Of course not, let it slide, didn't make a difference, etc etc etc
Ok! So I guess the Republicans are in denial mode hoping Ted/Rubio will win in the end?
Wow, bottom right corner, Barack got elected President of the world!
Sander's path has to rely on not losing in Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, Florida by huge margins and go on a streak from 3/22-4/19. He wants to try to gain delegates as time goes on, and he has the money to last a while and apparently the base that will fund him. There are 35 more states left and if he can win 10-20 delegates in many of them, he can eventually catch up, and at the very least last until the convention. At that point, he has already won on the message front, but not the nomination.
Well, Rubio did win a state, so Marcomentum is in full effect.
But yeah, the non-establishment candidate is whipping the establishment all over the place. The RNC is probably shitting their pants behind the scenes.
Clinton really can do no wrong according to HillaryGaf, huh? Everything is hand-waved away.
that was his plan all along
exists the white house while everything goes to shit.... becomes President of the world and then builds a wall all around the US with a dome on top
To be fair Bernie has been a part of the legislative branch of government longer than your average gaffer has been alive. It's strange that people argue he has no experience. He's pretty stacked if you ask me. Unfortunately experience, networking and history with minorities is something he definitely lacks compared to Clinton. No doubt about that.
Clinton really can do no wrong according to HillaryGaf, huh? Everything is hand-waved away.
It is a good write up but the super-delegates alone will be the end for Sanders. It won't be close at all.
I know what you're saying, but it's ironic when Bernie getting arrested for protesting during the civil rights movement is not counted as "history with minorities".
A dome... of Barak.
#SuperAllah
I do think it's a bit annoying that after years of reading GAFers lament about the fact that socialism etc isn't taken seriously, that there's such a large group that feels very threatened by Sanders's campaign and are eager for him to drop out. I mean, if I remember correctly, Bernie Sanders was very popular here before his campaign for President. I first learned about him on GAF. It was kind of disappointing to realize that a lot of the policially engaged GAFers are so strongly against his candidacy.
It is a good write up but the super-delegates alone will be the end for Sanders. It won't be close at all.
Nah. Bernie did better than expected. Still a long shot, but no need to misrepresent what actually went down.
Let's take minimum wage for example. Sanders says 15. Clinton says 12.5 I think.
Now republicans will oppose both and dems will have to compromise. If you start from 15 you might get 12. If ask for 12.5 you will get 10.
So what is Bernie Sanders' path to victory now? Or even a path to a rough tie? Of the primaries between now and March 16, the only one where Clinton doesn't have an ironclad lead in the polls is Ohio. She is pretty much expected to win Michigan, Florida, Illinois, and North Carolina.
Maitiú;197305828 said:I'm against a $15 federal minimum wage, as are most economists on both sides of the political spectrum, but here's my concern with this tactic: if Sanders starts on the extreme end of things on every issue, he is painted as an extremist, and the Republican party looks reasonable, realistic and responsible, and he looks the opposite. Look how the reasonable ACA damaged Obama and the Democratic party; now imagine what a universal coverage single payer proposal would do.
If this goes until June it's probably bad for the democrats.So what is Bernie Sanders' path to victory now? Or even a path to a rough tie? Of the primaries between now and March 16, the only one where Clinton doesn't have an ironclad lead in the polls is Ohio. She is pretty much expected to win Michigan, Florida, Illinois, and North Carolina.
There is no path forward that involves losing places like Ohio, Florida, Illinois, North Carolina, Michigan. Places she's polling ahead.That's true, but if he has more pledged delegates going into a convention, then he has a really big point to make. Long story short, this is going until June probably, as long as he continues to have funding.
Sander's path has to rely on not losing in Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, Florida by huge margins and go on a streak from 3/22-4/19. He wants to try to gain delegates as time goes on, and he has the money to last a while and apparently the base that will fund him. There are 35 more states left and if he can win 10-20 delegates in many of them, he can eventually catch up, and at the very least last until the convention. At that point, he has already won on the message front, but not the nomination.
As has already been pointed out repeatedly here, this is only a violation if this was an election, doesn't apply to primaries (unless someone dredges up a different rulebook or something). I agree it's in poor taste but man people are thirsty for anything they can get on both sides aren't they.
They paid dearly in the 2010 midterms.ACA hasn't damaged the Democratic party at all, though? It's the crowning achievement of the Obama admin and the major reason he coasted into re-election in 2012.
Is there any big states (100+ votes) where Bernie is projected to win?
If this goes until June it's probably bad for the democrats.
Trumps presser tonight showed him putting his sights on Hillary. So he's making the switch early.
Maitiú;197305828 said:I'm against a $15 federal minimum wage, as are most economists on both sides of the political spectrum, but here's my concern with this tactic: if Sanders starts on the extreme end of things on every issue, he is painted as an extremist, and the Republican party looks reasonable, realistic and responsible, and he looks the opposite. Look how the reasonable ACA damaged Obama and the Democratic party; now imagine what a universal coverage single payer proposal would do.
Aaand Trump is leading alaska
Then you have the whole email thing, for which she is actually under federal investigation, and again, Hillary fanboys hand-wave it away.
Don't get me wrong; I prefer Hillary a 1000x over Trump, but it is honestly not hard to see why so many Bernie supporters are threatening to stay home or even switch to Trump in a Hillary v Trump GE when such a vocal portion of Hillary supporters are such huge, condescending pricks.
Then you have the whole email thing, for which she is actually under federal investigation, and again, Hillary fanboys hand-wave it away.
Don't get me wrong; I prefer Hillary a 1000x over Trump, but it is honestly not hard to see why so many Bernie supporters are threatening to stay home or even switch to Trump in a Hillary v Trump GE when such a vocal portion of Hillary supporters are such huge, condescending pricks.
Then you have the whole email thing, for which she is actually under federal investigation, and again, Hillary fanboys hand-wave it away.
Don't get me wrong; I prefer Hillary a 1000x over Trump, but it is honestly not hard to see why so many Bernie supporters are threatening to stay home or even switch to Trump in a Hillary v Trump GE when such a vocal portion of Hillary supporters are such huge, condescending pricks.
Yeah, I really don't know what to say to that either.I know what you're saying, but it's ironic when Bernie getting arrested for protesting during the civil rights movement is not counted as "history with minorities".
I know what you're saying, but it's ironic when Bernie getting arrested for protesting during the civil rights movement is not counted as "history with minorities".
If this goes until June it's probably bad for the democrats.
Is there any big states (100+ votes) where Bernie is projected to win?
There is no path forward that involves losing places like Ohio, Florida, Illinois, North Carolina, Michigan. Places she's polling ahead.
I mean if you want to compare to Clinton staying in, in 08, sure she stayed in even though it was mathematically improbable to win. But she won Ohio and Texas and Pennsylvania following Barack Obama's delegate lead accumulation; she managed to cut down his pledged delegate lead from 100 to 60, winning these big states.
And I don't particularly mind him staying in to promote his message or whatever, but a 200 delegate lead isn't going to be eaten away by a win in Kansas.
Then you have the whole email thing, for which she is actually under federal investigation, and again, Hillary fanboys hand-wave it away.
Don't get me wrong; I prefer Hillary a 1000x over Trump, but it is honestly not hard to see why so many Bernie supporters are threatening to stay home or even switch to Trump in a Hillary v Trump GE when such a vocal portion of Hillary supporters are such huge, condescending pricks.
You can't welcome the fact that Bernie's campaign has attracted a crowd of young new voters to politics, and simultaneously alienate that very crowd with your smug condescension.
Blue dogs did more damage to Obama and the party than the ACA did.Maitiú;197305828 said:I'm against a $15 federal minimum wage, as are most economists on both sides of the political spectrum, but here's my concern with this tactic: if Sanders starts on the extreme end of things on every issue, he is painted as an extremist, and the Republican party looks reasonable, realistic and responsible, and he looks the opposite. Look how the reasonable ACA damaged Obama and the Democratic party; now imagine what a universal coverage single payer proposal would do.
The GOP waited too long to try and stop Trump and now they're about to pay. Both the Tea Party and Trump are monster of their own creation, the rhetoric they've employed, the devision and fear they've fostered over the decades is coming back to haunt them.
They paid dearly in the 2010 midterms.
Debatable and even if true Clinton did even better than better than expected.
Sanders decision to note try to narrow the South votes is looking costly.
Any Bernie supporter threatening to vote trump deserves to be ridiculed because they obviously never had a coherent thought process on why they were voting for him in the first place.