soil.
 
Thank you, I missed this post initially. For some reason we all love to talk about intersectionality but it's ok to disregard the class struggle because apparently that's less important than other kinds of struggles. That's the impression I get from a lot of Hillary supporters at least.
No, it's that it's an example of what you see with types like the Kochs.

They have liberal social views, but conservative economic ones. But at the end of the day, they're going to vote on their wallets 100% of the time, so you cannot ever rely on them to actually have your back.
 
Sad to see Trump winning in South Carolina. Hopefully after tonight Bush, Kasich, and Carson will realize they are only splitting the vote, allowing Trump to win, and step aside.
 
I don't know much about how primaries have historically worked, so: does Bush actually have any reasonable chance of bouncing back from a >=4th place position here?
 
and I'd like to know where all these millenials were when we were in the thick of it during the mid-terms during Obama's early tenure. It blows my mind that Bernie Sanders woke them up over somebody like Obama. Or are all these Bernie supporters really just first time voters?

You're now on my ignore list. I voted for Obama and at the midterms and at my seattle local elections.
 
If Kasich stays and Carson and Bush step out he could do nicely. But I'm guessing idiots financing Bush will expect HIS numbers to go much higher once Kasich and Carson are out.
They'll keep pushing him on the stage from behind the curtains as long as they can, because you never know when others might fuck up big time.
 
Those are almost entirely policies implemented by Republicans, what point are you trying to make? The 2 wars were started under GWB, the Drone Program started under Bush but was expanded under Obama in exchange for pulling troops out of various regions, PRISM was a byproduct of the Bush administration as well as the PATRIOT Act, Obama wanted to shut down Guantanamo but has faced intense push back, and Voter ID laws are passed in almost exclusively red states. Democrats had very little to do with any of these things.

I believe the post was about how the country has moved left in the past 15 years, which isn't quite so true in many areas.

I forgot about the TPP in the list of bad things (and that's on Obama). PRISM may have been a byproduct, but still Obama went along with it and expanded, same with drones.
 
No. You would be pretentious for thinking you are better than someone else just because that someone else is voting or supporting Trump/GOP.

Which is exactly how that other poster felt like.

I feel like there's a clear difference between losing respect for someone just because they are voting for Trump, and losing respect for someone over the reasons they are voting for Trump.
 
Um, guys. You do know Cruz would be easier to beat in the GE right? Why are we so excited for Trump winning?
According to what?

Not trying to be unnecessarily confrontational here, but I've seen so many electability arguments that are based on people's gut feelings (see: "Hillary is obviously more electable than Bernie", when all polling data implies otherwise) that I'm wondering how you would back this up?

Part of what scares me about Cruz is that he's polished (charismatic) enough to sound 100% genuine, even when he's clearly full of shit. People love that!
 
It's just so fucking amazing in a scary way that the two Republican front runners are a neo-fascist that wants mass deportations and wants to ban Muslims from entering the U.S and the other is a religious zealot that wants to put the bible above the U.S Constitution.

What the fuck is happening here? And the political pundits on CNN and other various cable channels refuse to call them out on their bullshit?

I think by now we've become so fucking desensitized that we don't even question their crazy ass ideas anymore...

You have to understand that a news channel is a vehicle to deliver eyeballs to advertisers. If CNN/etc. was honest and said-

"One party is having a legitimate debate on the speed of progressive change, and the other is climbing over each other in order to attack immigrants, the LGBT community, blacks, and the poor to advance the interests of a few wealthy white men."

Then they'd lose a large amount of viewership.

No. You would be pretentious for thinking you are better than someone else just because that someone else is voting or supporting Trump/GOP.

Which is exactly how that other poster felt like.

Supporting an outed racist and xenophobe counts against someone's character. It does, I'm sorry.
 
What about 2 wars, countless drone strikes, PRISM, Guantanamo, voter ID laws, etc.?

Democrats may have move left, but not their nominees (i.e., Obama and Hillary).

That's a fairly baffling list. Democrats have done everything possible to oppose voter IDs laws. We can over turn them with one more Supreme Court justice vote! Obama tried to close Guantanamo but Congress passed a law specifically blocking it. He also tried to stay out of the Middle East but ISIS almost taking over Iraq kinda made that impossible. The only thing I even kinda agree on is surveillance.

I agree on all of this, Roland. The continuation of surveillance is troubling, but to fault Obama for the rest if that is silly.

But again, it's indicative of so many Sanders supporters who see that everything isn't changing today and believe it's because our politicians aren't liberal enough, or they're liars, or they're just as bad as the GOP.

The truth is that these demonized Democrats are often forced to either compromise in order to pass something of greater importance to them or blocked completely. Because that's how our system of government was designed.

Progress takes time, which was my original point. We are inching left, ksharp. I get that it's frustrating that we can't be a progressive utopia today, but if we keep fighting, we can get there. Even if part of that fight is blocking the GOP from fucking us through the Supreme Court by voting for a Democrat who you hate. She may not be left enough for you, but she's a damn far sight better than what the GOP has on tap.
 
You can absolutely not want to be friends with people based on the kind of ideology they support without thinking you're better than those people. I don't know any personally, but I can say with fair certainty I don't want to be friends with any Neo-Nazi's or Clansman.

If politics are enough to ruin a friendship, I am not sure you are such a good friend after all.

Nice of you to characterize all Trump supporters as Neo-Nazis... (Godwin's law never fails)
 
Is the money going to be there that long?

He already downsized his campaign late last year, so I think the well is running dry. That, and the party jumping ship to Rubio means they're losing faith in Jeb rapidly. But the backing was so strong initially I think he'll still have the means to continue campaigning through the entirety of the primaries.
 
I agree. But eh... the talk about ruling classes kind of takes away from what you're really trying to say. It's distracting and sounds conspiratorial.

There's nothing conspiratorial about the fact that America is run by and for capitalists first and foremost. They're not hiding in a backroom snickering and conniving ways to screw everyone over, they just look out for their own interests and have the power to do so. Trump and Bernie's bases show that there are a lot of people who are fed up with this, which is why some (idiot) Bernie supporters bleed over into becoming Trump supporters, since Trump attracts populist nativists who are not happy with the globalized capitalist class that sees fit to ship jobs overseas. They want a nationalistic capitalism. Something more akin to fascism if they knew what they were talking about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom